dustyharbor18 said:If you were being vague when you said, "the Democratic Party started showing up," maybe you were trying to imply that I'm the one sending Democratic types this kind of content. I guess.
I am emphasizing that. Still happening. I guess. I didn't send any Democratic messages regarding the partial ban to anyone, so I certainly didn't send them to you.
If anyone actually cares about the massive contributions made by the users who got banned from Alternative, feel free to check out the last ten pages of this thread:
To those who have suddenly decided to play the "freedom of speech" card for no reason at all: I suppose you think that masking your petty personal agendas behind a veil of stupidity and nonsense will work. It won't. You can't hide your true motives forever with just empty talk and smoke and mirrors.
Look, we can disagree on the facts, and I'm not going to get into a debate over who sent what toxic garbage. But please, just give me an answer: why did I get a partial ban? Show me the posts you're talking about—and show yours too. Honestly, if you're going to point at someone else's post, show the whole context, including your own replies. In my case, that's easy to do because when I post on the Alternative board, I rarely insult anyone. I try to be a normal guy, unless someone pushes my buttons. I mean, if someone drops a huge 🤦 /picture of Captain Picard, that's just straight-up disrespect to another user. When I asked you that question about family and feminism, you dodged it, told me how you read novels "between the lines," basically called me a primitive nationalist, and then left Steve to answer the feminism question for you. You claim nothing important ever changes in the world, and that I'm just some crazy person imagining things—which you showed with a facepalm—but then, as soon as I replied, you pivoted to talking about nations and the clergy like they're some big negative thing. Look, I don't care if I'm wrong; I admit I love my heritage, but I have nothing to do with the clergy. So, I'm asking you again: why am I the one getting a partial ban while Steve... and all the other guys who were way more obnoxious, argumentative, and aggressive, didn't get anything? If I'm banned, tell me why they aren't. Thanks. The way this looks is totally one-sided, like bans aren't based on what was actually written, but on which "group" you belong to—something most people on the Alternative board can't even see. This is also the first time I've been banned and had all my posts wiped at once. It feels like someone really doesn't want people seeing what was actually said. Well, at least mine were easy to delete; there were only about five of them anyway.
P.S. The messages were sent, that's a fact. I'm not claiming *you* sent them; I'm just saying they were sent. Thanks in advance for the reply.