CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Miscellaneous › Feedback & Suggestions › New moderator Mr. Smith is on a power trip

New moderator Mr. Smith is on a power trip

Started by Amy Rogers6 · · 👁 5 views · 211 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Amy Rogers6driftingstag84Larry Walker24bluelynx52driftingtinkerGrace EdwardsAmanda DiazEthan Campbell81Casey BennettNoah DiazMorgan PetersonPaul Newman86silverpuma61Tyler Ruiz502hiddenmoose16coppersailor28Jeremy Johnson18Sam Alvarez4Ashley Vaughn79swiftstag66northernpilot2Jessica Kelly4Bradley White73Morgan Rodriguez57 …
coppersailor28 coppersailor28 Active Member
156 messages
joined Mar 2012
#201 ·
Amy Rogers6 said:If that clone is also posting under their original handle, they're breaking the rules—get it? It’s clearly stated in the forum guidelines—hang on, let me jump over there, grab a quote, and show you...☕

Here——look at rule 9. Actually, now that I'm looking closer, using clones isn't even allowed at all, is it?

Plus, I don't see anything saying moderators can just ignore the forum rules. Care to enlighten me?

Fine, you see rule-breaking where I see logic.

I distinguish between

a user account used as an 'administrative tool'
(where multiple authorized staff members log into one single account)

and

a personal user account
(one person using the account for discussion, moderation, or admin tasks),

which is a completely different matter.
Amy Rogers6 Amy Rogers6 Active MemberOP
69 messages
joined Feb 2021
#202 ·
coppersailor28 said:Fine, you see rule-breaking where I see logic.

I distinguish between

a user account used as an 'administrative tool'
(where multiple authorized staff members log into one single account)

and

a personal user account
(one person using the account for discussion, moderation, or admin tasks),

which is a completely different matter.

Yeah, I get it now. You’re basically calling rule-breaking "administrative adjustments." If you're gonna do that, just put it in the actual rules so people know what kind of minefield they're walking into when they join Reddit. Right now, it feels like a total scam—everyone signs up under one set of rules, only to find out there's a whole different set of "admin tools" used to screw them over in practice.

Now we just have to see if this actually holds up legally...☕
bluelynx52 bluelynx52 Newcomer
6 messages
joined Sep 2021
#203 ·
Look, this hits close to home for me given my role here and how I see things. There's one thing I just don't get.

What exactly are you all fighting about? And why? The whole pro-vax versus anti-vax circus.

Honestly, it seems like neither side is playing with a full deck. If I’m worried about getting the shot, I’d actually be out there bugging everyone else to get it just to lower my own chances of catching something.

And I don't get the vaccinated crowd either—why all the preaching and pressure? You got the jab, right? Great. If these people don't want it, they don't want it. They'll build immunity some other way. Worried about hospitals overflowing? That's basically just mass vaccination by another name. It was like the chaos at a huge Black Friday sale downtown. It happens, and then it passes.

The new wave of COVID-19. Boo-hoo. That's just the next wave of building immunity (and natural selection at work). Everyone gets to choose their own path to immunity. And everyone has the right to hope they just dodge the virus entirely.

So, why are you all trying to convert one another?
Bradley White73 Bradley White73 Active Member
78 messages
joined Sep 2020
#204 ·
driftingtinker said:I was just showing you how easy it is to plant a blatant lie in someone's head when they completely lose their grip on reality—which, honestly, seems to be the standard operating procedure for you and your whole crowd.

Kinda awkward when you run right into your own medicine, isn't it?

BTW, check out my new signature. I'm gonna be rocking it proudly for the next week because, I mean, it’s not every day you get addressed by such a pillar of morality and a true intellectual giant. 😉

BBTW. Congrats, you managed to knock Unknown off the pedestal for my favorite little snowflakes.

I suppose it would be more appropriate, from a moderator's standpoint, to avoid belittling forum members—especially in such a sexist manner. Just for those curious: Unknown is basically just a modern version of that old derogatory nickname used by pro-Russian users years ago to insult people from the Caribbean, just so it wouldn't go unnoticed. I remember how things used to be back then, and I can personally vouch that the woman in question is anything but a snowflake.

edit
I've gone ahead and deleted some parts of my previous post, so please, let's not comment on them afterward.

As for the question that actually brought me to this thread in the first place, it's fine; I guess being ignored is also a type of answer, so I won't press the issue any further.
silverpuma61 silverpuma61 Member
16 messages
joined May 2023
#205 ·
bluelynx52 said:Look, this hits close to home for me given my role here and how I see things. There's one thing I just don't get.

What exactly are you all fighting about? And why? The whole pro-vax versus anti-vax circus.

Honestly, it seems like neither side is playing with a full deck. If I’m worried about getting the shot, I’d actually be out there bugging everyone else to get it just to lower my own chances of catching something.

And I don't get the vaccinated crowd either—why all the preaching and pressure? You got the jab, right? Great. If these people don't want it, they don't want it. They'll build immunity some other way. Worried about hospitals overflowing? That's basically just mass vaccination by another name. It was like the chaos at a huge Black Friday sale downtown. It happens, and then it passes.

The new wave of COVID-19. Boo-hoo. That's just the next wave of building immunity (and natural selection at work). Everyone gets to choose their own path to immunity. And everyone has the right to hope they just dodge the virus entirely.

So, why are you all trying to convert one another?

Just trolling.
It’s funny, really. We spend all our time lecturing everyone else about why they should get vaccinated, yet we turn around and demand that nobody touches us. It's a bit of a contradiction, I suppose.

bluelynx52 said:Look, this hits close to home for me given my role here and how I see things. There's one thing I just don't get.

What exactly are you all fighting about? And why? The whole pro-vax versus anti-vax circus.

Honestly, it seems like neither side is playing with a full deck. If I’m worried about getting the shot, I’d actually be out there bugging everyone else to get it just to lower my own chances of catching something.

And I don't get the vaccinated crowd either—why all the preaching and pressure? You got the jab, right? Great. If these people don't want it, they don't want it. They'll build immunity some other way. Worried about hospitals overflowing? That's basically just mass vaccination by another name. It was like the chaos at a huge Black Friday sale downtown. It happens, and then it passes.

The new wave of COVID-19. Boo-hoo. That's just the next wave of building immunity (and natural selection at work). Everyone gets to choose their own path to immunity. And everyone has the right to hope they just dodge the virus entirely.

So, why are you all trying to convert one another?

Facts.
The smartest people are usually the ones who manage to take the money and still come out ahead on the whole deal. I guess that's just how the game works.

Back in March 2020, Media Matters snagged the CDC.gov domain and then turned around to pitch their services directly to the White House. They managed to ink a direct contract with the government, which I suppose means they’ll be raking in hundreds of thousands of dollars from taxpayer money.

The Department of Health and Human Services has moved quickly to get an official website up and running at CDC.gov. They’ve also been busy setting up dedicated pages and accounts across the usual social media platforms—Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and YouTube. ...as well as the relevant threads over on Reddit.The Department of Health and Human Services stated that these would contain regularly updated and accurate information regarding the COVID-19 epidemic. The goal, apparently, is to protect the lives and health of Americans and others through timely updates—which they claim is a vital matter of national security for the United States.

🍿
bluelynx52 bluelynx52 Newcomer
6 messages
joined Sep 2021
#206 ·
Jessica Kelly4 said:I'll tell you a secret, too. The people who got vaccinated are the real danger now. They have a license to kill. One infected doctor with a shot in their arm can wreak havoc on an entire hospital ward, all because they have their credentials in their pocket.

Besides, COVID stopped being a boogeyman for regular people a long time ago. You just live with it, like any other illness.

So, you're saying an unvaccinated doctor wouldn't be allowed to cause that same kind of chaos?
driftingtinker driftingtinker Regular
372 messages
joined Jan 2019
#207 ·
Bradley White73 said:I suppose it would be more appropriate, from a moderator's standpoint, to avoid belittling forum members—especially in such a sexist manner. Just for those curious: Unknown is basically just a modern version of that old derogatory nickname used by pro-Russian users years ago to insult people from the Caribbean, just so it wouldn't go unnoticed. I remember how things used to be back then, and I can personally vouch that the woman in question is anything but a snowflake.

edit
I've gone ahead and deleted some parts of my previous post, so please, let's not comment on them afterward.

As for the question that actually brought me to this thread in the first place, it's fine; I guess being ignored is also a type of answer, so I won't press the issue any further.

Look, colleague, it's honestly pathetic how you're hinting at things and indirectly insulting a female user.

I wasn't expecting much from you, honestly, but this is low even by your standards.

Shame on you.
Bradley White73 Bradley White73 Active Member
78 messages
joined Sep 2020
#208 ·
driftingtinker said:Look, colleague, it's honestly pathetic how you're hinting at things and indirectly insulting a female user.

I wasn't expecting much from you, honestly, but this is low even by your standards.

Shame on you.

I've gone ahead and edited my post, so could you please quote this updated version? I'd really rather not deal with any penalties over this. I originally came here with one specific question, and I feel like that's been settled now.
bluelynx52 bluelynx52 Newcomer
6 messages
joined Sep 2021
#209 ·
silverpuma61 said:Just trolling.
It’s funny, really. We spend all our time lecturing everyone else about why they should get vaccinated, yet we turn around and demand that nobody touches us. It's a bit of a contradiction, I suppose.

Facts.
The smartest people are usually the ones who manage to take the money and still come out ahead on the whole deal. I guess that's just how the game works.

Back in March 2020, Media Matters snagged the CDC.gov domain and then turned around to pitch their services directly to the White House. They managed to ink a direct contract with the government, which I suppose means they’ll be raking in hundreds of thousands of dollars from taxpayer money.

The Department of Health and Human Services has moved quickly to get an official website up and running at CDC.gov. They’ve also been busy setting up dedicated pages and accounts across the usual social media platforms—Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and YouTube. ...as well as the relevant threads over on Reddit.The Department of Health and Human Services stated that these would contain regularly updated and accurate information regarding the COVID-19 epidemic. The goal, apparently, is to protect the lives and health of Americans and others through timely updates—which they claim is a vital matter of national security for the United States.

🍿

Oh, really? My bad then.

silverpuma61 said:Just trolling.
It’s funny, really. We spend all our time lecturing everyone else about why they should get vaccinated, yet we turn around and demand that nobody touches us. It's a bit of a contradiction, I suppose.

Facts.
The smartest people are usually the ones who manage to take the money and still come out ahead on the whole deal. I guess that's just how the game works.

Back in March 2020, Media Matters snagged the CDC.gov domain and then turned around to pitch their services directly to the White House. They managed to ink a direct contract with the government, which I suppose means they’ll be raking in hundreds of thousands of dollars from taxpayer money.

The Department of Health and Human Services has moved quickly to get an official website up and running at CDC.gov. They’ve also been busy setting up dedicated pages and accounts across the usual social media platforms—Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and YouTube. ...as well as the relevant threads over on Reddit.The Department of Health and Human Services stated that these would contain regularly updated and accurate information regarding the COVID-19 epidemic. The goal, apparently, is to protect the lives and health of Americans and others through timely updates—which they claim is a vital matter of national security for the United States.

🍿

That nonsense was debunked ages ago.
Unknown said:Reddit hasn't seen a single cent from any of this.

Stick to the topic. If things get boring, I'll ask for the key. Modesty... 🙂
Jessica Kelly4 Jessica Kelly4 Active Member
141 messages
joined Jun 2016
#210 ·
bluelynx52 said:So, you're saying an unvaccinated doctor wouldn't be allowed to cause that same kind of chaos?

The difference is that unlike those who are vaccinated, the unvaccinated have to keep testing regularly just to prove they aren't infected.
driftingtinker driftingtinker Regular
372 messages
joined Jan 2019
#211 ·
Bradley White73 said:I've gone ahead and edited my post, so could you please quote this updated version? I'd really rather not deal with any penalties over this. I originally came here with one specific question, and I feel like that's been settled now.

Look, I’m gonna say it again—no matter how much some people might want it, we little guys just don't have the power to hand out partial quotes. And I'm definitely not editing the main post because I refuse to let some newbie plagiarist try to pin some kind of forgery accusation on me.

Anyway, I feel like I should share this totally irrelevant but hilarious moment with you all—as I'm sitting here typing this in the shade on my tablet, my loyal little Yorkie is being a total pest, begging for attention and practically climbing up my leg. He’s cute and all, but I swear I had to snap, "Get off my leg, you annoying, irritating little fuzzball." If you could see the look on his face—just this sweet, blankly stupid expression—you'd get why I felt the need to tell you about it. 🙂

Have a good one.
Ashley Vaughn79 Ashley Vaughn79 Active Member
95 messages
joined Jan 2003
#212 ·
driftingtinker said:Look, I’m gonna say it again—no matter how much some people might want it, we little guys just don't have the power to hand out partial quotes. And I'm definitely not editing the main post because I refuse to let some newbie plagiarist try to pin some kind of forgery accusation on me.

Anyway, I feel like I should share this totally irrelevant but hilarious moment with you all—as I'm sitting here typing this in the shade on my tablet, my loyal little Yorkie is being a total pest, begging for attention and practically climbing up my leg. He’s cute and all, but I swear I had to snap, "Get off my leg, you annoying, irritating little fuzzball." If you could see the look on his face—just this sweet, blankly stupid expression—you'd get why I felt the need to tell you about it. 🙂

Have a good one.


Oh boy... 😍
If only you'd snapped a photo of that face and posted it here. 😍

Sorry for jumping in, gotta run. 🙂

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads