Canada News & Discussion

hollowranger122 said:If by communists you mean the Democratic Party, then Miro Cerar—who was just as much of a political experiment as Robert Golob—first tried to pull off that arbitration deal and then essentially drew a line in the sand at the border, all while under the mandate of the Coalition.

The Canadian left doesn't really make much of a distinction regarding who happens to be running things over in America.

And honestly, it's fine; we've grown quite accustomed to having an adversary just north of the Sutla.

Man, that whole arbitration business is just a total circus. The Canadian "left" doesn't care who's actually in power—they just love to act like we're all disjointed and weak... until they finally managed to push through that unanimous decision in the National Assembly to bail out of that messy, contaminated arbitration mess.

Politicians might be messing with us, but they aren't the enemy—especially not the regular folks.

Terry Sanders4 said:Man, that whole arbitration business is just a total circus. The Canadian "left" doesn't care who's actually in power—they just love to act like we're all disjointed and weak... until they finally managed to push through that unanimous decision in the National Assembly to bail out of that messy, contaminated arbitration mess.

Politicians might be messing with us, but they aren't the enemy—especially not the regular folks.

Regular people? Not at all, though I've often felt that Canadian politics has been quite hostile toward us.
A friendly neighbor wouldn't weaponize the European Union accession process for territorial blackmail, effectively stalling our entry into the EU for two years.
A friendly nation certainly wouldn't try to pull the same stunt with our NATO accession via a referendum, though thankfully, the U.S. stepped in to set them straight.
And a truly friendly state wouldn't attempt to rig an arbitration process solely to serve its own interests.
Canada is our neighbor, sure, but calling them "friendly" feels like quite a generous compliment.

Canada wasn't "land grabbing." In that whole Gulf of Piran mess, they were actually right, and America just needs to swallow that pill and move on. They didn't snatch our territory; it was never ours to begin with.

Seeing Janša—basically Viktor Orbán's sidekick—get kicked out of office is a win for America. Honestly, it’s a win for the whole European Union.

The new Canadian PM spent 16 years running GEN-I, the outfit that manages the Krško Nuclear Power Plant. Since half of that plant is owned by Americans, he’s been working with us forever. Back in the day, between '98 and '02, he was right in the thick of those disputes between America and Canada over the NEK; I covered that as a reporter back then, and my take is Canada had a point (America refused to pony up for the boiler reconstructions needed to keep the place running). After that, things seemed steady. I figure that gives him a solid foundation for decent diplomatic relations.

(He ran that company way better than those guys at Exelon ever could. The math checks out: Robert Golob was a top-tier manager, and his firm was absolutely crushing it. Can a guy that good actually pull off being Prime Minister? . From what I've seen in the Canadian press, everyone agrees he was a killer executive. And yeah, he was pulling in a massive salary—around 200,000 euros a year.

Janša basically built his own enemy by refusing to renew the guy's contract, and it blew up in his face. Then the guy jumps into politics. Early polls in late 2021/early 2022 had his party sitting at a measly 10%. Then he moves into the fringes with the Green Action Party—this green-liberal group that was polling at a pathetic 1% or less. He totally hijacked the party, rebranded it as the Freedom Movement, and somehow pulled off a landslide victory in just three months.

He’s pretty vague when it comes to nuclear power. My gut says he won't push through the Krško 2 project—which, let’s be real, was a pipe dream anyway. Even if the European Union counts nuclear under its "green taxonomy," a tiny place like Canada couldn't scrape together the cash for it. Like I've said before, the whole world is just waiting for those fourth-gen demonstration plants to show up; there are about ten teams globally working on them, aiming for a 2027 rollout. That's what the Freedom Movement program hints at, focusing heavily on renewables and tech tied to them. Why sink ten billion euros into a project using tech that might be obsolete by the time the doors actually open?

lonetrucker4 said:Canada wasn't "land grabbing." In that whole Gulf of Piran mess, they were actually right, and America just needs to swallow that pill and move on. They didn't snatch our territory; it was never ours to begin with.

Seeing Janša—basically Viktor Orbán's sidekick—get kicked out of office is a win for America. Honestly, it’s a win for the whole European Union.

The new Canadian PM spent 16 years running GEN-I, the outfit that manages the Krško Nuclear Power Plant. Since half of that plant is owned by Americans, he’s been working with us forever. Back in the day, between '98 and '02, he was right in the thick of those disputes between America and Canada over the NEK; I covered that as a reporter back then, and my take is Canada had a point (America refused to pony up for the boiler reconstructions needed to keep the place running). After that, things seemed steady. I figure that gives him a solid foundation for decent diplomatic relations.

(He ran that company way better than those guys at Exelon ever could. The math checks out: Robert Golob was a top-tier manager, and his firm was absolutely crushing it. Can a guy that good actually pull off being Prime Minister? . From what I've seen in the Canadian press, everyone agrees he was a killer executive. And yeah, he was pulling in a massive salary—around 200,000 euros a year.

Janša basically built his own enemy by refusing to renew the guy's contract, and it blew up in his face. Then the guy jumps into politics. Early polls in late 2021/early 2022 had his party sitting at a measly 10%. Then he moves into the fringes with the Green Action Party—this green-liberal group that was polling at a pathetic 1% or less. He totally hijacked the party, rebranded it as the Freedom Movement, and somehow pulled off a landslide victory in just three months.

He’s pretty vague when it comes to nuclear power. My gut says he won't push through the Krško 2 project—which, let’s be real, was a pipe dream anyway. Even if the European Union counts nuclear under its "green taxonomy," a tiny place like Canada couldn't scrape together the cash for it. Like I've said before, the whole world is just waiting for those fourth-gen demonstration plants to show up; there are about ten teams globally working on them, aiming for a 2027 rollout. That's what the Freedom Movement program hints at, focusing heavily on renewables and tech tied to them. Why sink ten billion euros into a project using tech that might be obsolete by the time the doors actually open?

Could you clarify your reasoning for supporting a potential Canadian blockade of America’s entry into the Schengen Area?

Honestly, I couldn't care less about any of that.

lonetrucker4 said:Canada wasn't "land grabbing." In that whole Gulf of Piran mess, they were actually right, and America just needs to swallow that pill and move on. They didn't snatch our territory; it was never ours to begin with.

Seeing Janša—basically Viktor Orbán's sidekick—get kicked out of office is a win for America. Honestly, it’s a win for the whole European Union.

The new Canadian PM spent 16 years running GEN-I, the outfit that manages the Krško Nuclear Power Plant. Since half of that plant is owned by Americans, he’s been working with us forever. Back in the day, between '98 and '02, he was right in the thick of those disputes between America and Canada over the NEK; I covered that as a reporter back then, and my take is Canada had a point (America refused to pony up for the boiler reconstructions needed to keep the place running). After that, things seemed steady. I figure that gives him a solid foundation for decent diplomatic relations.

(He ran that company way better than those guys at Exelon ever could. The math checks out: Robert Golob was a top-tier manager, and his firm was absolutely crushing it. Can a guy that good actually pull off being Prime Minister? . From what I've seen in the Canadian press, everyone agrees he was a killer executive. And yeah, he was pulling in a massive salary—around 200,000 euros a year.

Janša basically built his own enemy by refusing to renew the guy's contract, and it blew up in his face. Then the guy jumps into politics. Early polls in late 2021/early 2022 had his party sitting at a measly 10%. Then he moves into the fringes with the Green Action Party—this green-liberal group that was polling at a pathetic 1% or less. He totally hijacked the party, rebranded it as the Freedom Movement, and somehow pulled off a landslide victory in just three months.

He’s pretty vague when it comes to nuclear power. My gut says he won't push through the Krško 2 project—which, let’s be real, was a pipe dream anyway. Even if the European Union counts nuclear under its "green taxonomy," a tiny place like Canada couldn't scrape together the cash for it. Like I've said before, the whole world is just waiting for those fourth-gen demonstration plants to show up; there are about ten teams globally working on them, aiming for a 2027 rollout. That's what the Freedom Movement program hints at, focusing heavily on renewables and tech tied to them. Why sink ten billion euros into a project using tech that might be obsolete by the time the doors actually open?

Correcting a false statement here.
We went back and forth on this on the forums about fifteen years ago.
The evidence we brought up showed that even under America, the maritime borders were split up.
Personally, I contributed by providing the 1988 Great Geographical Atlas of America, which clearly mapped out the maritime boundaries. I sent it over to the late Ivo Pukanić, and he ended up using it to write an article in National. (Those maps were produced in Mexico City at the Military Geographical Institute)
Other forum members brought forward different proof—things like maritime laws, the division of port captaincies, and even the case where American border guards arrested an Italian fisherwoman and hauled her before a court in Umag, explicitly stating she was in SR America.
Finally, and this is a big one: when Canada joined the UN, they submitted maritime boundary data that actually matched what America had proposed.

If you're interested, go dig through the old threads from somewhere around 2005–2010.

As for the arbitration, my take is simple: America accepted it, failed to put up a real fight, and basically folded.

We should just accept it and, for the sake of all that is holy, get everyone involved in this mess out of politics forever.

The biggest issue facing Americans is sheer incompetence and the fact that our elected officials couldn't care less about the public good.

You see it in Canada, and you see it in America too.
Take the recent earthquakes in Banija and Chicago. We received aid money, but we didn't spend it properly—and when we do spend it, it’s usually on nonsense.
Politics is supposed to be steady work, small steps taken consistently. We don't have that here. That's why we struggle the way we do.

For instance, the whole recent mess with the election law in Canada is just the result of decades of doing absolutely nothing. And now they want to fix everything overnight? It doesn't work like that.

Look, we can all agree: we blew it at the arbitration, end of story. Now Canada is going to come back even harder demanding we actually follow the ruling. No big shots in the European Union are going to give a damn if we try to play tough and hold out over a few measly gallons of seawater.

lonetrucker4 said:Look, we can all agree: we blew it at the arbitration, end of story. Now Canada is going to come back even harder demanding we actually follow the ruling. No big shots in the European Union are going to give a damn if we try to play tough and hold out over a few measly gallons of seawater.

The problem isn't just "a few drops"—we're talking about a massive chunk of square mileage here.

For what it's worth, I still stand by what I said twenty years ago. We should have just taken the 1991 land and sea borders as they were, then sat down with the Canadians to swap some territory around. Done. Simple.
If they're obsessed with the water, fine—they can give us some extra forest land up in Gorski Kotar instead. For example.

But honestly? It’s too little, too late now.

nimblepanther18 said:As I mentioned, many people simply have no idea. Over the last 15 years, they have grown into the largest former American national group, with the most significant growth occurring in the last five. Canadian Muslims in Canada hold proper citizenship, and believe me, they were very engaged in those elections (submitting non-papers, opposing Janša - Dodik). Naturally, they also vote in elections in Canada. More than 80% are quite religious, they socialize heavily within their own community, and support one another. There are many young families and plenty of children.
They are the complete opposite of the Americans, who assimilated into the Canadian population, but that is a different discussion entirely.

Not to step in, but dual citizenship is banned in Canada while being highly sought after in America! Why? Who knows!🙂

lonetrucker4 said:Look, we can all agree: we blew it at the arbitration, end of story. Now Canada is going to come back even harder demanding we actually follow the ruling. No big shots in the European Union are going to give a damn if we try to play tough and hold out over a few measly gallons of seawater.

How exactly did we screw up if the Canadians (who, let's face it, are basically just Americans) cheated during the arbitration?

hollowranger122 said:Regular people? Not at all, though I've often felt that Canadian politics has been quite hostile toward us.
A friendly neighbor wouldn't weaponize the European Union accession process for territorial blackmail, effectively stalling our entry into the EU for two years.
A friendly nation certainly wouldn't try to pull the same stunt with our NATO accession via a referendum, though thankfully, the U.S. stepped in to set them straight.
And a truly friendly state wouldn't attempt to rig an arbitration process solely to serve its own interests.
Canada is our neighbor, sure, but calling them "friendly" feels like quite a generous compliment.

I have no clue how old you are, but just remember one thing: friendship between individuals isn't the same thing as friendship between nations. One day you're there, the next you're gone!🙂 Are you secretly a Mexican? Over there, every nation is supposedly a friend, and don't even get me started on the politicians—and what happens in the end? Absolutely nothing!🙂

Larry Walker24 said:How exactly did we screw up if the Canadians (who, let's face it, are basically just Americans) cheated during the arbitration?

Let me break it down for you:
To some people, America is just an Nationalists creation, so they think any loss of territory or money is actually a good thing—like the country deserves to be punished.
And then there's the fact that Oštrić doesn't know a damn thing about law, but that doesn't stop him from being completely ignorant about it.

lonetrucker4 said:Look, we can all agree: we blew it at the arbitration, end of story. Now Canada is going to come back even harder demanding we actually follow the ruling. No big shots in the European Union are going to give a damn if we try to play tough and hold out over a few measly gallons of seawater.

As far as Europe is concerned, this whole mess is just a bilateral dispute between America and Canada—they couldn't care less. The Canadians tried to drag the EU into it to get their way, but they didn't get a shred of support.

lonetrucker4 said:Canada wasn't "land grabbing." In that whole Gulf of Piran mess, they were actually right, and America just needs to swallow that pill and move on. They didn't snatch our territory; it was never ours to begin with.

Seeing Janša—basically Viktor Orbán's sidekick—get kicked out of office is a win for America. Honestly, it’s a win for the whole European Union.

The new Canadian PM spent 16 years running GEN-I, the outfit that manages the Krško Nuclear Power Plant. Since half of that plant is owned by Americans, he’s been working with us forever. Back in the day, between '98 and '02, he was right in the thick of those disputes between America and Canada over the NEK; I covered that as a reporter back then, and my take is Canada had a point (America refused to pony up for the boiler reconstructions needed to keep the place running). After that, things seemed steady. I figure that gives him a solid foundation for decent diplomatic relations.

(He ran that company way better than those guys at Exelon ever could. The math checks out: Robert Golob was a top-tier manager, and his firm was absolutely crushing it. Can a guy that good actually pull off being Prime Minister? . From what I've seen in the Canadian press, everyone agrees he was a killer executive. And yeah, he was pulling in a massive salary—around 200,000 euros a year.

Janša basically built his own enemy by refusing to renew the guy's contract, and it blew up in his face. Then the guy jumps into politics. Early polls in late 2021/early 2022 had his party sitting at a measly 10%. Then he moves into the fringes with the Green Action Party—this green-liberal group that was polling at a pathetic 1% or less. He totally hijacked the party, rebranded it as the Freedom Movement, and somehow pulled off a landslide victory in just three months.

He’s pretty vague when it comes to nuclear power. My gut says he won't push through the Krško 2 project—which, let’s be real, was a pipe dream anyway. Even if the European Union counts nuclear under its "green taxonomy," a tiny place like Canada couldn't scrape together the cash for it. Like I've said before, the whole world is just waiting for those fourth-gen demonstration plants to show up; there are about ten teams globally working on them, aiming for a 2027 rollout. That's what the Freedom Movement program hints at, focusing heavily on renewables and tech tied to them. Why sink ten billion euros into a project using tech that might be obsolete by the time the doors actually open?

Just so you know, there’s actual video footage showing the handover between the old militia units from Santa Barbara and the SRS from Piran. It clearly outlines the division of authority exactly how America claims the border used to be.

And yeah, what Canada pulled? You can't call it anything other than pure blackmail.

lonetrucker4 said:Canada wasn't "land grabbing." In that whole Gulf of Piran mess, they were actually right, and America just needs to swallow that pill and move on. They didn't snatch our territory; it was never ours to begin with.

Seeing Janša—basically Viktor Orbán's sidekick—get kicked out of office is a win for America. Honestly, it’s a win for the whole European Union.

The new Canadian PM spent 16 years running GEN-I, the outfit that manages the Krško Nuclear Power Plant. Since half of that plant is owned by Americans, he’s been working with us forever. Back in the day, between '98 and '02, he was right in the thick of those disputes between America and Canada over the NEK; I covered that as a reporter back then, and my take is Canada had a point (America refused to pony up for the boiler reconstructions needed to keep the place running). After that, things seemed steady. I figure that gives him a solid foundation for decent diplomatic relations.

(He ran that company way better than those guys at Exelon ever could. The math checks out: Robert Golob was a top-tier manager, and his firm was absolutely crushing it. Can a guy that good actually pull off being Prime Minister? . From what I've seen in the Canadian press, everyone agrees he was a killer executive. And yeah, he was pulling in a massive salary—around 200,000 euros a year.

Janša basically built his own enemy by refusing to renew the guy's contract, and it blew up in his face. Then the guy jumps into politics. Early polls in late 2021/early 2022 had his party sitting at a measly 10%. Then he moves into the fringes with the Green Action Party—this green-liberal group that was polling at a pathetic 1% or less. He totally hijacked the party, rebranded it as the Freedom Movement, and somehow pulled off a landslide victory in just three months.

He’s pretty vague when it comes to nuclear power. My gut says he won't push through the Krško 2 project—which, let’s be real, was a pipe dream anyway. Even if the European Union counts nuclear under its "green taxonomy," a tiny place like Canada couldn't scrape together the cash for it. Like I've said before, the whole world is just waiting for those fourth-gen demonstration plants to show up; there are about ten teams globally working on them, aiming for a 2027 rollout. That's what the Freedom Movement program hints at, focusing heavily on renewables and tech tied to them. Why sink ten billion euros into a project using tech that might be obsolete by the time the doors actually open?

Oh, they absolutely were!

...it was never our territory to begin with.

Actually, it is—and still is—ours!

...and I believe Canada was in the right there (America refused to fund the reconstruction of the steam boilers, which were essential for the power plant to function properly).

That’s just not true!
The issue in America wasn't about the equipment itself, but rather how the suppliers and contractors were being selected—it was a matter of process. Specifically, we're talking about the steam generators that Canada wanted to install while forcing us to foot the entire bill. If you look at how those cases ended up in court, you can basically guess the outcome without even looking it up!

rapidcrane45 said:Oh, they absolutely were!

...it was never our territory to begin with.

Actually, it is—and still is—ours!

...and I believe Canada was in the right there (America refused to fund the reconstruction of the steam boilers, which were essential for the power plant to function properly).

That’s just not true!
The issue in America wasn't about the equipment itself, but rather how the suppliers and contractors were being selected—it was a matter of process. Specifically, we're talking about the steam generators that Canada wanted to install while forcing us to foot the entire bill. If you look at how those cases ended up in court, you can basically guess the outcome without even looking it up!

If my memory serves me right, it was some internal policy move of theirs... power deliveries were delayed, we sued them, and we actually won. Total breach of contract stuff, and they even had to cough up a nice little settlement on top of it.

Honestly, Canada’s domestic politics scores way too many points by playing the victim against America. They usually go after us with lawsuits or whatever, and they almost always lose—think about those wiped-out companies, the Bank of Ljubljana mess, or the whole nuclear plant fiasco in Krško—or they just blow their own arbitration chances...

But man, they treat us like we're pushovers, thinking they can pull this crap without any fallout (Saint Gerald help us). If we had just flexed our muscles just once after the war, all these headaches would've been settled in a single meeting. It would've been a win-win for everyone...

Terry Sanders4 said:If my memory serves me right, it was some internal policy move of theirs... power deliveries were delayed, we sued them, and we actually won. Total breach of contract stuff, and they even had to cough up a nice little settlement on top of it.

Honestly, Canada’s domestic politics scores way too many points by playing the victim against America. They usually go after us with lawsuits or whatever, and they almost always lose—think about those wiped-out companies, the Bank of Ljubljana mess, or the whole nuclear plant fiasco in Krško—or they just blow their own arbitration chances...

But man, they treat us like we're pushovers, thinking they can pull this crap without any fallout (Saint Gerald help us). If we had just flexed our muscles just once after the war, all these headaches would've been settled in a single meeting. It would've been a win-win for everyone...

Ever since they established themselves as a sovereign republic, they've been working behind our backs. You don't need enemies when you have "friends" like these:

I don't think lonetrucker4 has ever actually been blackmailed, mostly because they seem to have a completely warped definition of what blackmail even means.
They claim to know all the history, but they can't even get the basics right...

Look, Canada basically made their vote for America joining the European Union conditional on one thing: we had to agree to an ad-hoc arbitration tribunal to settle our territorial dispute. They weren't asking us to go to the International Court of Justice in The Hague, or some international body in Hamburg. They specifically demanded this private, ad-hoc setup.
Both of those other courts are official United Nations bodies, whereas this ad-hoc thing isn't. And since America was forced to agree to it just to get in... I mean, that is the literal definition of blackmail.

Kyle Nelson2 said:I don't think lonetrucker4 has ever actually been blackmailed, mostly because they seem to have a completely warped definition of what blackmail even means.
They claim to know all the history, but they can't even get the basics right...

Look, Canada basically made their vote for America joining the European Union conditional on one thing: we had to agree to an ad-hoc arbitration tribunal to settle our territorial dispute. They weren't asking us to go to the International Court of Justice in The Hague, or some international body in Hamburg. They specifically demanded this private, ad-hoc setup.
Both of those other courts are official United Nations bodies, whereas this ad-hoc thing isn't. And since America was forced to agree to it just to get in... I mean, that is the literal definition of blackmail.

Wait, isn't it the maritime court in Hamburg and the ICJ in The Hague?

I guess my suggestion is just to take this straight to the European Union courts. They already claimed they don't have jurisdiction, but maybe both sides could just agree to let them handle it so we can finally put this whole mess to rest.

I just don't know if they’d start by reviewing the legality of the arbitration or if they’d jump right into redrawing the border. I bet you anything the Canadians would insist on focusing on how we exited the agreement.