CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Sports › Soccer › Champions League or World Cup?

Champions League or World Cup?

Started by nimblehawk6 · · 👁 5 views · 30 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants nimblehawk6Chloe Williams10Chloe Palmer2Hannah Thompson2William Doyle2urbaneagle722ABradley Ramirez5Roger Allen3boldhound8nimblemarlin17Jerry Evans57Richard Cooper7driftingmason7analoghound9Arthur MartinezAustin Brown88Kimberly Barnes2
Arthur Martinez Arthur Martinez Newcomer
6 messages
joined Oct 2007
#21 ·
The World Cup, naturally—and that’s assuming our local wooden puppets actually manage to show up to the pitch.
Austin Brown88 Austin Brown88 Newcomer
4 messages
joined Sep 2006
#22 ·
Look, this is probably going to be the first female perspective you hear on here, but whatever...
I'll take the Champions League over USA vs. Trinidad and Tobago any day. Watching AC Milan vs. FC Barcelona is just way more fun.
If I haven't made it obvious yet, basically everyone in the Champions League plays decent football. You can't really say the same for most of the teams at the World Cup.
analoghound9 analoghound9 Member
12 messages
joined Sep 2006
#23 ·
Look, I get it, the Champions League is way more fun to watch, but honestly, it’s just because the clubs have more time to gel and actually learn how to play together. Whether you like it or not, our guy Šimić works way better with Kaká than he does with Srna, and yeah, Kaká plays better with Šimić than he ever did with Ronaldinho. But hey, the World Cup isn't actually that much worse than the Champions League—I'd take a Brazil-Argentina match over a Levski-HSV game any day of the week.

What if they actually set up some kind of competition between leagues? It would be wild. Eto'o wouldn't even have to deal with citizenship issues, and we'd finally see the real gap between South American style and European football (though let's be real, everyone plays the European way now, except maybe a few random teams from Africa or Asia that sneak into the World Cup finals). Maybe a tournament between the big five leagues? It's all just different versions of the World Cup concept.

The players on national teams really need more downtime or longer training camps; if they did that, the World Cup would be a hell of a lot better. I don't want to see football end up like what happened to basketball.
nimblemarlin17 nimblemarlin17 Regular
459 messages
joined Mar 2004
#24 ·
Austin Brown88 said:This is probably going to be the first female opinion I hear on this, but whatever..
Champions League is way better. Watching AC Milan vs. FC Barcelona is a much bigger thrill than watching USA vs. Trinidad and Tobago..

The USA and Trinidad and Tobago can't even play each other in the group stage at the World Cup. It’s pretty obvious you're a woman. I think I've made myself clear enough. 🙄
Austin Brown88 Austin Brown88 Newcomer
4 messages
joined Sep 2006
#25 ·
nimblemarlin17 said:The US and Trinidad and Tobago can't be in the same group at the World Cup. It's pretty obvious you're a woman, I think I've made myself clear enough. 🙄

Exactly. Your literal, brain-dead interpretation of everything written here just confirms that missing Y chromosome in your genetic code..
If your fragile masculinity is triggered by some "lady" daring to watch football, then my bad..
Mea culpa. I don't spend my free time memorizing FIFA rulebooks, because they aren't the reason I bother watching a game in the first place..
P.S.
The US and Trinidad example was purely hypothetical. But I'm curious: where exactly did I mention a group?
nimblemarlin17 nimblemarlin17 Regular
459 messages
joined Mar 2004
#26 ·
Look... you said you'd rather watch Barca-Milan than USA-Trinidad and Tobago. Really? So what's the move then—Italy-Brazil or Lille-Anderlecht? Germany-Argentina or Levski-Spartak? The way you're looking at this is just childish and naive.
Austin Brown88 Austin Brown88 Newcomer
4 messages
joined Sep 2006
#27 ·
nimblemarlin17 said:Look... you said you'd rather watch Barca-Milan than USA-Trinidad and Tobago. Really? So what would you prefer instead? Italy-Brazil or Lille-Anderlecht? Germany-Argentina or Levski-Spartak? Your take on this is just childish and naive, lady.

1.) You still haven't answered my point about the 'groups.'
2.) I don't know if it's just me, but I'm pretty sure I'm not the first one in this poll to pick the Champions League. Not sure why all these questions are being aimed solely at me.
My approach to the topic was simple and blunt: I stated my opinion, which is—again—that the football we get in the Champions League is more interesting to me than what we see at the World Cup.
(I'm ignoring the atmosphere here, which is definitely—and again, just my opinion—way crazier at the World Cup.)
Call me naive again if you want, but I don't see anything childish about it.
Isn't the whole point of this thread for people to weigh in on the question?
Am I banned from doing that just because God didn't make me part of the superior male gender?!
nimblemarlin17 nimblemarlin17 Regular
459 messages
joined Mar 2004
#28 ·
The US and Trinidad and Tobago have basically zero chance of meeting up in the World Cup group stage. The US could easily slide through as a runner-up, but there's just no way T&T pulls that off. Look, the football played at the World Cup is the exact same stuff you see in the Champions League. You get the same amount of favorites, the same number of underdogs causing chaos, the same kind of massive upsets—like 🙄 seeing Levski play that aggressive style similar to how Saudi Arabia played in Germany—and the same heavy-hitting matches. It’s all the same game.
Kimberly Barnes2 Kimberly Barnes2 Member
39 messages
joined Apr 2007
#29 ·
I honestly feel like we need to scrap the World Cup immediately—and I mean right now—and just stick to the qualifiers! Don't get me wrong, the UEFA Champions League can still function as it is, since those competitions are basically the lifeblood keeping teams like Steaua, Levski, Spartak, Kyiv, and Roseburg afloat, but we really ought to abolish the group stages, the round of 16, and the quarterfinals entirely. Just leave the UEFA Cup, the EP, the qualifiers, and even that Intertoto mess alone... goodness gracious. 😁
Jerry Evans57 Jerry Evans57 Active Member
77 messages
joined Dec 2004
#30 ·
This thread is nonsense and should be closed immediately.
Austin Brown88 Austin Brown88 Newcomer
4 messages
joined Sep 2006
#31 ·
nimblemarlin17 said:The USA and Trinidad and Tobago have basically zero chance of meeting in the World Cup group stage. The USA might scrape through as runners-up, but T&T isn't happening. Football at the World Cup is the same stuff as the Champions League. Same favorites, same underdogs, same massive upsets (like Barcelona-Levski, where Levski played just as aggressively as Saudi Arabia did in Germany... 🙄), same big matchups, all that.

thanks so much for the "clarification."
guess I was actually watching some amateur bowling tournament instead of the Champions League..
I stated my opinion.. and I'm sticking to it..
maybe try practicing a little tolerance for other people's views. just because someone disagrees with you doesn't mean they're wrong..
everything can be viewed from different angles.. it's all about perspective..
if you're that lost, go take a philosophy class and ask someone to explain the Sophists to you..

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads