New moderator Mr. Smith is on a power trip

bluelynx52 said:Why would anyone think I need defending? 🤔

As an unbiased observer, I’m just looking at who actually contributed here. There are more of you than there is Casey Bennett. And that’s not even counting the guy who asked me the same question four times—asking why his own ego got deleted. 🙂 Like Casey Bennett would say: "Start your own thread, what are you doing crashing our party?" 🙂

You guys are being way too serious and repetitive. This whole thing was settled on page one. If someone's playing dumb (hopefully they aren't actually dumb), then they're just looking for a laugh. Which is clearly what this thread is for.

Here's a little secret: COVID is over.

(For those who took the shot. Bu-h!)

It is over for me too. I am living my life according to the "old normal" again without having been vaccinated (pure shock and disbelief 😲) and I have zero intention of complying, nor is anyone forcing anything on me with some COVID pass.

Jessica Kelly4 said:So you got rid of him too? Honestly, is there anyone left from the old COVID forums worth reading? Bocecco is still trying... Perma? His idea isn't half bad.

Budu, don't sweat it. You won't find any reason to worry.😉

Ethan Campbell81 said:The moment you actually manage to throw someone off their rhythm, that's when you see what a bunch of lowlifes and frauds they truly are.🤣

Just soft little snowflakes, always being hunted down while you're just trying to pick some wildflowers. 🙂

driftingtinker said:Just soft little snowflakes, always being hunted down while you're just trying to pick some wildflowers. 🙂

Look, you spineless coward, I wasn't addressing you because I don't engage with lower life forms.

Later.

bluelynx52 said:Why would anyone think I need defending? 🤔

As an unbiased observer, I’m just looking at who actually contributed here. There are more of you than there is Casey Bennett. And that’s not even counting the guy who asked me the same question four times—asking why his own ego got deleted. 🙂 Like Casey Bennett would say: "Start your own thread, what are you doing crashing our party?" 🙂

You guys are being way too serious and repetitive. This whole thing was settled on page one. If someone's playing dumb (hopefully they aren't actually dumb), then they're just looking for a laugh. Which is clearly what this thread is for.

Here's a little secret: COVID is over.

(For those who took the shot. Bu-h!)

That being said, could anyone give me an answer to this:



I don't really see the point in starting a whole new thread, but I suppose I could if it’s absolutely necessary.

bluelynx52 said:Why would anyone think I need defending? 🤔

As an unbiased observer, I’m just looking at who actually contributed here. There are more of you than there is Casey Bennett. And that’s not even counting the guy who asked me the same question four times—asking why his own ego got deleted. 🙂 Like Casey Bennett would say: "Start your own thread, what are you doing crashing our party?" 🙂

You guys are being way too serious and repetitive. This whole thing was settled on page one. If someone's playing dumb (hopefully they aren't actually dumb), then they're just looking for a laugh. Which is clearly what this thread is for.

Here's a little secret: COVID is over.

(For those who took the shot. Bu-h!)

No, the topic wasn't finished on page one—it was wrapped up in this specific post on page three or four—

The crux of the issue is that you're showing up as a clone on a thread where you already posted under your original handle, which flies in the face of the rules you personally wrote... and that's a technical issue for which Casey Bennett offered an answer—but since I didn't hear that answer from you, I'll repeat the questions:

Is it true that as the owner, you can just do whatever you want, breaking every single rule you established that we all joined this forum to follow?

Do you consider this a scam against the people who signed up for this forum—especially since nobody was given any notice about the rules changing?

Do you think this is even legally valid?

Jessica Kelly4 said:So you got rid of him too? Honestly, is there anyone left from the old COVID forums worth reading? Bocecco is still trying... Perma? His idea isn't half bad.

Pardoncek, you’ve gone off the deep end into conspiracy theories once again. Somied hasn't been hit with a permanent ban, but rather a temporary suspension for being incredibly rude—which was sent his way to cool things down. I truly hope there won't be a need for a permanent ban once he regains his senses.

By the way, if I recall correctly, we have never actually issued a permanent ban over that whole COVID PDF situation. A few factions split off among the regulars, but that was the extent of it.

But really, this constant atmosphere of terror...

Ethan Campbell81 said:Look, you spineless coward, I wasn't addressing you because I don't engage with lower life forms.

Later.

At least I don't have to hide the fact that I got the shot, unlike you, "hero." 😁

Amy Rogers6 said:The trial in Germany starts on September 11, 2021.

Oh. I see. Is it just me, or does it ring a bell that the date was actually September 11, 2021, rather than November 9? But then again, I can't be too sure when I'm constantly tripping over the difference between American and European date formats. :barbie:
Still, surely we aren't going to start playing fast and loose with dates, as if we were Jehovah's Witnesses obsessed with the apocalypse?
No... certainly not. 🙂

Morgan Peterson said:Pardoncek, you’ve gone off the deep end into conspiracy theories once again. Somied hasn't been hit with a permanent ban, but rather a temporary suspension for being incredibly rude—which was sent his way to cool things down. I truly hope there won't be a need for a permanent ban once he regains his senses.

By the way, if I recall correctly, we have never actually issued a permanent ban over that whole COVID PDF situation. A few factions split off among the regulars, but that was the extent of it.

But really, this constant atmosphere of terror...

There's really no point when you've shoved all your critical thinking into conspiracy theories anyway.

bluelynx52 said:Why would anyone think I need defending? 🤔

As an unbiased observer, I’m just looking at who actually contributed here. There are more of you than there is Casey Bennett. And that’s not even counting the guy who asked me the same question four times—asking why his own ego got deleted. 🙂 Like Casey Bennett would say: "Start your own thread, what are you doing crashing our party?" 🙂

You guys are being way too serious and repetitive. This whole thing was settled on page one. If someone's playing dumb (hopefully they aren't actually dumb), then they're just looking for a laugh. Which is clearly what this thread is for.

Here's a little secret: COVID is over.

(For those who took the shot. Bu-h!)

I'll tell you a secret, too. The people who got vaccinated are the real danger now. They have a license to kill. One infected doctor with a shot in their arm can wreak havoc on an entire hospital ward, all because they have their credentials in their pocket.

Besides, COVID stopped being a boogeyman for regular people a long time ago. You just live with it, like any other illness.

Morgan Peterson said:Oh. I see. Is it just me, or does it ring a bell that the date was actually September 11, 2021, rather than November 9? But then again, I can't be too sure when I'm constantly tripping over the difference between American and European date formats. :barbie:
Still, surely we aren't going to start playing fast and loose with dates, as if we were Jehovah's Witnesses obsessed with the apocalypse?
No... certainly not. 🙂

First off, regarding the Israeli lawsuits at the ICC against apartheid in Israel—there are a ton of cases starting up or about to kick off, I can't even keep track anymore. For instance, I don't know if the one against Fauci has officially started yet, but if it hasn't, it will soon... (Reiner Fuellmich filed the suit back in July, but it doesn't actually start until November 9th—but hey, it's finally confirmed).

On the other hand, the Indian lawsuit against the WHO over Ivermectin has already launched, and that’s gonna be wild. If they get convicted, we're talking life in prison or even the death penalty...☕

Anyway, is the goal here just to troll the thread so coppersailor28 won't answer my questions?

Amy Rogers6 said:No, the topic wasn't finished on page one—it was wrapped up in this specific post on page three or four—

The crux of the issue is that you're showing up as a clone on a thread where you already posted under your original handle, which flies in the face of the rules you personally wrote... and that's a technical issue for which Casey Bennett offered an answer—but since I didn't hear that answer from you, I'll repeat the questions:

Is it true that as the owner, you can just do whatever you want, breaking every single rule you established that we all joined this forum to follow?

Do you consider this a scam against the people who signed up for this forum—especially since nobody was given any notice about the rules changing?

Do you think this is even legally valid?

The core of your posts is simple: you just refuse to accept it. Loud and clear. The answers are there. Or maybe you just don't understand them—but honestly, that’s becoming your problem alone.

Regarding that nickname. Don't use it. Exclusively.It’s always the same person.It’s been explained.
Whether anyone actually buys that explanation or not is irrelevant. It's all the same thing.
Personally, I find that explanation acceptable. Logical. Rational. As for what constitutes an "operative" on any given forum...

So, anyone can just "show up" under a pseudonym. (WATCH OUT!)
In the case of that exact username, An administrative tool. (i.e., in the form of) korisničkog imena @bluelynx52)
...Sure. It’s been approved. Access to that. (Again, Watch out.)In the case of that specific username, An administrative tool..

coppersailor28 said:The core of your posts is simple: you just refuse to accept it. Loud and clear. The answers are there. Or maybe you just don't understand them—but honestly, that’s becoming your problem alone.

Regarding that nickname. Don't use it. Exclusively.It’s always the same person.It’s been explained.
Whether anyone actually buys that explanation or not is irrelevant. It's all the same thing.
Personally, I find that explanation acceptable. Logical. Rational. As for what constitutes an "operative" on any given forum...

So, anyone can just "show up" under a pseudonym. (WATCH OUT!)
In the case of that exact username, An administrative tool. (i.e., in the form of) korisničkog imena @bluelynx52)
...Sure. It’s been approved. Access to that. (Again, Watch out.)In the case of that specific username, An administrative tool..

Where exactly does it say that, and since when? Look, smart guy, I don't care about what makes sense to you personally. I want to see the actual rules or some legal basis explaining why this doesn't apply to the forum owner. And yeah, I want an explanation on whether they’re actually required to notify users via the written rules upon joining the forum... Is that clear enough for you?

And what on earth is GIOD? Honestly, these damn acronyms are enough to drive anyone insane.🤔

Amy Rogers6 said:Where exactly does it say that, and since when? Look, smart guy, I don't care about what makes sense to you personally. I want to see the actual rules or some legal basis explaining why this doesn't apply to the forum owner. And yeah, I want an explanation on whether they’re actually required to notify users via the written rules upon joining the forum... Is that clear enough for you?

It’s on the
FIRST page,
SEVENTH post,
right in YOUR thread:

bluelynx52 said:Of course bluelynx52 is a clone. I can't tell you who's pulling the strings, and honestly, it doesn't matter. More than one person has been using him so far, and that’s how it’ll stay.

Why couldn't some random stranger be a moderator—and a good one at that? You probably realize there's a massive conflict of interest when a regular user jumps into a mod role. Everyone already knows his biases and how skewed his views are. He’s just as predictable in discussions as he is in moderating. A mod like that shouldn't be allowed to both participate and moderate. That's why it's actually great if the new mod is truly a newcomer. Someone without baggage. Or at least, someone you don't know yet. 🙂 And if you eventually figure them out, bluelynx52 will probably have moved on to being someone else by then.

Judging by how fast you jumped to conclusions based on just one neutral post, you're either incredibly perceptive or you just walk into every Reddit thread expecting the worst. I wouldn't call you perceptive, though. You should've known your off-topic post was going to get nuked. That isn't tyranny. It's just the rules.

You've got no reason to assume I won't be an awesome moderator who might actually surprise you. While you're busy holding onto your prejudices, I'll just be focusing on what you actually write moving forward. 🙂

bluelynx52 said:Of course bluelynx52 is a clone. I can't tell you who's pulling the strings, and honestly, it doesn't matter. More than one person has been using him so far, and that’s how it’ll stay.

Why couldn't some random stranger be a moderator—and a good one at that? You probably realize there's a massive conflict of interest when a regular user jumps into a mod role. Everyone already knows his biases and how skewed his views are. He’s just as predictable in discussions as he is in moderating. A mod like that shouldn't be allowed to both participate and moderate. That's why it's actually great if the new mod is truly a newcomer. Someone without baggage. Or at least, someone you don't know yet. 🙂 And if you eventually figure them out, bluelynx52 will probably have moved on to being someone else by then.

Judging by how fast you jumped to conclusions based on just one neutral post, you're either incredibly perceptive or you just walk into every Reddit thread expecting the worst. I wouldn't call you perceptive, though. You should've known your off-topic post was going to get nuked. That isn't tyranny. It's just the rules.

You've got no reason to assume I won't be an awesome moderator who might actually surprise you. While you're busy holding onto your prejudices, I'll just be focusing on what you actually write moving forward. 🙂

You still haven't answered whether the above applies to the PDF world too?

@Amy Rogers6
It's really not right that you're still bringing up the ICC, Israel, and that supposedly accepted COVID lawsuit.
We cleared up those pieces of misinformation a long time ago.

driftingtinker said:At least I don't have to hide the fact that I got the shot, unlike you, "hero." 😁

Pure comedy. This is easily the most ridiculous post on this entire board. 🤣
Then people claim we are paranoid or obsessed with conspiracy theories. 🤣
As if I am some mindless sheep. I have taken four doses because I am just so incredibly progressive and enlightened. My shoulder is so loaded with shots that I might as well start taking them in the groin next. ☕

Let’s make a bet, driftingtinker. We meet for coffee. I will show you my medical records covering the last two years—vaccinations for polio, hepatitis, and so on, though certainly not for COVID. I will also present my COVID passes, which I keep printed, along with every single negative test result from the last 20 months. I travel frequently, so testing is a necessity regardless of vaccination status. If everything I say is true, you will leave this forum forever and never return.
If I am lying, I will pay you $1,000 in cash, fifty-dollar bills. I will publicly admit here that I am a liar and a fraud, and I will request that my profile be deleted so I never appear on this forum again.

Consider this a public challenge. I will cover the bill for dinner, drinks, or whatever else you desire. You can live large on my dime all night if you want. Let’s see how confident you actually are in your claims. You have an incredible opportunity to make easy money while proving that I am nothing more than a common fraud.

If you nonchalantly decline, you simply confirm my assertion: that you are talking nonsense without any basis in reality and that you are merely a spineless coward without a shred of conviction.

Looking forward to hearing from you. 🍿

Regards
Regards Hez

coppersailor28 said:It’s on the
FIRST page,
SEVENTH post,
right in YOUR thread:

If that clone is also posting under their original handle, they're breaking the rules—get it? It’s clearly stated in the forum guidelines—hang on, let me jump over there, grab a quote, and show you...☕

Here——look at rule 9. Actually, now that I'm looking closer, using clones isn't even allowed at all, is it?

Plus, I don't see anything saying moderators can just ignore the forum rules. Care to enlighten me?

Ethan Campbell81 said:Pure comedy. This is easily the most ridiculous post on this entire board. 🤣
Then people claim we are paranoid or obsessed with conspiracy theories. 🤣
As if I am some mindless sheep. I have taken four doses because I am just so incredibly progressive and enlightened. My shoulder is so loaded with shots that I might as well start taking them in the groin next. ☕

Let’s make a bet, driftingtinker. We meet for coffee. I will show you my medical records covering the last two years—vaccinations for polio, hepatitis, and so on, though certainly not for COVID. I will also present my COVID passes, which I keep printed, along with every single negative test result from the last 20 months. I travel frequently, so testing is a necessity regardless of vaccination status. If everything I say is true, you will leave this forum forever and never return.
If I am lying, I will pay you $1,000 in cash, fifty-dollar bills. I will publicly admit here that I am a liar and a fraud, and I will request that my profile be deleted so I never appear on this forum again.

Consider this a public challenge. I will cover the bill for dinner, drinks, or whatever else you desire. You can live large on my dime all night if you want. Let’s see how confident you actually are in your claims. You have an incredible opportunity to make easy money while proving that I am nothing more than a common fraud.

If you nonchalantly decline, you simply confirm my assertion: that you are talking nonsense without any basis in reality and that you are merely a spineless coward without a shred of conviction.

Looking forward to hearing from you. 🍿

Regards
Regards Hez

I was just showing you how easy it is to plant a blatant lie in someone's head when they completely lose their grip on reality—which, honestly, seems to be the standard operating procedure for you and your whole crowd.

Kinda awkward when you run right into your own medicine, isn't it?

BTW, check out my new signature. I'm gonna be rocking it proudly for the next week because, I mean, it’s not every day you get addressed by such a pillar of morality and a true intellectual giant. 😉

BBTW. Congrats, you managed to knock Unknown off the pedestal for my favorite little snowflakes.