CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Lifestyle › Health › Chlorine in drinking water and its health effects

Chlorine in drinking water and its health effects

Started by Dennis White2 · · 👁 4 views · 90 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Dennis White2stormyheron4vividorca45Jerry Morales4Bradley Williams5Michael Campbell55Bradley Bailey10Casey Palmer5Susan Harris4rustygull7dustymarlin10Timothy Vaughn44Keith Thomas21Tyler Morgan3gentlehound9Carol Parkerferalwolf24Scott Allen10Rachel Robinson3Kenneth Ruiz4Jack Smith5Brenda Sanders56Larry Walker24hiddenviper13 …
Dennis White2 Dennis White2 MemberOP
11 messages
joined Jul 2007
#1 ·
I ran some tests on my drinking water and it seems there's a slightly higher chlorine level than expected. I notice a bit of a gritty texture on my tongue when I drink it. Everywhere else I go, the water tastes fine and my tongue feels normal.

..

I guess I'm wondering if this water is actually harmful to my health?

..
Who am I supposed to call to get this "fixed"?
stormyheron4 stormyheron4 Active Member
86 messages
joined Aug 2009
#2 ·
the guy who dumps all that chlorine into the water
vividorca45 vividorca45 Member
10 messages
joined Nov 2007
#3 ·
One can hardly draw any meaningful conclusions based solely on the texture of the water.

Chlorine is inherently hazardous, regardless of its specific form when introduced into a water supply. It is employed as a necessary evil—a tool used for disinfection to eradicate microorganisms within the system. In this process, certain compounds are formed which carry carcinogenic risks. Unfortunately, we have yet to discover a more efficient or cost-effective method for maintaining water purity across massive infrastructures, such as our municipal water systems.

Within public water networks, treatment plants utilize chlorine dosing stations that automatically inject precise amounts into the flow based on real-time quality assessments. These levels are kept at the absolute minimum required by federal safety regulations. If you believe there are significant issues at hand, I suggest contacting the EPA or your local health department, as they are the authorities responsible for overseeing the safety of drinking water distributed through public utilities.
Jerry Morales4 Jerry Morales4 Member
16 messages
joined Sep 2007
#4 ·
vividorca45 said:One can hardly draw any meaningful conclusions based solely on the texture of the water.

Chlorine is inherently hazardous, regardless of its specific form when introduced into a water supply. It is employed as a necessary evil—a tool used for disinfection to eradicate microorganisms within the system. In this process, certain compounds are formed which carry carcinogenic risks. Unfortunately, we have yet to discover a more efficient or cost-effective method for maintaining water purity across massive infrastructures, such as our municipal water systems.

Within public water networks, treatment plants utilize chlorine dosing stations that automatically inject precise amounts into the flow based on real-time quality assessments. These levels are kept at the absolute minimum required by federal safety regulations. If you believe there are significant issues at hand, I suggest contacting the EPA or your local health department, as they are the authorities responsible for overseeing the safety of drinking water distributed through public utilities.

Does boiling the water evaporate some of the chlorine?
Bradley Williams5 Bradley Williams5 Newcomer
3 messages
joined Apr 2008
#5 ·
Jerry Morales4 said:Does boiling the water evaporate some of the chlorine?

You might want to look into getting a dedicated water filtration system...

I found this link for you to check out; I ended up purchasing one myself recently, and I have to say, I am just incredibly happy with how it works!
vividorca45 vividorca45 Member
10 messages
joined Nov 2007
#6 ·
Jerry Morales4 said:Does boiling the water evaporate some of the chlorine?

Well, technically, any residual free chlorine left in the water can indeed evaporate through boiling. However, we shouldn't get too caught up in that particular detail. The real issue—the part that's actually problematic—is when the chlorine reacts with organic matter and microorganisms in the water, creating carcinogenic byproducts. That's the true culprit here.
Ultimately, the whole point of using automated dosing systems is to ensure we only introduce the absolute minimum amount of chlorine required, thereby minimizing the amount of free chlorine lingering in our water supply.
Dennis White2 Dennis White2 MemberOP
11 messages
joined Jul 2007
#7 ·
Actually, I got a bit mixed up there... what I meant was that I think I'm tasting limescale in my water. My apologies.

@Bradley Williams5 - Is there actually any noticeable difference when using a filter versus not? If so, what kind?
- I'm not sure. The tap water just tastes... stale. Maybe it's because I live in a single-family house where the water doesn't get cycled through the pipes as constantly as it would in an apartment complex? In a few different buildings I've stayed in, the water always tasted crisp and fresh.
stormyheron4 stormyheron4 Active Member
86 messages
joined Aug 2009
#8 ·
From what I’ve gathered, most of the water in Washington, D.C. comes from artesian wells. We're talking about underground water flowing right beneath the city itself.
vividorca45 vividorca45 Member
10 messages
joined Nov 2007
#9 ·
stormyheron4 said:From what I’ve gathered, most of the water in Washington, D.C. comes from artesian wells. We're talking about underground water flowing right beneath the city itself.

The vast majority of water used in public utilities is drawn from groundwater. It is actually quite rare to find municipal systems relying heavily on open surface water; managing and protecting those sources from contamination is an absolute nightmare. Personally, I don't see any inherent issue with using wells, provided you understand the mechanics behind it.
The real controversy lies in how we treat our environment. We are talking about the unchecked use of pesticides and herbicides, the practice of burying trash, neglecting sewage infrastructure, or even the total absence of a centralized sewer system—which leads to people relying on leaky septic tanks. Then there is the matter of dumping untreated industrial runoff directly into our waterways. That is where the crisis lives, because every bit of pollution eventually migrates into the groundwater. While the earth acts as a sort of natural filtration system, its capacity is by no means infinite. Consequently, the responsibility rests entirely on each of us to act with absolute care regarding our environmental footprint.
Michael Campbell55 Michael Campbell55 Newcomer
1 message
joined Jul 2008
#10 ·
aaa
Bradley Bailey10 Bradley Bailey10 Newcomer
1 message
joined Mar 2009
#11 ·
Chlorine was used as a chemical weapon during World War I, so you could say it’s definitely hazardous,
but it doesn't kill everything.
I actually found some great info on rust and how to get rid of it over at
http://www.homedepot.com/
Casey Palmer5 Casey Palmer5 Regular
470 messages
joined Jan 2016
#12 ·
I really hope you aren't just out here plugging yourself or your own company.

At the end of the day, chlorine is a poison, just like aspirin is a poison. It’s all about the dosage...
Susan Harris4 Susan Harris4 Member
24 messages
joined Sep 2007
#13 ·
Bradley Bailey10 said:Chlorine was used as a chemical weapon during World War I, so you could say it’s definitely hazardous,
but it doesn't kill everything.
I actually found some great info on rust and how to get rid of it over at
http://www.homedepot.com/

Seriously, what kind of link is that? Chlorine is practically a fundamental component of the human body! 😉 Making an argument like that is about as logical as saying "I refuse to drive because people can die in car accidents." 😁

Chlorine in water isn't dangerous when it's present in those levels; you only need to worry once you see residual chlorine, which is the actual indicator that there's an excessive amount in the supply.
Susan Harris4 Susan Harris4 Member
24 messages
joined Sep 2007
#14 ·
Casey Palmer5 said:I really hope you aren't just out here plugging yourself or your own company.

At the end of the day, chlorine is a poison, just like aspirin is a poison. It’s all about the dosage...

Finally, someone with half a brain!👍
rustygull7 rustygull7 Newcomer
2 messages
joined Mar 2009
#15 ·
So, is it actually safe to drink the tap water, or should I be looking for bottled stuff?
dustymarlin10 dustymarlin10 Active Member
238 messages
joined Nov 2015
#16 ·
rustygull7 said:So, is it actually safe to drink the tap water, or should I be looking for bottled stuff?

Obviously it's healthy.

Plus, it’s like 777 times cheaper than grabbing a little plastic bottle at the gas station.☕
Timothy Vaughn44 Timothy Vaughn44 Member
27 messages
joined Feb 2009
#17 ·
Chlorine isn't actually a problem on its own, but once it hitches a ride with organic compounds, things get a little more sketchy because those combinations can be carcinogenic... and since we're basically made of organic matter ourselves, there's a decent chance that chlorine might react with our own internal chemistry before we even have a chance to flush it out, potentially creating those nasty byproducts.
Timothy Vaughn44 Timothy Vaughn44 Member
27 messages
joined Feb 2009
#18 ·
vividorca45 said:One can hardly draw any meaningful conclusions based solely on the texture of the water.

Chlorine is inherently hazardous, regardless of its specific form when introduced into a water supply. It is employed as a necessary evil—a tool used for disinfection to eradicate microorganisms within the system. In this process, certain compounds are formed which carry carcinogenic risks. Unfortunately, we have yet to discover a more efficient or cost-effective method for maintaining water purity across massive infrastructures, such as our municipal water systems.

Within public water networks, treatment plants utilize chlorine dosing stations that automatically inject precise amounts into the flow based on real-time quality assessments. These levels are kept at the absolute minimum required by federal safety regulations. If you believe there are significant issues at hand, I suggest contacting the EPA or your local health department, as they are the authorities responsible for overseeing the safety of drinking water distributed through public utilities.

There actually is a better—and much healthier—way to go about it, which would be using ozone disinfection, but honestly, for us regular folks, that's just way too expensive to pull off on our own.😁 🙄
rustygull7 rustygull7 Newcomer
2 messages
joined Mar 2009
#19 ·
dustymarlin10 said:Obviously it's healthy.

Plus, it’s like 777 times cheaper than grabbing a little plastic bottle at the gas station.☕

Cheaper? Yeah, right! When I bought that bulk pack of bottled water, we basically polished off the whole thing in like three days. So now, I’ve just gone back to drinking from the tap. I mean, it's probably fine, right? Hopefully it's safe. 😁
Keith Thomas21 Keith Thomas21 Member
47 messages
joined Nov 2007
#20 ·
Based on this, is bottled water actually any healthier than what comes straight out of our taps at home?

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads