CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Society › Parenting & Kids › Students & Teens › School Reform: Thoughts?

School Reform: Thoughts?

Started by Karen Richardson3 · · 👁 27 views · 1.7K replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Karen Richardson3rowdypanther12urbantinker8Charles Murphy6wanderinggardener12Arthur Hernandez6brightheron64Terry Cooper69jadetinker85Rachel Jones8David Palmer5Benjamin Wilson4analogseal18silentraven6Jason MorganAngela Wright4Susan Jamesnimblelynx7David Jackson2Chloe Roberts2Jonathan Ortiz2Emily Gonzalez51Brandon Brooks11Susan Nguyen54 …
Brandon Brooks11 Brandon Brooks11 Member
22 messages
joined Jul 2008
#141 ·
Jason Morgan said:No, they get separate tests and customized oral exams.
And sure, you can walk by during class and hand them something a bit more manageable, but how on earth are you supposed to pull that off every single day within a forty-five-minute period—especially when you're juggling two students with accommodations alongside the rest of the class? There simply isn't enough time in the day. Plus, there aren't even specialized textbooks available for them.

Specialized programs exist for children with partial integration needs (those closer to mild intellectual disabilities), where they attend specialized instruction three days a week. In those settings, they truly thrive, and their progress is honestly quite remarkable because of that specific environment.

Is that a typo? That number is closer to three hours a day. 🙂
Brandon Brooks11 Brandon Brooks11 Member
22 messages
joined Jul 2008
#142 ·
Susan James said:The decision to change a student's academic track is made by a school physician, based on documentation from a medical facility where a psychologist was part of the evaluation team.
The suggestion for an evaluation usually comes from a teacher or subject instructor after consulting with the school's specialist staff (though some schools don't even have a psychologist on site). That was my response to Susan James, who suggested I should just "clean up my own backyard." A school psychologist doesn't make the final call on changing a program; they simply support their teaching colleagues during parent meetings or consultations with outside specialists.

I’m not quite sure which declining trades you're referring to, but personally, I think there will always be a demand for plumbers, carpenters, electricians, masons, butchers, and chefs... those jobs aren't going anywhere.
The thing is, many kids just don't have an interest in traditional academics or the general culture we try to push through eight years of schooling. In my experience, kids often show clear interests—especially if they come from families with hands-on trades or have relatives in practical fields—yet we force them to just "sit in a chair" in hopes that it leads to a better life later on.
(And I know plenty of people in bureaucratic roles who have nothing to do and no idea how to do it), while at the same time, kids fail to develop work habits and lose interest in things they actually care about.

I don't know, it seems crazy to force a kid to memorize history and geography if they'd rather be taking apart car engines or building furniture.
Or to read classic literature when they're passionate about culinary arts.
I don't have any prejudices; I just believe kids need more encouragement in things they love, rather than being pushed into things they have zero interest in.

edit: signed with a spicy pepper

Actually, it’s a multi-member commission that makes the decision, not just one doctor. Under the new regulations, the ruling comes from a commission at the local school district office—which is going to be a total disaster if they start mass consolidations or shut them down entirely.
Jason Morgan Jason Morgan Active Member
130 messages
joined Mar 2015
#143 ·
Brandon Brooks11 said:Is that a typo? That number is closer to three hours a day. 🙂

No, that’s how it works on my end.
rowdypanther12 rowdypanther12 Regular
894 messages
joined Jul 2012
#144 ·
Jason Morgan said:Good heavens, I don't mean that at all—quite actually the exact opposite of what I just wrote above.

I think I misunderstood you; you seem to be focusing only on students who struggle academically, whereas I was talking about everyone, including the honor roll kids.😁
silentraven6 silentraven6 Regular
276 messages
joined Nov 2018
#145 ·
rowdypanther12 said:So, you really think the curriculum is fine as it is, without any unnecessary depth being forced on elementary schoolers?
I mean, teaching chemical equations, mass percentages, and linear functions at the elementary level seems a bit much to me. Honestly, I'm just speaking from memory here—thankfully, I haven't looked at a textbook or talked to middle schoolers in quite a while.

WTF?! What’s the actual issue here?

The kids aren't being forced to sequence DNA strands or calculate complex molecular compounds on day one. They're learning the fundamentals. Equations, functions, and mass percentages—these things explain how the world works, showing them that everything stems from a core definition. It teaches them how to draw mathematical conclusions and back them up with solid evidence...

And they're doing all of this using really basic examples.
rowdypanther12 rowdypanther12 Regular
894 messages
joined Jul 2012
#146 ·
Why? To me, that isn't exactly foundational chemistry knowledge. 🤷 I’m not saying it’s useless, but since I believe middle school curricula should be broader and less deep, I don't think chemical equations or mass percentages belong there.
If a student is genuinely passionate about chemistry, they should have access to elective workshops. That should go for every subject, really.
In fact, if it were up to me, I’d actually add more subjects to the middle school curriculum. Like I said, much broader, much shallower, and with a lot more hands-on learning and cross-subject connections.
That’s just my take on it.
silentraven6 silentraven6 Regular
276 messages
joined Nov 2018
#147 ·
rowdypanther12 said:Why? To me, that isn't exactly foundational chemistry knowledge. 🤷 I’m not saying it’s useless, but since I believe middle school curricula should be broader and less deep, I don't think chemical equations or mass percentages belong there.
If a student is genuinely passionate about chemistry, they should have access to elective workshops. That should go for every subject, really.
In fact, if it were up to me, I’d actually add more subjects to the middle school curriculum. Like I said, much broader, much shallower, and with a lot more hands-on learning and cross-subject connections.
That’s just my take on it.

Saying "that's just my opinion" is kind of like saying "everyone is entitled to their own opinion"... it doesn't really add anything to the conversation.

Give me an actual example of what those extra subjects would be. I'm genuinely curious.

Also, I'm wondering how many people here are just parents, and how many of you are professionals in these fields as well as parents?
Jonathan Ortiz2 Jonathan Ortiz2 Member
41 messages
joined Dec 2015
#148 ·
silentraven6 said:Saying "that's just my opinion" is kind of like saying "everyone is entitled to their own opinion"... it doesn't really add anything to the conversation.

Give me an actual example of what those extra subjects would be. I'm genuinely curious.

Also, I'm wondering how many people here are just parents, and how many of you are professionals in these fields as well as parents?

Mine. honestly, i don't know what to make of all this, but my two cents is that we're all just spinning our wheels in the same old cycle, thinking we've found some grand epiphany when really it's just more of the same noise. I mean, does most people just drift through the whole education system without ever actually retaining those core fundamentals, regardless of whether the lessons were surface-level fluff or some deep, life-altering stuff?

You just stick a TV in front of a kid and they’ll pick up English before they can even tie their shoes... yet you spend eight years dragging them through the public school system and they barely walk away knowing two words of the language. It's honestly kind of pathetic.

So now you’re out here assuming that some kids just can't hack it or succeed in elementary school by default, but honestly, the reality is that most people don't remember a single damn thing they learned back then anyway, so what's even the point of stressing over it?

Are you seriously trying to tell me that in a class of thirty students, fifteen of them actually give a damn about chemistry or chemical equations? If five of them...

Look, we don't need to overhaul the entire curriculum overnight, but maybe we could start by looking at the credit hour requirements... I mean, why are we still dragging around all these useless electives that nobody actually needs? We should probably ditch the fluff and rethink how we're even teaching this stuff in the first place.

P.S. Does it even matter who’s actually an expert and who’s just talking out of their ass? As if anyone’s going to start PayPaling you their diplomas to prove it anyway.
silentraven6 silentraven6 Regular
276 messages
joined Nov 2018
#149 ·
Jonathan Ortiz2 said:Mine. honestly, i don't know what to make of all this, but my two cents is that we're all just spinning our wheels in the same old cycle, thinking we've found some grand epiphany when really it's just more of the same noise. I mean, does most people just drift through the whole education system without ever actually retaining those core fundamentals, regardless of whether the lessons were surface-level fluff or some deep, life-altering stuff?

You just stick a TV in front of a kid and they’ll pick up English before they can even tie their shoes... yet you spend eight years dragging them through the public school system and they barely walk away knowing two words of the language. It's honestly kind of pathetic.

So now you’re out here assuming that some kids just can't hack it or succeed in elementary school by default, but honestly, the reality is that most people don't remember a single damn thing they learned back then anyway, so what's even the point of stressing over it?

Are you seriously trying to tell me that in a class of thirty students, fifteen of them actually give a damn about chemistry or chemical equations? If five of them...

Look, we don't need to overhaul the entire curriculum overnight, but maybe we could start by looking at the credit hour requirements... I mean, why are we still dragging around all these useless electives that nobody actually needs? We should probably ditch the fluff and rethink how we're even teaching this stuff in the first place.

P.S. Does it even matter who’s actually an expert and who’s just talking out of their ass? As if anyone’s going to start PayPaling you their diplomas to prove it anyway.

Look, I don't think you've quite grasped what I'm getting at...

Maybe they won't remember every tiny detail, but they will realize that the world has a structure that can be deduced—that specific logic inherent to every field of study. It's the process that matters, not just the raw content. That's the part so many people are missing today.

I brought up expertise because so many people fail to see that not every topic is for everyone, yet they still try to jump in blindly. Without understanding the foundations of the system, and without even having the intention to learn how it works from the inside to offer meaningful suggestions for improvement, they just end up peddling these fairy-tale ideas instead.
Susan James Susan James Veteran
1K messages
joined Jan 2023
#150 ·
silentraven6 said:Saying "that's just my opinion" is kind of like saying "everyone is entitled to their own opinion"... it doesn't really add anything to the conversation.

Give me an actual example of what those extra subjects would be. I'm genuinely curious.

Also, I'm wondering how many people here are just parents, and how many of you are professionals in these fields as well as parents?

Well, I'm definitely the expert here!
The more time I spend working with kids who are starting to act out or getting into real trouble, the more convinced I become that the school system itself is largely to blame. We’ve essentially pushed them into this corner. By placing such an overwhelming emphasis on traditional academic success, we end up driving kids right out of the classroom and onto the streets. It takes a massive toll on their self-esteem; when they feel like they can't meet the standards of a "good student," they figure the only way to find any sense of achievement is to lean into being a "troublemaker" instead.

Before the self-proclaimed experts on this forum start lecturing everyone about "family values," I just want to say that I truly believe the family is the foundation. Most of a child's core behavior starts at home. However, they also pick up a whole different set of behaviors at school—and then an entirely separate set while they're busy trying to find any excuse to skip class!
It’s no wonder some kids feel the need to skip school. For them, it doesn't feel like a place meant for learning or discovery at all. Instead, it feels like an environment where they constantly fall short—a place where their unique talents, interests, and skills just aren't valued. It can be incredibly draining when you're constantly being pressured to meet expectations that don't align with who you actually are or what you're capable of doing.

I honestly think the biggest misconception held by our parents—and even our grandparents—was the idea that sending kids to college was the only way to escape the grind. Their whole logic was basically, "Work hard in school and get a degree so you don't have to struggle like we did." They were so focused on making sure we wouldn't end up stuck in manual labor or working the fields just to get by, thinking a nice white-collar office job was the ultimate ticket to a smooth life.

To be honest, not every kid grows up wanting to sit behind a desk all day, and frankly, there just aren't enough of those office roles out there to go around anyway.
With unemployment rates climbing and so many people finding out that a college degree doesn't guarantee much these days, I completely get why kids aren't as obsessed with higher education anymore. You don't even really have to spell it out for them—they see it for themselves. They look around and see parents who went through the whole grind at places like UC Berkeley, only to end up unemployed or stuck in jobs that don't pay nearly what they were promised. It’s hard to value the hustle when you see that reality playing out right in front of you.

The most heartwarming thing I've noticed lately is that there are actually kids out there who genuinely get excited about different types of jobs while they play. It’s such a sweet thing to see.
Just look at these little ones in preschool—well, except for the kids who were handed a tablet by their grandparents!
People are curious about all sorts of things—how to start a garden from scratch, what it’s really like to work as a contractor, an electrician, or a carpenter. They want to know the ins and outs of being a tailor, a chef, a firefighter, or even a hairstylist. It's funny, I was just chatting with a neighbor about how much everyone seems to be looking for hands-on careers lately!
Kids are naturally such curious little explorers, aren't they? They’re constantly observing everything happening around them, trying to make sense of the world. I've always felt that the best way for them to process all that information is through play—it's how they actually get to test out those observations and experience things firsthand.
So, we send them off to school, but what do they actually spend most of their time doing there?
They just sit there, quiet and obedient, doing exactly what they’re told. It feels like all they do is study—and most of the time, it’s just pure rote memorization. I remember being back in high school, and it felt like we were constantly being told to "get a move on" or "keep your seat warm." There was always that pressure to stay focused and push harder, almost like if you weren't constantly grinding, you were falling behind.
I honestly don't see anything wrong with assigning homework. It’s about giving kids access to different types of information and teaching them how to actually hunt for answers on their own—as long as we aren't doing it at the expense of their actual interests. The problem is that we often fail to find that balance. I can't tell you how many times I've heard parents say things like, "You can't go play soccer until your math worksheet is done," or "You can't help Dad fix the car until you finish your reading assignment." I've even heard, "You can't help Grandpa in the garage because you haven't finished that geography project," or "No gardening with Grandma this weekend because you have tests all week." The mindset is always "school comes first, period." Teachers often back this up, too. But here's the thing I've noticed: when we constantly tell a child they can only enjoy life once their schoolwork is finished, it often backfires. In my experience, instead of motivating them, it just leads to a standoff where the kid ends up doing neither—they don't go play, and they don't finish the homework either.
By the time a kid hits eighth grade, they often lose interest in learning practical trades or hands-on skills, yet they aren't exactly hitting the books or excelling in school either. It’s that tricky middle ground where they seem to drift away from everything at once.
To be clear, I’m not talking about people losing focus because they’re glued to their computers or hanging out with the wrong crowd on the street. This is about something much deeper. It's about how families, relatives, neighbors, and even kids are genuinely showing interest in pursuing specific, high-level career paths. We're seeing real ambition and meaningful connections to important professions within the community.

Not everyone is going to be into poetry, geography, or obsessing over what happened 20 or 200 years ago...
Just like I had zero interest in technical drawing back in the day, my buddy sitting next to me in class couldn't care less about literature.
I’d spend my time reading books and knocking out our required reading assignments (for both of us), while he’d help me fill out my workbooks.
In the end, we both walked away with straight A's in both subjects.
But what did we actually learn from all that?
I learned how to cut corners and navigate around the system—though, to be fair, I actually enjoyed the reading part.
Honestly, we were pretty lucky to have each other. We could swap favors, and by helping each other out, we were actually practicing things we were genuinely interested in.
Nowadays, if a kid struggles with a subject, parents usually just step in, hire a tutor, or pay someone to write their book reports for them.
I really don't like that.
It still feels like we're just encouraging kids to cheat and find loopholes.

I often see school reports stating that a child lacks "study habits" (usually alongside a long list of behavioral issues).
And it's true—they haven't developed the habit of memorizing facts, coming home to finish homework, reading assigned books, or doing any extra reading.
Among these kids, you'll find some who are totally lost in front of a computer or TV, or just wandering the streets. But you'll also find kids who love tearing computers apart and putting them back together, or who are obsessed with car mechanics. (I can talk your ear off about mechanics, but those kids usually have a mentor—someone they shadow at a local garage, for instance).

Sure, you could argue that kids get to choose a vocational path around age 14 or 15.
They do.
And quite often, they make that choice.
They can be really successful during their apprenticeships, yet they still choose not to go to college (which makes me wonder: do we really need as many professors and academic subjects in vocational high schools as we currently do?)
But then there are the ones who fall in with the wrong crowd before they hit 15. They lose interest in everything, never develop any work ethic—not for school, and not for a trade—and they end up cycling through various institutions that constantly tell them how much of a failure they are.

That's why I think we shouldn't wait until they're 15 to start guiding them; we should start much earlier.
Or, at the very least, we should scale back the hours spent on history, geography, literature, and biology. (I remember most of that was just review for us in high school, so it seems logical that the heavy lifting should happen during the later years).
As for physics, chemistry, and technical subjects... those should be strictly hands-on workshops in middle school.
(Maybe with a little bit of theory thrown in, but definitely different from how things are handled today).
analogseal18 analogseal18 Active Member
75 messages
joined Nov 2018
#151 ·
Jonathan Ortiz2 said:Mine. honestly, i don't know what to make of all this, but my two cents is that we're all just spinning our wheels in the same old cycle, thinking we've found some grand epiphany when really it's just more of the same noise. I mean, does most people just drift through the whole education system without ever actually retaining those core fundamentals, regardless of whether the lessons were surface-level fluff or some deep, life-altering stuff?

You just stick a TV in front of a kid and they’ll pick up English before they can even tie their shoes... yet you spend eight years dragging them through the public school system and they barely walk away knowing two words of the language. It's honestly kind of pathetic.

So now you’re out here assuming that some kids just can't hack it or succeed in elementary school by default, but honestly, the reality is that most people don't remember a single damn thing they learned back then anyway, so what's even the point of stressing over it?

Are you seriously trying to tell me that in a class of thirty students, fifteen of them actually give a damn about chemistry or chemical equations? If five of them...

Look, we don't need to overhaul the entire curriculum overnight, but maybe we could start by looking at the credit hour requirements... I mean, why are we still dragging around all these useless electives that nobody actually needs? We should probably ditch the fluff and rethink how we're even teaching this stuff in the first place.

P.S. Does it even matter who’s actually an expert and who’s just talking out of their ass? As if anyone’s going to start PayPaling you their diplomas to prove it anyway.

If you simply park a child in front of a television, they might passively absorb a handful of phrases or recognize a few sounds, but let us be clear: that is nowhere near actual proficiency. If one wishes to truly master a language, it requires a systematic approach. One cannot rely on osmosis alone, especially when compared to the rigorous "use of English" standards required by international certification exams used globally.

I find myself in agreement with rhino. Every child possesses unique strengths, and we ought to emphasize those specific areas, particularly if the child shows little interest in a broad, generalized curriculum.

In fact, I was visiting a friend just yesterday, and she was quite distraught because her nephew—who was merely an average student—decided to enroll in a three-year vocational program. It isn't that he lacks passion for the trade itself; rather, he simply has no stomach for traditional academics. He isn't unintelligent, nor is he a troublemaker or lazy; he actually commits to three hours of grueling physical training every single day. He has simply grown weary of the standard curriculum offered by most schools.
For these types of children, who are fundamentally average, we should provide a spectrum of content where they can actually find their footing—perhaps a cluster of related trades taught over four years so they can refine their choice later. In our current system, it feels as though you are forced to be either a genius or a complete fool just to get by.😢
David Palmer5 David Palmer5 Active Member
80 messages
joined Jan 2024
#152 ·
Susan James said:Well, I'm definitely the expert here!
The more time I spend working with kids who are starting to act out or getting into real trouble, the more convinced I become that the school system itself is largely to blame. We’ve essentially pushed them into this corner. By placing such an overwhelming emphasis on traditional academic success, we end up driving kids right out of the classroom and onto the streets. It takes a massive toll on their self-esteem; when they feel like they can't meet the standards of a "good student," they figure the only way to find any sense of achievement is to lean into being a "troublemaker" instead.

Before the self-proclaimed experts on this forum start lecturing everyone about "family values," I just want to say that I truly believe the family is the foundation. Most of a child's core behavior starts at home. However, they also pick up a whole different set of behaviors at school—and then an entirely separate set while they're busy trying to find any excuse to skip class!
It’s no wonder some kids feel the need to skip school. For them, it doesn't feel like a place meant for learning or discovery at all. Instead, it feels like an environment where they constantly fall short—a place where their unique talents, interests, and skills just aren't valued. It can be incredibly draining when you're constantly being pressured to meet expectations that don't align with who you actually are or what you're capable of doing.

I honestly think the biggest misconception held by our parents—and even our grandparents—was the idea that sending kids to college was the only way to escape the grind. Their whole logic was basically, "Work hard in school and get a degree so you don't have to struggle like we did." They were so focused on making sure we wouldn't end up stuck in manual labor or working the fields just to get by, thinking a nice white-collar office job was the ultimate ticket to a smooth life.

To be honest, not every kid grows up wanting to sit behind a desk all day, and frankly, there just aren't enough of those office roles out there to go around anyway.
With unemployment rates climbing and so many people finding out that a college degree doesn't guarantee much these days, I completely get why kids aren't as obsessed with higher education anymore. You don't even really have to spell it out for them—they see it for themselves. They look around and see parents who went through the whole grind at places like UC Berkeley, only to end up unemployed or stuck in jobs that don't pay nearly what they were promised. It’s hard to value the hustle when you see that reality playing out right in front of you.

The most heartwarming thing I've noticed lately is that there are actually kids out there who genuinely get excited about different types of jobs while they play. It’s such a sweet thing to see.
Just look at these little ones in preschool—well, except for the kids who were handed a tablet by their grandparents!
People are curious about all sorts of things—how to start a garden from scratch, what it’s really like to work as a contractor, an electrician, or a carpenter. They want to know the ins and outs of being a tailor, a chef, a firefighter, or even a hairstylist. It's funny, I was just chatting with a neighbor about how much everyone seems to be looking for hands-on careers lately!
Kids are naturally such curious little explorers, aren't they? They’re constantly observing everything happening around them, trying to make sense of the world. I've always felt that the best way for them to process all that information is through play—it's how they actually get to test out those observations and experience things firsthand.
So, we send them off to school, but what do they actually spend most of their time doing there?
They just sit there, quiet and obedient, doing exactly what they’re told. It feels like all they do is study—and most of the time, it’s just pure rote memorization. I remember being back in high school, and it felt like we were constantly being told to "get a move on" or "keep your seat warm." There was always that pressure to stay focused and push harder, almost like if you weren't constantly grinding, you were falling behind.
I honestly don't see anything wrong with assigning homework. It’s about giving kids access to different types of information and teaching them how to actually hunt for answers on their own—as long as we aren't doing it at the expense of their actual interests. The problem is that we often fail to find that balance. I can't tell you how many times I've heard parents say things like, "You can't go play soccer until your math worksheet is done," or "You can't help Dad fix the car until you finish your reading assignment." I've even heard, "You can't help Grandpa in the garage because you haven't finished that geography project," or "No gardening with Grandma this weekend because you have tests all week." The mindset is always "school comes first, period." Teachers often back this up, too. But here's the thing I've noticed: when we constantly tell a child they can only enjoy life once their schoolwork is finished, it often backfires. In my experience, instead of motivating them, it just leads to a standoff where the kid ends up doing neither—they don't go play, and they don't finish the homework either.
By the time a kid hits eighth grade, they often lose interest in learning practical trades or hands-on skills, yet they aren't exactly hitting the books or excelling in school either. It’s that tricky middle ground where they seem to drift away from everything at once.
To be clear, I’m not talking about people losing focus because they’re glued to their computers or hanging out with the wrong crowd on the street. This is about something much deeper. It's about how families, relatives, neighbors, and even kids are genuinely showing interest in pursuing specific, high-level career paths. We're seeing real ambition and meaningful connections to important professions within the community.

Not everyone is going to be into poetry, geography, or obsessing over what happened 20 or 200 years ago...
Just like I had zero interest in technical drawing back in the day, my buddy sitting next to me in class couldn't care less about literature.
I’d spend my time reading books and knocking out our required reading assignments (for both of us), while he’d help me fill out my workbooks.
In the end, we both walked away with straight A's in both subjects.
But what did we actually learn from all that?
I learned how to cut corners and navigate around the system—though, to be fair, I actually enjoyed the reading part.
Honestly, we were pretty lucky to have each other. We could swap favors, and by helping each other out, we were actually practicing things we were genuinely interested in.
Nowadays, if a kid struggles with a subject, parents usually just step in, hire a tutor, or pay someone to write their book reports for them.
I really don't like that.
It still feels like we're just encouraging kids to cheat and find loopholes.

I often see school reports stating that a child lacks "study habits" (usually alongside a long list of behavioral issues).
And it's true—they haven't developed the habit of memorizing facts, coming home to finish homework, reading assigned books, or doing any extra reading.
Among these kids, you'll find some who are totally lost in front of a computer or TV, or just wandering the streets. But you'll also find kids who love tearing computers apart and putting them back together, or who are obsessed with car mechanics. (I can talk your ear off about mechanics, but those kids usually have a mentor—someone they shadow at a local garage, for instance).

Sure, you could argue that kids get to choose a vocational path around age 14 or 15.
They do.
And quite often, they make that choice.
They can be really successful during their apprenticeships, yet they still choose not to go to college (which makes me wonder: do we really need as many professors and academic subjects in vocational high schools as we currently do?)
But then there are the ones who fall in with the wrong crowd before they hit 15. They lose interest in everything, never develop any work ethic—not for school, and not for a trade—and they end up cycling through various institutions that constantly tell them how much of a failure they are.

That's why I think we shouldn't wait until they're 15 to start guiding them; we should start much earlier.
Or, at the very least, we should scale back the hours spent on history, geography, literature, and biology. (I remember most of that was just review for us in high school, so it seems logical that the heavy lifting should happen during the later years).
As for physics, chemistry, and technical subjects... those should be strictly hands-on workshops in middle school.
(Maybe with a little bit of theory thrown in, but definitely different from how things are handled today).

It’s an undeniable fact that you see way more behavioral issues in students at elite prep schools than you do in kids attending local vocational high schools.🙄

In reality, our culture doesn't actually emphasize the true value of education. And let's be clear: real learning isn't just about memorizing facts for a test.

If you look at countries with the highest percentages of highly educated citizens—like Finland, Norway, the US, Japan, South Korea, Canada, or the UK—I think that speaks volumes on its own.
analogseal18 analogseal18 Active Member
75 messages
joined Nov 2018
#153 ·
It isn't that the system actively pushes these kids out onto the streets; rather, it fails to prevent them from ending up there in the first place. It could easily offer alternative pathways—vocational training, internships, or different specialized programs—for those who simply aren't built for traditional academics. But the system offers no such alternatives, leaving these youths to stumble into all the wrong directions. If they don't have parents to steer them toward organized sports or to engage them with activities back at 😉
, what hope do they have?
What truly infuriates me is the lack of honesty we show these children; why does nobody just tell them, "Look, this path isn't for you, find something else"? We see students enrolled in hospitality programs who can barely scrape by in English or Spanish—how on earth are they supposed to function in the service industry? Then you have those pursuing surveying or engineering tracks who can hardly pass algebra, physics, or geometry. One group might limp along by passing math while failing languages, while the other survives through language skills despite being lost in math, but neither scenario is sustainable. It leads nowhere, or worse, it leads to a permanent spot on the unemployment line where they'll be crushed by anyone with actual competence.
David Palmer5 David Palmer5 Active Member
80 messages
joined Jan 2024
#154 ·
analogseal18 said:It isn't that the system actively pushes these kids out onto the streets; rather, it fails to prevent them from ending up there in the first place. It could easily offer alternative pathways—vocational training, internships, or different specialized programs—for those who simply aren't built for traditional academics. But the system offers no such alternatives, leaving these youths to stumble into all the wrong directions. If they don't have parents to steer them toward organized sports or to engage them with activities back at 😉
, what hope do they have?
What truly infuriates me is the lack of honesty we show these children; why does nobody just tell them, "Look, this path isn't for you, find something else"? We see students enrolled in hospitality programs who can barely scrape by in English or Spanish—how on earth are they supposed to function in the service industry? Then you have those pursuing surveying or engineering tracks who can hardly pass algebra, physics, or geometry. One group might limp along by passing math while failing languages, while the other survives through language skills despite being lost in math, but neither scenario is sustainable. It leads nowhere, or worse, it leads to a permanent spot on the unemployment line where they'll be crushed by anyone with actual competence.

I assume the competition consists of people who are more highly educated.😁

Look, it’s not quite that simple. Just ask middle schoolers what they want to be when they grow up, and you'll hear everything from pop stars and pro athletes to soap opera actors. Or, they don't want to do anything at all. Or, they simply have no clue.
In my view, kids in middle school need a solid, well-rounded education just so they actually have the tools to make an informed choice later on.
And for most of them, that big decision happens the moment they enroll in high school.

And how exactly do you expect us to tell them "this isn't for you"? If a student in a culinary arts program is barely passing their foreign language classes, that’s a pretty loud signal. It only gets messy if they also struggle with math and science on top of that, and they aren't particularly handy with their hands either.🤷
David Palmer5 David Palmer5 Active Member
80 messages
joined Jan 2024
#155 ·
analogseal18 said:If you simply park a child in front of a television, they might passively absorb a handful of phrases or recognize a few sounds, but let us be clear: that is nowhere near actual proficiency. If one wishes to truly master a language, it requires a systematic approach. One cannot rely on osmosis alone, especially when compared to the rigorous "use of English" standards required by international certification exams used globally.

I find myself in agreement with rhino. Every child possesses unique strengths, and we ought to emphasize those specific areas, particularly if the child shows little interest in a broad, generalized curriculum.

In fact, I was visiting a friend just yesterday, and she was quite distraught because her nephew—who was merely an average student—decided to enroll in a three-year vocational program. It isn't that he lacks passion for the trade itself; rather, he simply has no stomach for traditional academics. He isn't unintelligent, nor is he a troublemaker or lazy; he actually commits to three hours of grueling physical training every single day. He has simply grown weary of the standard curriculum offered by most schools.
For these types of children, who are fundamentally average, we should provide a spectrum of content where they can actually find their footing—perhaps a cluster of related trades taught over four years so they can refine their choice later. In our current system, it feels as though you are forced to be either a genius or a complete fool just to get by.😢

I'll be honest, I don't quite follow the tragedy in this story: why didn't he just pick a different three-year program or a trade he actually enjoyed?

As for this whole idea of being "average": yeah, most people are. If someone picks a career or a trade they genuinely enjoy and ends up being great at it, that doesn't make them a genius, nor does it make them a failure. Honestly, the "failures" are often created by a system that refuses to give people a well-rounded education.
analogseal18 analogseal18 Active Member
75 messages
joined Nov 2018
#156 ·
When I spoke about competition, my thoughts were directed toward those applying for the exact same position who possess superior expertise—knowledge that is absolutely vital to the profession. It doesn't need to be phrased formally.

A grade of two as a message? Honestly, even parents struggle to grasp the significance of that. In most cases, the fault lies with the professors; current instructors are far too stringent, whereas those from middle school failed to provide these students with a sufficiently solid foundation. 🙄

It isn't exactly a tragedy, though there is a certain sadness within the adult members of a family when a child fails to strive for excellence. This child is much like many others today—someone who has grown disillusioned with academics and opted for a path where they heard the workload is lightest, specifically where there is minimal theory involved. For children considering a trade, we ought to make those vocations more accessible; schools should demonstrate what the work actually entails in practice, showcasing the various specialties and providing genuine opportunities to experiment. A trade is not something one can develop a passion for simply by glancing at a technician working on a machine while being called home by parents. One must actually try it. That kind of exposure is nonexistent here; kids don't truly realize what they are getting into until they are out on an internship.
Angela Wright4 Angela Wright4 Member
17 messages
joined May 2015
#157 ·
They’re offering these kids factory tours, trying to make everything look all exciting and high-tech. We have over a thousand eighth graders enrolled.
Only three groups signed up, totaling maybe twenty students??? Good grief, everyone is going to be a doctor, I guess—why would they bother looking at blue-collar jobs...

I heard Russia has the highest percentage of highly educated people... I should probably do a little digging online to verify that.

On another note, I’m actually wondering about something else: who am I supposed to complain to about my fifth grader having to lug around 8kg of gear to school tomorrow? And get this, there was even a presentation on it today.
Seriously though, which damn department at the Department of Education should I write to? I am absolutely livid that my child has to haul all this weight. 8 kg??? In fifth grade???????? We’ve completely lost our minds here!
Susan James Susan James Veteran
1K messages
joined Jan 2023
#158 ·
David Palmer5 said:It’s an undeniable fact that you see way more behavioral issues in students at elite prep schools than you do in kids attending local vocational high schools.🙄

In reality, our culture doesn't actually emphasize the true value of education. And let's be clear: real learning isn't just about memorizing facts for a test.

If you look at countries with the highest percentages of highly educated citizens—like Finland, Norway, the US, Japan, South Korea, Canada, or the UK—I think that speaks volumes on its own.

True, but when you look at those high graduation rates in places like Canada, the UK, or Scandinavia, you have to account for the huge influx of bright immigrants moving there from all over the world.😍

As for how high schoolers behave... hmm. Looking at a large prep school with maybe 500 students, you might actually run into more disciplinary issues there than you would in an entire district of vocational schools combined.🤣
nimblelynx7 nimblelynx7 Regular
336 messages
joined Jul 2016
#159 ·
Susan James said:True, but when you look at those high graduation rates in places like Canada, the UK, or Scandinavia, you have to account for the huge influx of bright immigrants moving there from all over the world.😍

As for how high schoolers behave... hmm. Looking at a large prep school with maybe 500 students, you might actually run into more disciplinary issues there than you would in an entire district of vocational schools combined.🤣

Problematic in what way? Are they solving differential equations just to look cool?
silentraven6 silentraven6 Regular
276 messages
joined Nov 2018
#160 ·
Susan James said:Well, I'm definitely the expert here!
The more time I spend working with kids who are starting to act out or getting into real trouble, the more convinced I become that the school system itself is largely to blame. We’ve essentially pushed them into this corner. By placing such an overwhelming emphasis on traditional academic success, we end up driving kids right out of the classroom and onto the streets. It takes a massive toll on their self-esteem; when they feel like they can't meet the standards of a "good student," they figure the only way to find any sense of achievement is to lean into being a "troublemaker" instead.

Before the self-proclaimed experts on this forum start lecturing everyone about "family values," I just want to say that I truly believe the family is the foundation. Most of a child's core behavior starts at home. However, they also pick up a whole different set of behaviors at school—and then an entirely separate set while they're busy trying to find any excuse to skip class!
It’s no wonder some kids feel the need to skip school. For them, it doesn't feel like a place meant for learning or discovery at all. Instead, it feels like an environment where they constantly fall short—a place where their unique talents, interests, and skills just aren't valued. It can be incredibly draining when you're constantly being pressured to meet expectations that don't align with who you actually are or what you're capable of doing.

I honestly think the biggest misconception held by our parents—and even our grandparents—was the idea that sending kids to college was the only way to escape the grind. Their whole logic was basically, "Work hard in school and get a degree so you don't have to struggle like we did." They were so focused on making sure we wouldn't end up stuck in manual labor or working the fields just to get by, thinking a nice white-collar office job was the ultimate ticket to a smooth life.

To be honest, not every kid grows up wanting to sit behind a desk all day, and frankly, there just aren't enough of those office roles out there to go around anyway.
With unemployment rates climbing and so many people finding out that a college degree doesn't guarantee much these days, I completely get why kids aren't as obsessed with higher education anymore. You don't even really have to spell it out for them—they see it for themselves. They look around and see parents who went through the whole grind at places like UC Berkeley, only to end up unemployed or stuck in jobs that don't pay nearly what they were promised. It’s hard to value the hustle when you see that reality playing out right in front of you.

The most heartwarming thing I've noticed lately is that there are actually kids out there who genuinely get excited about different types of jobs while they play. It’s such a sweet thing to see.
Just look at these little ones in preschool—well, except for the kids who were handed a tablet by their grandparents!
People are curious about all sorts of things—how to start a garden from scratch, what it’s really like to work as a contractor, an electrician, or a carpenter. They want to know the ins and outs of being a tailor, a chef, a firefighter, or even a hairstylist. It's funny, I was just chatting with a neighbor about how much everyone seems to be looking for hands-on careers lately!
Kids are naturally such curious little explorers, aren't they? They’re constantly observing everything happening around them, trying to make sense of the world. I've always felt that the best way for them to process all that information is through play—it's how they actually get to test out those observations and experience things firsthand.
So, we send them off to school, but what do they actually spend most of their time doing there?
They just sit there, quiet and obedient, doing exactly what they’re told. It feels like all they do is study—and most of the time, it’s just pure rote memorization. I remember being back in high school, and it felt like we were constantly being told to "get a move on" or "keep your seat warm." There was always that pressure to stay focused and push harder, almost like if you weren't constantly grinding, you were falling behind.
I honestly don't see anything wrong with assigning homework. It’s about giving kids access to different types of information and teaching them how to actually hunt for answers on their own—as long as we aren't doing it at the expense of their actual interests. The problem is that we often fail to find that balance. I can't tell you how many times I've heard parents say things like, "You can't go play soccer until your math worksheet is done," or "You can't help Dad fix the car until you finish your reading assignment." I've even heard, "You can't help Grandpa in the garage because you haven't finished that geography project," or "No gardening with Grandma this weekend because you have tests all week." The mindset is always "school comes first, period." Teachers often back this up, too. But here's the thing I've noticed: when we constantly tell a child they can only enjoy life once their schoolwork is finished, it often backfires. In my experience, instead of motivating them, it just leads to a standoff where the kid ends up doing neither—they don't go play, and they don't finish the homework either.
By the time a kid hits eighth grade, they often lose interest in learning practical trades or hands-on skills, yet they aren't exactly hitting the books or excelling in school either. It’s that tricky middle ground where they seem to drift away from everything at once.
To be clear, I’m not talking about people losing focus because they’re glued to their computers or hanging out with the wrong crowd on the street. This is about something much deeper. It's about how families, relatives, neighbors, and even kids are genuinely showing interest in pursuing specific, high-level career paths. We're seeing real ambition and meaningful connections to important professions within the community.

Not everyone is going to be into poetry, geography, or obsessing over what happened 20 or 200 years ago...
Just like I had zero interest in technical drawing back in the day, my buddy sitting next to me in class couldn't care less about literature.
I’d spend my time reading books and knocking out our required reading assignments (for both of us), while he’d help me fill out my workbooks.
In the end, we both walked away with straight A's in both subjects.
But what did we actually learn from all that?
I learned how to cut corners and navigate around the system—though, to be fair, I actually enjoyed the reading part.
Honestly, we were pretty lucky to have each other. We could swap favors, and by helping each other out, we were actually practicing things we were genuinely interested in.
Nowadays, if a kid struggles with a subject, parents usually just step in, hire a tutor, or pay someone to write their book reports for them.
I really don't like that.
It still feels like we're just encouraging kids to cheat and find loopholes.

I often see school reports stating that a child lacks "study habits" (usually alongside a long list of behavioral issues).
And it's true—they haven't developed the habit of memorizing facts, coming home to finish homework, reading assigned books, or doing any extra reading.
Among these kids, you'll find some who are totally lost in front of a computer or TV, or just wandering the streets. But you'll also find kids who love tearing computers apart and putting them back together, or who are obsessed with car mechanics. (I can talk your ear off about mechanics, but those kids usually have a mentor—someone they shadow at a local garage, for instance).

Sure, you could argue that kids get to choose a vocational path around age 14 or 15.
They do.
And quite often, they make that choice.
They can be really successful during their apprenticeships, yet they still choose not to go to college (which makes me wonder: do we really need as many professors and academic subjects in vocational high schools as we currently do?)
But then there are the ones who fall in with the wrong crowd before they hit 15. They lose interest in everything, never develop any work ethic—not for school, and not for a trade—and they end up cycling through various institutions that constantly tell them how much of a failure they are.

That's why I think we shouldn't wait until they're 15 to start guiding them; we should start much earlier.
Or, at the very least, we should scale back the hours spent on history, geography, literature, and biology. (I remember most of that was just review for us in high school, so it seems logical that the heavy lifting should happen during the later years).
As for physics, chemistry, and technical subjects... those should be strictly hands-on workshops in middle school.
(Maybe with a little bit of theory thrown in, but definitely different from how things are handled today).

Look, I agree with most of this, I just want to point out that cutting out chemical equations that are vital for practical learning won't lead to anything good.😁

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads