Offside Chat Archives (2014-2021)

Can someone please walk me through the psychological profile of an individual who spends their entire existence on this forum attacking a local politician like Mayor Adams, only to turn around and start swooning over Putin's portrait... honestly, I just can't wrap my head around it... 🤷 It’s perfectly clear to me 🙏 that while his rhetoric remains predictably consistent—which I suppose is one way to look at it—this specific contradiction feels less like a political shift and more like a complete break from reality... there's really no other explanation...

It’s like saying you loathe LeBron James but absolutely worship Cristiano Ronaldo.

Honestly, Keith Miller30, if you look closely, Bandic and Putin are pretty much cut from the same cloth on a lot of levels.

They’re pretty much cut from the same cloth since they both end up obsessing over Ronaldo anyway.

restlesssurfer97 said:The line between stuff we just don't know yet and stuff we haven't even begun to wrap our heads around is super thin, just a little correction there 😂

Has science actually taken issue with you personally? 🤣

This is quite possibly one of the most effective commercials I've seen for a bee-related product lately.

Feel free to share your thoughts over on YouTube

Dropkick Murphys - Rose Tattoo

🙏 🙏 🙏 🙏 🙏

write about Tiesto's very first gig, haha

Just give YouTube the slip, man.

Keith Miller30 said:Has science actually taken issue with you personally? 🤣

Nah, not really. I’m actually a huge fan of tech breakthroughs, I’m all about physics, and honestly, math is basically my playground.

But here’s the thing... since religion doesn't have these rigid "scientific foundations," does that just mean it's irrelevant or something? Just because there isn't a "scientific explanation" for everything, does it just vanish? Isn't that a bit hypocritical if you think about it?

Look, I'm just sitting here saying that God created the wormhole and keeps it running.

They didn't just flop or anything, they actually handled themselves pretty well under pressure

restlesssurfer97 said:Nah, not really. I’m actually a huge fan of tech breakthroughs, I’m all about physics, and honestly, math is basically my playground.

But here’s the thing... since religion doesn't have these rigid "scientific foundations," does that just mean it's irrelevant or something? Just because there isn't a "scientific explanation" for everything, does it just vanish? Isn't that a bit hypocritical if you think about it?

Look, I'm just sitting here saying that God created the wormhole and keeps it running.

I understand where you're coming from, though I couldn't help but get the impression that you might be being a little too critical of science itself. ☕

So, what you're basically trying to tell me is that I'm just way too much for people to handle, right?

restlesssurfer97 said:Nah, not really. I’m actually a huge fan of tech breakthroughs, I’m all about physics, and honestly, math is basically my playground.

But here’s the thing... since religion doesn't have these rigid "scientific foundations," does that just mean it's irrelevant or something? Just because there isn't a "scientific explanation" for everything, does it just vanish? Isn't that a bit hypocritical if you think about it?

Look, I'm just sitting here saying that God created the wormhole and keeps it running.

Look, I actually asked you something here. ☕

restlesssurfer97 said:So, what you're basically trying to tell me is that I'm just way too much for people to handle, right?

Exactly. ☕

restlesssurfer97 said:Look, we all know Ronaldo is the undisputed GOAT, everything else is just people talking just to hear themselves speak.

You know, you've actually hit the nail on the head there. It’s pretty much an undisputed fact that Ronaldo stands alone at the top, isn't it? Everything else is just noise and endless debate, so why not let Matthew Anderson4 try to make a case for anyone else being better than CR7? 🙏

You know, in a situation like this, I find myself wanting to give the scientists a bit of a nudge:

It really comes down to genetics. Messi possesses a certain trait that Ronaldo simply lacks; the Argentine carries a genetic predisposition that fuels his creativity and sheer inventiveness on the pitch. Left-footed players tend to excel at generating ideas through methods that explore a much wider array of solutions, which is why Messi always seems to find an extra option that Ronaldo misses.

This was actually the conclusion of a collaborative study conducted by Oxford, St. Andrews, and Bristol, alongside several Australian institutions. The research suggested that players whose primary foot is the left hold a distinct tactical advantage over right-footed counterparts.

That specific gene Messi carries seems to have gone somewhat dormant lately, hasn't it? It’s been nearly three years since he last went four league games without scoring, but perhaps that slump is behind him, considering he netted twice against Milan in Barca's 3-1 Champions League victory last night.

The gene that’s been lying dormant 😂

restlesssurfer97 said:Nah, not really. I’m actually a huge fan of tech breakthroughs, I’m all about physics, and honestly, math is basically my playground.

But here’s the thing... since religion doesn't have these rigid "scientific foundations," does that just mean it's irrelevant or something? Just because there isn't a "scientific explanation" for everything, does it just vanish? Isn't that a bit hypocritical if you think about it?

Look, I'm just sitting here saying that God created the wormhole and keeps it running.

restlesssurfer97 said:Look, I actually asked you something here. ☕

Hypocritical how? It’s not failing to exist, it’s failing at science. Is it hypocritical that a woman can't compete in the men's bracket at the US Open just because she lacks the hardware? Or is it just that religion doesn't use the scientific method?

And what are you even trying to explain with your hypothesis? These scientists you're critiquing with your wormhole theory are trying to figure out what black holes actually are and how they work. If they're right, they actually explain things and help us understand the world. If you're right, we still don't know anything about black holes. Science looks for the "how," while religion goes for the "why." Honestly, those scientists' wormhole theories aren't even clashing with yours; both could be true at once.

damn

Cut the lies already
...

myself, my photo