Offside Chat Archives (2014-2021)

Morgan Hill84 said:Aha, nice. A piece of paper that’s supposed to stop a man from hitting his wife, or vice versa. Brilliant solution!

Alois, did you go beat up your wife today?
No.
Why?
Because they handed me some paperwork.

😂

ironpanther5 said:So, is this whole Constantinople mess and the leftist globalist meltdown actually any different from Markić's marriage initiative? It feels just as pointless because we already have everything we need covered under existing laws, it’s going to be an absolute money pit to implement, and honestly, it’s kind of embarrassing—I mean, thanks to Markić we're stuck with idiocy baked into our Constitution, and now we'll probably have some supranational body hovering over us like a vulture.

It’s just damn near impossible to stay rational when you're either a religious zealot or a hardcore leftist.

For heaven's sake, there are already international treaties... Take the Geneva Convention, the Convention on the Rights of the Child, and so on. Now we are just adding one more convention to the pile.

It's no big deal.
Unless, of course, you find it shameful that America might follow some silly convention that prevents men from beating women.

Anthony Jackson2 said:Seriously, where’s the hysteria? I’m just poking fun at the brainless clerics over at Hrast and the idiots in the Republican Party—hardly a meltdown.

Then you’ve got the crowd from the daily news outlets rambling about "uprisings and unrest in Australia"🤣, and the group terrified that men are going to sneak into women's restrooms just to cause trouble in a stall—pure nonsense. Who exactly is being hysterical here?

If anyone’s actually done something wrong, let them be the first one to take a shot at it.

In Adezej's poll, 2/3 are backing IK, but if you look at the comments on any news site, everyone's absolutely against it. #faithbasedpoll

loneseal said:In Adezej's poll, 2/3 are backing IK, but if you look at the comments on any news site, everyone's absolutely against it. #faithbasedpoll

Look, I have zero interest in defending the Republican Party's polling numbers, but we have to face reality: the people who feel the burning need to comment on every single article online are usually a pretty small, and often extremely radical, minority.

loneseal said:In Adezej's poll, 2/3 are backing IK, but if you look at the comments on any news site, everyone's absolutely against it. #faithbasedpoll

The only meaningful poll in America is actually pretty clear ☕

honestly, I’m almost afraid to ask which specific news sites we're talking about 🤣

Looks like we’re gonna have to get circumcised too now
We in Norval are totally against it

Justin James10 said:The Leftists.

You call them lefties... please. Anthony Jackson2, you're looking redder than a bell pepper right now.

Honestly, even Plenki is having a hard time making sense of this one.

We can always choose the right wing, led by Bujancc and his crew of elite scientists who truly understand how to help America best...

Well... because there's just nothing ridiculous on the left side! 🙏

Of course there are, but this one right here is the most recent 😁

If you haven't seen it yet, enjoy ☕

The show is basically a walking nightmare; there’s no debating that. It's just wild how Bujati keeps acting like he's some serious intellectual when, honestly, Malnar was the ultimate class act who actually knew how to have a laugh.

Beyond that, these extreme right-wingers are practically National Socialists in disguise—because the moment you start talking about actual economics, they turn into hardcore Bolsheviks.

The thing is, Bujati barely got a word in because this guy was just on another level; I think he managed maybe five sentences in an entire hour🤣

As for Malnar, yeah, he’s definitely missed👍

When it comes to political options, I don't recall any of them having someone who actually understands business or offers even remotely sensible ideas... It's all just extremes, from trying to maintain the mess we have now to talking about nationalizing banks and everything else. There's nothing halfway reasonable in the whole situation

I’ve been scrolling through Facebook lately, and honestly, people are just mourning the death of our society, writing little epitaphs for a culture they think is dying because, as of yesterday, anyone can claim to be whatever they want, and everyone else is expected to play along.

All because the Government decided to adopt some new convention.

Look, if you were a fool yesterday, you’re still going to be a fool tomorrow; no amount of conventions is going to change that reality.😂

brightpilot6 said:I’ve been scrolling through Facebook lately, and honestly, people are just mourning the death of our society, writing little epitaphs for a culture they think is dying because, as of yesterday, anyone can claim to be whatever they want, and everyone else is expected to play along.

All because the Government decided to adopt some new convention.

Look, if you were a fool yesterday, you’re still going to be a fool tomorrow; no amount of conventions is going to change that reality.😂

Now Yellow will jump in to explain how this is just leftist hysteria.

Anthony Jackson2 said:Now Yellow will jump in to explain how this is just leftist hysteria.

But honestly, it’s happening on that side too; everyone is clinging to this overblown nonsense as if their very lives depended on it. I can't help myself, though—it's just too funny watching those who previously swallowed everything Markić and Batarelo were selling.

Back when old man Sanders introduced gender identity into the Anti-Discrimination Act way back in 2008, you didn't hear a peep from the widows, the skeptics, or even the highly esteemed Bishops' Conference; they had no clue what was happening. But now that they’ve been enlightened by the real experts from Idaho and Texas, suddenly everyone is spiraling into a massive mental breakdown. 🙏🙏

They love to say, "just wait and see what happens in ten years"... Well, here I am, looking, and seeing absolutely nothing.

Quote:

"Picture this scenario: some radical feminist walks into a marriage—let's say she marries a veteran or even your own son—and then uses this Convention to kick him right out of his family estate, leaving him to foot the bill for her and the child. From there, she could just bring home another partner, while he’s stuck paying for everything as these lesbian communists tear his relationship with his kid apart."

Defenders are far too principled to enter into marriages with people like that.

"It is perfectly clear that believers who hold the Church and its teachings in high regard are expected to follow what the Church teaches, what the Pope preaches, and what the bishops instruct; indeed, it is expected that the faithful listen to what the bishops say. Those who embrace false doctrines regarding gender ideology are effectively excluding themselves and deviating from the core teachings of the Church," stated Puljić.

These people are merely threatening self-excommunication—it's nothing more than a circus.🤣

sesve said:What exactly is the distinction between a feminist and a lesbian communist?🤷

From what I’ve gathered, it seems the first was merely latent, whereas the second actually saw its intentions through to fruition.