#81 ·
Nicole Barrett76 said:I suspect that isn't actually the case.
From what I understand, there is a sect in Bengal known as the Baula, a group of somewhat unorthodox Vaišnavas who are heavily criticized and rejected by many others in India who fall outside that circle.
One of their songs begins roughly like this:
"That is why, brother, I became an impulsive baul,
refusing to follow the commands of any master."
I cannot recall the specific mood I was in when I read that poem, only that the book was written in our language.
If they truly do not follow the dictates of a master, choosing instead to live by the whims of their own intuition, aligning themselves with nature through impulse and acting purely on their own volition—much like a wind that shifts unpredictably from one direction to another—then, of course, they possess no guru at all.
I believe this might be the most sincere post in this entire thread.
If there's no guru, then there's no lineage of disciples stretching back to Brahma, which would basically mean all that Vedic knowledge is just a total fabrication.