shadowhawk31
Member
45 messages
joined Jan 2019
School isn't just about academics—it’s an institution for upbringing too.
The government, through the public school system, needs to step up regarding child development, because let's face it, not every kid is learning work ethic at home.
For those who actually pick up responsibilities while they're still under their parents' roof, transitioning to the classroom won't be such a shock.
It’s the same deal with literacy—kids who learn to read and write at home aren't going to struggle when they hit the classroom. In fact, they usually have a head start....
That’s why we need this dual role of parents and schools—as a safety net in case one side drops the ball.
Look, I agree that raising kids is primarily a parental duty, but plenty of parents just don't pull it off successfully. Kids are important.
The goal is for them to actually learn.
In my opinion, if a kid turns out completely undisciplined, yeah, the parents are to blame.
But the focus shouldn't constantly shift back to the parents; the focus should be on the children. The State—society, specifically the school system—has to look out for them.
And for the record, I wasn't even talking about teachers as individuals here.
I really don't want to drag the whole "teacher salaries" debate into every single conversation. Can we please move past that?
Everyone’s standards have slipped lately. It’s not necessarily because of one specific reason, but honestly, that’s yet another tangent.
As a profession, teachers aren't the exception to this decline—they're part of the rule.
Nobody gets to use a drop in general standards as an excuse for being lazy.
If anything, I think today's teachers are actually better than previous generations.
But again, that's not the point.
The point is the system.
Let's leave the finances out of it for a second.
The changes I’m advocating for don't require extra taxpayer dollars.
We shouldn't be confusing cause and effect.
I find it totally misplaced to label teacher pay as an "investment in our children."
It’s also completely ridiculous to make excuses like, "we can't emulate the Japanese model because our teachers don't get paid like theirs."
The argument always goes: "First give us better raises, then we'll talk about implementing the Japanese way."
They are mixing up the cause and the consequence.
The Japanese didn't start earning high wages and then suddenly progress; it was the exact opposite.
They progressed while they were still struggling, and *then* the wealth followed.
What do people expect? That money will just fall from the sky and suddenly everything will work perfectly? Is that how you teach kids?
Give me a break!
Where are we supposed to get more money than what's already being provided right now?
Now, regarding tech—we definitely need computer science as a required subject.
But no, not starting in first grade. Please.
First, we need to clarify what "computer science" actually means in this context.
If we're talking about web design, coding, and all that specialized stuff, then no, that absolutely shouldn't be mandatory for every single student—certainly not in elementary school.
However, if we mean teaching kids how to use a computer, a tablet, or basic software for writing and math? Yes, absolutely. But that doesn't need to be its own standalone subject.
Personally, I think it's much more effective to integrate these tools into core subjects; for instance, using Word during English class or Excel during Math, Physics, or Chemistry.
At the same time, we cannot neglect handwriting and basic mental math without relying on computers, calculators, tablets, or whatever else.
I wouldn't call myself a huge tablet enthusiast, but I'm not against them either.
I assume a kid will probably need to be proficient with these devices later in life, so we shouldn't isolate them from technology, but it's not the most vital thing in the world.
Yet, it seems like there’s this total consensus among parents, students, teachers, and the media that the most important thing in education is the tablet.
And of course, the "most important" thing is making sure the school budget is big enough to buy every single kid a tablet. I disagree, though I know I'm in the minority here.
You see how people rave about the Swedish school system because they hand out tablets to everyone.
If they started handing out two tablets per kid, they'd probably be even more obsessed with their educational system.