CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Sports › Soccer › Offside Chat Archives (2014-2021)

Offside Chat Archives (2014-2021)

Started by Morgan Williams · · 👁 84 views · 18K replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Morgan WilliamsRachel Cooper3Joseph Clark37Keith Patel81darkseal9neonfalcon16urbanhawk17Amanda Evans2bluebison47brightpilot6Patrick MartinJoseph Fisher3steelharbor9Robin Fox2Maria AndersonAnthony Jackson2Jason Newmanruggedjackal46Michelle Palmer6Jeffrey Edwards76Jason Campbell70Anthony Barrett37graniteangler31Dennis Evans6 …
Steven Wood72 Steven Wood72 Member
23 messages
joined Oct 2013
#241 ·
Patrick Martin said:The biggest joke of this whole thing? I honestly can't stand running. Like, at all. It’s just not my vibe.
I’m more about lurking in the shadows, waiting for the right moment... ☕

What a player. 🙏 You'd probably get me banned if you had the chance. ☕
Steven Wood72 Steven Wood72 Member
23 messages
joined Oct 2013
#242 ·
Grace Patel88 said:It had to be something loud and over-the-top, just to reel Jonathan in. Even if he’s playing the troll card claiming he didn't even open it. ☕

I get it, but looking at the big picture, I don't think anyone actually died here. Time to switch to Plan B.

I'm following this daily because I'm genuinely interested. I'm not exactly a tech expert or anything, but wasn't there some way to track cell signals or something similar?

I've seen the question popping up on several different sites.
Grace Patel88 Grace Patel88 Newcomer
6 messages
joined Apr 2014
#243 ·
Steven Wood72 said:I'm following this daily because I'm genuinely interested. I'm not exactly a tech expert or anything, but wasn't there some way to track cell signals or something similar?

I've seen the question popping up on several different sites.

From what I've been reading, the family mentioned that the victim's phone was still receiving calls five days after they went missing! That pretty much rules out any theory about an immediate explosion or a sudden fire. Honestly, man, the idea that nobody has stumbled upon wreckage or any part of the plane a full month after it vanished just doesn't sit right with me—it feels completely surreal!🙂

On a side note, seeing the tension at the local stadium today is wild! It's basically the hometown favorites versus the high-priced mercenaries!☕
Steven Wood72 Steven Wood72 Member
23 messages
joined Oct 2013
#244 ·
Grace Patel88 said:From what I've been reading, the family mentioned that the victim's phone was still receiving calls five days after they went missing! That pretty much rules out any theory about an immediate explosion or a sudden fire. Honestly, man, the idea that nobody has stumbled upon wreckage or any part of the plane a full month after it vanished just doesn't sit right with me—it feels completely surreal!🙂

On a side note, seeing the tension at the local stadium today is wild! It's basically the hometown favorites versus the high-priced mercenaries!☕

Here is their explanation for why those phones might ring:

Families are caught off guard because they aren't getting voicemail, but experts claim that in certain instances, you'll hear a ringtone immediately after hitting the call button.

'That doesn't actually mean the phone you're calling is ringing,' claims analyst Jeff Kagan. He added that once a call is placed, the network starts searching for the device, initially basing its search on the last known location. From there, the search area expands, and if nothing turns up, the call simply drops.

The search can be instantaneous or take several seconds. During that window, depending on the model, the carrier, and other variables, the phone may ring to signal the caller that a connection attempt is being made. While the caller might hear four rings, the person being called might only hear one—or none at all.

http://edition.cnn.com/world/news/missing-flight-investigation...
Grace Patel88 Grace Patel88 Newcomer
6 messages
joined Apr 2014
#245 ·
Look, I’m certainly no expert, and I didn't catch every single detail of the report, but 🤷 all I know is that it feels incredibly surreal. We live in an era where we have enough high-tech surveillance and military hardware to track a mosquito from orbit, yet somehow, after a full month, nobody can pinpoint the wreckage of a plane the size of a massive football stadium. It just doesn't add up. It's absolutely 🙏 crazy
.
Matthew Anderson4 Matthew Anderson4 Regular
598 messages
joined Jun 2013
#246 ·
Yeah, there's probably nothing left of him after splashing into the Indian Ocean and sinking miles down. Remember how it took two years to find the black box from that Air France flight that went down in the Atlantic back in '09? They got lucky because they found the wreckage almost immediately—mostly just because the plane didn't pull any weird maneuvers like this Malaysian one, so they knew exactly where to look before it sank or the fuel slick vanished. On the flip side, by the time these guys realized their plane had veered off course and started searching the right spot, enough time had passed for all the evidence to vanish from the surface. Without scanning the seafloor, they aren't finding anything. That black box signal only narrows the search area down to the size of New Jersey, which doesn't help much since you won't know jack until someone actually dives down there.

It definitely hit the water. If it had hit land, they would've found it by day two. It went down; nobody hijacked it or any of that nonsense.
Steven Wood72 Steven Wood72 Member
23 messages
joined Oct 2013
#247 ·
Matthew Anderson4 said:Yeah, there's probably nothing left of him after splashing into the Indian Ocean and sinking miles down. Remember how it took two years to find the black box from that Air France flight that went down in the Atlantic back in '09? They got lucky because they found the wreckage almost immediately—mostly just because the plane didn't pull any weird maneuvers like this Malaysian one, so they knew exactly where to look before it sank or the fuel slick vanished. On the flip side, by the time these guys realized their plane had veered off course and started searching the right spot, enough time had passed for all the evidence to vanish from the surface. Without scanning the seafloor, they aren't finding anything. That black box signal only narrows the search area down to the size of New Jersey, which doesn't help much since you won't know jack until someone actually dives down there.

It definitely hit the water. If it had hit land, they would've found it by day two. It went down; nobody hijacked it or any of that nonsense.

I watched a show where they argued it’s impossible for the signal to just vanish like that. Some expert claimed you'd need an explosion so massive it would have pulverized the plane into literal dust in a split second—and that’s nearly impossible.
Robin Fox2 Robin Fox2 Regular
523 messages
joined Apr 2016
#248 ·
Isn't the entire point of black boxes being their indestructible nature? And shouldn't they be transmitting some kind of signal so they can actually be located? Or what, you just find them if you happen to be standing right next to them... 🤣 either way, they're utterly useless.
boldfox88 boldfox88 Active Member
130 messages
joined Aug 2012
#249 ·
How does it feel now that I've proven you both were completely in the dark?

Here is the proof: http://www.nytimes.com/news/mysteries/productivity.html

☕
Steven Wood72 Steven Wood72 Member
23 messages
joined Oct 2013
#250 ·
I’ve seen this theory floating around here before. ☕

Here’s another one for you:

http://www.nytimes.com/crazy-conspiracy-theories.../1182203/

Honestly—it feels like watching Lost. ☕
Matthew Anderson4 Matthew Anderson4 Regular
598 messages
joined Jun 2013
#251 ·
Black boxes are indestructible, sure, but if the battery dies after a month, they're basically paperweights 🙏
Matthew Anderson4 Matthew Anderson4 Regular
598 messages
joined Jun 2013
#252 ·
http://truthnewsinternational.files....s008671381.pdf

so this patent is under the Rothschilds now. maybe someone who actually knows their stuff can explain what kind of doomsday weapon we're looking at here ☕
Jason Campbell70 Jason Campbell70 Veteran
1K messages
joined Jun 2017
#253 ·
Robin Fox2 said:Do you think you could actually land it? 🍿

Well, if we're going by the latest research— Do women, men with a bit more weight are more attractive. Is that just me?

Robin Fox2 said:I can't quite grasp why people are laughing... seeing how Messi barely breaks a sweat on the pitch, I can only assume his fans aren't particularly fond of physical exertion either ☕

Meanwhile, back at VRM, we actually look like our idols.
steelharbor9 steelharbor9 Active Member
198 messages
joined Jul 2012
#254 ·
graniteangler31 said:Fast forward twenty or thirty years when sports teams are being snatched up by massive conglomerates and every single game is locked behind some expensive PPV subscription, there’s gonna be a handful of us visionaries still sitting here, probably laughing at how right we were. ☕

Anyway, just checking in after my 10kth post of pure, unadulterated constructive brilliance. 👋

How did graniteangler31's post count jump like that? I mean, wow. Just... wow. Yawn.
Jesse Sullivan5 Jesse Sullivan5 Regular
309 messages
joined Aug 2018
#255 ·
Yes, yes—that is actually a really solid question! I'm going to shoot him a private message right now to see what he thinks.
Michelle Palmer6 Michelle Palmer6 Regular
432 messages
joined Sep 2018
#256 ·
I know ☕
Jesse Sullivan5 Jesse Sullivan5 Regular
309 messages
joined Aug 2018
#257 ·
He says they’ve been breaking his constructive posts down into several smaller ones—can you believe that?
bluebison47 bluebison47 Regular
469 messages
joined Jul 2012
#258 ·
Both of them? I suppose... maybe.
Michelle Palmer6 Michelle Palmer6 Regular
432 messages
joined Sep 2018
#259 ·
bluebison47 said:Both of them? I suppose... maybe.

Yes, we broke them down letter by letter!
Jesse Sullivan5 Jesse Sullivan5 Regular
309 messages
joined Aug 2018
#260 ·
bluebison47 said:Both of them? I suppose... maybe.

Only those specific ones—and I mean truly constructive ones—because, honestly, there are thousands upon thousands of helpful suggestions out there!

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads