CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Culture & Entertainment › Movies › Girl with a Pearl Earring

Girl with a Pearl Earring

Started by mistyfox812 · · 👁 7 views · 29 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants mistyfox812Bradley Davis33electriclynx45swiftbison7urbanhawk28Richard Hernandez13Jack Harris3Bradley Bennett57Donna Nelson23Anthony Kim18Laura Palmer25Kyle Fisherrapidorca22Andrew Garcia2Bryan Taylor9Betty Palmer8wearyviper25
Laura Palmer25 Laura Palmer25 Active Member
102 messages
joined Aug 2007
#21 ·
Anthony Kim18 said:Hmm, I have my doubts that life was actually like that.
Maybe they hit those standards, but it feels a bit too perfect to me.
It’s basically just a movie made to show how people back then wanted to see themselves.

What kind of idealization are you talking about? The service life during that era was brutal, and the film shows that faithfully. If I saw maids sleeping in feather beds, then I'd call it idealized. But look at the life of that famous artist and his family living in a Netherlands torn apart by religious tension? That's pure misery... a greedy wife constantly demanding money (while popping out a new kid every year), painting portraits for obnoxious elites just to stay in their good graces, and a mother-in-law who keeps the cash under lock and key... To me, it felt more like a descent into hell, where the only sliver of light is that sudden connection between two people from different worlds whose love is doomed before it even starts.
The movie is incredibly sad precisely because it feels real.
Anthony Kim18 Anthony Kim18 Active Member
238 messages
joined Apr 2006
#22 ·
I wasn't saying the plot was off, it's more about how it looks visually
Laura Palmer25 Laura Palmer25 Active Member
102 messages
joined Aug 2007
#23 ·
Anthony Kim18 said:I wasn't saying the plot was off, it's more about how it looks visually

So you're talking about the fancy decor, the clothes, the jewelry, all that? I don't think any of it is over the top. The Netherlands has always been an incredibly wealthy country, and their middle class could afford luxuries that would be strictly reserved for the aristocracy in other places.
Anthony Kim18 Anthony Kim18 Active Member
238 messages
joined Apr 2006
#24 ·
No, you're totally missing my point. I'm talking about cinematic lighting.
It’s just too polished, you know? Not like "luxurious" gorgeous, more like...
hmm, actually, never mind! 😎
Kyle Fisher Kyle Fisher Newcomer
8 messages
joined Nov 2007
#25 ·
If you ask me, Scarlett delivered an unforgettable performance. She’s absolutely stunning.
rapidorca22 rapidorca22 Member
19 messages
joined May 2009
#26 ·
Finished the book and watched the movie... and yeah, it’s that same old story where the book absolutely crushes the film. I guess the only exception is when it's *The Godfather* 🤷... honestly, if I hadn't read the book first, half of this wouldn't have even made sense 🤷... my take? Kind of a letdown
.
It’s also a bummer they didn't include the actual ending from the book, or that part where Cornelia gets slapped again 🙏. That would've actually hit hard
.
Andrew Garcia2 Andrew Garcia2 Member
30 messages
joined Apr 2010
#27 ·
I saw this movie on TV about two years ago... It was alright. Not exactly a masterpiece, but definitely worth a watch if you have the time.
Bryan Taylor9 Bryan Taylor9 Member
43 messages
joined Nov 2013
#28 ·
rapidorca22 said:Finished the book and watched the movie... and yeah, it’s that same old story where the book absolutely crushes the film. I guess the only exception is when it's *The Godfather* 🤷... honestly, if I hadn't read the book first, half of this wouldn't have even made sense 🤷... my take? Kind of a letdown
.
It’s also a bummer they didn't include the actual ending from the book, or that part where Cornelia gets slapped again 🙏. That would've actually hit hard
.

I'm with you on this! The book was so intense and emotionally charged that I inhaled it in one sitting. But watching the movie? I was dying of boredom! The acting was so wooden and lifeless—honestly, what a complete waste of talent
Betty Palmer8 Betty Palmer8 Member
35 messages
joined Aug 2012
#29 ·
I watched the movie before picking up the book, and honestly, it was fantastic. I’ve always thought Colin Firth was a genius—and Scarlett Johansson was the perfect Griet 👍 ... even today, she’s my first thought whenever I think about her filmography. Even after finishing the book, my opinion of the movie hasn't wavered one bit.

The whole story is pretty heavy and bleak—just a really tough life—but I think they captured that realism quite well. As for the ending? It was the only way it could have gone. From the very start of the film, I never expected them to end up together; that connection was simply impossible, making that conclusion the only logical outcome.
wearyviper25 wearyviper25 Member
16 messages
joined Aug 2010
#30 ·
mistyfox812 said:I can't find a single thread... is it seriously possible that nobody has anything to say about this movie? If nothing else, it looks stunning, honestly just like a Delft painting.
Here’s my little brain dump after watching it.

A Frozen Tragedy
It’s pretty obvious as the movie unfolds that everything is heading toward a total disaster. He’s gonna lose his family and any chance at doing what he lives for, and she’s gonna lose her entire world—her family, her reputation, basically any way to fit back into society.
People always throw around that line: "We'll stay together even if the world ends." But here, that’s literal: the price of them being together is the absolute destruction of his world and hers, the whole reality she exists in.
When his wife tells him, "Get out of my house," everything is laid bare. It's one or the other.
He chooses his own world over hers, which kind of halts the tragedy.
In a weird way, there's a > vibe because she ends up marrying some young, hot butcher, so she isn't a maid anymore. And he keeps painting, having actually made money off the work.
But still, you can tell "it's just not it."
The real tragedy is that the heartbreak is unavoidable. If a person rebels against their place in the world—refuses to accept it—fate punishes them for that hubris, for defying the "will of the gods." But if they don't rebel and just swallow their fate and accept where they belong, you're left with this bitter taste that "this isn't it."

All that's left for a person is art. That's the one place where you can push past the boundaries of destiny without the gods coming after you. In art, "it" can finally be achieved without the unbearable consequence of tearing your whole life apart.
In the Delft painting, Gretchen becomes who she truly is: the "Girl with a Pearl Earring." And the version of her captured in that painting feels way more real than the actual reality of her being a maid or a butcher's wife.

It’s weird—I didn't even pick up on the whole romance between the painter and the girl. After the movie ended, I actually wrote down something else entirely, like this:

It’s a gloomy 17th-century setting where people were still ruled by basic human vices—jealousy, lust, malice, selfishness, vanity, and all that childish nonsense. I mean, sure, people haven't changed, they've just gotten better at hiding it. Anyway, this is basically about a young maid who somehow ends up as the subject of that famous painting by Jan Vermeer—Girl with a Pearl Earring. Honestly, if you've ever been in a spot where some idiot blamed you for something you didn't even do—just total pathetic losers—then you might actually relate to her. The movie is pretty depressing and dark in the background, but let's not get too dramatic about it—just enjoy the scenes where Scarlett licks her bottom lip four times in a row.
Rating: 8/10.


Now that people are actually bringing up this supposed romance between her and the painter—I just can't wrap my head around it. All I see is her helplessness, how she's stuck in a subordinate position, and just pure, unadulterated injustice... if anything, the painting is magical because Vermeer managed to capture all that tension with his brush. The girl knows damn well that earring could cost her her job and her livelihood, but I guess the painter realizes that too. He’s got to finish this piece for his patron just to survive—it's basically make or break for him. His wife can't stand being broke, and he's stuck in a pretty miserable spot himself. As far as I'm concerned, there's nothing between them—she’s just an inspiration at first, and then maybe a convenient way for him to stay in his patron's good graces.

The maid—that girl with the earring—is clearly in love with the butcher's son. It’s pretty obvious from the way she runs to him to be with him before that greedy, depraved patron can get his hands on her. Honestly, having her portrait painted back then feels like she was just trying to land a cover story in modern-day Playboy. The movie really captures how fleeting that whole era was. 🤷

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads