#41 ·
Jeremy James3 said:The total absence of suffering is far more significant than anything psychotherapy can offer.
Have you ever studied buddhism? It focuses specifically on the mind and its inherent tendencies. Suffering exists solely within our own minds if we choose to identify ourselves with the body, the spirit, or our desires. If you refuse to identify with any of those things, then suffering ceases to exist.
Goodness, man. Suffering doesn't just exist in our heads; it is quite real because it traps us psychologically. No matter what "spiritual practice" one attempts to use to escape it, that heavy suffering remains present, much like how turning on a water heater inevitably produces hot water. buddhism teaches that suffering arises from the desire to be satisfied—which is true sometimes when our ambitions are high and unmet—but often it isn't. For instance, if I were to break my leg and my arm, that pain wouldn't stem from a desire to be satisfied; it would result from an unfortunate accident. In that situation, I wouldn't be seeking pleasure; I would be seeking the removal of pain. To me, those are not the same thing. Seeking pleasure is more akin to hedonism, whereas the desire to remove pain is a fundamental physical and psychological necessity, whether the pain is bodily or mental. In such a case, identifying with the body would be of little help. Consider those born with physical deformities or medical conditions; identifying with their bodies won't help them. They don't want to identify with anything; they simply want to escape the suffering they endure.
