#21 ·
Nicholas Walker3 said:If you're claiming this is totally unique without knowing about the Brass project... well—unfortunately, everything ended up being pretty much the same anyway—though one version could honestly be classified as straight-up pornography!
It is one thing when Tinto Brass—a director who primarily focuses on anatomy regardless—ventures into Hollywood seeking his dream directorial project, hiring heavyweights like Malcolm McDowell and Peter O'Toole just to shoot his usual fare with a higher budget and better lighting.
It is an entirely different matter when De Palma, a director who has worked with untouchable Hollywood icons like Travolta and Pacino (in films like Blow Out and Scarface) and has been a staple studio director since Carrie, decides to assemble a cast featuring a certain "queen of adult cinema" and the scandalous Annette Havens. His goal was to bring them to Hollywood to film a sort of "Hitchcockian" erotic thriller where the lead actress might serve as a provocative incarnation of a Hitchcockian Grace Kelly or Kim Novak.
While the content might share some superficial similarities in a purely pornographic sense, the context and the circumstances surrounding the creation of Caligula versus De Palma's film are actually diametrically opposed.
A while back in London, I picked up the DVD of Body Double which includes some excellent supplemental material; apparently, the producers De Palma approached with this concept were absolutely livid, reacting with pure disbelief and fury.
In short, De Palma's idea back then—much as I fear it is now—was a precedent in the truest possible sense of the word.