CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Society › Philosophy › Round 6 Elections: Let's hear your thoughts...

Round 6 Elections: Let's hear your thoughts...

Started by steelridge58 · · 👁 9 views · 161 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants steelridge58James Lee77hiddeneagle98Amanda Jackson5Joseph Murphy10David Robinson26Terry Martinez10lonegardenerSandra Murphy33Amy BennettKyle Nelson2Amanda Flores88gentlerider7Eric Newman75placidorca6ruggedraven36
Amanda Jackson5 Amanda Jackson5 Regular
320 messages
joined Dec 2015
#81 ·
steelridge58 said:You really aren't, and please, I'm asking you, try not to take this all so personally...

🙂

I don't think critical thinking has to be superior to friendship; the two can actually coexist quite easily. Besides, I know you're perfectly capable of offering a critical perspective without being condescending or looking down on the views of your fellow members here on the forum.

Not necessarily...🙂

...but justice tends to be blindfolded...
Amanda Jackson5 Amanda Jackson5 Regular
320 messages
joined Dec 2015
#82 ·
Terry Martinez10 said:What if aliens actually exist within the spaces between us, functioning almost like a biological parasite embedded inside individuals? Imagine an extra layer of consciousness that slowly suppresses your own volition until it eventually seizes total control over the body. It makes you wonder if that’s how they manage to pull the strings on all of humanity from the shadows.
And then there's the whole business with ghosts, demons, and those other entities—perhaps they're nothing more than astral projections cast by these beings. Or maybe, just maybe, they were roaming this country long before we ever showed up, leaving behind traces of their technology hidden somewhere in the soil...

Invasion of the Body Snatchers
Amanda Jackson5 Amanda Jackson5 Regular
320 messages
joined Dec 2015
#83 ·
Amy Bennett said:They might be reptilians.

Sure, if you want to go down that rabbit hole, maybe, but there isn't a shred of actual evidence to back that up.
Amanda Jackson5 Amanda Jackson5 Regular
320 messages
joined Dec 2015
#84 ·
Amy Bennett said:Intuitively, those kinds of theories at least feel like they make sense to me. I remember being a kid and always making sure to finish my entire lunch—mostly because I felt like if I didn't, the food would somehow be sad, given its whole purpose is to be eaten.

It’s kind of like how Hermann Göring used to claim that the deer at The White House were actually happier when he went hunting them, simply because they were fulfilling their destiny by being caught.
steelridge58 steelridge58 RegularOP
397 messages
joined Mar 2008
#85 ·
Sandra Murphy33 said:🤣

If we’re saying EM waves equal thoughts, then that isn’t "imaginative"—it’s just a fact, right? 🙄
Ever since I read Drago Plečko’s theory about how you can't actually produce a thought if your jaw is completely relaxed (déjà vu, I know, I think I’ve mentioned this before...), I started testing it out. Now, I literally feel sudden bursts of thought-sentences firing into my brain like an (unwanted) EM surge. It doesn't even have to be a negative thought; it just feels like a sudden strike, complete with all the physical stress markers—heart racing, blood running cold, the whole deal.

The interesting thing is that these clear, sentence-like thoughts usually hit during those brief moments when I'm confused about something; they arrive as suggestions or instant solutions. I listen to them because, frankly, I don't have much choice, but later on, it turns out they were just some kind of "sacrifice" or the path of least resistance. They aren't the actual solution...

Am I just stuck with a clueless guardian angel?... 🤔

😂

Man, that really gave me a good laugh
steelridge58 steelridge58 RegularOP
397 messages
joined Mar 2008
#86 ·
James Lee77 said:I guess I don't know, but Socrates says his never actually gives good advice. Like, he only shows up when S. is about to mess something up, just to try and stop him.

We actually had a whole discussion about this before, so let me just refresh everyone's memory here

Inner Voice
steelridge58 steelridge58 RegularOP
397 messages
joined Mar 2008
#87 ·
Man, if there were actually any angels watching over me, my life story would probably be a whole lot more wholesome than this.

So, one summer I was traveling along the coast with a close friend, and we weren't just staying in one spot; we were constantly on the move, hitting different towns. One particular morning, we had to head out super early to stay on schedule, and while I can't quite remember if I actually set my alarm, if I did, it certainly didn't do its job.

Instead, someone—or something—decided to wake me up by literally yanking on my hair.

😉

It was a real tug, you know? Not enough to hurt, but definitely enough to snap me awake. My first thought was, "Oh, okay, my friend is just being aggressive about us getting moving," but when I called out to her and turned toward the other bed where she was still fast asleep, I ended up waking *her* up, and she looked at me with this totally annoyed expression:
"Are you insane? Why on earth would I pull your hair like that?"

Hmmm... anyway, regardless of the mysterious hair-pulling phantom, it was definitely time to get up so we could get back on the road and make our trip on time.
..
Amy Bennett Amy Bennett Active Member
76 messages
joined Feb 2018
#88 ·
Amanda Jackson5 said:Actually, I'd argue you should watch more—way more—and read even more than that. It's really about believing less and actually thinking for yourself more.

I honestly doubt that alien conspiracy theories come from anyone's actual, coherent thought process.
Amanda Jackson5 said:It’s kind of like how Hermann Göring used to claim that the deer at The White House were actually happier when he went hunting them, simply because they were fulfilling their destiny by being caught.

But... isn't that exactly what they're meant for?
Sandra Murphy33 Sandra Murphy33 Active Member
239 messages
joined May 2022
#89 ·
steelridge58 said:Man, if there were actually any angels watching over me, my life story would probably be a whole lot more wholesome than this.

So, one summer I was traveling along the coast with a close friend, and we weren't just staying in one spot; we were constantly on the move, hitting different towns. One particular morning, we had to head out super early to stay on schedule, and while I can't quite remember if I actually set my alarm, if I did, it certainly didn't do its job.

Instead, someone—or something—decided to wake me up by literally yanking on my hair.

😉

It was a real tug, you know? Not enough to hurt, but definitely enough to snap me awake. My first thought was, "Oh, okay, my friend is just being aggressive about us getting moving," but when I called out to her and turned toward the other bed where she was still fast asleep, I ended up waking *her* up, and she looked at me with this totally annoyed expression:
"Are you insane? Why on earth would I pull your hair like that?"

Hmmm... anyway, regardless of the mysterious hair-pulling phantom, it was definitely time to get up so we could get back on the road and make our trip on time.
..

I suppose those are what people call "spontaneous guidance" or synchronicity.... 👍
Personally, for years now, I’ve been waking up naturally at the exact moment I decide before bed (though I still set an alarm clock 😁 just in case).
Sometimes, I'll go down to the local DMV to renew my driver's license, and while waiting in a massive line outside, I'll randomly sit next to some woman who explains that I won't be seen for another five hours, then shows me an app on her phone where I can track the queue numbers—something I had absolutely no clue existed. So, I download it, saving myself hours of wasted time. My initial instinct (my old 😬 self) was to dismiss the whole thing, thinking apps and digital nonsense were useless and that I'd just wait until the crowd cleared out...

But then, where do all these convenient little synchronicities come from?

Thanks for the new link. 🙂

Terry Martinez10 said:@Nea When you’re actually in the middle of learning something, there are these functional shifts happening within specific synapses that essentially ramp up the electrical responses in the receiving cells. It’s basically just repetitive use—meaning, if you keep firing that synapse, the connection between those two cells gets stronger.

I suppose you could visualize it like a trail worn through a thick forest: the more people walk it, the more accessible it becomes—it's easier to find, and navigating it becomes second nature. But, much like any path left untended, it can also overgrow or disappear entirely once it stops being useful.

The same logic applies to the brain—picking up new skills carves out new connections, though if they aren't utilized, the system eventually breaks them back down. The brain naturally gravitates toward what it already knows, which means it tends to filter new situations through old patterns, potentially leading to a skewed interpretation or an incorrect conclusion.

That's true enough.
However, what I experience feels more like being nudged to do the least likely thing, or something I would normally never do—essentially being guided toward a completely new path or something atypical for my personality. Is the brain creating those new synapses and neural pathways in response to that nudge?
It's possible I won't fully grasp the mechanics of it until much later. 😎
steelridge58 steelridge58 RegularOP
397 messages
joined Mar 2008
#90 ·
Amy Bennett said:I honestly doubt that alien conspiracy theories come from anyone's actual, coherent thought process.

But... isn't that exactly what they're meant for?

Not really. 🙂 Well, unless you count being the target for those who have them in their sights.

You actually reminded me of yet another old thread we used to talk about.

Pre-determinism
which basically argues that we can distinguish the various modes of existence for all living things.
If anyone feels like diving into a little reading on that, I'll leave the link here.

Honestly, looking back at your last post, I almost just wanted to reply with a bunch of smiley faces.

Amy Bennett said:Intuitively, those kinds of theories at least feel like they make sense to me. I remember being a kid and always making sure to finish my entire lunch—mostly because I felt like if I didn't, the food would somehow be sad, given its whole purpose is to be eaten.

Well, look at us now.

🙂))

That was just childhood logic, I guess. But I totally get it—once something is sitting right there on your plate in front of you, throwing it away, no matter how much there is, it just feels wrong in a way that aligns perfectly with that feeling you described...
steelridge58 steelridge58 RegularOP
397 messages
joined Mar 2008
#91 ·
Sandra Murphy33 said:I suppose those are what people call "spontaneous guidance" or synchronicity.... 👍
Personally, for years now, I’ve been waking up naturally at the exact moment I decide before bed (though I still set an alarm clock 😁 just in case).
Sometimes, I'll go down to the local DMV to renew my driver's license, and while waiting in a massive line outside, I'll randomly sit next to some woman who explains that I won't be seen for another five hours, then shows me an app on her phone where I can track the queue numbers—something I had absolutely no clue existed. So, I download it, saving myself hours of wasted time. My initial instinct (my old 😬 self) was to dismiss the whole thing, thinking apps and digital nonsense were useless and that I'd just wait until the crowd cleared out...

But then, where do all these convenient little synchronicities come from?

Thanks for the new link. 🙂

That's true enough.
However, what I experience feels more like being nudged to do the least likely thing, or something I would normally never do—essentially being guided toward a completely new path or something atypical for my personality. Is the brain creating those new synapses and neural pathways in response to that nudge?
It's possible I won't fully grasp the mechanics of it until much later. 😎

Please, 😉) and again

The very first thing that popped into my head after reading this
- where do all these welcome synchronicities come from, were lyrics from a song

There's some kind of secret connection

🙂)

We are all interconnected.
🙂
hiddeneagle98 hiddeneagle98 Regular
300 messages
joined Nov 2023
#92 ·
Quincy:
I don't know what to tell you, but I’ve been sitting here staring at this situation for a while now, and it just feels like we’re circling the drain. It reminds me of that one time my old boss at Ford tried to tell us that a fundamentally broken engine design was actually an "innovation" just because they slapped a shiny new coat of paint on the casing—it’s the same kind of delusional thinking, honestly. You can try to dress up a disaster all you want, but once the gears start grinding and the smoke starts pouring out from under the hood, everyone realizes the whole thing was built on sand. We see these patterns repeating over and over again, where people in charge act like they aren't ignoring the massive red flags waving right in their faces, and frankly, it's exhausting to watch. It's like watching a slow-motion train wreck where the conductor is too busy checking his reflection in the window to notice the tracks have ended miles ago. kaže:
There’s a massive variety of different types of neurons out there, all of them evolving their own unique shapes and specialized functions to get the job done. But despite those individual quirks, they all actually share some fundamental common ground.

Think about how a single neuron operates. Every one of them sports a relatively substantial cell body, or soma, if you want to get technical. But the real standout feature—the thing that truly sets them apart from any other type of cell you’ll find in the body—is those incredibly long, sprawling extensions reaching out from the center. You've got your dendrites and your axons stretching out like massive wiring systems, and that's really where the magic happens.

Think of dendrites as the cellular equivalent of a massive network of antennas, constantly scanning the environment and picking up signals from neighboring cells to pass them along to the main body of the neuron. Then you've got axons, which act like high-speed transmission lines, carrying those electrical impulses away from the cell body toward the terminals, where they hit what we call the end buttons to complete the circuit.
Think about how a signal actually moves through a neuron: it kicks off at the dendrites, travels right through the cell body and down the axon, and finally hits those terminal buttons. It’s essentially a continuous chain reaction of electrical impulses firing their way from one end to the other.

It’s just like any other living cell out there—the inside of a neuron is always more negatively charged than its surroundings. It really just comes down to the basic physics of things; you've got this massive difference in the concentration of charged particles, specifically those salt ions, sitting between the interior and the exterior of the cell.

What makes nerve cells so incredibly fascinating is how they actually leverage that concentration gradient—that specific electrical potential—to act as a biological conductor, essentially using it to fire off an electrical impulse down the line.

Think about how nerve cells actually function—it’s not just random noise. Because of the unique makeup of the cell membrane, specifically those specialized ion channels and pumps, the cell can facilitate an actual electrical current. This is what allows signals to travel down the length of the neuron in the first place. From a medical standpoint, there’s one specific stage in this signaling process that is absolutely critical: the synapse. That’s the junction where one nerve cell passes information to the next. When you look at conditions like Parkinson’s or clinical depression, the fundamental issue often boils down to these switching points being completely out of whack. It’s like having a faulty circuit breaker in a house; if those synapses aren't maintaining a perfect balance, the whole system starts to malfunction.

Think about how nerve cells actually function, because most people get it wrong. These stations aren't physically wired together like a circuit board or a bundle of copper cables running through the walls of an old house. There’s no direct electrical connection between them. Instead, if a cell wants to pass data along to its neighbor, it has to bridge a literal void. It’s like trying to jump a gap between two cliffs; you can't just walk across empty air, you need a way to leap that distance. This tiny, microscopic space is what we call the synaptic gap. When you break down the mechanics of a synapse, you're really looking at three distinct parts: the axon terminal of the sending cell, the dendrite of the receiving cell, and that crucial little gap sitting right in the middle where all the action happens.

Think about how an axon terminal actually functions—it’s basically a tiny, high-stakes relay station. You've got these little bubbles called vesicles packed with chemical messengers, or neurotransmitters, just sitting there waiting for the signal. Once an electrical impulse hits that terminal button, it's like flipping a switch at a massive power plant; those vesicles fuse right into the cell membrane, dumping their payload straight into the synaptic cleft. It's a fascinating handoff where a purely electrical surge transforms into a chemical message to keep the chain reaction going.

Think of it like this: you’ve got these specific docking stations—receptor molecules—sitting right there on the surface of the receiving cell's membrane. When a messenger molecule comes floating by and latches onto one of those receptors, it’s like flipping a switch inside the cell. That connection triggers a fresh electrical signal that starts racing through the cell itself. It’s exactly how nerve impulses travel from one cell to the next. It works just like a line of dominoes set up on a table; once that first piece tips over, the signal ripples through the whole chain, one after another.
It’s actually pretty wild when you dig into the neurobiology, because the really fresh, interesting stuff is that dendrites aren't just passive wires waiting to pass along a signal; they're actually performing computations themselves. We're talking about complex dendritic trees that carry out all sorts of heavy lifting on incoming signals—things like multiplication, addition, subtraction, and even XOR operations. It basically means a single neuron isn't just a simple "on or off" switch; it's capable of executing incredibly sophisticated functions right there at the branch level.
hiddeneagle98 hiddeneagle98 Regular
300 messages
joined Nov 2023
#93 ·
James Lee77 said:What I'm trying to say is that the sun has these specific, periodic electromagnetic patterns that just don't happen in some random, amorphous mass.

Look, obviously we aren't talking about the Sun being some simple ball of Play-Doh here; we know it's a massive, rotating body fueled by colossal nuclear reactions and all that physics stuff.
Joseph Murphy10 Joseph Murphy10 Active Member
102 messages
joined Dec 2020
#94 ·
Terry Martinez10 said:Given that's the case, I'm really not sure why I should even bother attempting a response when it's painfully obvious that I'm operating on a level far beneath her expectations....

Like...

I got stuck reading comment number 50 about hypothetical civilizations and honestly, I started wondering the exact same thing.

Thank God there are still some grounded people left in this world.
Terry Martinez10 Terry Martinez10 Active Member
82 messages
joined Nov 2021
#95 ·
hiddeneagle98 said:Quincy:
I don't know what to tell you, but I’ve been sitting here staring at this situation for a while now, and it just feels like we’re circling the drain. It reminds me of that one time my old boss at Ford tried to tell us that a fundamentally broken engine design was actually an "innovation" just because they slapped a shiny new coat of paint on the casing—it’s the same kind of delusional thinking, honestly. You can try to dress up a disaster all you want, but once the gears start grinding and the smoke starts pouring out from under the hood, everyone realizes the whole thing was built on sand. We see these patterns repeating over and over again, where people in charge act like they aren't ignoring the massive red flags waving right in their faces, and frankly, it's exhausting to watch. It's like watching a slow-motion train wreck where the conductor is too busy checking his reflection in the window to notice the tracks have ended miles ago. kaže:
There’s a massive variety of different types of neurons out there, all of them evolving their own unique shapes and specialized functions to get the job done. But despite those individual quirks, they all actually share some fundamental common ground.

Think about how a single neuron operates. Every one of them sports a relatively substantial cell body, or soma, if you want to get technical. But the real standout feature—the thing that truly sets them apart from any other type of cell you’ll find in the body—is those incredibly long, sprawling extensions reaching out from the center. You've got your dendrites and your axons stretching out like massive wiring systems, and that's really where the magic happens.

Think of dendrites as the cellular equivalent of a massive network of antennas, constantly scanning the environment and picking up signals from neighboring cells to pass them along to the main body of the neuron. Then you've got axons, which act like high-speed transmission lines, carrying those electrical impulses away from the cell body toward the terminals, where they hit what we call the end buttons to complete the circuit.
Think about how a signal actually moves through a neuron: it kicks off at the dendrites, travels right through the cell body and down the axon, and finally hits those terminal buttons. It’s essentially a continuous chain reaction of electrical impulses firing their way from one end to the other.

It’s just like any other living cell out there—the inside of a neuron is always more negatively charged than its surroundings. It really just comes down to the basic physics of things; you've got this massive difference in the concentration of charged particles, specifically those salt ions, sitting between the interior and the exterior of the cell.

What makes nerve cells so incredibly fascinating is how they actually leverage that concentration gradient—that specific electrical potential—to act as a biological conductor, essentially using it to fire off an electrical impulse down the line.

Think about how nerve cells actually function—it’s not just random noise. Because of the unique makeup of the cell membrane, specifically those specialized ion channels and pumps, the cell can facilitate an actual electrical current. This is what allows signals to travel down the length of the neuron in the first place. From a medical standpoint, there’s one specific stage in this signaling process that is absolutely critical: the synapse. That’s the junction where one nerve cell passes information to the next. When you look at conditions like Parkinson’s or clinical depression, the fundamental issue often boils down to these switching points being completely out of whack. It’s like having a faulty circuit breaker in a house; if those synapses aren't maintaining a perfect balance, the whole system starts to malfunction.

Think about how nerve cells actually function, because most people get it wrong. These stations aren't physically wired together like a circuit board or a bundle of copper cables running through the walls of an old house. There’s no direct electrical connection between them. Instead, if a cell wants to pass data along to its neighbor, it has to bridge a literal void. It’s like trying to jump a gap between two cliffs; you can't just walk across empty air, you need a way to leap that distance. This tiny, microscopic space is what we call the synaptic gap. When you break down the mechanics of a synapse, you're really looking at three distinct parts: the axon terminal of the sending cell, the dendrite of the receiving cell, and that crucial little gap sitting right in the middle where all the action happens.

Think about how an axon terminal actually functions—it’s basically a tiny, high-stakes relay station. You've got these little bubbles called vesicles packed with chemical messengers, or neurotransmitters, just sitting there waiting for the signal. Once an electrical impulse hits that terminal button, it's like flipping a switch at a massive power plant; those vesicles fuse right into the cell membrane, dumping their payload straight into the synaptic cleft. It's a fascinating handoff where a purely electrical surge transforms into a chemical message to keep the chain reaction going.

Think of it like this: you’ve got these specific docking stations—receptor molecules—sitting right there on the surface of the receiving cell's membrane. When a messenger molecule comes floating by and latches onto one of those receptors, it’s like flipping a switch inside the cell. That connection triggers a fresh electrical signal that starts racing through the cell itself. It’s exactly how nerve impulses travel from one cell to the next. It works just like a line of dominoes set up on a table; once that first piece tips over, the signal ripples through the whole chain, one after another.
It’s actually pretty wild when you dig into the neurobiology, because the really fresh, interesting stuff is that dendrites aren't just passive wires waiting to pass along a signal; they're actually performing computations themselves. We're talking about complex dendritic trees that carry out all sorts of heavy lifting on incoming signals—things like multiplication, addition, subtraction, and even XOR operations. It basically means a single neuron isn't just a simple "on or off" switch; it's capable of executing incredibly sophisticated functions right there at the branch level.

I’m not entirely certain I followed your train of thought correctly, so please feel free to correct me if I’m veering off in the wrong direction here.
Initially, actin and microtubule filaments are arranged in a somewhat symmetrical fashion. From this arrangement, neurites—those cellular extensions—begin to develop, featuring a microtubule-based trunk and an actin-rich tip, with these structures overlapping within the transition zone.

Actin filaments tend to push microtubules toward the center of the cell, though we can actually track cytoskeleton components in living cells by using genetically engineered fusions with fluorescent proteins. Once that's done, the dynamic reorganization of these parts can be observed through subsequent video microscopy studies. In these observations, you start to notice a constant flow of actin filaments moving from the cell's edge toward its center, a phenomenon known as retrograde flow. This movement is driven by actin polymerization at the outermost edge of the cell, which is then amplified by the action of the molecular motor myosin. This retrograde actin flow can also shift microtubules toward the interior of the cell once they enter the actin-rich outer regions. The force transmitted by this retrograde flow leads to the compression of microtubules, causing them to bend. This suggests that actin filaments can directly influence how microtubules are organized. Conversely, microtubules can also exert influence back onto the actin filaments; for instance, a cluster of microtubules might restrict the spatial distribution of actin fibers. However, it remains unclear exactly which property of the microtubules is driving this effect on the actin cytoskeleton. Could microtubules be generating local chemical signals that alter actin dynamics? Or perhaps the mechanical stability of the microtubules simply limits the actin flow through a more passive mechanism? There's also the possibility that microtubules play a more active role, where molecular motor proteins push against the retrograde flow, creating a sort of tug-of-war. As long as neither force gains the upper hand, changes in the cytoskeleton's organization and the overall shape of the cell remain minimal.
Perhaps you were referring to their specific role in data processing?
Terry Martinez10 Terry Martinez10 Active Member
82 messages
joined Nov 2021
#96 ·
Sandra Murphy33 said:I suppose those are what people call "spontaneous guidance" or synchronicity.... 👍
Personally, for years now, I’ve been waking up naturally at the exact moment I decide before bed (though I still set an alarm clock 😁 just in case).
Sometimes, I'll go down to the local DMV to renew my driver's license, and while waiting in a massive line outside, I'll randomly sit next to some woman who explains that I won't be seen for another five hours, then shows me an app on her phone where I can track the queue numbers—something I had absolutely no clue existed. So, I download it, saving myself hours of wasted time. My initial instinct (my old 😬 self) was to dismiss the whole thing, thinking apps and digital nonsense were useless and that I'd just wait until the crowd cleared out...

But then, where do all these convenient little synchronicities come from?

Thanks for the new link. 🙂

That's true enough.
However, what I experience feels more like being nudged to do the least likely thing, or something I would normally never do—essentially being guided toward a completely new path or something atypical for my personality. Is the brain creating those new synapses and neural pathways in response to that nudge?
It's possible I won't fully grasp the mechanics of it until much later. 😎

Our brains are constantly soaking up all this input we aren't even consciously aware of, you know? Just spontaneous, subconscious data streaming in.
Those little suggestions could be triggered by anything at all—maybe a certain song, a specific scent, or even a flavor; just those tiny, subtle things.
David Robinson26 David Robinson26 Member
28 messages
joined Jan 2019
#97 ·
Haven't we drifted off-topic for about three pages now?
Is it possible that nobody is interested in this subject anymore?
We have the chat available if you prefer.
Amanda Jackson5 Amanda Jackson5 Regular
320 messages
joined Dec 2015
#98 ·
Amy Bennett said:I honestly doubt that alien conspiracy theories come from anyone's actual, coherent thought process.

But... isn't that exactly what they're meant for?

I honestly don't see how pondering hypothetical extraterrestrial civilizations has anything to do with conspiracy theories.

Joseph Murphy10 said:Like...

I got stuck reading comment number 50 about hypothetical civilizations and honestly, I started wondering the exact same thing.

Thank God there are still some grounded people left in this world.

It’s truly Fascinanto how certain people get so worked up over the mere idea of alien civilizations—ideas that, based on everything we know about the scale of the universe, wouldn't just be possible, they'd be statistically bizarre if they didn't exist. Yet, at the very same time, those same people cling desperately to notions of some fantastic supreme being, convinced that this entity "loves" them or will eventually "save" them (whatever that's supposed to mean). We're talking about beliefs in things that likely don't exist and lack even a shred of evidence, let alone any connection to common sense or critical thinking. It's pure bias. I’d love to hear a rational explanation from you religious types regarding why the concept of extraterrestrial life bothers you so much. Rational, mind you, not emotional. From an emotional standpoint, it's obvious that these ideas just mess with your head. Are you afraid your imaginary friend might run into some competition?
Joseph Murphy10 Joseph Murphy10 Active Member
102 messages
joined Dec 2020
#99 ·
None of that matters. Honestly, all this pseudo-philosophical nonsense is just irritating—especially when it's 100 degrees out and I'm stuck in the shade dealing with it. Btw, my mind is totally open to the idea of alien civilizations and the existence of God, and the fact that both can coexist in one brain is something you’ll never wrap your head around. No offense, Amanda Jackson5 🙂

User using Tapatalk
Amanda Jackson5 Amanda Jackson5 Regular
320 messages
joined Dec 2015
#100 ·
Joseph Murphy10 said:None of that matters. Honestly, all this pseudo-philosophical nonsense is just irritating—especially when it's 100 degrees out and I'm stuck in the shade dealing with it. Btw, my mind is totally open to the idea of alien civilizations and the existence of God, and the fact that both can coexist in one brain is something you’ll never wrap your head around. No offense, Amanda Jackson5 🙂

User using Tapatalk

If you actually look back at what I’ve already posted in this thread, it’s pretty obvious my mind is just as open to those possibilities, which naturally means I am capable of grasping them. The real distinction here is that I can actually provide a rational argument for both sides, whereas you can't—so you end up hiding behind words like "never." Don't say never. And if we're being honest, it's quite clear who the one doing the "pseudo-philosophical rambling" is, considering you feel the need to bring God into every single post. No offense.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads