#141 ·
Jacob Cooper5 said:You've got a point there. But if we follow your logic—that science eventually cracks the code on everything—religion would probably just shrink into these tiny little fringe groups instead of being the mainstream force it is now.
True, but what if that "short circuit" actually ends up doing some good for the person, despite how messed up the circumstances are?
I mean, are there really enough cases where grieving parents take the loss of a child and, fueled by faith in a good God, go out and change laws or start massive charitable foundations to help other kids?
Actually, I disagree. You’d still have those folks who deny everything and see a massive conspiracy behind every single discovery.
Jacob Cooper5 said:You've got a point there. But if we follow your logic—that science eventually cracks the code on everything—religion would probably just shrink into these tiny little fringe groups instead of being the mainstream force it is now.
True, but what if that "short circuit" actually ends up doing some good for the person, despite how messed up the circumstances are?
I mean, are there really enough cases where grieving parents take the loss of a child and, fueled by faith in a good God, go out and change laws or start massive charitable foundations to help other kids?
I never said it definitely works one way or the other. In American slang, there's a perfect word for this kind of logic: "coping." That’s essentially the mindset of anyone doing things solely because "that's what God wants," rather than simply wanting to lend a hand.