CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Society › Politics › Close to Politics › What were your main grievances with America?

What were your main grievances with America?

Started by Rachel Carter90 · · 👁 5 views · 33 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Rachel Carter90George Booth58Sarah Wilson95darkfox14Scott Stewart6Alex Taylor7Rebecca Castillo4Justin Patel8Rebecca Roberts3velvetmaker3Jacob Lewis5Susan Price30rapidmaker9Peter Morgan3velvetlynx63mistygull16Linda Roberts2Morgan Rodriguez57Charles Fox10
darkfox14 darkfox14 Member
32 messages
joined Sep 2014
#21 ·
Susan Price30 said:It was an artificial, sinister construct built on nothing but corruption and blind worship of some illiterate guy who declared himself the "leader of the people."

The mere thought of it makes my skin crawl. And the funniest part? They actually teamed up with those so-called independent nations like India, Bangladesh & Co. and treated them as their primary "allies."😬 😂

What’s so funny about that?🤷
Look, what kind of moves did a country like America even have left once its old-school heavy hitters, like Germany and Austria, got absolutely crushed? The rest of their allies couldn't have cared less about us, and meanwhile, you've got Stalinism blowing in from the East like a damn hurricane.
rapidmaker9 rapidmaker9 Newcomer
7 messages
joined Apr 2011
#22 ·
Who actually gives a damn about the USA?
It's not happening again.
Susan Price30 Susan Price30 Regular
304 messages
joined Feb 2017
#23 ·
Sarah Wilson95 said:just another person acting like they actually lived through communism, even though a true communist state has never really existed anywhere yet 🙄😁

So, looking at it objectively, the idea behind the USA was actually quite brilliant, representing perhaps the most significant step toward political emancipation for all the various ethnic groups involved (assuming they were being honest with themselves 😳😁 ). Unfortunately, when put into practice, the system proved unable to resist even the most primitive forms of nationalism, which essentially forced us to set the whole issue aside for the next century or so, if you ask me, and hopefully, that stays the case

In reality, it’s going to take some time to truly understand why the hunger for capitalism ran so deep, especially when you look specifically at the situation in California, which serves as such a tragic example of how that played out 🤷

Furthermore, when you consider the EU, where Americans won't possess nearly the same level of rights they once held within the US federation... it makes you wonder: did people give up their hard-won rights because they didn't grasp the trade-offs, or were they simply caught up in a nationalist trance?

🤦 But there was definitely a single ruling party called the "Communist Party." Why didn't they just call themselves Social Democrats or something else if they weren't actually communist? 🙄☕

Why do you find that funny?
What options did America have, for example, after its traditional allies like Germany and Austria were defeated? The other allies couldn't care less about us, and Stalinism was blowing in from the East.

America? What are we talking about here—our own country or the old USA? 🤷
Peter Morgan3 Peter Morgan3 Active Member
57 messages
joined Jun 2011
#24 ·
We can spend our time hating everything from the old USA era and Josip Broz Marshall to communism itself...
But if it hadn't worked, it wouldn't have lasted forty-five years.
People can spin whatever fairy tales they want about whether things were better or worse—it all comes down to perspective...
The reality is simply that it was different.
I never hated it, though I’m certainly no one's nostalgic dreamer.

Out of all of it, my only grievance is with our own people—every group across the former states who lacked the strength, the will, or the sense to resist the toxic ideologies that took hold in the early 90s.
If only the ringleaders had been dealt with at the dawn of the conflict, and everyone had sat down to negotiate like adults.
Perhaps we all got more or less what we thought we wanted back then, but I doubt we are all actually happy with the result.
As the old saying goes: be careful what you wish for...
☕
I can only hope that in the future, we all become a bit smarter, more cautious, and a little wiser...
Justin Patel8 Justin Patel8 Active Member
99 messages
joined Mar 2014
#25 ·
Sarah Wilson95 said:The real issue lies in the decision-making process itself, which is a fundamental difference that shouldn't be overlooked. If you actually want to present the situation honestly to the public, you shouldn't use rhetoric like that; it just comes across as small-minded provincialism.

Americans didn't just stumble into anything; they made a conscious choice. Unlike others who were playing a long game of calculation, trying to compare that past era to the current reality of the European Union is completely pointless. Understand?

So you're claiming the countries joining the European Union were all just calculating their moves?
Well, their referendums showed something entirely different.

And was there even a referendum when we joined the European Union? Nope.
velvetlynx63 velvetlynx63 Member
11 messages
joined Mar 2012
#26 ·
I was against the judge back then, though I only truly realize it now; I was just as naive as everyone else, even if most people still haven't caught on...
rapidmaker9 rapidmaker9 Newcomer
7 messages
joined Apr 2011
#27 ·
-
Peter Morgan3 said:We can spend our time hating everything from the old USA era and Josip Broz Marshall to communism itself...
But if it hadn't worked, it wouldn't have lasted forty-five years.
People can spin whatever fairy tales they want about whether things were better or worse—it all comes down to perspective...
The reality is simply that it was different.
I never hated it, though I’m certainly no one's nostalgic dreamer.

Out of all of it, my only grievance is with our own people—every group across the former states who lacked the strength, the will, or the sense to resist the toxic ideologies that took hold in the early 90s.
If only the ringleaders had been dealt with at the dawn of the conflict, and everyone had sat down to negotiate like adults.
Perhaps we all got more or less what we thought we wanted back then, but I doubt we are all actually happy with the result.
As the old saying goes: be careful what you wish for...
☕
I can only hope that in the future, we all become a bit smarter, more cautious, and a little wiser...

Actually, the whole thing would have collapsed instantly if there had ever truly been freedom of choice.
By the way, this kind of relativizing the aggression from the 90s only happens on certain types of American forums.
Susan Price30 Susan Price30 Regular
304 messages
joined Feb 2017
#28 ·
Peter Morgan3 said:We can spend our time hating everything from the old USA era and Josip Broz Marshall to communism itself...
But if it hadn't worked, it wouldn't have lasted forty-five years.
People can spin whatever fairy tales they want about whether things were better or worse—it all comes down to perspective...
The reality is simply that it was different.
I never hated it, though I’m certainly no one's nostalgic dreamer.

Out of all of it, my only grievance is with our own people—every group across the former states who lacked the strength, the will, or the sense to resist the toxic ideologies that took hold in the early 90s.
If only the ringleaders had been dealt with at the dawn of the conflict, and everyone had sat down to negotiate like adults.
Perhaps we all got more or less what we thought we wanted back then, but I doubt we are all actually happy with the result.
As the old saying goes: be careful what you wish for...
☕
I can only hope that in the future, we all become a bit smarter, more cautious, and a little wiser...

Actually, I’d argue the opposite—if it were truly successful, it wouldn't have stopped at just 45 years.😉
In the context of an entire nation's history, forty-five years is nothing more than a mere blink of an eye.
Rebecca Roberts3 Rebecca Roberts3 Member
46 messages
joined Apr 2013
#29 ·
darkfox14 said:By that logic, we should probably just quit the UN too.

It’s an apples-to-oranges comparison. The EU was granted a seat at the UN much like a sovereign nation would be.

http://razotkrivanje.net/2011/05/08/...o-superdrzave/
mistygull16 mistygull16 Active Member
199 messages
joined May 2013
#30 ·
I mean, I was always all for America just taking charge of its own destiny. My take? We should have just focused on building our own sovereignty from the jump, especially since the USA was falling apart anyway, so there wasn't really any point in worrying about staying tied to it.

Honestly, I’m kind of hoping the European Union falls apart before we end up wading chest-deep into that mess too. If you look back, during the days of the DR, the EZ felt more like a loose collection of sovereign, democratic, multi-party nations with actual borders between them. Nowadays? It feels less like a union and more like the old USSR. I’m not trying to pretend the USA was some kind of utopia—(the younger crowd might not get it, but back then, one wrong political joke could land you straight in a federal prison camp, which was a real "lovely" experience)—but the EU is turning into this totalitarian beast. Sure, they might not use the same heavy-handed tactics the USA did, but their sneaky, underhanded methods are just as bad.

Back in the USA, we at least had some semblance of a vote, even if most of the politicians were just puppets for the central government. With the EU, we won't even have a meaningful say, and whoever ends up representing us will be totally pro-EU through and through.
Linda Roberts2 Linda Roberts2 Active Member
140 messages
joined Dec 2013
#31 ·
Even today, we’re stuck dealing with the most pathetic crop of politicians we've ever seen. I mean, can you even imagine what it would be like to actually have our own sovereign policy and just tell the UN to back off? Back in the day, Marshall stood his ground against Stalin, and even though the country was a hell of a lot poorer then than it is now, there was some dignity involved. But I guess when you lose your self-respect, nobody else is going to respect you either.
Linda Roberts2 Linda Roberts2 Active Member
140 messages
joined Dec 2013
#32 ·
"Oh, Comrade Marshall, you were a vision in white..." Honestly, back then, saying stuff like that could have landed you straight on a desert island—or a "naked man," as the prisoners used to call those brutal camps. The police back in the day were way more intimidating than what we see now, but I guess they actually commanded a certain level of respect too. You didn't want to be on their bad side, trust me. P.S. I actually knew someone who spent time on a desert island; once he got out, he wouldn't touch politics with a ten-foot pole. He told me, "God forbid you ever air your dirty laundry in public."
Morgan Rodriguez57 Morgan Rodriguez57 Active Member
216 messages
joined Oct 2011
#33 ·
- dictatorship
- keeping less developed regions of the USA held back
- suppressing American leadership (like during the '71 crackdown)
- Mexican dominance within the federation
- the military being dominated by Mexicans and Mexicans
- painting Americans as fascists
- overcompensating for the rights of certain groups just to make up for past violence—as if we owed them something because of historical conflicts

Marshall actually pointed out once—quite smartly, really—that the USA couldn't survive unless the Americans were kept under a tight thumb... well, I’m not exactly a fan of that kind of "tightening," and honestly, that’s why I wasn't a fan of the USA either...
Charles Fox10 Charles Fox10 Regular
352 messages
joined Mar 2009
#34 ·
More heat on the digital front pages. Politics. No thanks.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads