#61 ·
mistybison said:I am hardly a regular forum user like hiddenpuma75, so I won't be casting spells on other members. 🙂 😁
the owl was mocking shadows🙂
Started by placidorca16 · · 👁 9 views · 88 replies
mistybison said:I am hardly a regular forum user like hiddenpuma75, so I won't be casting spells on other members. 🙂 😁
Andrew Booth29 said:I’d love for my esteemed colleague bluecyclist64 to actually elaborate on his position here. Is he suggesting that women are incapable of evolving into higher beings while men can? Or is he arguing that neither gender has that capacity? Honestly, whatever his answer turns out to be, I suspect he'll have quite a lot of explaining to do at the next Communist Party USA meeting. He’s either being a total sexist or a complete reactionary.
Brian Gray5 said:So, basically, this lady believes humans—women included—evolved from animals simply by hooking up without any social strings or moral hang-ups attached? Good for her for being so liberated. And good luck to her husband, assuming he managed to snag her during that "animalistic" phase. He must be feeling pretty zen, much like Šeks, having such a free-spirited and independent woman by his side.
Why not? I get the impression his wife is absolutely thrilled.
placidorca16 said:Our friend Letec left you a comment over in Philosophy regarding her take on all this, so go ahead—have a read:
Huge thanks to Letec for her support, her principles, and for standing up as a woman and a feminist—proving that her name won't be used to serve someone else's dirty agenda, despite the moderator's unfortunate attempts here!🧐🙂
Andrew Booth29 said:I think I’ll take the advice of my esteemed colleague Letec—it’s probably for the best—and I’m asking the forum administration to please remove me from the moderation team for both forums I currently oversee. Thanks...
briskwalker10 said:Good God!
hiddenpuma75 said:the owl was mocking shadows🙂
bluecyclist64 said:I appreciate you quoting Letec, who holds some partial influence within the PŽK. It’s quite obvious, though, that Andrew Booth29 was completely out of his depth when he attempted to misrepresent her perspective on the matter.
It’s the exact same Andrew Booth29 who’s been advising you to steer clear of him following everything that’s gone down lately...
What kind of trouble are we talking about here, Andrew Booth29? Are the mods actually going to come after my friend placidorca16 just because I’ve been acting like a bit of a jerk? I have to wonder—is there some sort of database you guys maintain where you track users based on how questionable their friends might be?
What would Grunf say to that? "Better to retreat with honor than to win like a coward."
You’ve run out of things to say, and let’s be honest here—it’s getting obvious. That loss clearly eats at you far more than any loss of honor or integrity ever could.
Fair enough, I think you're onto something there. I'm on board with the idea.👍
Whether it’s a literal flood or some metaphorical locust plague, whatever chaos decides to descend upon us—you can always count on him to be the one reliable constant.😈
placidorca16 said:Don't mention it, friend!🙂 I honestly don't get why certain officials here—people holding all the power and tools—are so terrified of a few regular users hanging out. We don't have any clout or tools to hurt anyone, so what's the fear? I really don't understand this anxiety toward public support for exposing such a disgraceful mess—something that went completely unnoticed on Philosophy, which you shared with me quite openly, and I thanked you for.😲 Since I truly think that kind of integrity is admirable coming from a "real" man—which is a rare sight on this forum—maybe it just bothers people when someone shows up with a spine, a sense of humor, and an actual imagination? It's not a crime, though I suppose emancipated women might find it refreshing.🕺🙂
hiddenhound3 said:The subject matter itself is inherently absurd, and I find it difficult to believe that anyone with any sense of self-respect would choose to participate in such a discussion. It is equally insulting to women and men who possess even a modicum of intelligence. Furthermore, it serves as an affront to the very concept of being a person, regardless of one's gender.
Lock this thread, leave us to Andrew Booth29, and let's all move on peacefully.
hiddenhound3 said:The subject matter itself is inherently absurd, and I find it difficult to believe that anyone with any sense of self-respect would choose to participate in such a discussion. It is equally insulting to women and men who possess even a modicum of intelligence. Furthermore, it serves as an affront to the very concept of being a person, regardless of one's gender.
Lock this thread, leave us to Andrew Booth29, and let's all move on peacefully.
hiddenhound3 said:The subject matter itself is inherently absurd, and I find it difficult to believe that anyone with any sense of self-respect would choose to participate in such a discussion. It is equally insulting to women and men who possess even a modicum of intelligence. Furthermore, it serves as an affront to the very concept of being a person, regardless of one's gender.
Lock this thread, leave us to Andrew Booth29, and let's all move on peacefully.
steelridge58 said:If that's how you feel, then why on earth did you decide to jump into the fray yourself?
steelridge58 said:If that's how you feel, then why on earth did you decide to jump into the fray yourself?
mistybison said:Just be honest and admit you're the absolute worst among all the kids and leaders in this pub. 🧐 😁
Kate James14 said:@placidorca16, you're the spice of life 😂
hiddenpuma75 said:1. Personally, I believe everything should be examined scientifically, and we should give our fellow forum members a chance to weigh in.
2. You seem to be opening a poll somewhere (maybe in some sub-group or the PŽK)
Asking whether hiddenpuma75 is the leader of the pub crowd during our philosophy discussions—well, let's see what people actually think.
Actually, maybe I'll just start one myself. I've already got a few options floating around in my head:
a) Yes, he is
b) No, he isn't
c) It's both yes and no
d) Neither yes nor no
e) All the regulars at the pub are men
f) This isn't a pub; it's a scholarly forum
g) There are women part of the pub crowd too