CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Society › Politics › Close to Politics › Massive protests erupt to topple the Democratic Party's government!

Massive protests erupt to topple the Democratic Party's government!

Started by Taylor Vaughn8 · · 👁 8 views · 43 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Taylor Vaughn8George Morgan3Susan Jackson65Larry Walker24Carl Hill6Gregory Peterson2Robert Clark4James Nguyen13Morgan Brown4velvetskipper11Jack Cook7Nicholas NguyenSean Sanders81Joseph White5darkfox14jademoose6Steven Martinez13Richard Wilson4Brenda Lewis4George Gomez34Dana Robinson4George Parker3Grace Fowler37Thomas Smith …
Brenda Lewis4 Brenda Lewis4 Newcomer
3 messages
joined Nov 2013
#41 ·
Gregory Peterson2 said:Look, I know exactly what we need. I’ll give you a real-world example from my own life. I just launched a small manufacturing startup. It’s still in the "diapers and wipes" stage—very early days—but hey, I’m out there making moves! And honestly, the feedback so far has been incredibly positive.
The real headache for me right now is the massive amount of money being handed over to the government through taxes and those payroll contributions I'll be needing very soon. In this early phase, I'm pouring everything into heavy machinery, equipment, raw materials, plus dealing with sales and marketing hurdles while trying to get the wheels turning. It feels like running a marathon with a backpack full of bricks. I truly believe it would be a game-changer if the government just stayed off my back for at least two years. Imagine if a new business was totally exempt from all federal and local taxes during that window. It’s nearly impossible to hire your first employee when you're already struggling, only to hand almost their entire paycheck straight back to the IRS.

I really think that kind of move would supercharge the economy. Just let new companies and entrepreneurs breathe for a little while! Let us build some momentum, earn a profit, and actually feel the win of our hard work... then they can come knocking for their cut later just like everyone else. But when they start squeezing you from day one? That’s when they turn a difficult start into a total disaster. If I go under because of the overhead, then all they'll have left is $0.00 of me.

Exactly. With this many unnecessary burdens during a recession, you practically have to be a madman to start any kind of business. Personally, I'm hoping this current ballot initiative gives us some hope that someone might push for something similar—like eliminating industrial electricity rates for small shops like hair salons, florists, or cafes, or getting rid of those parasitic chamber of commerce fees. If we can cut out the parasites, then maybe there's hope. Otherwise, we're just waiting for the government to steer entrepreneurs straight into an abyss.
Grace Fowler37 Grace Fowler37 Member
11 messages
joined Nov 2013
#42 ·
Everything written here is spot on, and frankly, every administration in Washington knows it too; it’s just that some people simply don't give a damn about whether the country actually succeeds or not, because I honestly can't see any other way to interpret it.
Thomas Smith Thomas Smith Newcomer
6 messages
joined Jan 2011
#43 ·
There isn't a single viable political alternative on the horizon as long as the Department of Justice and the entire judicial establishment refuse to go after the gangsters and deal with the criminal activity properly. They need to actually prosecute them. Only then can they prove to the people that the majority of these thieves have been cleared out. But to get to that point, we have to change the people running the show first. Since the judiciary—along with everyone else tasked with enforcing and guarding our laws—is subject to the law to appoint politics, we’re just stuck spinning in circles. In my estimation, early elections won't do a thing, and there won't be any real benefit after the next regular cycle either. I am a total pessimist. These old-guard remnants from the deep state are so thoroughly embedded in every party, so deeply rooted within "non-profits" and even veteran organizations, that expecting any meaningful change resulting from a shift in political leadership is a fool's errand. I think the only way forward is for each of us to focus on ourselves and our own families. We need to evolve by changing our mindset—moving away from that old socialist, lazy mentality toward a level of true democracy where things like "the husband finds out last" or "we have a stable majority in Congress" aren't even things we talk about. Other paths lead straight to revolution, and I'm not sure our children want that. Of course, these partisan operatives know exactly what they're doing. Personally, I don't care about violence or bloodshed; I haven't had a drop of interest left for this country we've built. We watched passively as constitutional rules were tweaked to favor new special interests, and now we watch silently as more constitutional changes are hammered out behind closed doors by the same group. It's obvious they coordinate amongst themselves while tossing distractions at the public like culture war grievances. And us? What are we supposed to do? Is there a smarter suggestion than "trust in yourself and your own horse"? Given the state of things, how do you change the people at the top? You can only do it by force, because the newcomers need to realize their necks are on the line too if they act the same way. That implies fratricide among our own kind... and that is something I cannot support. If things turn ugly, I'll be packing up the whole family and heading out. It'll end up being the same as it is now. Whatever happens, my own "horse" comes first, especially after every political gang in history has lied to me and let me down.
swiftcyclist42 swiftcyclist42 Active Member
72 messages
joined Sep 2014
#44 ·
Robert Clark4 said:I’m kind of worried that these recent changes to the Constitution might actually wipe that option off the table entirely. Honestly, it wouldn't surprise me one bit, especially since they already mentioned they want to strictly limit what kind of stuff can even be put up for a vote in a referendum down the road. ☕

But man, they'd have to be total fools not to take advantage of that loophole if it exists. And let's be real, those guys always learn from their mistakes...

Honestly, who cares about the Constitution or referendums?
If 200,000 people march from Times Square toward Pennsylvania Avenue, they'll topple this out-of-touch administration in thirty minutes flat.
There isn't any O'Brien's police force capable of stopping that kind of momentum.

That does leave us wondering, though.
How would we organize new elections, and who would step in to run things temporarily?

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads