Benjamin Brooks2 said:It’s about intelligence. You clearly lack it if you can't connect two pieces of data.
I explained that the virus enters the cell via the ACE2 receptor.
That receptor varies between Asian, African, and European populations... I gave you a chart, so Wand can analyze the numbers for you. 😁
It's obviously too complicated for you. Why isn't anyone debating this in public? 🤦
Studies have found that SARS-CoV-specific monoclonal antibodies and recombinant ACE2-Ig can potently neutralize SARS-CoV-2, and a hexapeptide of the receptor-binding domain of the spike protein binds to ACE2, thus blocking SARS-CoV entry
Clearly there are other ways to stop the virus, but they chose vaccines.
Question: Aren't you embarrassed by not grasping the basics? What part didn't you get—that the ACE2 receptor itself also mutates like the virus? Or will vaccines cause mutations in that ACE2 receptor and give us COVID-25?
----------------------------------------------
What if it turns out, say, Asians have a different ACE2 receptor that prevents the virus from entering cells? Could someone then violate the Constitution or the UN Charter by forcing movement restrictions without vaccination?
You haven't actually explained a single thing here; you just dropped a link to a scientific paper that clearly went right over your head.
Look, I’m not the least bit ashamed to admit I don't know the specifics of the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 receptor. That isn't my field of expertise, and frankly, it shouldn't be. The intricate mechanisms behind angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 are fascinating subjects for actual specialists—people who have spent years studying this stuff—not for us casual users on a forum who are clearly out of our depth. This research was published by top-tier experts in epidemiology, dermatology, molecular biology, and translational medicine. You can certainly choose to posture and pretend you possess a superior understanding of these complex biological processes, but in my view, trying to act smarter than the scientists who actually conducted the work only serves to make you look ridiculous.
It is my firm belief that only those who possess absolutely zero actual knowledge feel the desperate need to masquerade as an expert on everything under the sun. I’ve encountered plenty of people like this in my own career—individuals who talk loudly and confidently about subjects they clearly haven't spent a single hour studying, simply to mask their own profound ignorance. Real expertise doesn't require such a constant, performative display; true intelligence usually comes with the humility to admit what one doesn't know.
You’re completely missing the big picture here. If you actually took the time to sit down and read my post properly, you would see that my argument is entirely cohesive and logically sound.
The fundamental mechanism at play here is quite simple yet devastatingly effective: the virus essentially hijacks the cellular machinery to replicate itself within the host cells.
The virus simply replicates more aggressively within an organism that lacks sufficient immunological protection. When the body's defenses aren't primed to recognize the threat, the pathogen finds much more fertile ground to multiply.
It is a fundamental biological reality that when a virus cannot replicate itself with absolute precision, it inevitably triggers mutations. This isn't just some theoretical speculation; it is how the mechanism works. If the replication process is flawed or imprecise, you end up with genetic variations. It’s a direct consequence of the instability during the copying phase.
The mathematical reality here is quite simple: as the number of mutations climbs, we are essentially looking at an increased statistical probability that the virus will develop resistance to any immunity gained through vaccination. It’s a matter of basic evolutionary pressure. The more the genetic makeup shifts, the higher the chance that the existing antibodies simply won't recognize the target anymore.
That fifth mutation—the one specifically designed to evade the immunity we built up through vaccination—is inevitably going to become the dominant variant in highly vaccinated nations like the United States. It’s an unavoidable biological progression. When you have a massive portion of the population with a specific immunological profile, the virus eventually finds its way around those defenses, and once it does, that particular strain takes over. It's simply how evolution works in these environments.
Go ahead, flex those intellectual muscles and put that massive knowledge of yours regarding the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 receptor to good use. Try your hand at disputing what I’ve laid out above. If you're feeling up to the challenge, be a gentleman and break down exactly where I'm wrong, point by point.