Limeni Nos said:I’ve only ever heard about the Air soundtrack.
Your information is incomplete. While an Air soundtrack exists, there is also a soundtrack featuring other music from the film—specifically the tribal music and those records they use to communicate with the boys.
Larry Torres4 said:Well, this certainly doesn't 👎
The movie was supposed to be shocking, wasn't it? Instead, it felt like just another entry in the endless line of teenage dramas. Is being slow and boring really the same thing as being shocking or provocative?
It features beautiful cinematography that ultimately leads nowhere (much like >), the symbolism is rather heavy-handed, and the dialogue between the boys—especially toward the end—feels incredibly cheesy (they say the book is much better).
I suspect the film achieved cult status primarily due to > and the casting of ... overall, I didn't care for it.
As Diki and Milk so eloquently pointed out, isn't the entire point that we don't know why they took their lives? The narrative is intentionally ambiguous, riddled with massive gaps, because the film aims to mimic the unpredictability of life itself.
Personally, I am not particularly fond of >. It is a fine film, certainly, but I feel no compulsion to revisit it more than once every three years. It shares a certain subtlety and stillness with >, yet > is superior precisely because it manages such profound tragedy without ever slipping into sentimentality or offering easy explanations. Given that distinction, how can you claim this film is a typical teen flick? Your assessment seems quite misplaced.
And which symbolism specifically did you find too obvious? Please, enlighten me.
Furthermore, I am unaware of who claims the book is superior; both the novel and the film are excellent works. Those parts you found "cheesy" were lifted directly from the text. In fact, the film succeeds by perfectly preserving that sense of incompleteness.
I adore >. 😍 But then again, I have always been somewhat obsessed with the complexities of female adolescence.