CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Sports › Soccer › ESPN graphics claim the ball didn't cross the line...

ESPN graphics claim the ball didn't cross the line...

Started by Brandon Castillo4 · · 👁 7 views · 68 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Brandon Castillo4swiftmoose22Donna Nelson23Sean Nguyen4Michael Sullivan3Morgan Wrightnimblemarlin17Brandon Turner2Chris Campbell3Jonathan Clark12Jacob Johnson70David Phillips4Tyler Anderson8brighthawk20Michael Carter6Jason Foster7AChloe Palmer2William Gray90Scott Fisher34boldhound8Aaron Gonzalez4James Roberts87
nimblemarlin17 nimblemarlin17 Regular
459 messages
joined Mar 2004
#61 ·
Because those two photos aren't even from the exact same split second. In the photo on the right, William Gallas has already jumped into the net, which is why his leg—which is already mid-air instead of planted on the ground—is closer to the line. It’s just a matter of hundredths of a second. And if the goal were actually legit, you'd see it instantly on any standard video replay.
Brandon Castillo4 Brandon Castillo4 RegularOP
277 messages
joined Nov 2003
#62 ·
nimblemarlin17 said:That's because those two photos aren't capturing the exact same millisecond. In the actual shot, William Gallas has already jumped into the net, which is why his leg—which is clearly mid-air and not planted on the ground—looks closer to the line. It’s all about hundredths of a second. Besides, if the goal were actually valid, you'd see it clearly on any standard video replay.

You think YOU would have seen it?😁

Look man, no offense, but I think you're overthinking this. They ARE the same moment. And honestly, who even cares? On the REAL photo, you can clearly see where his foot is, and the other one is definitely inside the goal unless you pulled six ribs out of him and hid them under your pillow.☕

Anyways, what's your take on Milan vs Juventus tomorrow? My money is on a 0-0 draw and everyone goes home happy.😉
nimblemarlin17 nimblemarlin17 Regular
459 messages
joined Mar 2004
#63 ·
I think Juventus FC is going to take this one. I heard David Trezeguet is finally back in the lineup—though hey, maybe I've got that wrong—and they’ve had a full week off to prep. Plus, they always seem to play their best when they're in Chicago. Either way, aside from Real Madrid vs Barcelona, this is easily the biggest domestic clash of the year.
boldhound8 boldhound8 Regular
437 messages
joined Oct 2007
#64 ·
Goal or no goal...

It doesn't even matter anymore...

I just know this is gonna be the first LP final in the last decade that I’m straight up skipping.☕

The UEFA Champions League rules are absolute trash.😍
Brandon Castillo4 Brandon Castillo4 RegularOP
277 messages
joined Nov 2003
#65 ·
Check out this latest shot taken from orbit using what looks like alien tech:

image
Aaron Gonzalez4 Aaron Gonzalez4 Member
25 messages
joined Sep 2004
#66 ·
This picture clearly shows the goal was legit—we're looking at technology that’s lightyears ahead of that Israeli simulator Sky used ☕

End of debate
William Gray90 William Gray90 Member
10 messages
joined May 2005
#67 ·
Not gonna happen. I was pretty sure the ball crossed the line before—but after seeing that, maybe it actually didn't 🤔
James Roberts87 James Roberts87 Active Member
61 messages
joined Mar 2011
#68 ·
Who cares if they moved on or not.
The main thing is that Chelsea FC is out.🙂 🙂
Jason Foster7 Jason Foster7 Member
18 messages
joined Apr 2005
#69 ·
Wait, who is this player playing for Los Angeles FC?
Barros??😁

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads