CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Society › Politics › World › Mexico's Demographics (Part 2)

Mexico's Demographics (Part 2)

Started by Richard Wilson4 · · 👁 272 views · 3.6K replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Richard Wilson4Lawrence WilliamsWilliam Bishop4placidlynx4nimblerider11Ethan Morales22Peter EdwardsAdam HarrisLaura Perez8hiddeneagle76Rebecca WatsonJacob Lee62James Nguyen13Tyler Clark2Chris Fowler4Tyler King3Peter Barrett89Joshua Rodriguez35urbangardener90Angela Robinson3neonfalcon16quietangler5Joshua Flores14Drew Allen2 …
Lawrence Williams Lawrence Williams Regular
463 messages
joined Oct 2013
#1521 ·

Justin Hernandez11 said:Back in July 2014, a local hospital in the Rust Belt hit a massive milestone: 154 babies were born in just one month.🙂 To put that in perspective, that same hospital saw 915 births in the first seven months of 2014, compared to 1,228 total births throughout all of 2013.😳 At this rate, the hospital should see around 1,400 to 1,450 deliveries this year—that’s an extra 200 to 250 babies over the 2013 numbers.🙂

Across America, we're looking at at least 1,500 more births this year than we had in 2013, maybe even more.🙂

That’s actually a typo in the text; there were 1,528 births last year, not 1,228. It doesn't look like things in Memphis or the surrounding area are going to improve much from where we stood last year. Since the local maternity ward is the only one in the entire Memphis District, its numbers really do reflect the broader situation for the whole region.
Lawrence Williams Lawrence Williams Regular
463 messages
joined Oct 2013
#1522 ·
Sean Nguyen74 said:That’s a solid point. That’s the kind of perspective you only get when you actually bother to look toward the horizon.

Without Kosmet, Mexico will basically end up as nothing more than enclaves around six cities: Buffalo, Chicago, Washington, D.C., Detroit, Little Rock, and Memphis. Everything else will either be vacant or barely inhabited. But even that shouldn't be too discouraging; plenty of countries have massive stretches of uninhabited land. Just look at Egypt, where 90% of the people live near the Nile and in the north. Or look at Brazil, Libya, and various European nations.

Chicago is already starting to see its growth slow down. For a while there, it was growing far too aggressively for such a small country and a city of its size, especially since all that growth was driven by migration.
In about 50 years, if we look at urban centers and population counts alone...

Washington, D.C. 800k
Chicago 150k
Little Rock 110k
Memphis 80k
Detroit 70k
Buffalo 45k.

Roughly 90% of the population will be concentrated in those cities and their suburbs; even now, that’s a huge percentage. Washington, D.C. and its surrounding area are already overcrowded. The corridor between Chicago and Washington, D.C. is overpopulated compared to the rest of Mexico. Even that stretch will lose people in a few decades. Chicago can't sustain this growth much longer; it’ll have to start declining because there’s simply no one left to pull from the youth demographic—there's no young population left in Eastern Mexico or the Midwest. Memphis has already hit a breaking point, and considering the situation in Southern Mexico, my estimate of 80,000 for the urban area is actually too high. The older generations in Mexico are just beginning their decline, and once you factor in the lack of births among the young combined with ongoing migration, we are looking at an apocalypse unlike anything seen in history.

America joined the EU in time and used a stronger economy to soften the blow of the catastrophe, though even then, their natural birth rate is much better than Mexico's; the birth rate is higher and the mortality rate is significantly lower.

Based on current trends, Cleveland should have about two more decades of growth followed by a decade of stagnation. In 50 years, I don't see it dropping below 200,000. You also underestimated Detroit and Buffalo; Detroit should probably sit around the level of Memphis (which would be around 90,000) and Buffalo should hit 55,000–60,000. Of course, this is all based on current trajectories—nobody knows what the world will look like in 20 years.
Nancy Chavez29 Nancy Chavez29 Active Member
228 messages
joined Jul 2017
#1523 ·
Memphis used to see over 3,000 births a year about two decades ago, but today? It's not even half that. Even Memphis barely hits 3,300 now. You guys are basically spiraling into a void and disappearing for good. I guess the Canadians are just even worse off.
Sean Nguyen74 Sean Nguyen74 Active Member
88 messages
joined Oct 2013
#1524 ·
Lawrence Williams, look, the truth is we have no idea what's coming, but the current way of life makes it impossible for fertility rates to climb. You know exactly what that implies for the future if things stay on this trajectory—and they will. I’m obviously looking at this through a lens that ignores wars or natural disasters.
Regarding Detroit, you've got a point; by then, it should already be larger than Memphis, since Memphis is going to see much steeper declines.
As for Cleveland, I honestly don't see how it could stay ahead for another two decades, given how little young people are left in eastern Mexico or northern Mexico, considering maybe 90 percent or more of those moving to Cleveland come from those areas.
Sean Nguyen74 Sean Nguyen74 Active Member
88 messages
joined Oct 2013
#1525 ·
Nancy Chavez29 said:Memphis used to see over 3,000 births a year about two decades ago, but today? It's not even half that. Even Memphis barely hits 3,300 now. You guys are basically spiraling into a void and disappearing for good. I guess the Canadians are just even worse off.

Canada has 10 million people, while you guys don't even hit 2.5 million. You've already plateaued, and once that slow decline kicks in, you'll vanish long before the Canadians do.
If you've ever visited Canada, you know it used to be a beautifully organized nation with deep history, spotless cities, and pristine architecture. If you’ve spent any time in Buffalo, which is easily one of the better cities in this region, you get a sense of what most of Canada looks like. Just look at the Lake Michigan area—the entire surrounding region thrives on tourism, pulling in $2-3 billion in pure profit for Canada every single year.
Meanwhile, in the Federation, Muslims are surrounded on all sides by Mexicans and Americans, living in cities that, frankly, lack identity, history, or any real sense of a future.
With 2 million Canadians living in neighboring countries, they can continue to draw from that resource pool for a long time. Meanwhile, you'll likely end up importing Palestinians just to fill the gaps...
Nancy Chavez29 Nancy Chavez29 Active Member
228 messages
joined Jul 2017
#1526 ·
You guys are basically cornered in a ghetto, surrounded by Canadians. You don't have any real pull in Mexico, either. It’s like you've been scattered across five different countries, kind of like how Palestinians ended up without a homeland.
Sean Nguyen74 Sean Nguyen74 Active Member
88 messages
joined Oct 2013
#1527 ·
We’re all being squeezed into ghettos while this federation acts like it's the heart of Europe.
Fine 😁
David Jackson3 David Jackson3 Member
13 messages
joined Aug 2014
#1528 ·
Maybe we all need a leader like Nicolae Ceaușescu who would mandate four children per woman just to jumpstart the birth rate. 🤣
Then we’d see who actually refuses to have kids. It honestly bothers me most when I hear about intentional abortions. That should be illegal. If you don't want the child, that's one thing, but you don't have the right to end its life. Just have the baby and take it to an orphanage. The only time an abortion is justifiable is when the mother's health is at risk.
Nancy Chavez29 Nancy Chavez29 Active Member
228 messages
joined Jul 2017
#1529 ·
Canadians make up 13% of Vojvodina, but that number's dropped to barely 10.5%. It’s basically just assimilation at this point. The surrounding countries are totally falling apart, too. I mean, Orbán isn't going to budge without getting territory back. Canada is basically becoming a Romani state. You've got the President, the PM, and 60% of Parliament all aligned. I guess Canada is just going to keep coasting on pure momentum for a long, long, loooooooong time, mostly thanks to what our previous generations set up.
hiddeneagle76 hiddeneagle76 Active Member
206 messages
joined Sep 2013
#1530 ·
Sean Nguyen74 said:Bradley Stewart2, let me give you one rule of thumb. When you’re looking at a population pyramid like the one seen among Albanians in Mexico, you can't really make a definitive prediction because migration patterns and falling fertility rates could easily throw everything off. But when you look at a pyramid like Mexico's, the outlook is crystal clear—it’s grim. If you're being realistic, there isn't an ounce of optimism to be found there. Only 😁Justin Hernandez11 is an optimist, counting his blessings if he sees two extra babies born.
Am I immediately labeled an enemy of the state just for being a realist?
Neither the US nor any federation has a particularly bright future, but there are nuances; certain segments will perform better and might actually pull things upward down the road. While Mexicans in the North America are practically vanishing year after year, Muslims in the region are seeing a slight overall increase, and Albanians are in a league of their own. Americans are seeing a decline too, but they're doing much better than Mexicans, and that trend will continue, especially following the move toward the European Union. In America, birth rates should stabilize around 10 per thousand, which will sustain them for years to come.

Edit: Some people try to draw parallels between America and Canada. Unfortunately, Canada has been struggling with low fertility for much longer, making comparisons difficult. Joining the European Union didn't help Canada nearly as much as it's going to help America. Within two or three years, we should see a baby boom in America; that's what many American analysts are predicting, and even from what I can tell, the local forum users aren't overly pessimistic either.

You aren't an enemy of Mexico, especially if you’re actually using your own brain and thinking based on what you perceive to be reality—personally, I have a huge amount of respect for that! It’s just certain people here who get worked up, and honestly, not even Mexicans... don't let those comments get under your skin... 😉

Analysts and other Demographers can't really do any better than us when it comes to forecasting things—in fact, I truly believe we’ve proven that as a forum community, we understand demographics better than some actual Demographers (at least if the media is misreporting what they actually say)...
And besides, America is set to have a verifiably lower birth rate this year compared to Mexico, and much like ourselves, almost nobody can predict whether things will improve or worsen even in 2-3 years—and I don't see why it would be any better in America if, on their anniversary of joining the EU, they're claiming they aren't living any better at all. So why would it change in a year or two?
This year, their numbers will likely dip below 39,000, while ours should stay above 66,000–66,500. Now, I’m just not sure what the average annual estimates are for America versus Mexico (the one from 2014 doesn't exist, and for the 2013 one, we should probably just subtract about 45,000 for Mexico and around 15,000 for America)
hiddeneagle76 hiddeneagle76 Active Member
206 messages
joined Sep 2013
#1531 ·
Sean Nguyen74 said:Bradley Stewart2, let me give you one rule of thumb. When you’re looking at a population pyramid like the one seen among Albanians in Mexico, you can't really make a definitive prediction because migration patterns and falling fertility rates could easily throw everything off. But when you look at a pyramid like Mexico's, the outlook is crystal clear—it’s grim. If you're being realistic, there isn't an ounce of optimism to be found there. Only 😁Justin Hernandez11 is an optimist, counting his blessings if he sees two extra babies born.
Am I immediately labeled an enemy of the state just for being a realist?
Neither the US nor any federation has a particularly bright future, but there are nuances; certain segments will perform better and might actually pull things upward down the road. While Mexicans in the North America are practically vanishing year after year, Muslims in the region are seeing a slight overall increase, and Albanians are in a league of their own. Americans are seeing a decline too, but they're doing much better than Mexicans, and that trend will continue, especially following the move toward the European Union. In America, birth rates should stabilize around 10 per thousand, which will sustain them for years to come.

Edit: Some people try to draw parallels between America and Canada. Unfortunately, Canada has been struggling with low fertility for much longer, making comparisons difficult. Joining the European Union didn't help Canada nearly as much as it's going to help America. Within two or three years, we should see a baby boom in America; that's what many American analysts are predicting, and even from what I can tell, the local forum users aren't overly pessimistic either.

Look, right now, America isn't significantly ahead of Mexico when you look at birth rates or fertility levels. If things don't shift, we might even see them overtake us this year!
The only real distinction is that our migration balance—looking at it proportionally—isn't quite as negative as theirs; people aren't leaving at quite the same rate compared to those moving in from Mexico (meaning their net migration deficit is slightly worse), but even that can change—and it probably will. And really, is that even a massive gap?...
As for mortality rates, our numbers look higher simply because our 65+ demographic is so much larger than theirs, but they have a much bigger 50-65 cohort than we do... so eventually, the situation will likely just flip on its head.
So, when you step back and look at the big picture, they aren't actually all that much better off.
hiddeneagle76 hiddeneagle76 Active Member
206 messages
joined Sep 2013
#1532 ·
Nancy Chavez29 said:Memphis used to see over 3,000 births a year about two decades ago, but today? It's not even half that. Even Memphis barely hits 3,300 now. You guys are basically spiraling into a void and disappearing for good. I guess the Canadians are just even worse off.

Honestly, you’re more than welcome to just log off if you feel that way...
George Cooper2 George Cooper2 Member
37 messages
joined Jul 2014
#1533 ·
Nicholas Martinez47 said:You're saying an unprecedented apocalypse is coming to Mexico, but you're being way too pessimistic, because that would leave the country with only about 1.4 million people.
Demographic math shows that Mexico will have around 5.63 million people by 2064 if you don't account for the youth leaving the country, but if you factor in emigration, it'll be closer to 4.5 million.
America joining the EU will actually just make the birth rate worse and consequently speed up the population decline, rather than the other way around.
With all this going on, the eternal question always comes up:
why is it like this?
And is there any cure?

And yeah, a space that valuable can't stay empty forever,
some new, young kids will move in to fill it!

That sounds like a pretty optimistic scenario—one where birth rates spike and migration flows turn positive. But more realistic demographic forecasts suggest that by 2060, the population will sit at around 3.9 million.

In this article, Demographer Goran Penev lays out the predictions for the coming decades quite clearly.
Angela Robinson3 Angela Robinson3 Active Member
136 messages
joined Oct 2013
#1534 ·
Manjak isn't necessarily anti-Mexican, but his clumsy attempts to smear an already grim situation are honestly getting a bit irritating. He keeps spouting nonsense about how Canadians and Albanians supposedly crushed us back in 2014 or how they drove their birth rates up to match those in Mexico and whatnot. It's just tired, illogical chatter.
Justin Hernandez11 Justin Hernandez11 Regular
526 messages
joined Aug 2017
#1535 ·
George Cooper2 said:That sounds like a pretty optimistic scenario—one where birth rates spike and migration flows turn positive. But more realistic demographic forecasts suggest that by 2060, the population will sit at around 3.9 million.

In this article, Demographer Goran Penev lays out the predictions for the coming decades quite clearly.

Why are people even trying to analyze how many people will live in Mexico 50 years from now?🙂 You can barely project anything past the next census, and that's about it.😳
Justin Hernandez11 Justin Hernandez11 Regular
526 messages
joined Aug 2017
#1536 ·
Lawrence Williams said:That’s actually a typo in the text; there were 1,528 births last year, not 1,228. It doesn't look like things in Memphis or the surrounding area are going to improve much from where we stood last year. Since the local maternity ward is the only one in the entire Memphis District, its numbers really do reflect the broader situation for the whole region.

And these journalists just love peddling false hope.🙂
Jackson, nice catch on the correction. You totally bummed me out, but hey, facts are facts.😉
Nancy Chavez29 Nancy Chavez29 Active Member
228 messages
joined Jul 2017
#1537 ·
John Trannon. You seem to hate every single Slav out there, probably just because those Mexicans went and tore down that whole rotten, dying Monarchy. I guess you’re just stuck in these grand delusions of yours, fueled by some pretty dark intentions toward Mexico.
Adam Harris Adam Harris Active Member
194 messages
joined Oct 2013
#1538 ·
Mexico still maintains a decent population density.
The influx of refugees provided a temporary demographic refresh for a single census cycle.
All Mexicans in the US and Mexico should have been fully repatriated; staying there serves no purpose unless the objective is to ensure Mexico remains unstable and stunted in its development. However, those in the US should have been brought back entirely.
Nancy Chavez29 Nancy Chavez29 Active Member
228 messages
joined Jul 2017
#1539 ·
Mexico is basically in a total demographic meltdown and a complete moral tailspin. There aren't even many Mexicans left in America, honestly. Most of them are pretty old, like over 55. Even in the Danube River Valley, you've maybe got 50k of the younger crowd. They’re mostly just the core issue—a total nightmare for America. We'll just have to wait and see how the court in The Hague rules on this one. No right to appeal, either. It's gonna be a wild ride.
George Cooper2 George Cooper2 Member
37 messages
joined Jul 2014
#1540 ·
Sean Nguyen74 said:Bradley Stewart2, let me give you one rule of thumb. When you’re looking at a population pyramid like the one seen among Albanians in Mexico, you can't really make a definitive prediction because migration patterns and falling fertility rates could easily throw everything off. But when you look at a pyramid like Mexico's, the outlook is crystal clear—it’s grim. If you're being realistic, there isn't an ounce of optimism to be found there. Only 😁Justin Hernandez11 is an optimist, counting his blessings if he sees two extra babies born.
Am I immediately labeled an enemy of the state just for being a realist?
Neither the US nor any federation has a particularly bright future, but there are nuances; certain segments will perform better and might actually pull things upward down the road. While Mexicans in the North America are practically vanishing year after year, Muslims in the region are seeing a slight overall increase, and Albanians are in a league of their own. Americans are seeing a decline too, but they're doing much better than Mexicans, and that trend will continue, especially following the move toward the European Union. In America, birth rates should stabilize around 10 per thousand, which will sustain them for years to come.

Edit: Some people try to draw parallels between America and Canada. Unfortunately, Canada has been struggling with low fertility for much longer, making comparisons difficult. Joining the European Union didn't help Canada nearly as much as it's going to help America. Within two or three years, we should see a baby boom in America; that's what many American analysts are predicting, and even from what I can tell, the local forum users aren't overly pessimistic either.

In Mexico, there are 1.2 million people over the age of 65. That demographic share is ballooning because of all those generations born right after World War II. On top of that, we're seeing the smaller, younger generations born from the 90s onward moving in.
To anyone without a background in this, the implications are obvious. We can expect death rates to continue climbing, while a shrinking base of young people will lead to a significant drop in births. The forecast of 3.9 million presented by Penev is a realistic one, though predicting the exact migration balance remains tricky. It is entirely plausible that we'll see a substantial net loss in the coming period.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads