Susan James said:According to this, the minimum score for a high school is 46.
So, it's really up to each individual school to set their own threshold, like 76.
It’s interesting that nobody challenged the constitutionality of how certain competitions aren't accessible to all kids, since it often depends on whether a teacher is willing to sign them up and mentor them enough to get results.
A couple of points for music school is definitely less discriminatory than the gap between schools with highly motivated teachers for competitions and those without (though, a colleague whose grandson lost those two crucial music points that year explained it was also discriminatory; parents rebelled because their kids went to various private music academies but weren't entitled to those points, so eventually, they just scrapped the bonus for everyone).
Yeah, but the thing is, they weren't allowed to set a cutoff lower than 46—meaning, in a case like a Small town in rural USA, they couldn't just enroll students who had fewer than 36 points.
That was specified in the old
Decision on elements and criteria for selecting candidates for high school enrollment for the 2012/2013 school year.
Now, if I understand this correctly, they don't pass a specific decision like that every single year; instead, there's this standing
High school enrollment regulations. It's been around since 2015 and has gone through a few updates; you can find the consolidated text here.
But then, every year, they issue a specific
Enrollment decision for the 1st grade of high school for that particular year.. That's where they list how many spots are available at each school and things like that. The public consultation for next year's enrollment decision can be found here.
So, looking at the current High school enrollment regulations regarding the minimum score threshold, it says this:
Article 28. (NN 39/22)
(1) For educational programs lasting at least four years, a school may establish a minimum number of points required to apply for a specific program, which applies exclusively to the common assessment element.
(2) The minimum number of points established in paragraph 1 of this article applies throughout the entire enrollment process for all candidates, except for those mentioned in Article 16 of these Regulations who have the right to direct enrollment.
(3) For vocational qualification programs lasting three years, apprenticeship programs, or programs lasting less than three years but at least one year, no minimum score requirement is established for application purposes..
So, basically, it's still up to the school to decide if they want to set a minimum score, but it seems to me like they aren't strictly limited from below anymore. If they wanted to, say, accept students with fewer than 36 points for four-year programs, they could.