CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Society › Politics › Close to Politics › The Trilateral Commission - America

The Trilateral Commission - America

Started by silentsurfer3 · · 👁 5 views · 51 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants silentsurfer3wiredcanyon55bluesurfer6urbanotterSteven Murphy2mistygull16velvetcanyon20Amy Rogers6Lawrence Torres56bluerider63wearypilot34
Amy Rogers6 Amy Rogers6 Active Member
69 messages
joined Feb 2021
#21 ·
mistygull16 said:Quote: People of The same trade Selda meet together , even for merriment and diversion

I'm pretty convinced that these conspiracy theories—the ones that turn everything into alien mysticism (not that I don't call the elite "lizards" myself, given how cruel they are)—are actually their own creation. Because the second anyone starts questioning the motives of the elite, they slap the "conspiracy theorist" label on them.

Still, these laws against verbal offenses... maybe they're just a sign that people are finally starting to wake up and figure things out.

Spot on, Colonel. For the first time ever, the term "conspiracy theory" was actually weaponized by US intelligence agencies as a way to shut down anyone questioning the moon landing—you know, all that stuff about the flag waving in a vacuum or the whole thing being filmed on a Hollywood soundstage. Ever since then, the phrase has just stuck around as a convenient label to crush anyone brave enough to question things that are supposedly "settled." The playbook is actually pretty simple and effective: you jump into a legitimate discussion, drown the actual questions in a sea of absolute nonsense by attaching them to the most insane, far-fetched claims imaginable, and suddenly the real issue gets buried under a mountain of stupidity where nobody can find it anymore.

To actually get the real questions through the noise, you need someone who actually knows their stuff—someone who can spot the difference between total nonsense and a legitimate inquiry. That’s a rare breed these days, even here in the States. And don't give me that "education level" argument; it’s not about how many degrees people have. These topics aren't even touched in our school systems, let alone at the PhD level. You won't find a single academic dissertation out there tackling these issues. Sure, you might find some books, but a formal scientific dissertation? Forget about it.

Sure, they messed up along the way—creating an internet and social media landscape basically designed to protect monopolies and keep the masses under control. But since every coin has two sides, those same platforms ended up creating a massive information floodgate. Now, people are more aware of what's actually going on than ever before.

Information and knowledge are everything—honestly, they’re more dangerous than a thousand nukes. That’s exactly why the elites are sweating through their suits right now. The mainstream media is losing its grip, people on the internet are actually talking and debating for once, and information is spreading faster than they can track it. They’re losing control. All these new "safety" slogans they keep pushing? It's just a pathetic attempt to shrink the space we have to speak. But it isn't working. Now that their little gatekeeping tricks are failing, they’re pivoting toward total censorship. We'll see how that plays out, but history shows us one thing: these self-important hacks who think they were born with a divine right to rule aren't the first to try this, and they won't be the last. They're mortal, no matter how much it pisses them off.
Amy Rogers6 Amy Rogers6 Active Member
69 messages
joined Feb 2021
#22 ·
velvetcanyon20 said:The Trilateral Commission isn't some conspiracy by the USA to bring in people based on negative selection. If we actually had our rights respected—say, if we were entitled to ten representatives in the Commission and at least six or seven seats in Congress—most of this 90% nonsense would have been settled ages ago. I mean, if the old regime had sent people with actual substance to those meetings, they probably could have bypassed the entire bloody mess of the nineties and moved forward peacefully... just playing devil's advocate here, exploring alternatives...
I’m skipping the video; I don't have the stomach for idiots, and honestly, I’ve rarely heard two intelligent things come out of Congress. Whatever Bulj is rambling about doesn't really seem to involve much brainpower. Some people might get fired up by that kind of trash, but if you ask me, he's just one of the most incompetent people in the building.

mhm—because censorship, control, destroying entire nations, stepping over bodies, and total dehumanization are just so incredibly "smart"—pure genius, really...

By the way, since we're talking about "selection," George W. Bush is basically the gold standard for eloquence...

If I wrote what I actually think about this, I'd be drinking straight from the box.
urbanotter urbanotter Regular
431 messages
joined Oct 2020
#23 ·
velvetcanyon20 said:It’s all just "what if" this and "maybe" that. If these things actually exist—if plans are truly being drawn up behind closed doors—you really don't want to be left out in the cold. Because if you don't have a seat at the table, you're essentially flying blind. You won't know what's coming, and you certainly won't have any way to change the outcome. You won't even know who to talk to...
When you have access, you actually understand the landscape, and more importantly, you gain a level of influence. It’s much better to be the one holding the reins of your own fate rather than just a puppet on a string, completely unaware that someone else is pulling the wires...

True masters of their own destiny 🤦

When you consider that America represents such a massive slice of the global economy, our domestic influence over these international matters is practically negligible compared to something as trivial as a hotel concierge.

Our local representatives are basically just messengers; they’re there to relay decisions that have already been finalized in meetings that the public isn't even allowed to attend.
In my view, the most influential figures among us would be Luković, followed by Tedeschi.
bluesurfer6 bluesurfer6 Active Member
77 messages
joined Feb 2018
#24 ·
Honestly, there’s enough pixelated nonsense piled up in this thread collectively to warrant a whole separate subforum dedicated to "Alternatives." I’d really appreciate it if the admin could move all this over there.
urbanotter urbanotter Regular
431 messages
joined Oct 2020
#25 ·
bluesurfer6 said:Honestly, there’s enough pixelated nonsense piled up in this thread collectively to warrant a whole separate subforum dedicated to "Alternatives." I’d really appreciate it if the admin could move all this over there.

Arguments like that just completely fall flat.🤦

There is absolutely no transparency regarding who actually selects the members, what specific criteria they are being judged by, what topics are actually being debated during meetings, or what the final conclusions are—let alone the behind-the-scenes analysis of what is truly happening once those meetings wrap up.

The only takeaway here is the suggestion to move this to the Alternative section, though honestly, it would be much more productive if everything were released as an official PDF document. It feels like nothing more than a way to cloud the truth and manipulate public perception.

Only the most incredibly naive people believe that the top 1% of the population, who control more than half of the world's wealth, are just going to sit idly by and let things unfold purely by chance.

There is a long history of brilliant minds who have repeatedly hammered home the points that "nothing in politics happens by accident" and that "politics is driven exclusively by interests."
mistygull16 mistygull16 Active Member
199 messages
joined May 2013
#26 ·
bluesurfer6 said:Honestly, there’s enough pixelated nonsense piled up in this thread collectively to warrant a whole separate subforum dedicated to "Alternatives." I’d really appreciate it if the admin could move all this over there.

The deindustrialization of America, the emptying out of the Midwest... you really think that's just some accident? Like it wasn't all part of the plan from the jump?

Not a single one of our top politicians actually comes from the working class; they're all hand-picked by the power brokers or they were just little scholarship kids for them.

Why would Americans give anyone a scholarship just because they're buddies? Especially when college costs an absolute fortune.
silentsurfer3 silentsurfer3 Active MemberOP
63 messages
joined Jul 2023
#27 ·
bluesurfer6 said:Honestly, there’s enough pixelated nonsense piled up in this thread collectively to warrant a whole separate subforum dedicated to "Alternatives." I’d really appreciate it if the admin could move all this over there.

Moving this whole thing to the Alternative section would basically be ignoring reality itself—plus, the whole discussion would just spiral off into some weird, non-linear rabbit hole...
bluesurfer6 bluesurfer6 Active Member
77 messages
joined Feb 2018
#28 ·
I can't help but wonder where Tom and Jerry fit into this whole mess? 🤔
Lawrence Torres56 Lawrence Torres56 Active Member
228 messages
joined Feb 2015
#29 ·
mistygull16 said:Honestly, I’d take a bunch of local hillbillies running the show over this global elite any day. Those guys are never satisfied with just their fair share, they always want everything.
watch the whole video, it's worth it.

It’s kind of like how Thomas W. Jackson (a Mason) used to put it:
"laws are our freedom" and "freemasonry never meddles in politics, yet meddling in politics is their ultimate goal."

The thing is, it’s going to take a while before people actually grasp what those words really mean.🙂
bluerider63 bluerider63 Regular
382 messages
joined Jan 2013
#30 ·
The Trilateral Commission and this whole pile of other secret or semi-secret groups—the ones the mainstream media ignores for reasons I can't quite wrap my head around—are basically the ones pulling the strings on global politics. It’s always these shadow players operating way out of the spotlight, while the presidents and prime ministers we see on TV just act as their errand boys.
Lawrence Torres56 Lawrence Torres56 Active Member
228 messages
joined Feb 2015
#31 ·
bluerider63 said:The Trilateral Commission and this whole pile of other secret or semi-secret groups—the ones the mainstream media ignores for reasons I can't quite wrap my head around—are basically the ones pulling the strings on global politics. It’s always these shadow players operating way out of the spotlight, while the presidents and prime ministers we see on TV just act as their errand boys.

Oh, come on, it’s not like the media is ignoring them; these people are all over the news every single day! It’s just that nobody wants to go on camera and loudly admit they belong to one of those organizations, so you end up with this illusion that they're invisible... I think someone here (maybe mistygull16?) posted a clip from that NU2 interview where Mickey Manoilov was answering a question from Stankovic about whether he was a Mason by saying, "Would I even be standing here if I wasn't?"
silentsurfer3 silentsurfer3 Active MemberOP
63 messages
joined Jul 2023
#32 ·
Man, you couldn't even get a single decent comment on the passing of M. Hanzekovica on any of the big-name US news sites—not on CNN, Fox News, or the New York Times, nothing.
So yeah, that's that.
bluesurfer6 bluesurfer6 Active Member
77 messages
joined Feb 2018
#33 ·
silentsurfer3 said:Man, you couldn't even get a single decent comment on the passing of M. Hanzekovica on any of the big-name US news sites—not on CNN, Fox News, or the New York Times, nothing.
So yeah, that's that.

I suppose certain sensitive stories just don't get traction on mainstream sites because of certain American cultural tendencies—you know, the whole habit of people using fake Facebook profiles to vent vitriol at the deceased.
Steven Murphy2 Steven Murphy2 Active Member
65 messages
joined Jul 2018
#34 ·
I mean, how are the media supposed to report on anything when they basically own the outlets themselves? Take Hearst Communications, for example. You really think they're going to bite their own hand? It’s all part of the setup—think about all those Turkish soap operas or shows like Big Brother (which, let's be real, sounds a lot like some Masonic "brotherhood" stuff). It’s all just conditioning for the cultural shockwaves coming our way, getting us used to having our private lives invaded—like when they push digital IDs or start tracking every single IP address we use online. They can see exactly what we're typing if they decide we're becoming a problem. And why did Mickey frame that as a rhetorical question to Stankovic? Because Radman was a member of the Rotary Club back then while running the show as Stankovic's boss.
silentsurfer3 silentsurfer3 Active MemberOP
63 messages
joined Jul 2023
#35 ·
I heard there’s some interview floating around online where Hanzekovic is basically bragging about being a member of the Rotary Club—if anyone actually tracks it down, please drop the link here.
silentsurfer3 silentsurfer3 Active MemberOP
63 messages
joined Jul 2023
#36 ·
Man, seriously—over at Stanmovic's place in Nu2, this guy's basically confirming he's a freaking Mason, and then I look up and see the dude above me rambling about Tom and Jerry? What a joke.

Just a bunch of sheep, honestly 🙂 🤦:klap:
bluesurfer6 bluesurfer6 Active Member
77 messages
joined Feb 2018
#37 ·
silentsurfer3 said:Man, seriously—over at Stanmovic's place in Nu2, this guy's basically confirming he's a freaking Mason, and then I look up and see the dude above me rambling about Tom and Jerry? What a joke.

Just a bunch of sheep, honestly 🙂 🤦👏

I guess you could explain to me why there's anything wrong with someone claiming to be a Mason—especially since that claim might be true, or it might just be nonsense.
Just the other day, I was reading Pernar, and man, he went full throttle on the Masons... heavy artillery right there... and what can anyone actually do to him? Did anything bad happen to him? Was his Facebook profile permanently nuked? ...Nah, the guy is doing just fine, and I'll just quote what he wrote here:
In my line of work, I run into all sorts of people, and by pure chance, I crossed paths with Hanzekovic—or rather, he crossed paths with me, since I only started looking into his character and actions once that jerk sued me.

At that moment, I stepped into the "hidden world" of Freemasonry and connected with people on the inside who are willing to leak info about which high-ranking government officials are actually members of Masonic lodges.

If you're going to keep using the judicial system to target me personally—or if you're going to rule in favor of people like Aleksandar Stankovic—then I'm going all the way to expose you one by one.

My fight against the Masons might be broad, or it might get deeply personal, ranging from the lowest apprentice to the Grandmaster.

I'm expecting the ruling in favor of Stankovic, which I appealed, to be overturned. If it isn't, we keep going. Hanzekovic was the first "brother" I decided to take aim at—or more accurately, he was crazy enough to try and go toe-to-toe with me.

😵

You can download the "American Masonic newspaper Kutnik" right here... so really, everything is out in the open.
silentsurfer3 silentsurfer3 Active MemberOP
63 messages
joined Jul 2023
#38 ·
The real issue with Pernar is that even little kids don't take him seriously anymore... ☕

Representative democracy is a messy, complicated beast when you look at this whole situation...

What I really want to know is—are we actually going to pull it off and become one of the most developed nations in the European Union by 2020? ☕
bluesurfer6 bluesurfer6 Active Member
77 messages
joined Feb 2018
#39 ·
silentsurfer3 said:The real issue with Pernar is that even little kids don't take him seriously anymore... ☕

Representative democracy is a messy, complicated beast when you look at this whole situation...

What I really want to know is—are we actually going to pull it off and become one of the most developed nations in the European Union by 2020? ☕

Nice attempt at a pivot there, 👍
first you act like the Masons are out here eating people, and then you try to pull a "correction
regarding an inaccurate quote" by bringing up Pernar.😁😁
silentsurfer3 silentsurfer3 Active MemberOP
63 messages
joined Jul 2023
#40 ·
bluesurfer6 said:Nice attempt at a pivot there, 👍
first you act like the Masons are out here eating people, and then you try to pull a "correction
regarding an inaccurate quote" by bringing up Pernar.😁😁

Honestly, I don't really see any point in going back and forth with someone whose takes are this shallow and plastic.
My bad

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads