#101 ·
steelmarlin77 said:You've got a point there. Sometimes I find myself looking for some kind of "higher power" to guide me, too. I've never made money that I didn't have some sort of right to—money I hadn't earned or wasn't somehow meant to be mine. These two guys represent exactly that, and that's the crux of the issue. There are ways to get there, but we won't get into the weeds of that right now. Simply put, you have to sell yourself. Not in the usual way, like for a paycheck or a job, but in a different sense. You have to engage with certain circles, organizations, certain cliques. People say the Masons run this world however they please, but then they pay triple in hell for it later. I can't verify that, so I won't claim it's true. Personally, I am given what I need. However, in this specific case, these gentlemen were right to take what belongs to me. It's not like they were specifically targeting me... they just spread their lies among anyone willing to swallow them, and in this instance, they swallowed them even by people who matter to me. You might wonder why I don't just take revenge on the media outlets spreading these lies, but obviously... Hanzi is now formally tied to one of those outlets, and they hold others under the table... I could leave them alone, but I can't just sit by while people are poisoned by their falsehoods, because that hits home for me personally. Taking a Gandhian approach, I don't want to defeat them with the money they have and I don't, nor with an army, but with the truth. I'll turn their own army against them, because nobody fights for a liar who makes promises only to break them.
The real headache is that immoral people often lack the self-awareness to realize they’re being immoral. They genuinely believe their behavior is just standard operating procedure. Just look at Bill Clinton—he built quite an empire through some pretty shady dealings, all while acting like a man of high principle. To make matters even more surreal, his siblings were deeply religious. His brother was a priest and his sister was a nun. How could they not see that their own brother wasn't exactly walking the straight and narrow? Or maybe they just think everyone is entitled to a little "finder's fee."
I mean, what’s the actual difference if I were Ken Lay, closing a $100 million deal with some overseas partners and asking for a 2% kickback sent to my account in Bermuda 2? If Sanders closes a similar deal and asks for his cut, what changes?
The only distinction is ownership: Ken Lay owned his conglomerate, whereas Sanders never owned the state-run companies. He was just a temporary manager handed the keys based on an election.