northerncrane66 said:Let's dig this topic back up from the ashes. November is Men's Health Awareness Month, after all. Are you guys planning on getting a checkup sometime this month?
I’ve actually been chewing on this topic for a few years now. If we’re talking specifically about prostate cancer, it feels like other health issues just don't carry that same sense of immediate danger, doesn't it?😁
But after spending way too much time digging through Google searches, I eventually stumbled upon the idea that early screening might not even be all it's cracked up to be.
This link leads to a PDF document regarding prostate cancer screening.
Back in 2013, a review from the Cochrane database revealed some pretty interesting findings:
- Screening increases the detection rate of prostate cancer by about 1.3 times.
- It allows us to catch localized prostate cancer 1.79 times more often.
but here's the kicker:
- After reviewing five major randomized studies involving a massive pool of 341,000 patients, they didn't see any actual change in mortality rates caused by prostate cancer.
- Furthermore, looking at four large randomized studies, there was no significant impact on overall mortality rates either.
The reality is that modern medicine still hasn't found a definitive cure for prostate cancer, and it’s also true that almost every man alive today will eventually face prostate cancer—assuming we don't pass away from something else first. It seems almost inevitable, much like death itself. For instance, over 90% of men older than 90 have it, and I believe it's closer to 50% or 60% for those in their 70s.
The silver lining, if you can call it that, is that prostate cancer typically progresses so slowly that most people end up passing away from something entirely unrelated before it ever becomes an issue.
So many seniors pass away without ever even knowing they had it.
Which basically suggests that early diagnosis might not offer much real-world benefit. Most of these various studies seem to point toward very similar conclusions.