Alexander Moore67 said:The guy is rocking an i5 2500k and he's looking at spending $133 on an i7 2600k just for specific performance gains in certain games, all while putting it on a motherboard that lacks a warranty and could fail any day now. Since I clearly don't know anything and this guy is obviously the smartest person here, I'm done arguing.
p.s. This board survived all these years on a crappy 400W unit!!!
It's because you're constantly talking out of your neck without doing any actual research or checking facts. You claimed the Core i7-2600k was laughable compared to a Ryzen 1600, saying that even at its absolute best, the i7 is only equal to it.
I already explained why. He’ll see better FPS in basically every game because his CPU won't be pinned at 100% usage and choking the GPU.
So what if it dies? What's the big deal? He's still spending $133 instead of almost $0.67 just to jump to a processor that's essentially the same power in gaming as that i7.
Don't start an argument if you aren't going to fact-check before spewing nonsense.
And who cares if it worked on a generic PSU? The board isn't pulling 150w—it's not like it fried the unit. I actually have an old LGA 775 build I picked up back in 2008 with a generic 400w power supply, and it ran on that for about six years. Now it's running on an EVGA CX430 with a Q6600 and a Radeon HD 6870, and my cousin's kid is still using it today for stuff like CS and CoD4.
At the end of the day, he can play just fine for $133 instead of dumping $0.67 into a CPU upgrade, so let him figure it out. Personally, I wouldn't go that route. I'd grab the i7, a decent new PSU, and maybe a used RX 570, 580, or a GTX 1060, then just run it until it's obsolete. With a Core i7-2600, he'll still have a perfectly smooth experience on a 60/75Hz monitor.