Jeremy White9 said:That logo is so bad even Mitchell’s summer highlights would be embarrassed by it. It’s awful.
Dinamo isn't celebrating anything; I guess you could say they're just celebrating being the big shots in New York. Besides, why do you even care? No one is calling you out.
I don't feel called out, I'm just asking out of curiosity what Real Madrid is actually celebrating. I follow football (mostly for the kits) and I'm wondering what would make Real Madrid sink my mood.
As for that Juventus 100-year logo? Total disaster. First off, the pros and the jury picked different designs entirely. As much as those other options disappointed me, seeing them ignore the experts just to pick some fourth random logo was where things went south—partly because they ignored the professionals, and partly because this fourth option is a tragedy upon tragedies. Why? Because that logo can only ever exist inside its little square box. Where are you even going to put it? Imagine a jersey with a giant square logo sitting there—would you actually wear that? And how are they planning to apply this thing to places where you need embroidery instead of printing—like jerseys or hats? You can't. Embroidery won't recognize the gradients, glows, or whatever other flashy effects this "designer" is playing with in Photoshop. This looks like the work of someone who just discovered the software and wants to show off every effect the program offers. You can barely see the "Split" quote through those Saturn rings, not to mention the "1911" and "2011" are nearly unreadable. Honestly, the only good thing about it is the story the guy told to win over Savage. It’s a shame for Juventus, and even more of a shame that they didn't listen to the experts—just another case of primitive decision-making. We'll have to see how it actually looks on physical materials, but as a pro, I'm incredibly skeptical...