#61 ·
Paul Rogers94 said:That applies to any rational human being, or any self-aware entity for that matter. I'm not ruling that out, but building an entire culture based on the herd instinct of animalistic fear? That’s strictly subhuman territory.
Just to be clear—when I use terms like "subhuman," "animal," or "human being" in the full sense of the word, I'm not making some sort of moral judgment or trying to rank people...
We all have bits of all three in us, just in different proportions. The real question is which part is running the show psychologically—for the vast majority, it's the animal.
I honestly don't care about the linguistic nuances here; you can call it untermensch if it makes you feel better. It doesn't matter how you choose to categorize people or what values you assign to them—those are your own personal hang-ups, and I have no business interfering with them. My point, which I keep trying to hammer home, is that this idea of "primal herd fear" simply isn't a real thing. You're more than welcome to make up your own phrases (or borrow someone else's) that lack actual substance... but I’m also going to hold onto my right to avoid using your specific brand of doublespeak.
Paul Rogers94 said:That applies to any rational human being, or any self-aware entity for that matter. I'm not ruling that out, but building an entire culture based on the herd instinct of animalistic fear? That’s strictly subhuman territory.
Just to be clear—when I use terms like "subhuman," "animal," or "human being" in the full sense of the word, I'm not making some sort of moral judgment or trying to rank people...
We all have bits of all three in us, just in different proportions. The real question is which part is running the show psychologically—for the vast majority, it's the animal.
And what exactly are you using as a yardstick for that?