shadowmarlin22 said:If you’re going to log off, please just stay offline—it’s better for everyone involved.
@Nicholas Newman2 👍 This link explains everything perfectly.
But hey, go ahead and keep living in your own little bubble. That one line—“Mainly because of all those places worse than first”—pretty much proves you don't get how this sport works.
Coming in second is just being the first loser.
And then there's this new brand of mathematical gymnastics: claiming someone won more points outside of their victories 🤣 damn math, right? 🙏🙏🙏 Trying to compare total points when the number of races isn't even the same—that's some pretty weak early-morning mental gymnastics.
Hamilton averaged 14.44 points in races where he finished but didn't win, while Rosberg sat at 14.54. It's basically the same thing—one point difference over ten races. And most importantly, what kind of logic is it to discount wins? Wins are the whole point of motorsports.
For your own good, maybe try using your brain and some basic math instead of swallowing the garbage these so-called journalists serve up...
Logged in or not, whatever. ☕
And yeah, because this link "explains everything"...🙏
It explains how some reporter is clearly obsessed with Lewis Hamilton, so they hide the actual stats under percentages that don't mean a damn thing...
That link is literally cherry-picking stats to favor Lewis Hamilton while burying the facts that show why Rosberg actually won...
That trash link only shows this:
Podium Finishes: 17 LH vs 16 NR, then some percentage...
Top 5 finishes: 18 LH vs 19 NR, then some percentage...
But here is what actually matters:
Rosberg:
5 x 2nd place
2 x 3rd place2 x 4th place
...
159 points
Hamilton:
3 x 2nd place
4 x 3rd place1 x 5th place
1 x 7th place
...
130 points
Those 9 races for Rosberg were pure damage control against Hamilton's 9 wins, and Hamilton's 9 races were damage control against Rosberg's 9 wins...
And there’s the main difference—that massive 29-point gap that was apparently enough for Rosberg to take the title despite having one fewer win...
But sure, after reading that crap, you guys think those bolded numbers above showing podiums, Top 5 results, and total points are all the same thing...
Not surprising, considering the garbage you lot swallow from links like that...
Statistically, if you only look at the percentage of podiums per season, it looks close since both have 7 podiums bolded...
But there's a huge difference between grabbing more 2nd or 3rd places, and that Top 5 finish count—finishing 5th or 7th isn't the same as finishing 4th twice...
And when you add it all up, it's a significant 29-point difference...
But hey, the "expert" journalist doesn't write that...
He just writes percentages to make it look like they're almost identical. 🙂
Then he throws in some random guesswork by adding a "race performance" column, which he probably dreamed up while sitting on the toilet this morning, rounding it to two decimal places just to look smart. 🙏
And you guys look down and see the percentage where Lewis Hamilton is supposedly "drastically better," and suddenly it's all Malaysia's fault. 🙂
No wonder you talk such nonsense when you're busy reading and believing absolute garbage. 🤦