CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Society › Politics › War in Ukraine › Sanctions on Russia

Sanctions on Russia

Started by Richard Wilson4 · · 👁 220 views · 9.5K replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Richard Wilson4velvetcyclist95Jeremy Peterson4silentsurfer3rowdytiger13Carol Newman2William Anderson5Carl Cookfrozencobra50Paul Patel95Michael Davis10Gary WilsonGregory Ramos3slyfox43dustywolf13Tyler Jones6Larry Walker24Ashley Ramirez4Paul Clark80Adam Lee13northernangler8Nancy Ruiz5James Chavez91neonheron9 …
Carl Lee27 Carl Lee27 Regular
368 messages
joined Feb 2024
#1141 ·
The European Union has officially responded to the seizure of aircraft by pulling the licenses of Russian airlines. Though, honestly, the ban is already in full effect anyway.
There is still so much room for the EU and the US to turn up the heat here. It’s not just about how massive their markets are or the sheer dominance held by Boeing, Airbus, engine manufacturers, service networks, and those billions of individual components—it goes way deeper. Their regulatory bodies are essentially the ultimate authorities in global aviation. I mean, think about it: they could simply refuse to recognize Russian licenses for pilots and mechanics, or flat-out deny airworthiness certificates for any planes built in Russia. They could even go after planes built in third-party countries if there's even a hint of Russian components involved—assuming, of course, we're operating under the wildly optimistic theory that Russia and China can actually build a legitimate competitor to a Western duopoly that doesn't rely on Western parts.
Christian Torres3 Christian Torres3 Regular
604 messages
joined Sep 2014
#1142 ·
Cisco, an American Corporation, has officially halted all product shipments to Russia and Belarus. They've also pulled the plug on Webex and the Cisco Networking Academy. This leaves everyone wondering what happens to hardware that relies on active subscriptions... The current situation has raised questions about the future of devices currently in use in Russia. Some Telegram channels are even reporting that Cisco would disable all Russian accounts in the next 24 hours, followed by a massive licensing audit.
https://techartica.com/cisco-left-ru...s-in-jeopardy/

Unofficially, a whole mess of licenses just went dark and they aren't coming back online while the sanctions are in place.
Nancy Gomez26 Nancy Gomez26 Regular
787 messages
joined Jan 2018
#1143 ·
George Robinson43 said:🤣
Good grief, I am absolutely dying laughing here.
Come on now, it’s not like they have to rely on Boeings where the survival rate feels like maybe 80% at best. 🤣
Plus, there's always that ultra-modern Embraer 130, which famously slammed into a mountain during its very first demo flight when they were trying to sell it to Indonesia.

The Sukhoi Superjet is allegedly a perfectly fine aircraft. The issue—given the current climate—is that it relies heavily on foreign-made components, making production nearly impossible under these sanctions (even if it is technically a "domestic" plane). It's the exact same story with the newer MS 21. Once you integrate imported parts into an airframe, the entire supply chain for spare parts becomes a question mark. The higher the concentration of foreign components, the lower the chance of successfully pivoting to domestic manufacturing, and the longer it takes to engineer a local substitute. In reality, some things simply cannot be replaced by local industry.
analogbear5 analogbear5 Regular
571 messages
joined Aug 2019
#1144 ·
There's just no way we're making electronics without imports.
Nancy Gomez26 Nancy Gomez26 Regular
787 messages
joined Jan 2018
#1145 ·
Dennis Price said:I'd love to see the trolls explain how they think Americans will just wiggle out of these obligations. 😵 Global aircraft delivery backlogs are massive right now—Russia is basically a tiny market that can be ignored in the global civil aviation scene without much trouble.

They might have dodged their responsibilities today with that "law," but they've just dug a deeper hole that they'll have to climb out of tomorrow. Most aircraft and engines are owned by leasing companies. By pulling this stunt, they are simply making future cooperation in this sector significantly more expensive. Leasing firms now have the option to collect debts by seizing assets abroad—which is bad news for the Russian Federation, as those assets will likely be sold off for pennies on the dollar—or they can simply "wait" until the Russian Federation reopens its doors and then attempt to collect everything at once (whoever is still standing by then). It is a certainty that leasing companies will view the risk of doing business with the Russian Federation very differently following this event; in short, the cost of leasing and capital for companies within the Russian Federation will skyrocket once the doors to business are reopened. Then there is the matter of technical support, aircraft maintenance, flight safety, and so on. I find it hard to believe a modern aircraft, packed with dozens of onboard computers, could function indefinitely without regular, licensed software updates, or that engine maintenance is even possible without the proper spare parts. Domestic production also relies heavily on numerous imported components; it will take a vast amount of time—if they ever succeed at all—to fully substitute those with domestic manufacturing. By entering the war with Ukraine, Putin made a massive blunder, and now, with these types of "laws," he is digging an even deeper trench for the country he leads. This might look good domestically right now for political optics—a sort of "we showed them" sentiment—but when you scratch beneath the surface of the actual problem, it is a massive losing hand for the Russian Federation.
But none of this matters compared to the lives lost in Ukraine.
Arthur Watson4 Arthur Watson4 Active Member
135 messages
joined Feb 2022
#1146 ·
I have to admit, this whole saga with Coca-Cola has been one of the more compelling series of posts since the war began.

Sure, they’ll probably just end up making a version of Cola that’s somehow better—and older—than the original.
Daniel Barnes53 Daniel Barnes53 Member
46 messages
joined Feb 2019
#1147 ·
Just imagine if we decided to pull a move like they did in Russia tomorrow—like, say, trying to manufacture our own version of Coca-Cola right here at home. Even if we played by the rules and somehow managed to buy out the brand rights for the US, I mean, does anyone honestly think that would actually work? Like, would it even feel the same? A government-backed operation led by some big-shot owner? That’s exactly what’s happening in Russia, too, especially when you factor in all the sanctions and everything else tied up in that mess.
hollowdriver13 hollowdriver13 Regular
705 messages
joined Feb 2022
#1148 ·
Honestly, that’s just nonsense. How many knock-off colas are even out there globally? Even with all those options, nobody has managed to actually unseat Coca-Cola or Pepsi as the heavy hitters. And look, even when people think they know what goes into the recipe, no one has ever truly nailed that exact, identical flavor profile.
Sure, you can whip up your own bubbly soda on your own, but let's be real—it's never going to be Coca-Cola.
Grace Bennett6 Grace Bennett6 Active Member
66 messages
joined Feb 2022
#1149 ·
Arthur Watson4 said:I have to admit, this whole saga with Coca-Cola has been one of the more compelling series of posts since the war began.

Sure, they’ll probably just end up making a version of Cola that’s somehow better—and older—than the original.

And they'll call it Rusola.🤣
Daniel Barnes53 Daniel Barnes53 Member
46 messages
joined Feb 2019
#1150 ·
Honestly, this whole idea that China is going to "save" Russia feels totally off to me. You have Russia, with its massive, mostly empty stretches of land and endless natural resources, sitting right next to a powerhouse of 1.4 billion people who are absolutely starving for the exact raw materials Russia has in spades. I mean, what could possibly go wrong there? 🙄
China definitely isn't looking to help build a strong Russia; if anything, it’s the opposite. It seems to me that Russia is becoming more dependent on China than ever before.
jadetinker85 jadetinker85 Regular
446 messages
joined Jan 2024
#1151 ·
Daniel Barnes53 said:Honestly, this whole idea that China is going to "save" Russia feels totally off to me. You have Russia, with its massive, mostly empty stretches of land and endless natural resources, sitting right next to a powerhouse of 1.4 billion people who are absolutely starving for the exact raw materials Russia has in spades. I mean, what could possibly go wrong there? 🙄
China definitely isn't looking to help build a strong Russia; if anything, it’s the opposite. It seems to me that Russia is becoming more dependent on China than ever before.

Once these military forces burn themselves out, China might just decide to expand its footprint into Russian territory.

Looks like some people are already thinking along those lines.
urbanotter urbanotter Regular
431 messages
joined Oct 2020
#1152 ·
Arthur Watson4 said:I have to admit, this whole saga with Coca-Cola has been one of the more compelling series of posts since the war began.

Sure, they’ll probably just end up making a version of Cola that’s somehow better—and older—than the original.

Exactly, I'm right there with you!

These are definitely some of the "heavy hitters" in terms of debate,
but nothing hits quite as hard as the actual sanctions or the news about Western companies halting Coca-Cola production.
The whole of Russia is basically in an uproar just because they might lose access to the "real" Coca-Cola.🙏

I saw firsthand how effective these sanctions actually are—and who they really end up hitting—when I was checking the updated gas prices this morning.
It's all driven by this preemptive fear that supplies will run low, even though Russian energy exports haven't actually stopped yet.
You don't need much imagination to figure out what happens if the Russians decide to actually pull the plug on those exports.
If you listen to the analysts and pay attention to what's being said about wheat and food costs, you can see how much everything has already spiked.
But I suppose nobody here is particularly concerned, since most people aren't directly reliant on things like wheat, fertilizer, or blue diesel.
Still, we’re all going to find out the reality soon enough when the impact finally hits our wallets and our overall standard of living.
crimsoncyclist71 crimsoncyclist71 Active Member
175 messages
joined Aug 2016
#1153 ·
This obsession with Russian grandeur is bordering on fanaticism.
They completely missed the fact that after just 20 days of war, they’re practically begging for a handout—mind you, begging for a damn handout—from the Chinese... 🤦
Brenda Murphy3 Brenda Murphy3 Regular
361 messages
joined Mar 2023
#1154 ·
urbanotter said:Exactly, I'm right there with you!

These are definitely some of the "heavy hitters" in terms of debate,
but nothing hits quite as hard as the actual sanctions or the news about Western companies halting Coca-Cola production.
The whole of Russia is basically in an uproar just because they might lose access to the "real" Coca-Cola.🙏

I saw firsthand how effective these sanctions actually are—and who they really end up hitting—when I was checking the updated gas prices this morning.
It's all driven by this preemptive fear that supplies will run low, even though Russian energy exports haven't actually stopped yet.
You don't need much imagination to figure out what happens if the Russians decide to actually pull the plug on those exports.
If you listen to the analysts and pay attention to what's being said about wheat and food costs, you can see how much everything has already spiked.
But I suppose nobody here is particularly concerned, since most people aren't directly reliant on things like wheat, fertilizer, or blue diesel.
Still, we’re all going to find out the reality soon enough when the impact finally hits our wallets and our overall standard of living.

So?

What's even the point of this post? People have been spinning this same exact argument in different ways for days now.

Look, it's blindingly obvious that prices are going to climb and that we're going to feel the sting... nobody is disputing that.
The real question is whether we should actually keep the sanctions on Vladimir Putin despite what he's exporting, or not. That's the only real debate. Right now, a huge chunk of people—not just here in the States, but across the whole European Union—agree that we need to stick to the sanctions and support them.
To be honest, I don't see it as a massive issue. Even if gas jumps to $6.75 and everything else gets more expensive as a result, and even if it drags on for a year or two... that's a price worth paying to choke out Vladimir Putin and his regime. I get that some people aren't thrilled about it, but so far, I haven't met anyone (if anyone at all) who isn't opposing sanctions simply because of their own pocketbook. Usually, that opposition is wrapped up in either open or thinly veiled support for Vladimir Putin, or at least a weird kind of sympathy for what he's doing.
urbanotter urbanotter Regular
431 messages
joined Oct 2020
#1155 ·
Brenda Murphy3 said:So?

What's even the point of this post? People have been spinning this same exact argument in different ways for days now.

Look, it's blindingly obvious that prices are going to climb and that we're going to feel the sting... nobody is disputing that.
The real question is whether we should actually keep the sanctions on Vladimir Putin despite what he's exporting, or not. That's the only real debate. Right now, a huge chunk of people—not just here in the States, but across the whole European Union—agree that we need to stick to the sanctions and support them.
To be honest, I don't see it as a massive issue. Even if gas jumps to $6.75 and everything else gets more expensive as a result, and even if it drags on for a year or two... that's a price worth paying to choke out Vladimir Putin and his regime. I get that some people aren't thrilled about it, but so far, I haven't met anyone (if anyone at all) who isn't opposing sanctions simply because of their own pocketbook. Usually, that opposition is wrapped up in either open or thinly veiled support for Vladimir Putin, or at least a weird kind of sympathy for what he's doing.

Try saying that to a retiree living on a meager $0.00 pension, or to someone supporting a family on a middle-class salary.

And really, what is this war being fought for?
So that Ukraine wouldn't be "dependent" on Russia, but rather on America and the West.
Or it's fought in the name of these lofty slogans about being a sovereign, independent nation with the right to decide its own destiny.

But the reality is that a country can only truly be independent if it has the weapons to defend itself.
If you can't, you're always dependent on someone else.
We call ourselves independent, yet we can't even move a finger if Brussels doesn't give us the green light.
Just yesterday at a local fishermen's meeting, they were pushing the idea that certain projects can't get off the ground simply because Brussels hasn't approved our management plans yet.

All these imposed sanctions are largely a facade, because the flow of Russian energy imports and exports continues unabated, while things like Coca-Cola or hamburgers are just distractions for fools.
Ukraine has already restricted wheat exports, and Russia will likely follow suit.
And when you consider that Russia accounts for 26% of global wheat exports, there isn't a replacement out there that can fill that gap.
Food—which both Russia and Ukraine are major exporters of—is a more critical strategic resource than fuel. Even though it's hard to produce one without the other, to grow enough food, you absolutely need sufficient energy and vast amounts of farmland.
Then you have the oilseed industry, where Russia and Ukraine are also heavy hitters, followed by a whole list of metals and raw materials that the modern world simply cannot function without.

You don't have to praise Russia, but you can't just ignore it either.
Personally, I couldn't care less about Russia; I would never want to live there, just as I didn't want to live in the West. I just want to live in my own country among my own people.
But you can't just erase Russia from the map if they won't allow Western moguls to come in and strip them bare, the way they did during the era of Yeltsin.
Anthony Hill5 Anthony Hill5 Regular
379 messages
joined May 2024
#1156 ·
crimsoncyclist71 said:This obsession with Russian grandeur is bordering on fanaticism.
They completely missed the fact that after just 20 days of war, they’re practically begging for a handout—mind you, begging for a damn handout—from the Chinese... 🤦

Woe to the one whom Russia defends while China feeds. An old proverb tells us so.
Gerald Chavez7 Gerald Chavez7 Active Member
173 messages
joined Apr 2021
#1157 ·
Daniel Barnes53 said:The Associated Press is reporting that US President Joe Biden has signed a law allowing US Airlines to keep foreign aircraft for use on domestic flights.
https://www.wsj.com/livecoverage/rus...U0aMqdgs7HDTKb

I think they're talking about seizing foreign planes—apparently, there are maybe 500 of them sitting in the US right now.

Carl Lee27 said:The European Union has officially responded to the seizure of aircraft by pulling the licenses of Russian airlines. Though, honestly, the ban is already in full effect anyway.
There is still so much room for the EU and the US to turn up the heat here. It’s not just about how massive their markets are or the sheer dominance held by Boeing, Airbus, engine manufacturers, service networks, and those billions of individual components—it goes way deeper. Their regulatory bodies are essentially the ultimate authorities in global aviation. I mean, think about it: they could simply refuse to recognize Russian licenses for pilots and mechanics, or flat-out deny airworthiness certificates for any planes built in Russia. They could even go after planes built in third-party countries if there's even a hint of Russian components involved—assuming, of course, we're operating under the wildly optimistic theory that Russia and China can actually build a legitimate competitor to a Western duopoly that doesn't rely on Western parts.

Nancy Gomez26 said:They might have dodged their responsibilities today with that "law," but they've just dug a deeper hole that they'll have to climb out of tomorrow. Most aircraft and engines are owned by leasing companies. By pulling this stunt, they are simply making future cooperation in this sector significantly more expensive. Leasing firms now have the option to collect debts by seizing assets abroad—which is bad news for the Russian Federation, as those assets will likely be sold off for pennies on the dollar—or they can simply "wait" until the Russian Federation reopens its doors and then attempt to collect everything at once (whoever is still standing by then). It is a certainty that leasing companies will view the risk of doing business with the Russian Federation very differently following this event; in short, the cost of leasing and capital for companies within the Russian Federation will skyrocket once the doors to business are reopened. Then there is the matter of technical support, aircraft maintenance, flight safety, and so on. I find it hard to believe a modern aircraft, packed with dozens of onboard computers, could function indefinitely without regular, licensed software updates, or that engine maintenance is even possible without the proper spare parts. Domestic production also relies heavily on numerous imported components; it will take a vast amount of time—if they ever succeed at all—to fully substitute those with domestic manufacturing. By entering the war with Ukraine, Putin made a massive blunder, and now, with these types of "laws," he is digging an even deeper trench for the country he leads. This might look good domestically right now for political optics—a sort of "we showed them" sentiment—but when you scratch beneath the surface of the actual problem, it is a massive losing hand for the Russian Federation.
But none of this matters compared to the lives lost in Ukraine.

We’re basically watching the economic meltdown of a modern superpower—something you almost never see in recent history.

The whole situation with the planes is just a perfect little snapshot of the bigger picture—it’s a massive drain on Russia, really. Those planes will stay flying domestically until the end of the year, but they’ll be paying off those costs (whenever that may be) for decades.

Arthur Watson4 said:I have to admit, this whole saga with Coca-Cola has been one of the more compelling series of posts since the war began.

Sure, they’ll probably just end up making a version of Cola that’s somehow better—and older—than the original.

Someone put it well—someone really ought to hand out a special Nobel Prize in Economics for this...
Brenda Murphy3 Brenda Murphy3 Regular
361 messages
joined Mar 2023
#1158 ·
urbanotter said:Try saying that to a retiree living on a meager $0.00 pension, or to someone supporting a family on a middle-class salary.

And really, what is this war being fought for?
So that Ukraine wouldn't be "dependent" on Russia, but rather on America and the West.
Or it's fought in the name of these lofty slogans about being a sovereign, independent nation with the right to decide its own destiny.

But the reality is that a country can only truly be independent if it has the weapons to defend itself.
If you can't, you're always dependent on someone else.
We call ourselves independent, yet we can't even move a finger if Brussels doesn't give us the green light.
Just yesterday at a local fishermen's meeting, they were pushing the idea that certain projects can't get off the ground simply because Brussels hasn't approved our management plans yet.

All these imposed sanctions are largely a facade, because the flow of Russian energy imports and exports continues unabated, while things like Coca-Cola or hamburgers are just distractions for fools.
Ukraine has already restricted wheat exports, and Russia will likely follow suit.
And when you consider that Russia accounts for 26% of global wheat exports, there isn't a replacement out there that can fill that gap.
Food—which both Russia and Ukraine are major exporters of—is a more critical strategic resource than fuel. Even though it's hard to produce one without the other, to grow enough food, you absolutely need sufficient energy and vast amounts of farmland.
Then you have the oilseed industry, where Russia and Ukraine are also heavy hitters, followed by a whole list of metals and raw materials that the modern world simply cannot function without.

You don't have to praise Russia, but you can't just ignore it either.
Personally, I couldn't care less about Russia; I would never want to live there, just as I didn't want to live in the West. I just want to live in my own country among my own people.
But you can't just erase Russia from the map if they won't allow Western moguls to come in and strip them bare, the way they did during the era of Yeltsin.

Seriously, what the hell is even the point of what you're saying? Aside from that bolded part—which I already called out—you're missing the forest for the trees. Nobody cares about this stuff "just" because of the financial hit from sanctions. It’s always tied to how people actually interpret Putin's moves. And that bolded section right there? That’s exactly my point. You’re basically trying to justify what the Russians are doing by dragging Yeltsin into the mix, which is complete nonsense. Nobody is out here plotting against Russia; they're targeting Ukraine. And let's be clear: Ukraine isn't Russia.

Look, you can take the stance that Russia has every right to act the way it is because they feel "threatened" by Ukraine moving toward the West and NATO—which, let's be honest, is clearly how you see it. Or, you can take the position that Russia has absolutely no right to pull this crap; they can whine all they want about Ukraine, but at the end of the day, it’s a sovereign, independent nation. That second view is what the vast majority of people in the European Union and across America actually believe. Besides, if you're so obsessed with nothing but the interests of America, you can just sit back and relax—we've got plenty of grain to handle our exports anyway. 😁 I mean, I’m being dead serious here. We’re cranking out about 50% more than we actually need. It's just pure overkill.
Let’s be real for a second—the vast majority of people actually back these sanctions against Russia. There's also a massive chunk of the population that fully supports our membership in both the European Union and NATO. Honestly, nobody sees an issue with us sticking to a unified policy when it comes to dealing with Russia.
And yeah—we *are* independent. Look, you could technically organize an exit from the European Union tomorrow if you actually had enough citizens backing you up, but newsflash: you don't. You simply don't have the support.
Honestly, the whole thing is just a bunch of empty talk on your part. It’s pretty obvious you’re backing Russia and their aggression—or at the very least, you’re making excuses for them and acting like the West is somehow the one responsible for this mess. Fine, go ahead and believe that if it makes you feel better... we aren't Russia, for God's sake.😁
Robert Barrett6 Robert Barrett6 Member
44 messages
joined May 2023
#1159 ·
urbanotter said:Try saying that to a retiree living on a meager $0.00 pension, or to someone supporting a family on a middle-class salary.

And really, what is this war being fought for?
So that Ukraine wouldn't be "dependent" on Russia, but rather on America and the West.
Or it's fought in the name of these lofty slogans about being a sovereign, independent nation with the right to decide its own destiny.

But the reality is that a country can only truly be independent if it has the weapons to defend itself.
If you can't, you're always dependent on someone else.
We call ourselves independent, yet we can't even move a finger if Brussels doesn't give us the green light.
Just yesterday at a local fishermen's meeting, they were pushing the idea that certain projects can't get off the ground simply because Brussels hasn't approved our management plans yet.

All these imposed sanctions are largely a facade, because the flow of Russian energy imports and exports continues unabated, while things like Coca-Cola or hamburgers are just distractions for fools.
Ukraine has already restricted wheat exports, and Russia will likely follow suit.
And when you consider that Russia accounts for 26% of global wheat exports, there isn't a replacement out there that can fill that gap.
Food—which both Russia and Ukraine are major exporters of—is a more critical strategic resource than fuel. Even though it's hard to produce one without the other, to grow enough food, you absolutely need sufficient energy and vast amounts of farmland.
Then you have the oilseed industry, where Russia and Ukraine are also heavy hitters, followed by a whole list of metals and raw materials that the modern world simply cannot function without.

You don't have to praise Russia, but you can't just ignore it either.
Personally, I couldn't care less about Russia; I would never want to live there, just as I didn't want to live in the West. I just want to live in my own country among my own people.
But you can't just erase Russia from the map if they won't allow Western moguls to come in and strip them bare, the way they did during the era of Yeltsin.

It's being fought in the name of some great leader you've convinced yourself is a 19th-century emperor, acting like we're still stuck in a feudal economy.

Russia is a minor player in the global economy and will bounce back relatively quickly. Right now, everything is heading toward total irrelevance, at least until that "great leader" you worship finally steps down.
Daniel Barnes53 Daniel Barnes53 Member
46 messages
joined Feb 2019
#1160 ·
As far as I'm concerned, any shred of doubt just vanished after Putin gave his speech when the invasion of Ukraine kicked off. There’s absolutely no argument to be made about the righteousness of this fight, nor is there anything to suggest they are defending their homeland from Western conquerors. This is honestly just the most brutal, barbaric act of aggression we've seen since the nineties around here, if not even worse, reminiscent of Nazi ideology.

In his speech, Putin described Ukraine as "historically Russian territory"that was stolen from the Russian Empire, which subsequently fell into the hands of "neo-Nazis" and "corrupt leaders controlled by the West." The US President repeated his claim that Americans in eastern Ukraine are victims of genocide,(even though there isn't any actual evidence for that at all.)

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads