CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Miscellaneous › Feedback & Suggestions › New moderator Mr. Smith is on a power trip

New moderator Mr. Smith is on a power trip

Started by Amy Rogers6 · · 👁 4 views · 211 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Amy Rogers6driftingstag84Larry Walker24bluelynx52driftingtinkerGrace EdwardsAmanda DiazEthan Campbell81Casey BennettNoah DiazMorgan PetersonPaul Newman86silverpuma61Tyler Ruiz502hiddenmoose16coppersailor28Jeremy Johnson18Sam Alvarez4Ashley Vaughn79swiftstag66northernpilot2Jessica Kelly4Bradley White73Morgan Rodriguez57 …
Amy Rogers6 Amy Rogers6 Active MemberOP
69 messages
joined Feb 2021
#1 ·
Seriously, what even is this? How low can we go? Some new moderator just popped up on the COVID subreddit under the name bluelynx52—this guy has, what, twenty posts total, and he’s claiming to be a mod???????????? Who in their right mind makes someone a moderator with only twenty posts??? It’s obvious he’s lying and hiding who he really is—he’s clearly some clone of one of the mods, or an admin, or maybe even the forum owner... What kind of games are being played here??? What is actually happening to you people??? You’ve completely lost the plot. This is rock bottom... absolutely bottom of the barrel.😵😵😵

The absolute peak of this nonsense is that the guy introduced himself as a new moderator in that thread about Sprajc and Bakic that he started. So, naturally, I asked him the exact same questions I'm asking here—who is he and whose clone is he? The result? The guy just deleted my post, claiming off-topic threads get nuked... Unbelievable.🤣🤣🤣🤣
driftingstag84 driftingstag84 Member
11 messages
joined May 2023
#2 ·
Amy Rogers6 said:Seriously, what even is this? How low can we go? Some new moderator just popped up on the COVID subreddit under the name bluelynx52—this guy has, what, twenty posts total, and he’s claiming to be a mod???????????? Who in their right mind makes someone a moderator with only twenty posts??? It’s obvious he’s lying and hiding who he really is—he’s clearly some clone of one of the mods, or an admin, or maybe even the forum owner... What kind of games are being played here??? What is actually happening to you people??? You’ve completely lost the plot. This is rock bottom... absolutely bottom of the barrel.😵😵😵

The absolute peak of this nonsense is that the guy introduced himself as a new moderator in that thread about Sprajc and Bakic that he started. So, naturally, I asked him the exact same questions I'm asking here—who is he and whose clone is he? The result? The guy just deleted my post, claiming off-topic threads get nuked... Unbelievable.🤣🤣🤣🤣

Brava Mrs. Hilderik, you just put Anderlon on the Ignore list 🤣
He only has 20 posts. This isn't like you.
Amy Rogers6 Amy Rogers6 Active MemberOP
69 messages
joined Feb 2021
#3 ·
driftingstag84 said:Brava Mrs. Hilderik, you just put Anderlon on the Ignore list 🤣
He only has 20 posts. This isn't like you.

Am I the bad guy here for pointing out how he's turning this whole Reddit into a total joke? Maybe he should go hit up Wikipedia to look up what a "travesty" actually is—maybe then he'll grow up. This place is absolute bottom-of-the-barrel garbage right now. He probably thinks he's being hilarious.🤷
Larry Walker24 Larry Walker24 Veteran
1K messages
joined Jun 2022
#4 ·
nick has been registered since 2003
Amy Rogers6 Amy Rogers6 Active MemberOP
69 messages
joined Feb 2021
#5 ·
Larry Walker24 said:nick has been registered since 2003

So? What am I supposed to say to that? This site was founded back in late 2002, right? Does that mean Anderlon is actually hiding behind this handle? Because if that's true, his best bet is to crawl into a basement and stay there for at least a year...☕

What an absolute joke. 🤦🤦🤦
bluelynx52 bluelynx52 Newcomer
6 messages
joined Sep 2021
#6 ·
Of course bluelynx52 is a clone. I can't tell you who's pulling the strings, and honestly, it doesn't matter. More than one person has been using him so far, and that’s how it’ll stay.

Why couldn't some random stranger be a moderator—and a good one at that? You probably realize there's a massive conflict of interest when a regular user jumps into a mod role. Everyone already knows his biases and how skewed his views are. He’s just as predictable in discussions as he is in moderating. A mod like that shouldn't be allowed to both participate and moderate. That's why it's actually great if the new mod is truly a newcomer. Someone without baggage. Or at least, someone you don't know yet. 🙂 And if you eventually figure them out, bluelynx52 will probably have moved on to being someone else by then.

Judging by how fast you jumped to conclusions based on just one neutral post, you're either incredibly perceptive or you just walk into every Reddit thread expecting the worst. I wouldn't call you perceptive, though. You should've known your off-topic post was going to get nuked. That isn't tyranny. It's just the rules.

You've got no reason to assume I won't be an awesome moderator who might actually surprise you. While you're busy holding onto your prejudices, I'll just be focusing on what you actually write moving forward. 🙂
driftingtinker driftingtinker Regular
372 messages
joined Jan 2019
#7 ·
That is just classic Sprajc, 100% guaranteed.
Grace Edwards Grace Edwards Active Member
184 messages
joined May 2023
#8 ·
So, according to that logic, I just open a new account, drop one or two posts, sit on my hands for fifteen years, and suddenly I’m just as qualified to be a moderator?
Amanda Diaz Amanda Diaz Active Member
74 messages
joined Jan 2009
#9 ·
Why are you all attacking this guy before you even see how he actually handles things? It’s not like he could be much more incompetent or biased than the current top moderators on that site anyway.
Grace Edwards Grace Edwards Active Member
184 messages
joined May 2023
#10 ·
It’s not even about how they act; it’s more about how they even landed that position in the first place.
I mean, I've been hanging out on different forums, both here in the States and abroad, since I was a kid, and usually, if you want to be a moderator, there’s some kind of seniority involved—you need a certain level of activity and a decent reputation, basically meaning you haven't been causing massive drama or breaking the rules constantly.
But honestly, screw all that. 🙏
Amy Rogers6 Amy Rogers6 Active MemberOP
69 messages
joined Feb 2021
#11 ·
bluelynx52 said:Of course bluelynx52 is a clone. I can't tell you who's pulling the strings, and honestly, it doesn't matter. More than one person has been using him so far, and that’s how it’ll stay.

Why couldn't some random stranger be a moderator—and a good one at that? You probably realize there's a massive conflict of interest when a regular user jumps into a mod role. Everyone already knows his biases and how skewed his views are. He’s just as predictable in discussions as he is in moderating. A mod like that shouldn't be allowed to both participate and moderate. That's why it's actually great if the new mod is truly a newcomer. Someone without baggage. Or at least, someone you don't know yet. 🙂 And if you eventually figure them out, bluelynx52 will probably have moved on to being someone else by then.

Judging by how fast you jumped to conclusions based on just one neutral post, you're either incredibly perceptive or you just walk into every Reddit thread expecting the worst. I wouldn't call you perceptive, though. You should've known your off-topic post was going to get nuked. That isn't tyranny. It's just the rules.

You've got no reason to assume I won't be an awesome moderator who might actually surprise you. While you're busy holding onto your prejudices, I'll just be focusing on what you actually write moving forward. 🙂

I had no idea the mods were already using those tools—cloning mods and everything. Now that I’m looking at it, my eyes are actually burning...

Regarding this idea that an anonymous moderator can actually be good because their anonymity supposedly eliminates bias—first off, let me stop you right there. An anonymous mod isn't a "good" mod. They don't bring stability, clear rules, or any sense of accountability to the table; instead, they just breed suspicion and distrust. If you think I’m wrong, go ahead and ask anyone outside your little moderator circle what they actually think. That'll give you the real picture. As for this whole "objective" thing? That cloak of anonymity disappears the second the first warnings and bans start flying.

Being a good moderator isn't about hiding behind anonymity; it’s about having the guts to step back from your own biases and try to steer the conversation without being heavy-handed. That takes actual work, which is why decent mods are hard to find—you can see that on Reddit, too. They might be rare, but they have distinct personalities and viewpoints, which lets the users actually build a rapport with them. Honestly, understanding those basic traits is crucial. What you're doing right now is a terrible move—trying to implement some "matrix" system that's never going to work. It just looks like you're chasing total control over the sub because you don't trust your own people.

Honestly, out of everyone here, you’re the one who should be most dialed in on the basic rules of moderation. You were basically one of the pioneers of this whole Reddit culture back in the day, so it’s pretty weird that you seem so clueless about it now—it’s like you’ve completely lost your compass. At this rate, it'll just be a case of "even a broken clock is right twice a day." But hey, whatever, have it your way.

Regarding my intuition—honestly, it all turned out to be pretty shallow. I was actually expecting you to surprise me. Instead, I post my critique about this whole moderator clone situation, only to have it deleted with some "off-topic" excuse. That just gave me the perfect opening to head over to the PZK Reddit and start this thread, which is perfectly on-topic for this sub—exactly what I was aiming for. In the end, you’re left with a chance to hear the criticism, but if you delete it, you're basically scoring an own goal while the moderator clone issue just keeps festering.

Honestly, if you actually wanted to surprise me, you'd have to react differently than how this whole mess is playing out...

And what about that last sentence—what are we even supposed to make of it? How should we take it? It reads like a veiled threat, though let’s be real, it’s barely even veiled; it’s just poorly disguised under this fake layer of objectivity. That’s an absolute self-inflicted wound right there. It shows that when you run out of actual things to say, you just resort to pulling rank. That’s definitely not the mark of smart behavior on a Reddit thread, nor is it how real politics works—you see that kind of nonsense all the time in our daily political scene here in the States....

But hey, if you think you look cool doing it, then I guess it was worth it—regardless of the damage caused...☕
Ethan Campbell81 Ethan Campbell81 Member
30 messages
joined Sep 2022
#12 ·
bluelynx52 said:Of course bluelynx52 is a clone. I can't tell you who's pulling the strings, and honestly, it doesn't matter. More than one person has been using him so far, and that’s how it’ll stay.

Why couldn't some random stranger be a moderator—and a good one at that? You probably realize there's a massive conflict of interest when a regular user jumps into a mod role. Everyone already knows his biases and how skewed his views are. He’s just as predictable in discussions as he is in moderating. A mod like that shouldn't be allowed to both participate and moderate. That's why it's actually great if the new mod is truly a newcomer. Someone without baggage. Or at least, someone you don't know yet. 🙂 And if you eventually figure them out, bluelynx52 will probably have moved on to being someone else by then.

Judging by how fast you jumped to conclusions based on just one neutral post, you're either incredibly perceptive or you just walk into every Reddit thread expecting the worst. I wouldn't call you perceptive, though. You should've known your off-topic post was going to get nuked. That isn't tyranny. It's just the rules.

You've got no reason to assume I won't be an awesome moderator who might actually surprise you. While you're busy holding onto your prejudices, I'll just be focusing on what you actually write moving forward. 🙂

Wait, I don't understand one thing; everyone has their own opinion, a stance on something (on everything, actually). It is practically impossible to be neutral because, in that case, a person wouldn't even be able to think at all (which is impossible).

And then, let's say you let that person hide behind a moderator account and their views magically vanish "at the push of a button," or what exactly happens?
I don't get this concept. Do you have some kind of switch in your head so you can turn your opinions on and off whenever necessary?
Neutrality doesn't exist per se. Everyone has a stance on absolutely everything. The only question in this specific case is how much those stances influence the moderation of a thread. Some handle it better; others handle it significantly worse...

And why this hiding behind accounts? By doing so, you only deepen the suspicion regarding the neutrality of this platform (in fact, that suspicion has long since been confirmed) and you look ridiculous. Get serious and post from your actual profiles, because this way you genuinely look unprofessional.
Casey Bennett Casey Bennett Regular
522 messages
joined Nov 2011
#13 ·
Amy Rogers6 said:I had no idea the mods were already using those tools—cloning mods and everything. Now that I’m looking at it, my eyes are actually burning...

Regarding this idea that an anonymous moderator can actually be good because their anonymity supposedly eliminates bias—first off, let me stop you right there. An anonymous mod isn't a "good" mod. They don't bring stability, clear rules, or any sense of accountability to the table; instead, they just breed suspicion and distrust. If you think I’m wrong, go ahead and ask anyone outside your little moderator circle what they actually think. That'll give you the real picture. As for this whole "objective" thing? That cloak of anonymity disappears the second the first warnings and bans start flying.

Being a good moderator isn't about hiding behind anonymity; it’s about having the guts to step back from your own biases and try to steer the conversation without being heavy-handed. That takes actual work, which is why decent mods are hard to find—you can see that on Reddit, too. They might be rare, but they have distinct personalities and viewpoints, which lets the users actually build a rapport with them. Honestly, understanding those basic traits is crucial. What you're doing right now is a terrible move—trying to implement some "matrix" system that's never going to work. It just looks like you're chasing total control over the sub because you don't trust your own people.

Honestly, out of everyone here, you’re the one who should be most dialed in on the basic rules of moderation. You were basically one of the pioneers of this whole Reddit culture back in the day, so it’s pretty weird that you seem so clueless about it now—it’s like you’ve completely lost your compass. At this rate, it'll just be a case of "even a broken clock is right twice a day." But hey, whatever, have it your way.

Regarding my intuition—honestly, it all turned out to be pretty shallow. I was actually expecting you to surprise me. Instead, I post my critique about this whole moderator clone situation, only to have it deleted with some "off-topic" excuse. That just gave me the perfect opening to head over to the PZK Reddit and start this thread, which is perfectly on-topic for this sub—exactly what I was aiming for. In the end, you’re left with a chance to hear the criticism, but if you delete it, you're basically scoring an own goal while the moderator clone issue just keeps festering.

Honestly, if you actually wanted to surprise me, you'd have to react differently than how this whole mess is playing out...

And what about that last sentence—what are we even supposed to make of it? How should we take it? It reads like a veiled threat, though let’s be real, it’s barely even veiled; it’s just poorly disguised under this fake layer of objectivity. That’s an absolute self-inflicted wound right there. It shows that when you run out of actual things to say, you just resort to pulling rank. That’s definitely not the mark of smart behavior on a Reddit thread, nor is it how real politics works—you see that kind of nonsense all the time in our daily political scene here in the States....

But hey, if you think you look cool doing it, then I guess it was worth it—regardless of the damage caused...☕

Unless the person behind the anonymous "Amy Rogers6" profile is actually a different real-life individual who just hijacked the account from someone who joined the forum yesterday—which would explain that quoted snippet—the alternative is that someone with a massive amount of forum seniority and history suddenly has absolutely no clue about basic forum rules or standard etiquette.

So, let me get this straight: in order to ask about a new moderator on the PZK, one must first post something off-topic on a more strictly moderated subforum, wait for that post to inevitably be deleted without any penalty, and then swoop in here fueled by pure hysteria, which is clearly evident from both the thread title and the opening posts you've left?

You little fish 🙂
Ethan Campbell81 Ethan Campbell81 Member
30 messages
joined Sep 2022
#14 ·
Casey Bennett said:Unless the person behind the anonymous "Amy Rogers6" profile is actually a different real-life individual who just hijacked the account from someone who joined the forum yesterday—which would explain that quoted snippet—the alternative is that someone with a massive amount of forum seniority and history suddenly has absolutely no clue about basic forum rules or standard etiquette.

So, let me get this straight: in order to ask about a new moderator on the PZK, one must first post something off-topic on a more strictly moderated subforum, wait for that post to inevitably be deleted without any penalty, and then swoop in here fueled by pure hysteria, which is clearly evident from both the thread title and the opening posts you've left?

You little fish 🙂

Kae, modesty, is nothing allowed to be asked on this forum anymore? It seems criticism is no longer welcome because it bruises the boss's fragile ego. I almost feel sorry for him.🙄
I see you have all mobilized on this thread, stepping up to defend The Bog boss just like the early adopters used to, while simultaneously stroking his ego behind his back.

Pathetic, nearly as much as this forum has been over the last few years.☕
Amy Rogers6 Amy Rogers6 Active MemberOP
69 messages
joined Feb 2021
#15 ·
Casey Bennett said:Unless the person behind the anonymous "Amy Rogers6" profile is actually a different real-life individual who just hijacked the account from someone who joined the forum yesterday—which would explain that quoted snippet—the alternative is that someone with a massive amount of forum seniority and history suddenly has absolutely no clue about basic forum rules or standard etiquette.

So, let me get this straight: in order to ask about a new moderator on the PZK, one must first post something off-topic on a more strictly moderated subforum, wait for that post to inevitably be deleted without any penalty, and then swoop in here fueled by pure hysteria, which is clearly evident from both the thread title and the opening posts you've left?

You little fish 🙂

"honey, both you and I know you can see my IP address (just like everyone else on this forum), and you probably know my info too, so this attempt to discredit me is just pathetic... you were so desperate to clean up after the boss that you ended up embarrassing yourself" 🤦 — this is exactly why you guys look even worse. Even the boss is going to find this mindless response to what I wrote annoying; instead of helping him out through blind loyalty, you're just creating a bigger mess (that's what happens when you write with pure emotion instead of thinking—don't worry, I'll comfort you, nobody's immune to it). Why do you think I became more active in that subforum? Because the moderation is a disaster. They aren't capable of hitting their goals without causing chaos until the goals themselves become irrelevant. It's not that I don't understand the boss (unlike you, who thinks you get it but clearly doesn't)—what I pointed out is that his method of using clones is a total fail, and I am 100% right on that. I trust that, unlike you, people will actually grasp what I said (whether they agree or not).

And at the end of the day, you are completely off-topic. As a moderator, you should at least be able to follow the basic outline of a thread. I have no idea where you studied forum logic (maybe a chicken coop?), but this kind of trolling that has nothing to do with the actual issue is bottom-tier behavior. You'd better hold back on any further comments if you aren't capable of writing something that actually relates to the topic....

Best,
Amy Rogers6 😁
Noah Diaz Noah Diaz Active Member
114 messages
joined Sep 2021
#16 ·
Amanda Diaz said:Why are you all attacking this guy before you even see how he actually handles things? It’s not like he could be much more incompetent or biased than the current top moderators on that site anyway.

So, my post with this link just got nuked:
https://www.nytimes.com/science...article-15103227
EXPERT ASSESSMENT
FDA declines universal third dose approval: ‘Yes, antibody counts are dropping, but B cells are still there...‘

Why?🙄
Ethan Campbell81 Ethan Campbell81 Member
30 messages
joined Sep 2022
#17 ·
Noah Diaz said:So, my post with this link just got nuked:
https://www.nytimes.com/science...article-15103227
EXPERT ASSESSMENT
FDA declines universal third dose approval: ‘Yes, antibody counts are dropping, but B cells are still there...‘

Why?🙄

Because the FDA is basically an association where conspiracy theorists and far-right extremists gather to dance in circles around a burning cross. Use your head.😵
Amanda Diaz Amanda Diaz Active Member
74 messages
joined Jan 2009
#18 ·
Noah Diaz said:So, my post with this link just got nuked:
https://www.nytimes.com/science...article-15103227
EXPERT ASSESSMENT
FDA declines universal third dose approval: ‘Yes, antibody counts are dropping, but B cells are still there...‘

Why?🙄

Just ask them there. I can do it for you if you want.

Why are you people deleting on-topic posts? Seriously, what is wrong with you?
Casey Bennett Casey Bennett Regular
522 messages
joined Nov 2011
#19 ·
Amy Rogers6 said:"honey, both you and I know you can see my IP address (just like everyone else on this forum), and you probably know my info too, so this attempt to discredit me is just pathetic... you were so desperate to clean up after the boss that you ended up embarrassing yourself" 🤦 — this is exactly why you guys look even worse. Even the boss is going to find this mindless response to what I wrote annoying; instead of helping him out through blind loyalty, you're just creating a bigger mess (that's what happens when you write with pure emotion instead of thinking—don't worry, I'll comfort you, nobody's immune to it). Why do you think I became more active in that subforum? Because the moderation is a disaster. They aren't capable of hitting their goals without causing chaos until the goals themselves become irrelevant. It's not that I don't understand the boss (unlike you, who thinks you get it but clearly doesn't)—what I pointed out is that his method of using clones is a total fail, and I am 100% right on that. I trust that, unlike you, people will actually grasp what I said (whether they agree or not).

And at the end of the day, you are completely off-topic. As a moderator, you should at least be able to follow the basic outline of a thread. I have no idea where you studied forum logic (maybe a chicken coop?), but this kind of trolling that has nothing to do with the actual issue is bottom-tier behavior. You'd better hold back on any further comments if you aren't capable of writing something that actually relates to the topic....

Best,
Amy Rogers6 😁

So many words, yet so little sense or logic to be found. 🤷
Ethan Campbell81 Ethan Campbell81 Member
30 messages
joined Sep 2022
#20 ·
Casey Bennett said:So many words, yet so little sense or logic to be found. 🤷

That is why your argument failed completely. The applause from the cheering crowd is still ringing in my ears. 🤦

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads