CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Culture & Entertainment › Movies › What did Ivy record on October 21, 2003?

What did Ivy record on October 21, 2003?

Started by Carol Rodriguez3 · · 👁 5 views · 31 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Carol Rodriguez3Thomas Williams59quietdriver3Larry Martin11Elizabeth Garcia2Amy Mendoza25Larry Cruz51Brandon Nelson5rowdybadger41Jose Miller17Brian Williamsbrightscout63Kevin Gonzalez79fadedheron132Emily Torres2Jesse Sullivan2northerncrane4
fadedheron132 fadedheron132 Newcomer
1 message
joined Nov 2005
#21 ·
good movie. Gregory absolutely kills it 🙂
anyway, I am so sick of all these ***** movies about partisans/fascists and the AFTERMATH of the Civil War. But man, I would love it if we actually had a real war movie or even a bunch of them (something like Band of Brothers). There is way too much material out there to not make one really great war epic.
Emily Torres2 Emily Torres2 Member
28 messages
joined Feb 2004
#22 ·
quietdriver3 said:cool movie idea

but having Tomislav Radić behind the lens doesn't sound like a winning move to me. 🤮

Hard to see myself seeking this out on my own. Maybe by some freak accident—stuck on a bus, in jail, or just channel surfing at 2 AM. 🙂

Ended up in a theater by pure accident. A film by Tomislav american Radić, husband of Maja Schundlich and father of stormy silence... man, what a mess. But hey...

The guy actually lucked out. He leaned into that fake "gritty, handheld, raw realism" vibe, and you basically can't miss. Sure, Ivo Gregurević is in it—that unavoidable, polarizing face of American cinema. And there's the repulsive Anja PL. Šovagović. But aside from those two "leads," everyone else was great.

the drunk artist brother
the cute hooker
the misfit teenager
the solid shady German dude

While waiting for Godot, the German businessman patriarch Gregurević tries to slide him a dinner, free sex, and a signed contract... but honestly, if kids didn't walk around with cameras filming everything, you could probably film some real horror movies—maybe even snuff films—in a supposedly god-fearing American household.

Fun little flick, but it doesn't come close to being a masterpiece like FORREST GUMP.

My advice? Watch it as a detox from T. Radić, Gregurević, and Showalter.
Amy Mendoza25 Amy Mendoza25 Member
39 messages
joined Nov 2015
#23 ·
wow, I haven't seen this much bias packed into a single thread in a long time (a little historical context never hurts, especially since we always seem to ignore it anyway...)
Emily Torres2 Emily Torres2 Member
28 messages
joined Feb 2004
#24 ·
Amy Mendoza25 said:wow, haven't seen this much bias packed into a single post in a long time (a little hindsight never hurts, especially since we always ignore it anyway...)

yeah, I've got my issues with Radić, Showalter, and maybe even Gregory.
but the movie actually turned out good. fun. contradiction, damn it.😁
Jesse Sullivan2 Jesse Sullivan2 Active Member
58 messages
joined Dec 2010
#25 ·
So what? Is Ivy actually Oscar material or what?!
northerncrane4 northerncrane4 Regular
384 messages
joined Aug 2005
#26 ·
Emily Torres2 said:Yeah, I definitely have some biases against Radić, Showalter, and to an extent, Gregory.

So—what's your specific issue with Ivo Gregurević?
Larry Martin11 Larry Martin11 Active Member
141 messages
joined Feb 2008
#27 ·
...unfortunately not... but only because the Academy just doesn't wrap their heads around this kind of material 🙂...

...basically, I think "Ivy" is a film meant for a predominantly European audience (it actually reminds me incredibly much of that one other European film, "The Celebration," and the whole Dogme 95 manifesto—which, in the US, only had one truly impressive "work," "Julian"—total off-topic moment here: 😍 /), and even the critics... whereas an American audience might prefer something a bit more dynamic, colorful, expensive, polished, heavily costumed, etc... (you get the picture) — but definitely not better!!! — titles like that probably wouldn't have fared as well. 🙂

..but if the movie had been distributed a bit more aggressively, it might have had a shot at becoming a "small big film" in Europe... though, of course, as an insider living right in the middle of this dysfunctional society of ours, I can't really say—unless it’s just too "American" for anyone else to understand besides us...🙂

..but then again, I'm sure there are people out there who feel differently... 😉
Jesse Sullivan2 Jesse Sullivan2 Active Member
58 messages
joined Dec 2010
#28 ·
Larry Martin11 said:..but if the movie had been distributed a bit more aggressively, it actually stood a chance at becoming one of those 'small big films' over in Europe.

Man, you aren't kidding! Generally speaking, American films—whether they're great, terrible, or just "meh"—just lack the marketing muscle. People, especially here in the States, don't even realize what kind of filmography we have. The only ones showing up to the theaters are kids, or maybe the slightly older crowd who actually know what an MP3 player is!
Emily Torres2 Emily Torres2 Member
28 messages
joined Feb 2004
#29 ·
Jesse Sullivan2 said:Spot on. Generally speaking, American films—whether they’re hits, flops, or just mediocre—are starving for decent marketing. People, especially Americans, don't even realize what kind of filmography we actually have. The only ones hitting theaters are kids or maybe those slightly older folks who actually know what an IMAX stands for.

No amount of hype is going to turn THIS little flick into Oscar material (even if it is fun, I'll admit).
Larry Martin11 Larry Martin11 Active Member
141 messages
joined Feb 2008
#30 ·
Emily Torres2 said:No amount of hype can turn THIS little flick—even if it is fun, I'll admit—into Oscar material.

...but why not? If Vinterberg managed to "conquer" Cannes with a similarly charming, brilliant little movie (picking up the Jury Prize, just a hair away from the Golden Palm), why couldn't Radic "conquer" some other similar institutions? 🙂 I mean, the movie isn't bad at all... sure, it’s not exactly groundbreaking, but it has its own "natural" charm...

...honestly, as I’ve mentioned before, I don't personally put much faith in the Oscars anyway—mostly for "other" and "thirdly" reasons...

...personally, I started watching Ostojicev's film, but I gave up after a few minutes because I just wasn't feeling it. I actually think "Ivy" ends up being better (though shame on me for not giving the guy a fair shake 👎 )...

...but then again, that's just me...
Jesse Sullivan2 Jesse Sullivan2 Active Member
58 messages
joined Dec 2010
#31 ·
Larry Martin11 said:...but then again, that's just me...

I'm gonna go out on a limb here and say that any movie—even if it isn't exactly "groundbreaking"—can totally win you over if it's just pure and innocent enough...
Larry Martin11 Larry Martin11 Active Member
141 messages
joined Feb 2008
#32 ·
Jesse Sullivan2 said:I’ll go out on a limb here—any movie that isn't trying to be "groundbreaking" can still win people over, provided it’s sincere enough...

👍 + 🙂

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads