CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Society › Psychology › What is apophenia and synchronicity? Let's discuss.

What is apophenia and synchronicity? Let's discuss.

Started by stormystag20 · · 👁 8 views · 46 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants stormystag20ironrider11Taylor Sanders4Lawrence Allen63Melissa Lopez30Kevin Ruiz36Joseph Williams3Arthur Campbell2Charles Wood73Olivia Jackson64Andrew DoyleKyle Sullivan3
Olivia Jackson64 Olivia Jackson64 Member
12 messages
joined Aug 2022
#21 ·
I get hit by these "angel numbers"—days where I can’t seem to live without seeing sequences like 1717, 1414, 0909, or 2323. Then there's a phase where they vanish entirely before returning again. To be clear—it isn't some conscious effort to check my phone or the clock constantly; it just happens at the exact moment I happen to look up.

I don't see any particular significance in it, nor do I feel like anything is actually happening, which is why it's starting to get frustrating. It offers no insight, yet it keeps repeating 🙂

I've also noticed a secondary pattern during these phases—if I visualize a specific wake-up time in the evening, I'll find myself awake two or three minutes before it. Even if I set an impossibly early goal, say 5:00 AM, it works. Normally, even a loud alarm won't budge me 🙂

Anyone else deal with something similar?
Charles Wood73 Charles Wood73 Active Member
70 messages
joined Apr 2022
#22 ·
Olivia Jackson64 said:I get hit by these "angel numbers"—days where I can’t seem to live without seeing sequences like 1717, 1414, 0909, or 2323. Then there's a phase where they vanish entirely before returning again. To be clear—it isn't some conscious effort to check my phone or the clock constantly; it just happens at the exact moment I happen to look up.

I don't see any particular significance in it, nor do I feel like anything is actually happening, which is why it's starting to get frustrating. It offers no insight, yet it keeps repeating 🙂

I've also noticed a secondary pattern during these phases—if I visualize a specific wake-up time in the evening, I'll find myself awake two or three minutes before it. Even if I set an impossibly early goal, say 5:00 AM, it works. Normally, even a loud alarm won't budge me 🙂

Anyone else deal with something similar?

That second part is a perfectly normal phenomenon, and the first part is something I experience too, though it doesn't frustrate me; I actually find it somewhat charming, even if I don't attach any profound significance to it, other than perhaps the idea that "things happen as they are meant to happen, even if what happens is nothing at all."

Speaking of those kinds of temporal phenomena, I had someone I knew who could always tell what time it was without ever looking at a clock. Sometimes he’d be spot on to the minute, but more often it was a rough estimate within a five-to-ten-minute window. For example, we’d be at the beach all day, his watch tucked away somewhere in a bag (this was back before everyone had smartphones), and you’d ask him the time. He’d give you an answer, and then, just for the hell of it, you’d dig through the bag to check, only to find he was exactly right. Even those "telepathic" moments worked for him occasionally, though more often than not, he’d miss the mark entirely.

As for the stuff mentioned above... it's a lottery, and I never win. I’ll buy a ticket here and there, just enough to give myself something to daydream about regarding how I'll spend the windfall, but nothing ever materializes. I don't predict currency fluctuations either, so my supposed "ability" (if you can even call it that) is completely unmonetizable.
Arthur Campbell2 Arthur Campbell2 Member
10 messages
joined Feb 2025
#23 ·
Telepathy, clairvoyance, precognition, synchronicity, or any other flavor of the paranormal just don't exist—or, if I want to be incredibly generous and open to new ideas—they haven't been reliably proven by science yet.

Everything you guys are describing here is just subjective experience. Those experiences aren't proof of anything; they could be caused by all sorts of things—coincidence, faulty memory, bad interpretation, you name it.
Take me, for example. I had some interesting out-of-body sensations when I was falling asleep once, but I didn't walk away thinking I was actually leaving my body. It was obvious to me it was just a byproduct of drifting off to sleep.

Trying to argue based on "something weird and unexplainable happened to me once" is about as logical as taking a psychoactive substance and deciding parallel universes exist just because you saw some trippy stuff.
Just because something is unexplainable to you doesn't mean it can't be explained. I already gave a quick rundown of potential explanations for these "weird coincidences" in my last post, so I'm not going to repeat myself.

But hey, if you still think the universe, other people, or some kind of "collective consciousness" is trying to talk to you, then please, do us all a favor and ask them for the winning Powerball numbers. 😁
Andrew Doyle Andrew Doyle Regular
268 messages
joined Aug 2011
#24 ·
Olivia Jackson64 said:The thing is, someone else eventually passes that info along... it’s not like the TV is transmitting it directly into your brain via telepathy.😁

@Andrew Doyle, maybe she reached out from another world—just a thought on why there hasn't been a response... you didn't exchange pleasantries, so the loop remains open. That's my take.

And honestly? Half the people on this side of the grave aren't worth listening to anyway, let alone those who have already passed on. 🤷

All jokes aside, though. I'm not making some massive, dramatic deal out of this; I simply remembered her the same way I remember countless other people from my past. It’s a heavy, unsettling feeling when you start finding entire generations of your life through obituaries. 👎
Olivia Jackson64 Olivia Jackson64 Member
12 messages
joined Aug 2022
#25 ·
Arthur Campbell2 said:Telepathy, clairvoyance, precognition, synchronicity, or any other flavor of the paranormal just don't exist—or, if I want to be incredibly generous and open to new ideas—they haven't been reliably proven by science yet.

Everything you guys are describing here is just subjective experience. Those experiences aren't proof of anything; they could be caused by all sorts of things—coincidence, faulty memory, bad interpretation, you name it.
Take me, for example. I had some interesting out-of-body sensations when I was falling asleep once, but I didn't walk away thinking I was actually leaving my body. It was obvious to me it was just a byproduct of drifting off to sleep.

Trying to argue based on "something weird and unexplainable happened to me once" is about as logical as taking a psychoactive substance and deciding parallel universes exist just because you saw some trippy stuff.
Just because something is unexplainable to you doesn't mean it can't be explained. I already gave a quick rundown of potential explanations for these "weird coincidences" in my last post, so I'm not going to repeat myself.

But hey, if you still think the universe, other people, or some kind of "collective consciousness" is trying to talk to you, then please, do us all a favor and ask them for the winning Powerball numbers. 😁

Russia conducted extensive research on this during the Cold War, and there is plenty of literature on the subject. It isn't established as an eternal truth—nothing is—but they had significant statistical probabilities. Try reading up on it... the world and its sciences didn't start revolving around you the day you were born. 🙂
Olivia Jackson64 Olivia Jackson64 Member
12 messages
joined Aug 2022
#26 ·
There's going to be more and more of it :-)
ironrider11 ironrider11 Regular
391 messages
joined Oct 2020
#27 ·
Olivia Jackson64 said:Russia conducted extensive research on this during the Cold War, and there is plenty of literature on the subject. It isn't established as an eternal truth—nothing is—but they had significant statistical probabilities. Try reading up on it... the world and its sciences didn't start revolving around you the day you were born. 🙂

Well, in his own head, it did. Depends on his "God-given" personality or whatever programming his reality runs on—that whole info-transfer thing regarding "collective reality." Basically, how he uses tools like copy-pasting his own universe based on data from every other world out there (whether they actually exist or not, depending on what his brain's curiosity or imagination reaches for)... everything that exists in his hyper-individual bubble exists because of the information left behind by previous worlds... as long as he's around. Once he's gone, his world goes with him.

Even Egyptologists can't agree on how old the pyramids are. What they were for. How they were built... It's all just theories, guesses, and hypotheses... nothing that gives us actual certainty about the world we're living in, let alone any imaginative predictions about the future. Life on this little speck of Fire and mud has been... hang in there... going on for maybe 4.5 billion years, according to theory. Not that creationists would buy it. In that massive stretch of mutations and cycles, you had "advanced civilizations of intellectual primates" chasing the Holy Grail of absolute truth, messing around with sacred information without having any clue about the xyz of past versions...

Just trivializing the triviality here—the guy who's obsessed and traumatized by the idea of a potential nuclear war, or rising prices making his lifestyle uncomfortable... his life is a totally individual consumerist tragedy that isn't even worth living... he probably doesn't bother with apophenia, synchronicity... or any of that woo-woo crap. His reality is strictly empirical. Imagination is fine, but trying to use it is just "magical thinking." And for people who need that fake sense of security to stay sane, it can be pretty damn destructive...
Charles Wood73 Charles Wood73 Active Member
70 messages
joined Apr 2022
#28 ·
Arthur Campbell2 said:Telepathy, clairvoyance, precognition, synchronicity, or any other flavor of the paranormal just don't exist—or, if I want to be incredibly generous and open to new ideas—they haven't been reliably proven by science yet.

Everything you guys are describing here is just subjective experience. Those experiences aren't proof of anything; they could be caused by all sorts of things—coincidence, faulty memory, bad interpretation, you name it.
Take me, for example. I had some interesting out-of-body sensations when I was falling asleep once, but I didn't walk away thinking I was actually leaving my body. It was obvious to me it was just a byproduct of drifting off to sleep.

Trying to argue based on "something weird and unexplainable happened to me once" is about as logical as taking a psychoactive substance and deciding parallel universes exist just because you saw some trippy stuff.
Just because something is unexplainable to you doesn't mean it can't be explained. I already gave a quick rundown of potential explanations for these "weird coincidences" in my last post, so I'm not going to repeat myself.

But hey, if you still think the universe, other people, or some kind of "collective consciousness" is trying to talk to you, then please, do us all a favor and ask them for the winning Powerball numbers. 😁

Well, obviously we're talking about subjective experiences. What else would we be doing on a forum? 🤷
Arthur Campbell2 Arthur Campbell2 Member
10 messages
joined Feb 2025
#29 ·
Olivia Jackson64 said:Russia conducted extensive research on this during the Cold War, and there is plenty of literature on the subject. It isn't established as an eternal truth—nothing is—but they had significant statistical probabilities. Try reading up on it... the world and its sciences didn't start revolving around you the day you were born. 🙂

I mean, sure, I believe they are—but just because something is written down somewhere doesn't make it the gospel truth, right?
And besides that—there’s a massive amount of so-called "research" coming out of these various Russian trolls, neo-Nazis, or whatever else you want to call them. Honestly, half of those people exist more in urban legends than they do in actual reality.
I honestly don't know where to find any serious literature on a topic like this—and if anyone actually has some decent recommendations, I’d be genuinely grateful for the lead.

I don't have any text to rewrite for you yet. Please provide the posts you want me to transform, and I'll get to work applying those specific persona guidelines and US-based replacements. kaže:
The world didn't start spinning and science didn't suddenly invent itself just because you showed up. 🙂

Look, that’s not what I said. I didn't mean it like that either—and I'm certainly not making any judgments here based on some... I don't care what anyone says—if you want results, you have to rely on your own damn work. Relying on handouts or someone else's effort is just a fast track to mediocrity. You build your own path, or you don't build one at all. Simple as that. Look, based on the actual research results—which, let's be honest, failed miserably to show even a shred of paranormal activity—it’s pretty clear what we're dealing with here.
Look, even if you set aside the fact that the mechanics behind this kind of nonsense pretty much fly in the face of everything we know about physics—which, let's be honest, they do—that doesn't exactly make these claims any more convincing.
Did you guys hear about that thing?Look, let's be real—extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. It’s not just some catchy saying; it’s basic logic. You can't just drop a bombshell theory into a conversation and expect everyone to nod along without showing your work. If you're going to claim the sky is falling or that a major corporation is cooking the books, you better have the receipts to back it up. Otherwise, you're just making noise.?

Just so we’re clear—I am absolutely willing to change my mind if someone actually proves me wrong. I really am. And honestly, it’s not nearly as difficult as people make it out to be.
Just to give you an idea—this is basically an experiment in precognition or telepathy that we actually used to run back in our college days—you take a deck of cards... Zener cards.It’s basically just taking five different symbols and mashing them together to make it work. X It’s all about the draws—you have the subject try to guess (or "feel," if you want to get fancy about it) which card is coming up next without actually looking. From there, you just run the numbers to see if they’re actually statistically better than someone just guessing at random.
I agree. It couldn't be any more straightforward than this.
Look, this is just a random example—but it goes to show how easily things can be proven if they actually exist in the first place.

Look, I don't want anyone getting the wrong idea—I’m not looking at the world through some narrow, purely mechanistic lens. I have absolutely zero issue with opinions, personal stances, beliefs, philosophy, religion, or metaphysics, or pretty much anything else for that matter.onostranim".

But those claims regarding... of this world Look, everyone around us—these people who are made of the exact same molecules and atoms as the rest of us—are subject to the same laws of physics and chemistry that govern everything else in existence. It's just basic science. Nah. It’s almost metaphysical. If you follow that logic, then there has to be... It’s provable.Right?
Look, if someone tells me they can bench 225 pounds—fine, show me. Prove it. Until then, I’m not buying it. It’s the exact same thing when people claim they can move objects with their minds, predict the future, or sense some mystical energy. If you're making claims that supposedly impact the real, empirical world, then just prove it. Show me the results or stop talking.

Doesn't seem like an unreasonable position to me—and I don't think I'm asking for much. What do you guys think? 🤷
ironrider11 ironrider11 Regular
391 messages
joined Oct 2020
#30 ·
Arthur Campbell2 said:I mean, sure, I believe they are—but just because something is written down somewhere doesn't make it the gospel truth, right?
And besides that—there’s a massive amount of so-called "research" coming out of these various Russian trolls, neo-Nazis, or whatever else you want to call them. Honestly, half of those people exist more in urban legends than they do in actual reality.
I honestly don't know where to find any serious literature on a topic like this—and if anyone actually has some decent recommendations, I’d be genuinely grateful for the lead.

I don't have any text to rewrite for you yet. Please provide the posts you want me to transform, and I'll get to work applying those specific persona guidelines and US-based replacements. kaže:
The world didn't start spinning and science didn't suddenly invent itself just because you showed up. 🙂

Look, that’s not what I said. I didn't mean it like that either—and I'm certainly not making any judgments here based on some... I don't care what anyone says—if you want results, you have to rely on your own damn work. Relying on handouts or someone else's effort is just a fast track to mediocrity. You build your own path, or you don't build one at all. Simple as that. Look, based on the actual research results—which, let's be honest, failed miserably to show even a shred of paranormal activity—it’s pretty clear what we're dealing with here.
Look, even if you set aside the fact that the mechanics behind this kind of nonsense pretty much fly in the face of everything we know about physics—which, let's be honest, they do—that doesn't exactly make these claims any more convincing.
Did you guys hear about that thing?Look, let's be real—extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. It’s not just some catchy saying; it’s basic logic. You can't just drop a bombshell theory into a conversation and expect everyone to nod along without showing your work. If you're going to claim the sky is falling or that a major corporation is cooking the books, you better have the receipts to back it up. Otherwise, you're just making noise.?

Just so we’re clear—I am absolutely willing to change my mind if someone actually proves me wrong. I really am. And honestly, it’s not nearly as difficult as people make it out to be.
Just to give you an idea—this is basically an experiment in precognition or telepathy that we actually used to run back in our college days—you take a deck of cards... Zener cards.It’s basically just taking five different symbols and mashing them together to make it work. X It’s all about the draws—you have the subject try to guess (or "feel," if you want to get fancy about it) which card is coming up next without actually looking. From there, you just run the numbers to see if they’re actually statistically better than someone just guessing at random.
I agree. It couldn't be any more straightforward than this.
Look, this is just a random example—but it goes to show how easily things can be proven if they actually exist in the first place.

Look, I don't want anyone getting the wrong idea—I’m not looking at the world through some narrow, purely mechanistic lens. I have absolutely zero issue with opinions, personal stances, beliefs, philosophy, religion, or metaphysics, or pretty much anything else for that matter.onostranim".

But those claims regarding... of this world Look, everyone around us—these people who are made of the exact same molecules and atoms as the rest of us—are subject to the same laws of physics and chemistry that govern everything else in existence. It's just basic science. Nah. It’s almost metaphysical. If you follow that logic, then there has to be... It’s provable.Right?
Look, if someone tells me they can bench 225 pounds—fine, show me. Prove it. Until then, I’m not buying it. It’s the exact same thing when people claim they can move objects with their minds, predict the future, or sense some mystical energy. If you're making claims that supposedly impact the real, empirical world, then just prove it. Show me the results or stop talking.

Doesn't seem like an unreasonable position to me—and I don't think I'm asking for much. What do you guys think? 🤷

Move objects with your mind? You think about unlocking a door, your hand reaches into your pocket for your keys, finds them, puts them in the lock, turns them... door opens. Plenty of objects moved by thought. Tomorrow will be sunny or rainy, says a weatherman predicting the future. And sure enough, the weather matches what he said. Temperature is kinetic energy that you can actually feel, maybe even during a fever. The question without an answer is who or what is making these observations, and how atomic bodies within those fundamental forces exist inside the empirical ("qualia space") world...
Arthur Campbell2 Arthur Campbell2 Member
10 messages
joined Feb 2025
#31 ·
ironrider11 said:Move objects with your mind? You think about unlocking a door, your hand reaches into your pocket for your keys, finds them, puts them in the lock, turns them... door opens. Plenty of objects moved by thought. Tomorrow will be sunny or rainy, says a weatherman predicting the future. And sure enough, the weather matches what he said. Temperature is kinetic energy that you can actually feel, maybe even during a fever. The question without an answer is who or what is making these observations, and how atomic bodies within those fundamental forces exist inside the empirical ("qualia space") world...

Are you actually serious right now? Are we really going to split hairs over semantics and word games? What's the point?

ironrider11 said:Move objects with your mind? You think about unlocking a door, your hand reaches into your pocket for your keys, finds them, puts them in the lock, turns them... door opens. Plenty of objects moved by thought. Tomorrow will be sunny or rainy, says a weatherman predicting the future. And sure enough, the weather matches what he said. Temperature is kinetic energy that you can actually feel, maybe even during a fever. The question without an answer is who or what is making these observations, and how atomic bodies within those fundamental forces exist inside the empirical ("qualia space") world...

Sure, great example. "Predict" the weather for me tomorrow and I might believe you. Go ahead, predict my Powerball numbers—now we're talking. 😁

ironrider11 said:Move objects with your mind? You think about unlocking a door, your hand reaches into your pocket for your keys, finds them, puts them in the lock, turns them... door opens. Plenty of objects moved by thought. Tomorrow will be sunny or rainy, says a weatherman predicting the future. And sure enough, the weather matches what he said. Temperature is kinetic energy that you can actually feel, maybe even during a fever. The question without an answer is who or what is making these observations, and how atomic bodies within those fundamental forces exist inside the empirical ("qualia space") world...

I have no idea what you're getting at. 🤷
Charles Wood73 Charles Wood73 Active Member
70 messages
joined Apr 2022
#32 ·
Every single piece of sufficiently advanced technology eventually hits that inevitable threshold where things start getting a little weird... blah, blah, blah. 🥱

https://tectales.com/bionics-robotic...-thoughts.html
ironrider11 ironrider11 Regular
391 messages
joined Oct 2020
#33 ·
Charles Wood73 said:Every single piece of sufficiently advanced technology eventually hits that inevitable threshold where things start getting a little weird... blah, blah, blah. 🥱

https://tectales.com/bionics-robotic...-thoughts.html

Monkey see, monkey do.
ironrider11 ironrider11 Regular
391 messages
joined Oct 2020
#34 ·
Arthur Campbell2 said:Are you actually serious right now? Are we really going to split hairs over semantics and word games? What's the point?

Sure, great example. "Predict" the weather for me tomorrow and I might believe you. Go ahead, predict my Powerball numbers—now we're talking. 😁

I have no idea what you're getting at. 🤷

Dead serious. Totally serious.
Arthur Campbell2 Arthur Campbell2 Member
10 messages
joined Feb 2025
#35 ·
🤦

Alright, let me be crystal clear since I clearly wasn't being direct enough—when I talk about "moving objects with your mind," I’m talking about psychokinesis or telekinesis, whatever label you want to slap on it.

So, no, I’m not talking about me "thinking" about a movement and then having my physical or bionic hand carry it out, nor am I talking about using some high-tech gadgetry. If I’m explicitly calling it paranormal, then by definition, we're excluding anything "normal."

But obviously, that specific phrase wasn't the whole point. My actual point is that any claim involving the "supernatural," "alternative," or whatever other buzzword you prefer, needs to be backed up by actual evidence. Without that, it’s just guesswork.

Look, it's true that sometimes it takes ages before a theoretical concept can actually be proven through experimentation. That's why I said right now we have zero proof for any of the stuff that's been floated around previously.
I'm perfectly fine waiting for that evidence to show up. There's no rush.

That's it.
ironrider11 ironrider11 Regular
391 messages
joined Oct 2020
#36 ·
Arthur Campbell2, you just can't or you just won't think outside the box? What even is consciousness—this subjective reality where matter shows up, what intelligence is actually for, and how we—as a species dreaming on the edge of our own timeline while being whispered at by these "forced thoughts and ideas" of progress—actually move forward and why.....?

Ah, ah, uhm, what we know is a drop, what we don't know is an ocean.
Arthur Campbell2 Arthur Campbell2 Member
10 messages
joined Feb 2025
#37 ·
ironrider11 said:Arthur Campbell2, you just can't or you just won't think outside the box? What even is consciousness—this subjective reality where matter shows up, what intelligence is actually for, and how we—as a species dreaming on the edge of our own timeline while being whispered at by these "forced thoughts and ideas" of progress—actually move forward and why.....?

Ah, ah, uhm, what we know is a drop, what we don't know is an ocean.

Look, those are all pretty deep questions—really—and honestly, I don't have satisfying answers for most of them. 🤷

But none of that was the point of this thread, at least not from my perspective (and hey, I could be wrong).
The goal here was explaining specific phenomena—so, basically, I offered some explanations. I laid out the logic behind them and left room for someone else to prove me wrong. I actually enjoy learning new things, so I'm all ears for alternative theories. Beyond that, though, I don't see any need to wander off—I'm just sticking to the topic (the "box," as you put it). 🙂

Quick tangent—12 Monkeys is a great movie. 😍
Charles Wood73 Charles Wood73 Active Member
70 messages
joined Apr 2022
#38 ·
The original poster was really just hunting for the right name for the phenomenon itself, though Modovlje decided to tack it onto the title later on.
Arthur Campbell2 Arthur Campbell2 Member
10 messages
joined Feb 2025
#39 ·
Charles Wood73 said:The original poster was really just hunting for the right name for the phenomenon itself, though Modovlje decided to tack it onto the title later on.

Oh, really?
I had no idea. 🕺

My bad if I missed the point then.
Kyle Sullivan3 Kyle Sullivan3 Newcomer
2 messages
joined Jun 2022
#40 ·
stormystag20 said:Hey everyone. As someone trained in educational psychology, there’s this one specific phenomenon I keep running into, and honestly, I can't find a logical explanation for it. It’s actually starting to get a little creepy. I’ve never been the type to buy into old wives' tales or any of that parapsychology nonsense—I'm a science person through and through—but lately, this has genuinely started to rattle me.

Here is what’s going on:

It’s a bit difficult to put into words, but I’ll give it my best shot.

Have you ever had a problem that’s been weighing on you for days, weeks, or even months? Let me use a mundane example, like a massive Biology final. This exam is huge; it’s the kind of thing that determines whether you pass the year or fail. You’re under immense stress, obsessing over it 24/7... and nobody else knows. No one knows you're struggling or how much prep work you're doing. That part is crucial.

Then, the very next day, you’re grabbing coffee with a friend and, out of nowhere, they mention how much they used to love biology. Later, you’re walking down the street and see a sign for the "American Biological Association" on a building. Then, an ad for "Biological Phenomena" pops up in your Facebook feed. Suddenly, you’re seeing this topic everywhere, even though nobody had mentioned it before.

Is it just a case of heightened focus? Like, because I'm stressed about the subject, my brain is just hyper-tuned to notice anything related to it? I thought that was the answer at first, but this has happened three or four times now with scenarios where the mathematical probability of such a coincidence is incredibly low. I don't think it's just selective attention.

Does this phenomenon have a specific name? Is it some version of the "Law of Attraction" or something similar? Again, I want to emphasize that I am absolutely not someone who gets swept up in paranormal theories, but this is catching me completely off guard.

I hope I'm not derailing the thread here.
Every man scratches where he itches... Human psychology works pretty much the same way.
If you're an electrician, you're going to notice stores selling cables, junction boxes, or shoddy wiring.
If you're a hairstylist, you'll spot a hundred bad haircuts just walking down the street. Last month at a family get-together, a guy spent the whole time inspecting the neighbors' roofs. Well, he's a roofer... so that makes sense.
Basically, once we become experts or focus heavily on a topic, we become hyper-sensitive to it.
That's the logical explanation.
The weaker explanation is when those obsessions become extreme and point toward a psychological issue—usually psychosis.
A good example is people who try to explain everything through a string of numbers (you can see Yubit Sladojev over on Yubitu constantly throwing out numbers that he links back to Bill Gejc).

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads