CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Sports › Soccer › Which league do you find most interesting?

Which league do you find most interesting?

Started by restlesssurfer97 · · 👁 5 views · 45 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants restlesssurfer97vividwalker7Zachary Jones4nimblemarlin17Jack Lee77Raymond Carter2Jeffrey Watson2boldhound8Bradley Ramirez5frozeneagle49silentpuma9Chloe Palmer2brightskipper5Dennis Baker34fadeddrifter26granitepilot2Eric Brown3
restlesssurfer97 restlesssurfer97 VeteranOP
1.2K messages
joined May 2004
#1 ·
Spain's top flight is sitting pretty at number one, while the Premier League and Serie A are basically fighting over second place, then you've got the Bundesliga further down the list along with everything else, including France, which honestly just doesn't really grab my attention.
vividwalker7 vividwalker7 Member
23 messages
joined Jul 2004
#2 ·
Honestly, I’m telling you right now, there is absolutely no debate about it because England is sitting pretty at the top of the table where they belong!
Spain sitting pretty in second place!
Italy is sitting pretty in third place!
Zachary Jones4 Zachary Jones4 Newcomer
5 messages
joined Jul 2004
#3 ·
1.United Kingdom
2.Italy
3.Spain
nimblemarlin17 nimblemarlin17 Regular
459 messages
joined Mar 2004
#4 ·
Italy
Spain
France

The English have built this massive commercial circus where clubs just buy foreigners regardless of whether they actually deliver anything useful. On the surface, every team looks like it’s packed with stars, but let’s be real—it’s mostly just aging veterans coasting along. You always see the same two teams sitting at the top, Manchester United and Arsenal. It would be a lot more interesting if someone actually stepped up and shook things up. As for Chelsea FC, the whole thing is a joke. I mean, look at how many players they’ve hauled in this year alone. Does Roman Abramovich even have a plan for all these high-priced talents he keeps collecting? Sending Hernán Crespo out on loan is a perfect example. With all due respect to the rest of his signings—who were bought for ridiculous sums that don't reflect their actual value—Crespo is easily the best player on that roster. So, what's the move now? What happens to Adrian Mutu? And Jimmy?
Jack Lee77 Jack Lee77 Member
22 messages
joined May 2008
#5 ·
1. Premier League
2. Major League Soccer
3. Bundesliga
.
.
.
.
4. Serie A
Raymond Carter2 Raymond Carter2 Active Member
108 messages
joined Jul 2004
#6 ·
The United Kingdom is the most interesting, followed by Spain.
Jeffrey Watson2 Jeffrey Watson2 Member
29 messages
joined Jan 2010
#7 ·
Serie A
Raymond Carter2 Raymond Carter2 Active Member
108 messages
joined Jul 2004
#8 ·
Jeffrey Watson2 said:Serie A

Maybe it wouldn't be so damn interesting if they weren't fixing the games.
nimblemarlin17 nimblemarlin17 Regular
459 messages
joined Mar 2004
#9 ·
Give me a break. Telling me Drogba and Kežman are better than Hernán Crespo is ridiculous. Selling Crespo alongside Ronaldo was easily one of the biggest blunders Inter Milan has made in the last five or six years. Sure, Kežman was great in the Netherlands, but I don't recall him scoring a single goal in over 10 or 15 Major League Soccer matches. He wasn't anything special for his national team either.
boldhound8 boldhound8 Regular
437 messages
joined Oct 2007
#10 ·
Italy... and honestly, it's not even about the drama, it's just because I've got massive love for Juve👍

Juventus
Mr. Ex. President😁
Bradley Ramirez5 Bradley Ramirez5 Member
45 messages
joined Feb 2007
#11 ·
The most fascinating spots in the United Kingdom, Italy, and Spain
My absolute favorite has to be Italy (if you look at my username😁 )
Jeffrey Watson2 Jeffrey Watson2 Member
29 messages
joined Jan 2010
#12 ·
Raymond Carter2 said:Maybe the league would actually be interesting if they weren't busy fixing matches.

But honestly, who gives a damn? Those scandals were always just about the teams fighting relegation anyway. The big clubs at the top—the ones actually worth watching—had nothing to do with those messes. And let's be real, THOSE are the teams that make Serie A worth following in the first place!
frozeneagle49 frozeneagle49 Active Member
59 messages
joined Jul 2004
#13 ·
Germany!!!

Look, their national team might be a total mess, but the football there is beautiful to watch. You get plenty of goals, and lately, even Bayern Munich isn't the absolute juggernaut they used to be. Now you've got Borussia Dortmund, VfB Stuttgart, Bayer Leverkusen, and even Werder Bremen consistently hovering near the top. Throw in clubs like Hamburger SV, Hertha BSC, and Schalke 04, and you're looking at a league full of high-quality sides that actually mean something in Europe...

It’s a different story compared to places like Spain, where only a handful of clubs really hold steady ground (Real Madrid, FC Barcelona, Deportivo La Coruña, Valencia CF, Celta Vigo), or Italy, with their usual suspects (Lazio, Juventus, AC Milan, Inter Milan, AS Roma), or even the United Kingdom, with the likes of Manchester, Liverpool FC, Arsenal, and Newcastle United...
Raymond Carter2 Raymond Carter2 Active Member
108 messages
joined Jul 2004
#14 ·
Jeffrey Watson2 said:Who cares? Those teams were just fighting to stay afloat anyway. The top clubs had nothing to do with those scandals. And honestly, THOSE are the teams that actually make Serie A worth watching!

Who knows. Nothing would surprise me at this point.
silentpuma9 silentpuma9 Member
36 messages
joined Feb 2008
#15 ·
1. Major League Soccer 🙏
2.
- Premier League
- Serie A
3. Bundesliga
4. Ligue 1
5. Portugal, Netherlands, Belgium, and those other smaller leagues....

👍
Chloe Palmer2 Chloe Palmer2 Regular
266 messages
joined May 2009
#16 ·
Maybe Serie A, because of AC Milan. Then the Bundesliga—due to Ivica Klasnić, Spain because of Ronaldinho and FC Barcelona, the Premier League because of Liverpool FC, and finally France because of Paris Saint-Germain.😁
vividwalker7 vividwalker7 Member
23 messages
joined Jul 2004
#17 ·
nimblemarlin17 said:The Americans have basically built this massive commercial league where teams just go out and buy foreign players regardless of whether they actually fit or not.

I mean, seriously, there’s just a total lack of logic here, and while I totally respect your personal taste and your deep love for that messy, chaotic style of Italian soccer 😁, you’ve really missed the mark with this one, man. Like, the rules in the United Kingdom regarding bringing in international talent are actually incredibly strict and convincing.

Now, look, Hernán Crespo is a great player, truly, but he just wasn't built for the pace of the Premier League, where everything is played at breakneck speed for the full ninety minutes. He was a absolute king back in Italy, where you can wait for that long pass or a perfect cross to land, but that doesn't fly in the UK. Honestly, if I were Roman Abramovich, I would have sold him myself, especially considering all those comments about AC Milan and the friction he had with José Mourinho.

There was even this hilarious little exchange when Crespo joined them for pre-season training, where Crespo tried to apologize for being late by explaining that the flight from Buenos Aires was completely overbooked, and José Mourinho just shot back with, "Why didn't you just take the bus?" 😁
nimblemarlin17 nimblemarlin17 Regular
459 messages
joined Mar 2004
#18 ·
It’s not about lacking standards. Arsenal and Manchester United bring in top-tier talent from abroad, sure, but just look at all the absolute garbage sitting in the bottom half of the table... Their whole philosophy seems to be: if they're foreign, they have to be superstars. It's ridiculous. I mean, what sane person would sign a random Sailor or Dragoslav Živković? Now they're wondering why their national team is a total disaster. Maybe if they actually started playing their own homegrown players, things wouldn't suck so much. In Italy and Spain, you see way fewer foreign players, especially at the smaller clubs, and honestly, that's a massive advantage for those leagues.
vividwalker7 vividwalker7 Member
23 messages
joined Jul 2004
#19 ·
nimblemarlin17 said:... The main thing is that if they're a foreigner, they absolutely have to be elite. That’s basically their whole philosophy.

But honestly, you know how the whole deal goes over there when it comes to work visas and all that paperwork?

nimblemarlin17 said:... There really aren't as many foreign players in Italy and Spain, especially once you look at the smaller clubs, and I actually think that's a massive win for those leagues.

The real powerhouses sitting in that top five tier in Italy and Spain pretty much rely on international talent to stay relevant, because if you look at the starting lineups for those big teams, you’ll find maybe three homegrown players at most. But then you look at the smaller clubs, and they aren't out there buying up foreigners like the Americans do, and it’s just simple math—they don't have nearly as much cash as the guys in the States... and that's especially true for the Italians, where besides that big trio from the North, almost everyone else is basically teetering on the edge of bankruptcy.
Raymond Carter2 Raymond Carter2 Active Member
108 messages
joined Jul 2004
#20 ·
vividwalker7 said:Hernán Crespo is solid, but he’s just not built for the pace of the Premier League where everyone plays at 100 mph for the full 90 minutes. He thrives in Italy, waiting for that long ball or a perfect cross, but that doesn't work in England. If I were Roman Abramovich, I'd move him on immediately—especially after all that drama involving Milan and his friction with José Mourinho.

Exactly. You nailed it. Some players just don't mesh with the American style of play (think Fabien Barthez or Hernán Crespo), while others thrive here but struggle anywhere else (like Nicolas Anelka).

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads