Is it possible to not belong to any subculture?

electricrider16 said:All at once? Really? We are discussing individuals who flip-flop on their most fundamental convictions across various categories—it’s a pattern of inconsistency, not a synchronized event. To use the word "simultaneously" in this context is, quite frankly, a logical impossibility.

Philosophers tend to overlook the technical side—the actual practical application of a hypothesis.

From an engineering standpoint, what you described is essentially a feedback control system.

Every bit of new data triggers a shift in the initial state, or in this case, a change in stance.

I bet everyone remembers this diagram:

Gerald Hill said:I disagree; I would call it philosophy—a genuine search for answers. A philosopher would approach this from various angles, perhaps even using a bit of satire to poke fun at all the different exceptions.

That's nothing more than eclectic amateurism.

coastalwalker said:That's nothing more than eclectic amateurism.

I disagree; this isn't about eclecticism or amateurism at all. It isn't an intentional pursuit of any specific style. Rather, it feels more like pure mockery. There is no connection to any underlying theory or a genuine search for truth here—it is simply everything thrown together at once, just for the sake of it.