Kate Cook27
Regular
557 messages
joined Jun 2022
The Orange Revolution (Part Two: Russia)
Yanukovych's loss back in 2004 really shook things up for Russia and its political trajectory. The Orange Revolution in Ukraine was driven by the youth—students, activists, NGOs, and independent media. For the first time in 2004, you could actually see a glimpse of "media freedom" emerging in Ukraine. This prompted the Kremlin to rethink everything. They started developing tactics to neutralize any factors that might spark an Orange Revolution on their own soil, while simultaneously carving out a new role for themselves on the global stage.
Media: Cracking down on independent outlets, giving state-run media massive influence over public opinion, and dealing with the harassment or even assassination of journalists...
Opposition: Honestly, I don't need to say much about the opposition in Russia or how the Kremlin goes after them.
Activists and NGOs: In most cases, these groups are just slapped with labels like "spies."
Youth and Students: In 2005, they set up an organization called "Nashi" to mobilize young people—basically "Putin's youth." It was framed as an anti-fascist movement, but in reality, it was just a way to spread the regime's influence among the younger generation.
By 2007, Putin started getting vocal against the West, global hegemony, the current world order, and NATO expansion. We even saw the launch of a Russian channel in English specifically to push propaganda abroad. After 2004, the separatist movements in Ukraine were essentially "frozen." Then came the 2008 NATO summit. Russia turned its attention toward Georgia in 2005, which eventually culminated in 2008 with the creation of para-states in Georgia.
Domestically, another huge factor is "Victory Day" on May 9th. After 2004, there was this massive revival of nostalgia for the Soviet Union and the victory over fascism. It turned into a ubiquitous cult in Russia—think orange-and-black ribbons and Saint George imagery. The danger here is how it’s framed: the idea that the Soviet Union alone defeated fascism (fighting against the entire world). All of this is fueled by the Victory Day parades, showing off heavy weaponry and emphasizing massive sacrifices, but it drifts far from historical reality. Many people are led to believe the entire world was fascist back then and only the Soviet Union stood against them—it's pure myth-making. This helps build the narrative that the West is once again the villain, an aggressor looking to attack Russia.
So, it’s not surprising when Russians believe that Ukraine was planning to invade them, or that the West wants to strike. I mean, Russia has nuclear weapons—who would want to launch a direct attack on a country like that? Does anyone really think Ukraine, without nukes, would attack a nuclear-armed Russia?
Then there's that whole narrative regarding Donbas, where they claim Donbas is Russian and Russia has every right to defend it. The logic follows that Russia can reclaim its territories, but others have no such right.
That’s why we see this glorification of the Soviet Union, and even monarchists who dream of returning to the borders of Imperial Russia. They argue all that territory was "stolen" from Russia and that they have the right to take it back. You've even heard people bring up Alaska, claiming it belongs to Russia. But according to their logic, everyone else lacks that same right.