CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Sports › Soccer › Feedback & Suggestions: PDF Soccer League Operations

Feedback & Suggestions: PDF Soccer League Operations

Started by Alex Cook · · 👁 47 views · 1.3K replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Alex CookRyan Vaughn7Anthony Jackson2Dennis Evans6Carol Lewisanaloggull4Walter Grant5Michelle Palmer6Casey White13Matthew Anderson4brightpilot6Jerry Rogers6Ronald HallJessica Rogers2rapidstag2graniteheron132Anthony Barrett37David Anderson72Douglas KernLarry Fox5dustyridge3darkmarlin16Patrick Martinwiredcanyon39 …
feralotter2 feralotter2 Member
13 messages
joined Nov 2012
#361 ·
and why on earth would an entire group from one of Europe's elite tournaments
be dropped into the American soccer scene? 🤷

sure, our representative is playing—but they're essentially just a guest in this European
circuit... honestly, it looks absolutely ridiculous to see a Champions League group stage set up within the context of American
soccer—just enough to include all four of our domestic clubs at once 🤷
boldhound8 boldhound8 Regular
437 messages
joined Oct 2007
#362 ·
Alex Cook said:Whoa, look at you, still reading this stuff. 🙂

You probably haven't been lurking in the IMF Betting section for long enough, so let me break it down for you—and explain why everyone seems so terrified of the moderator, acting like he's some kind of boogeyman.

Because back in the day—like, a year or two ago—this place actually had that classic old-school forum vibe...
AC Milan to win both ways at 1.37
PSG handicap at 1.43
Real Madrid win at 1.02

$133, bet the house on it☕

Milan's gonna screw you over🙂

They won't.

And that's it—thanks for nothing—that style of posting is ancient history. Anyone who still wants to write like that should probably just go find some other bottom-tier trash site to hang out on.

Fans have even more overlap with football, which is why they barely even mention it here—there's an entire sub-forum dedicated just to that crap.🤷
Look, you don't have to take my word for it. I've done my part. I'm not for it, I'm not against it, and honestly? I don't give a single damn how it all turns out.😁
Eric Fox7 Eric Fox7 Regular
320 messages
joined Jul 2012
#363 ·
boldhound8 said:Fans have even more overlap with football, which is why they barely even mention it here—there's an entire sub-forum dedicated just to that crap.🤷
Look, you don't have to take my word for it. I've done my part. I'm not for it, I'm not against it, and honestly? I don't give a single damn how it all turns out.😁

🤣

He totally forgot to mention that we actually rolled out a rule requiring everyone to give a little reasoning for the pairs they're playing—not that you need to write a whole novel or anything, just one quick sentence should do the trick.

What he was really trying to say between the lines is that I’m just being a difficult guy. 🙂
Anthony Jackson2 Anthony Jackson2 Regular
605 messages
joined Jul 2009
#364 ·
David Anderson72 said:Fair enough. I’m starting to see that they were right. When a few people start acting like dictators and bullying everyone on a forum, if you don't push back, you eventually just have to walk away. They weren't the first to do this, and they won't be the last. I've seen this play out on other message boards before—a group splits off to start a new community, resulting in a smaller, more focused, and significantly higher-quality space.

If you actually bothered to visit any of those other forums—the ones that actually matter—you'd see they’re far more active and high-quality. Just an observation.

Bryan Adams6 said:Why don't we just spin up a dedicated thread for Messi vs. Ronaldo or Barca vs. Real and let them go at it there? Then on the main board, we can just hit 'em hard and fast with penalties if they get out of line.😕

Tried to make it work—not really successful. This topic always ends up circling right back to the Example.

boldhound8 said:Anyway, the newer guys might not remember, but the Betting sub-forum was created specifically to pull all those scattered threads from every corner of the site into one single spot—that’s literally the entire point of having a sub-forum.
Starting a new betting thread here wouldn't break the concept of the Betting sub-forum (IMF), but it raises a massive question: what's even the point?🤷 If we're using the logic of keeping things "local" so people don't have to wander around, then fine, let's just open an IT topic or a US topic under the Football section too. I mean, why the hell should I go over to the US board just because I'm single? If I'm a local here, I stay here.😁

Personally, I don't care either way, I just wanted to remind everyone how the Betting sub-forum actually came to be.🙂 As far as I'm concerned, you can open 22 different betting threads if you want...

I agree—though I think the Casino would lose some regulars because of it. Anyone who gets tossed out for a red card would just end up moving over here. analoggull4 showed us exactly how that works. ☕

feralotter2 said:I’m just wondering if win rates actually improve for those who write three lines explaining why
Bayern should win versus someone just picking Anderlecht 1? They really ought to run
some kind of study—personally, I think the odds stay the same since both sides play
based on the stats anyway...

Take Greece as an example 👍—I used to love it before people started over-explaining everything, and now it's just noise.
When someone attaches a whole novel to a single pick, even if they are a top-tier tipster... I don't see how it makes them
any better than when they were just posting 👍 simple picks.

Injuries, suspensions—that kind of intel is always useful —but writing a manifesto about every little detail is usually just
pointless rambling.

It’s not that there's too much going on—it’s just getting tedious. Everyone is just dropping pairs without any context—it looks like spam at this point. Nobody bothers to give a single reason for their picks, so we're all left guessing if there's actually any logic behind it or not.

ruggedjackal46 said:I’m a regular participant in both the constructive and destructive chaos within the La Liga thread, so I figured I’d weigh in on things for a bit.

Look, I think tightening up the moderation isn't a bad idea, but we have to be careful not to turn this thread into some sterile, sanitized imitation of a "serious" debate. Unlike other threads—take the Premier League or Serie A, for example—the La Liga section is a place where people can go at each other tooth and nail one minute and then move on without any lingering resentment the next. Because of that, I don't think there's a need to make a massive drama out of trolling, nor should we try to completely eradicate it. This is supposed to be an escape from real life; people come here specifically to mess around and troll. The forum should allow for that, to a certain extent.

As far as new users and actual quality content goes, I’m all for moderators cracking down on trolls and those mindless arguments that constantly stifle newcomers and meaningful discussion. However, if you're going to punish the nonsense, the mods actually need to find a way to encourage the good stuff. It’s not enough to just delete posts and expect high-level discourse to magically manifest itself out of thin air. It’s not as if there are thirty die-hard fans of various Spanish clubs sitting on the sidelines too intimidated to join the fray. And it’s not like those of us already here don't know how to be constructive—it’s just that, frankly, we often don't feel like it. If you could occasionally nudge us toward being productive while still allowing a little room for trolling, I think this thread would work perfectly for everyone.

This thread has spiraled a few times now, and honestly, it’s irrelevant. Just because there’s no bad blood between you doesn't mean someone looking in from the outside won't see a complete circus. It’s not entertaining, it’s not interesting, and it’s definitely not constructive. Not that I haven't said this before.

Every thread on this forum is moderated loosely—there's always room for a bit of trolling. You all just pushed that freedom way too far.

Alex Cook said:image

The wolf is fed, the sheep are counted, the office grind continues with the usual suspects on their machines, and Anderson is finally cutting checks for Sterling.

Dennis Evans6 is at it again, even though it's only Tuesday!

🤣🤣

Ashley Bailey6 said:The point is to be able to debate with people we already know, all while keeping everything in one single place.
This is just for casual conversation. We aren't robots. There are no strict rules here, other than the standard requirement to be respectful.

Don't tell me your love life is just as tied to gambling as football is.

I don't get what the issue is.

You want to jump into a thread like Dinamo’s LP group? There isn't room for two constructive posts there. It makes no sense. You can't mention what you bought or why you bought it, give a little brag later, or even vent about needing a smoke. There just isn't any space for it.

Are you interested in consulting with people here? Just asking, since you're already reading this subforum.

And?
We’re getting to a point where even putting a period at the end of a sentence will be called trolling. It's just another vague term people use to manipulate things subjectively.

The truth is, the moderators just don't want to deal with managing another thread. That's the real issue, and people are just afraid to say it plainly.

Maybe you should take those kinds of threads to the Vegas sportsbook forums instead.🤷

You want to be in a thread like the Dallas Cowboys fan group where there are barely two constructive posts because it’s pointless, mention what you did, why you did it, brag a little later, or just vent because you're stressed—but you aren't allowed to. There's nowhere to go.

It's not that you aren't allowed—that was always permitted. But you really crossed the line on this one.

At this rate, even a period at the end of a sentence will be labeled as trolling—just another subjective, vague term used to manipulate things.

won't be

The thing is—it’s really just about them not wanting to moderate another thread—but nobody wants to be the one to actually say it out loud.

Yeah... There are already 20 active threads on the forum—it shouldn't be a huge burden to handle one more, especially one like this.
Ashley Bailey6 Ashley Bailey6 Active Member
208 messages
joined Jun 2013
#365 ·
Alright, fine. I’m out.
David Anderson72 David Anderson72 Active Member
135 messages
joined Jun 2011
#366 ·
Routine business. We certainly didn't expect anyone to actually show up and say: we were wrong.
Anthony Jackson2 Anthony Jackson2 Regular
605 messages
joined Jul 2009
#367 ·
Where exactly did we go wrong? What was the goal—to clean up the absolute worst thread on this entire site in the three and a half years I’ve been hanging around here?

If there was an error, it’s just that we weren't decisive enough about it.

Maybe some posts shouldn't have been nuked—but when you have to delete half a thread just to make it readable, it's inevitable that some things get caught in the crossfire. It brings me back to what I said last night: if one post goes, everything directly tied to it has to go too—whether they were being provocative or actually constructive.
Walter Grant5 Walter Grant5 Regular
459 messages
joined Oct 2012
#368 ·
Why is it that on certain threads, some mods jump into useless arguments with users, basically threatening them with a "next time you're getting a ban" while dodging the actual necessary discussions about how the PDF works on the thread meant specifically for that issue?
Anthony Jackson2 Anthony Jackson2 Regular
605 messages
joined Jul 2009
#369 ·
get to the point—what are you actually talking about?

if you're referring to my warning regarding the Examples yesterday, I don't see what the issue is.

as for avoiding discussion, everyone here has had their questions answered 🤷
Morgan Foster Morgan Foster Active Member
59 messages
joined Nov 2012
#370 ·
It isn’t a bad thing if someone drops a prediction right in the middle of a thread for a specific game—especially when it includes interesting details like what we've seen here... I mean, yes, I am curious about the odds for certain matchups 🙄
But starting an entirely new betting thread just for that 🤷
I think it would be much cleaner for those who don't follow everything closely or just prefer reading a specific discussion topic.
Walter Grant5 Walter Grant5 Regular
459 messages
joined Oct 2012
#371 ·
Anthony Jackson2 said:get to the point—what are you actually talking about?

if you're referring to my warning regarding the Examples yesterday, I don't see what the issue is.

as for avoiding discussion, everyone here has had their questions answered 🤷

Why aren't we allowed to talk about how the mods are running things if the whole topic is "The Functioning of the Soccer Subreddit"? Mod behavior directly affects how this sub actually works.
Anthony Jackson2 Anthony Jackson2 Regular
605 messages
joined Jul 2009
#372 ·
Walter Grant5 said:Why aren't we allowed to talk about how the mods are running things if the whole topic is "The Functioning of the Soccer Subreddit"? Mod behavior directly affects how this sub actually works.


You can say whatever you want—even if you didn't weigh in on that previous post—but complaints about moderator conduct belong in the formal review channel. That’s where they actually get seen by the people responsible for evaluating staff performance.

This thread is strictly for crowdsourcing suggestions to improve Football PDF—nothing else. Zero tolerance for spam or off-topic chatter. It’s meant solely for fleshing out the ideas already put on the table. Ashley Bailey6Yeah, those kinds of ideas will be considered—everything else is getting wiped from the thread.
Walter Grant5 Walter Grant5 Regular
459 messages
joined Oct 2012
#373 ·
Alright, just drop it. I’m not filing any complaints against the mods. I was just making an objective observation, not saying I actually wanted to whine about it. Someone else was complaining about a page a bit ago and got told not to do that.
darkmarlin16 darkmarlin16 Veteran
1K messages
joined Nov 2015
#374 ·
Seriously, why hasn't anyone actually done anything about these clones yet, like, can't we just track their IP addresses or something? 🤷
Anthony Jackson2 Anthony Jackson2 Regular
605 messages
joined Jul 2009
#375 ·
Which clones are we talking about? These offside calls are a total joke—pretty obvious to everyone, I guess 🤷
darkmarlin16 darkmarlin16 Veteran
1K messages
joined Nov 2015
#376 ·
Anthony Jackson2 said:Which clones are we talking about? These offside calls are a total joke—pretty obvious to everyone, I guess 🤷

honestly, it doesn't feel like some harmless little prank to me when someone’s out here actively impersonating my identity just to drag my name through the mud. 🙄
Anthony Jackson2 Anthony Jackson2 Regular
605 messages
joined Jul 2009
#377 ·
to feels like 🤷

all in all—if someone thought they were dealing with your clone, they’d have found out via some kind of penalty—but since you didn't get anything, I don't see any reason to keep dragging this through the forum.
Anthony Barrett37 Anthony Barrett37 Active Member
68 messages
joined Mar 2011
#378 ·
I wonder when they'll finally allow us to use clones on the same thread and quote our own posts?
Anthony Jackson2 Anthony Jackson2 Regular
605 messages
joined Jul 2009
#379 ·
Using Offsides as a discussion topic is mostly fine—it's tolerated there—but not on other threads 🙂

Please stop cluttering this thread with useless posts.
feralgardener36 feralgardener36 Newcomer
7 messages
joined Oct 2012
#380 ·
Anthony Jackson2 said:Using Offsides as a discussion topic is mostly fine—it's tolerated there—but not on other threads 🙂

Please stop cluttering this thread with useless posts.

Then why have I been banned multiple times by one of the moderators in that exact same Offside chat thread? 🙂

Different standards, or does someone here just not know how to do their job?

I'd like an answer.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads