CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Sports › Other Sports › Martial Arts & Combat Sports › General Chat & Info Board

General Chat & Info Board

Started by Megan White4 · · 👁 110 views · 3.5K replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Megan White4Melissa Williams25Roger Smith6George Alvarez13Jeffrey Longbriskjackal5placidbison20Gerald Smith76Jamie Fowler2Jonathan Johnson67Brandon Carter2Matthew SanchezTyler Edwards53driftinglynx7restlessmarlin6AJoseph Johnson6Lisa Torres2Nicole Lee43crimsonbison10Paul Peterson8Austin Phillips3Zachary Mendoza17mistypanther …
rustyangler02 rustyangler02 Member
35 messages
joined Dec 2007
#661 ·
Kick-boxing... honestly, that session this Saturday sounds like the most interesting part of the whole thing. Let me know once you're 100% sure about sitting for the exam. It surprises me that you don't have the exact date set yet—I usually start prepping months in advance for mine. Anyway, looks like we're colleagues now (french fries)...
briskjackal5 briskjackal5 Active Member
249 messages
joined Feb 2018
#662 ·
Jerry Thompson said:There’s really only one major difference here: you pick up BJJ fast, and you see actual results pretty quickly—maybe within two or three years. With Aikido, you won't see any real progress until you've put in eight to ten years. But you can't exactly compare the two disciplines like that. That's all there is to it. 😁


You don't just "learn" BJJ quickly. I mean, seriously, you really don't. It’s just not how it works, I guess. Maybe people think they can just show up for a few months and suddenly be ready to roll with the pros, but man, that’s just not reality. It's more like a lifelong thing, you know? You're constantly grinding, always picking up tiny little bits of info here and there... it's definitely a marathon, not a sprint. Definitely.

So, I was thinking about that whole "ten-year effect" thing we always hear about, and honestly? I guess those theories have been pretty much debunked around here for ages now. Like, seriously, people have been questioning the validity of that whole idea for a long time!

So, when someone makes a claim like that, I guess the big questions you start asking—and maybe I'm overthinking this, but still—are like, why on earth would these techniques totally fail to work after just two years, but then, somehow, suddenly they actually start working after ten? It’s such a weird gap, right? Maybe there's something to it, I don't know, but it really makes you wonder about that whole timeline.

So, I was just sitting here thinking about something kind of wild... like, how does a technique even happen? You know, those super specific skills that you can’t actually use until you’ve put in, like, ten whole years of grinding and practicing? It feels almost impossible when you think about it. I mean, was there really someone out there who just spent a decade getting absolutely pummeled in training? Like, maybe they were just incredibly stubborn—super persistent, I guess—and then, by some crazy stroke of luck, it turns out that after ten years of taking hits, the technique actually works? It sounds so intense, but I guess that's just how mastery works sometimes. Maybe? It's just such a crazy thought to wrap my head around! 😁

Hey there! So, I was just sitting here thinking about everything, and I guess I wanted to jump in and say hi to everyone! It’s been such a busy day over here in the States—honestly, kind sooner than I expected—but I’m feeling really good! Maybe a little caffeinated? Definitely. Anyway, I hope you guys are all having an absolutely wonderful afternoon! I mean, seriously, I hope life is treating you all like royalty today! Just wanted to send some good vibes your way! Catch you later!
briskjackal5 briskjackal5 Active Member
249 messages
joined Feb 2018
#663 ·
Jonathan Johnson67 said:I'm totally with you there. It just sounded a bit weird when you said BJJ would "build strength" because of the nature of the sport.
Daniel Garcia - exactly. Most of the leverage comes down to speed and technical precision rather than raw power. Though, I do get the feeling that being stronger makes you faster... and makes executing those submissions feel a lot smoother. (Assuming you aren't just bodybuilding, but actually focusing on functional strength and mobility).

Totally.

- briskjackal5 -
briskjackal5 briskjackal5 Active Member
249 messages
joined Feb 2018
#664 ·
jademarlin26 said:Forget the prices. It’s just bait for Westerners who still brag about practicing a martial art without breaking a sweat. In my dojo, we certainly incorporate strength training and conditioning drills. It's obvious why many Aikidoka skip it—they've convinced themselves that building muscle will somehow ruin their technique. Give me a break. 😵These are just pathological fixations by certain individuals.

IMNSHO, training any martial art without possessing enough strength to even handle your own body is absurd.


I guess you really need to put in the work and maybe even let things atrophy a little bit, just to see what your technique actually looks like and how good you really are. 😁

- briskjackal5 -
Jerry Thompson Jerry Thompson Active Member
106 messages
joined Mar 2010
#665 ·
briskjackal5, I thought you'd pick it up faster compared to Aikido.
rustyangler02, I have no idea when the grading is scheduled... this way is better.😉 I can't avoid it.😢
I still need to check. And about this Saturday... don't count on it. Better to try during the week if you can make it work.
briskjackal5 briskjackal5 Active Member
249 messages
joined Feb 2018
#666 ·
Jerry Thompson said:briskjackal5, I thought you'd pick it up faster compared to Aikido.
rustyangler02, I have no idea when the grading is scheduled... this way is better.😉 I can't avoid it.😢
I still need to check. And about this Saturday... don't count on it. Better to try during the week if you can make it work.


I don't know, man, I just don't think that's right.
You don't just "learn" BJJ quickly—honestly, it's kind of the exact opposite.
I mean, that's regardless of how you're defining "learning," I guess.

If you're looking at "learning" in terms of actually being able to hold your own during live rolling or matches, well... if you start training today and just grind BJJ for a year, after those twelve months you're basically gonna be a human toy for guys who have been at it for maybe two years (assuming they're training properly with a solid program, obviously).

Now, if you define "learning BJJ" by the time it takes to earn a black belt? Man, it takes forever. I really don't think many other martial arts can even compare to the sheer amount of time and grind required for that.

Also, all that talk about "delayed gratification—wait ten years to see results"—that stuff just doesn't sit right with me. It sounds totally unconvincing, personally.

- briskjackal5 -
Jerry Thompson Jerry Thompson Active Member
106 messages
joined Mar 2010
#667 ·
Hmm... alright then, an apology. I’ve spent my life living under the wrong assumptions. 👎
goldenhound9 goldenhound9 Newcomer
3 messages
joined Nov 2008
#668 ·
Daniel Garcia said:The thing is, certain techniques in some styles are impossible to pull off right if you rely solely on raw power—because muscle tension ends up blocking the full-body movement needed for the move. That's probably what they meant. Sure, you need strength and stamina, but the ratio of technique to brute force really depends on the specific style...

I’d say that applies to pretty much every move in every discipline.
If your own muscle tension is choking out the motion of the technique, then it's not
actually being done right. I mean, sure, the move might still work, but
you're definitely not hitting your true potential. If you keep repeating
sloppy movements, you're basically hardwiring bad habits into your muscle memory. And the more you do it wrong,
the harder it’s going to be to fix later. So, in my opinion, the priority should always be getting the form down perfectly first. Once you've actually mastered the mechanics, then maybe you start adding strength—as long as you don't ruin the technique in the process.
placidbison20 placidbison20 Active Member
197 messages
joined Jun 2010
#669 ·
goldenhound9 said:I’d say that applies to pretty much every move in every discipline.
If your own muscle tension is choking out the motion of the technique, then it's not
actually being done right. I mean, sure, the move might still work, but
you're definitely not hitting your true potential. If you keep repeating
sloppy movements, you're basically hardwiring bad habits into your muscle memory. And the more you do it wrong,
the harder it’s going to be to fix later. So, in my opinion, the priority should always be getting the form down perfectly first. Once you've actually mastered the mechanics, then maybe you start adding strength—as long as you don't ruin the technique in the process.

Fundamentals are everything when you're starting out. You hit the nail on the head there. If you master the basics right from the jump, all those advanced techniques will actually stick later on.
Karen Sullivan78 Karen Sullivan78 Member
10 messages
joined Feb 2007
#670 ·
goldenhound9 said:I’d say that applies to pretty much every move in every discipline.
If your own muscle tension is choking out the motion of the technique, then it's not
actually being done right. I mean, sure, the move might still work, but
you're definitely not hitting your true potential. If you keep repeating
sloppy movements, you're basically hardwiring bad habits into your muscle memory. And the more you do it wrong,
the harder it’s going to be to fix later. So, in my opinion, the priority should always be getting the form down perfectly first. Once you've actually mastered the mechanics, then maybe you start adding strength—as long as you don't ruin the technique in the process.

Exactly.
One more thing: any basic technique in martial arts needs to work IMMEDIATELY. Obviously, that’s relative to how fast you move and your experience level. If it doesn't click right away, it won't click five years from now either. If a move feels "off," then yeah, it’s worth putting in the hours to fix it. You need years of practice to stitch those raw techniques together into actual skill and build that muscle memory. Also, if an instructor can't explain a move in one or two sessions so that the student actually gets it—and more importantly, can spot their own mistakes—then something definitely smells fishy, especially if the whole class is struggling to follow along.

Sayings like "just keep at it, it'll come to you eventually" or "you'll see how it works once you learn to move fast" are just classic examples of mystification.
Michelle Edwards5 Michelle Edwards5 Newcomer
5 messages
joined Feb 2007
#671 ·
Karen Sullivan78 said:Exactly.
One more thing: any basic technique in martial arts needs to work IMMEDIATELY. Obviously, that’s relative to how fast you move and your experience level. If it doesn't click right away, it won't click five years from now either. If a move feels "off," then yeah, it’s worth putting in the hours to fix it. You need years of practice to stitch those raw techniques together into actual skill and build that muscle memory. Also, if an instructor can't explain a move in one or two sessions so that the student actually gets it—and more importantly, can spot their own mistakes—then something definitely smells fishy, especially if the whole class is struggling to follow along.

Sayings like "just keep at it, it'll come to you eventually" or "you'll see how it works once you learn to move fast" are just classic examples of mystification.

But as a student, how am I supposed to know if it's legitimate? I join a club specifically registered for a certain style expecting to actually learn something now, not ten years down the road.
granitefalcon24 granitefalcon24 Newcomer
4 messages
joined Jan 2007
#672 ·
Michelle Edwards5 said:But as a student, how am I supposed to know if it's legitimate? I join a club specifically registered for a certain style expecting to actually learn something now, not ten years down the road.

What follows is not an advertisement:
Come down to Phoenix and see for yourself.🧐
Karen Sullivan78 Karen Sullivan78 Member
10 messages
joined Feb 2007
#673 ·
Michelle Edwards5 said:But as a student, how am I supposed to know if it's legitimate? I join a club specifically registered for a certain style expecting to actually learn something now, not ten years down the road.

You should be able to feel when something works and when it doesn't.
You need to get the gist within one or two sessions. It takes years to turn techniques into actual skill and learn how to adapt them on the fly. You grind those skills for years—that's where the payoff is: seeing yourself get better every single time you step on the mat.
To me, the most important thing is catching your own mistakes quickly so you can fix them yourself.
Karen Sullivan78 Karen Sullivan78 Member
10 messages
joined Feb 2007
#674 ·
granitefalcon24 said:What follows is not an advertisement:
Come down to Phoenix and see for yourself.🧐

That’s not a promotion; it’s just aggressive marketing. 😲
granitefalcon24 granitefalcon24 Newcomer
4 messages
joined Jan 2007
#675 ·
Karen Sullivan78 said:That’s not a promotion; it’s just aggressive marketing. 😲

So I’m expected to pay for a bag of groceries and then what? 🙂
briskjackal5 briskjackal5 Active Member
249 messages
joined Feb 2018
#676 ·
Karen Sullivan78 said:Exactly.
One more thing: any basic technique in martial arts needs to work IMMEDIATELY. Obviously, that’s relative to how fast you move and your experience level. If it doesn't click right away, it won't click five years from now either. If a move feels "off," then yeah, it’s worth putting in the hours to fix it. You need years of practice to stitch those raw techniques together into actual skill and build that muscle memory. Also, if an instructor can't explain a move in one or two sessions so that the student actually gets it—and more importantly, can spot their own mistakes—then something definitely smells fishy, especially if the whole class is struggling to follow along.

Sayings like "just keep at it, it'll come to you eventually" or "you'll see how it works once you learn to move fast" are just classic examples of mystification.


I mean, I basically agree with you, though I guess the way you put it—saying it "has to work immediately"—might not be the best way to frame it.
But, like, what does "work" even mean?
And what does "immediately" mean? Like, right after the very first training session where you tried it?
And against whom? An inexperienced guy, some average dude, just anyone?😁

We’re pretty much on the same page here, really. I just think the most important part is breaking techniques down piece by piece.
For example, I could show you three different setups for a triangle choke and talk through how to finish it... but honestly, if you try to do it all at once, it just isn't going to work right (and I've seen plenty of guys try that and totally fail miserably).
Instead, you really need to get those hip and leg movements down first. You should probably drill that for a few sessions before you even attempt triangles, and honestly, everyone should be drilling that. At the same time, you have to actually understand the point of the move. I guess it's better to drill the movement that needs to become automatic first, and then maybe a session or two later, move on to the next step—otherwise, people tend to focus too much on the actual choking mechanics rather than drilling the essential movement that makes the whole thing happen (which, you know, includes a good chunk of the mechanics anyway).
Then, you have to learn the specific timing of when you can actually go for the triangle, and *then* you learn the setup and the full technique. Only then will a basic triangle (without getting bogged down in counters and counter-counters) actually work for you.

Of course, that’s all assuming you want a triangle so solid that even a pro wrestler couldn't escape the choke.
If you don't care about that, hey, just squeeze and tighten up.😁

But I don't think that's even what you meant with your paragraph, so I guess we're basically agreeing. And all that talk about things not working for ten years and then suddenly—abracadabra!—well, to be honest, that sounds a little hard to believe to me.

- briskjackal5 -
Karen Sullivan78 Karen Sullivan78 Member
10 messages
joined Feb 2007
#677 ·
briskjackal5 said:I mean, I basically agree with you, though I guess the way you put it—saying it "has to work immediately"—might not be the best way to frame it.
But, like, what does "work" even mean?
And what does "immediately" mean? Like, right after the very first training session where you tried it?
And against whom? An inexperienced guy, some average dude, just anyone?😁

We’re pretty much on the same page here, really. I just think the most important part is breaking techniques down piece by piece.
For example, I could show you three different setups for a triangle choke and talk through how to finish it... but honestly, if you try to do it all at once, it just isn't going to work right (and I've seen plenty of guys try that and totally fail miserably).
Instead, you really need to get those hip and leg movements down first. You should probably drill that for a few sessions before you even attempt triangles, and honestly, everyone should be drilling that. At the same time, you have to actually understand the point of the move. I guess it's better to drill the movement that needs to become automatic first, and then maybe a session or two later, move on to the next step—otherwise, people tend to focus too much on the actual choking mechanics rather than drilling the essential movement that makes the whole thing happen (which, you know, includes a good chunk of the mechanics anyway).
Then, you have to learn the specific timing of when you can actually go for the triangle, and *then* you learn the setup and the full technique. Only then will a basic triangle (without getting bogged down in counters and counter-counters) actually work for you.

Of course, that’s all assuming you want a triangle so solid that even a pro wrestler couldn't escape the choke.
If you don't care about that, hey, just squeeze and tighten up.😁

But I don't think that's even what you meant with your paragraph, so I guess we're basically agreeing. And all that talk about things not working for ten years and then suddenly—abracadabra!—well, to be honest, that sounds a little hard to believe to me.

- briskjackal5 -

Alright, I'm with you—that term is definitely a bit clunky right off the bat.
Right away, under the basic terms—meaning without countering your partner (uke)—but also without...
Stop with this nonsense... I’m gonna drop this even though your technique was trash, but in five years I’ll be like, "Actually, you were onto something," because by then you'll finally find your way... blah blah blah... etc.

We’re basically on the same page; the only thing that matters is breaking these techniques down and tackling them one step at a time.
Look, I could walk you through three different ways to set up a triangle and tell you exactly how to wrap it up... but you probably won't do it right. I’ve seen plenty of guys try that approach and absolutely butcher it.
Look, you gotta nail those hip and leg movements first. You should be drilling that for a few sessions before you even touch triangles—and honestly, everyone does that. At the same time, you need to actually grasp the point of the technique. It’s better to hammer the movement until it's muscle memory before moving on a session or two later; otherwise, people just end up obsessing over the choke mechanics instead of drilling the actual movement they need to master.
First, you gotta figure out which weight class actually lets you pull off a triangle. Once that's set, you grind the setup and the full technique. Only then does a basic triangle—without all the extra nonsense about counters and counter-counters—actually work.

Sure, but only if you want a triangle setup where even a pro wrestler can't escape the choke.
If you don't care, just tighten it up and get on with it. 😁

Exactly.
Every technique needs movement drills, whether you’re working from the ground or on your feet. You’ve got to drill hip mobility—that’s huge for pretty much any BJJ style out there. Every single move, regardless of the specific system, has a few fundamental phases. You have to define the movement and the posture for each phase. That’s how you build enough muscle memory to handle mistakes when things start moving fast.
Techniques can stray from the original template sometimes, but you’ll still get the same result in the end.

I don't think that’s even what you meant by that paragraph, but basically, we're on the same page. And this whole "it doesn't work for ten years and then suddenly abracadabra" thing? Honestly, it sounds pretty sketchy to me.

I think I finally cleared up what I meant by "IMMEDIATELY," and your point about the triangle choke definitely backs that up. When you're just starting out, the specific technique matters way less than actually being in the right spot. If your body positioning and movement aren't on point, you aren't doing anything smart. Good positioning creates that "time window" to actually execute the move—without it, the technique doesn't even exist.
Technique obviously improves day by day, but this idea that you get a sudden explosion of quality after ten years of grinding on the mats is just total nonsense.

Update: That "abracadabra" term you used perfectly describes that whole process of
ten-year mystification.
granitefalcon24 granitefalcon24 Newcomer
4 messages
joined Jan 2007
#678 ·
Karen Sullivan78 said:Alright, I'm with you—that term is definitely a bit clunky right off the bat.
Right away, under the basic terms—meaning without countering your partner (uke)—but also without...
Stop with this nonsense... I’m gonna drop this even though your technique was trash, but in five years I’ll be like, "Actually, you were onto something," because by then you'll finally find your way... blah blah blah... etc.

We’re basically on the same page; the only thing that matters is breaking these techniques down and tackling them one step at a time.
Look, I could walk you through three different ways to set up a triangle and tell you exactly how to wrap it up... but you probably won't do it right. I’ve seen plenty of guys try that approach and absolutely butcher it.
Look, you gotta nail those hip and leg movements first. You should be drilling that for a few sessions before you even touch triangles—and honestly, everyone does that. At the same time, you need to actually grasp the point of the technique. It’s better to hammer the movement until it's muscle memory before moving on a session or two later; otherwise, people just end up obsessing over the choke mechanics instead of drilling the actual movement they need to master.
First, you gotta figure out which weight class actually lets you pull off a triangle. Once that's set, you grind the setup and the full technique. Only then does a basic triangle—without all the extra nonsense about counters and counter-counters—actually work.

Sure, but only if you want a triangle setup where even a pro wrestler can't escape the choke.
If you don't care, just tighten it up and get on with it. 😁

Exactly.
Every technique needs movement drills, whether you’re working from the ground or on your feet. You’ve got to drill hip mobility—that’s huge for pretty much any BJJ style out there. Every single move, regardless of the specific system, has a few fundamental phases. You have to define the movement and the posture for each phase. That’s how you build enough muscle memory to handle mistakes when things start moving fast.
Techniques can stray from the original template sometimes, but you’ll still get the same result in the end.

I don't think that’s even what you meant by that paragraph, but basically, we're on the same page. And this whole "it doesn't work for ten years and then suddenly abracadabra" thing? Honestly, it sounds pretty sketchy to me.

I think I finally cleared up what I meant by "IMMEDIATELY," and your point about the triangle choke definitely backs that up. When you're just starting out, the specific technique matters way less than actually being in the right spot. If your body positioning and movement aren't on point, you aren't doing anything smart. Good positioning creates that "time window" to actually execute the move—without it, the technique doesn't even exist.
Technique obviously improves day by day, but this idea that you get a sudden explosion of quality after ten years of grinding on the mats is just total nonsense.

Update: That "abracadabra" term you used perfectly describes that whole process of
ten-year mystification.

Regarding Karen Sullivan78's explanation: 🧐 🙏 🙏 🙏 🙏 🙏

And regarding the rest... pure nonsense. 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣
placidbison20 placidbison20 Active Member
197 messages
joined Jun 2010
#679 ·
If you guys want to keep this discussion going, let's move it to its own dedicated thread so we don't clutter this one up.
briskjackal5 briskjackal5 Active Member
249 messages
joined Feb 2018
#680 ·
Karen Sullivan78 said:Alright, I'm with you—that term is definitely a bit clunky right off the bat.
Right away, under the basic terms—meaning without countering your partner (uke)—but also without...
Stop with this nonsense... I’m gonna drop this even though your technique was trash, but in five years I’ll be like, "Actually, you were onto something," because by then you'll finally find your way... blah blah blah... etc.

We’re basically on the same page; the only thing that matters is breaking these techniques down and tackling them one step at a time.
Look, I could walk you through three different ways to set up a triangle and tell you exactly how to wrap it up... but you probably won't do it right. I’ve seen plenty of guys try that approach and absolutely butcher it.
Look, you gotta nail those hip and leg movements first. You should be drilling that for a few sessions before you even touch triangles—and honestly, everyone does that. At the same time, you need to actually grasp the point of the technique. It’s better to hammer the movement until it's muscle memory before moving on a session or two later; otherwise, people just end up obsessing over the choke mechanics instead of drilling the actual movement they need to master.
First, you gotta figure out which weight class actually lets you pull off a triangle. Once that's set, you grind the setup and the full technique. Only then does a basic triangle—without all the extra nonsense about counters and counter-counters—actually work.

Sure, but only if you want a triangle setup where even a pro wrestler can't escape the choke.
If you don't care, just tighten it up and get on with it. 😁

Exactly.
Every technique needs movement drills, whether you’re working from the ground or on your feet. You’ve got to drill hip mobility—that’s huge for pretty much any BJJ style out there. Every single move, regardless of the specific system, has a few fundamental phases. You have to define the movement and the posture for each phase. That’s how you build enough muscle memory to handle mistakes when things start moving fast.
Techniques can stray from the original template sometimes, but you’ll still get the same result in the end.

I don't think that’s even what you meant by that paragraph, but basically, we're on the same page. And this whole "it doesn't work for ten years and then suddenly abracadabra" thing? Honestly, it sounds pretty sketchy to me.

I think I finally cleared up what I meant by "IMMEDIATELY," and your point about the triangle choke definitely backs that up. When you're just starting out, the specific technique matters way less than actually being in the right spot. If your body positioning and movement aren't on point, you aren't doing anything smart. Good positioning creates that "time window" to actually execute the move—without it, the technique doesn't even exist.
Technique obviously improves day by day, but this idea that you get a sudden explosion of quality after ten years of grinding on the mats is just total nonsense.

Update: That "abracadabra" term you used perfectly describes that whole process of
ten-year mystification.

Yeah, I'm totally with you on that. 👍

Update: That "abracadabra" thing you mentioned earlier... I guess that might be the best way to describe that whole process of
ten years of pure mystification.


I have to admit, personally, I never really saw any of that mystification stuff happening with Aikido (which seems to be the main topic of conversation here), and everyone there was actually a pretty great group of people... so, I guess if having a good crew is your main priority, Aikido is a decent choice.

There wasn't any of that constant nagging or criticizing others, you know? Like the whole "you have too big an ego" or "those people who say this or that are actually like this" kind of preaching that seems to be such a constant thing on these forums. 🙂

- briskjackal5 -

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads