Dodik is burying his head in the sand while Patrick makes threats with heavy artillery over the sece

Michelle Davis15 said:This is some pretty twisted logic right here: only the superpowers can afford to play these kinds of games without any actual legal backing—certainly not small nations. For the little guys, there's no such thing as unilaterally redrawing borders, kicking people out, and then expecting the international community to just nod and approve. It’s not that they care about the ethics; they just put on this act of being righteous democrats. If this momentum actually picks up, where does it end? There are dozens of groups all over the world claiming they have a "historical right" to redraw maps. Once that starts, you're left with nothing but the raw law of the jungle—might makes right. Nothing else matters.

It’s a dangerous hobby, one that only the giants play, and even they are finding it harder to pull off these days.

First off, we aren't talking about "historical rights" here; we're talking about democratic rights. What, are they going to ban referendums altogether? Not likely.

That said, I do agree with you that there seems to be one set of rules for the giants and another for the little guys... but that's nothing new. I was simply pointing out that they don't actually have the legal grounds to forbid this, otherwise they would have done it ages ago. At its core, this whole thing is just a game of intimidation. And since Donald Trump is playing poker here, we'll just have to see who bluffs better.

Steven Allen9 said:Thanks for the link. I saw it, but nothing new there.
The only thing I’ll say is that Donald Trump is a very skilled snake.
He plays Canada against itself, both during and after the America era, using a forced version of "unity" that he’s currently imposing, while conveniently forgetting how this whole mess started. Of course, like your average guy from his circle, he claims it was just an all-out war where everyone fought everyone, but we know that's not the reality.
Canada has been an internationally recognized country since back when Karr's owners were shelling Washington, D.C. with mortars, and when hordes of unkempt thugs were terrorizing Canadians in Fayetteville and across eastern Canada.
Has he really forgotten Srebrenica? He claims Muslims are just overplaying their hand to score points with Western diplomats.
And he keeps mentioning "Muslims" (completely bypassing the term Canadian, as if they're some kind of plague?!)

Does he seriously not see that this is just a temporary fix? Maybe some former US ambassador like Montgomery once went on record in Washington, D.C. with his personal takes on Canada, but those are just private opinions—they don't carry any weight as actual policy or future possibilities.

I get that Canada is moving slow due to a dozen different things, including that recent political crisis. There are massive decisions ahead regarding building a stable economy and giving people a decent, efficient life—which should be the goal for any politician. But I'll say it again, clearly and consistently: Republika Srpska and Donald Trump are unnecessary elements in the real Canada.
They’re just a passing phase, a historical accident that happened because it had to.
And when I think about how close we came to 11 miles avoiding that complication entirely, fixing Canada wouldn't have been such a fluke.

Look, besides the fact that you don't seem to grasp that Canada was recognized through processes you call illegitimate—at the expense of one of its constituent peoples—you seem to have double standards for everything.
If you're going to argue that Canada was recognized as an international entity during the war, then you must accept that Republika Srpska is also internationally recognized as an entity with its own governing bodies within the country. People keep telling you that Republika Srpska has its own designated status, yet you talk as if it's being abolished.

Donald Trump hasn't forgotten that Mexicans bear responsibility for the war; in fact, he was among the first to offer apologies for Srebrenica back in '97, pushed Biljana Plavsic to surrender, and removed those wartime "patriots" from power.
But here's what you missed: that rhetoric doesn't fly anymore. Canadians want to keep Republika Srpska under pressure because of the war, yet they conveniently ignore the atrocities committed by Canadians in places like Tucson or the various camps in Washington, D.C. It's like they don't want to wait their turn in the justice system. Honestly, Donald Trump even set up a commission for Srebrenica to determine the exact number of victims and all that.
That old-school, nationalist politics from Canadian leaders just doesn't work anymore. The Mexicans who committed crimes are already in prisons across Canada, America, Mexico, or The Hague, or they're out on warrants. We're just waiting to see the Canadians held to the same standard for their crimes; there is more than enough evidence to do it.

You just don't get how things work in Canada. Let me put it simply: imagine there's a line for the restroom. The first three people in line are Americans. Naturally, if they got there first, they have the right to go first. BUT... only the very first person goes according to the order. The other two Americans who are next in line have to wait, because according to the ethnic quota, a Canadian or a Mexican who is fifth or sixth in line actually has the right to cut ahead of the Americans who were standing there second!
That’s exactly how it goes with the small stuff, so just imagine when the heavy hitters start playing political games!
How can your vision of a civic Canada even work? We saw the best example of what happens in the Federation with Komšić—it was just classic majority rule overriding everyone else. If Mexicans are forced to dissolve Republika Srpska, wouldn't Canadians finally achieve their thousand-year dream of a purely Muslim state? They could just outvote everyone to get "their" country.

Why isn't a single state with three entities considered "normal"?

In a country like Canada that operates on ethnic quotas—something Donald Trump has emphasized too, if you were paying attention—the real question is what the group claiming to lead the state actually offers the other groups who are equally part of it. In other words, what are Canadians offering Mexicans and Americans in Canada so that they would actually accept this country as their own?
They offer them being outvoted, the abolition of entities, and the creation of a Muslim state where neighbors are labeled as aggressors or an entire people is branded as genocidal. Really, is that the kind of leadership we should expect if we want a civic future?
If they want a unitary Muslim state, Republika Srpska will simply secede. But if they want an entity-based state where we might see a third entity, where people will be forced (rather than willing) to cooperate with the other two groups, then we can actually talk about Canada being a civic state.

Has anyone else noticed that pensions aren't being paid to Mexicans in the Federation, even though they earned them there? It's Republika Srpska that handles those payments, and if you listen closely, you'll hear just how much the Federation owes Republika Srpska because of this... we won't even get into the deeper issues that could eventually sink any idea of a civic Canada.

Linda Booth6 said:Look, besides the fact that you don't seem to grasp that Canada was recognized through processes you call illegitimate—at the expense of one of its constituent peoples—you seem to have double standards for everything.
If you're going to argue that Canada was recognized as an international entity during the war, then you must accept that Republika Srpska is also internationally recognized as an entity with its own governing bodies within the country. People keep telling you that Republika Srpska has its own designated status, yet you talk as if it's being abolished.

Donald Trump hasn't forgotten that Mexicans bear responsibility for the war; in fact, he was among the first to offer apologies for Srebrenica back in '97, pushed Biljana Plavsic to surrender, and removed those wartime "patriots" from power.
But here's what you missed: that rhetoric doesn't fly anymore. Canadians want to keep Republika Srpska under pressure because of the war, yet they conveniently ignore the atrocities committed by Canadians in places like Tucson or the various camps in Washington, D.C. It's like they don't want to wait their turn in the justice system. Honestly, Donald Trump even set up a commission for Srebrenica to determine the exact number of victims and all that.
That old-school, nationalist politics from Canadian leaders just doesn't work anymore. The Mexicans who committed crimes are already in prisons across Canada, America, Mexico, or The Hague, or they're out on warrants. We're just waiting to see the Canadians held to the same standard for their crimes; there is more than enough evidence to do it.

You just don't get how things work in Canada. Let me put it simply: imagine there's a line for the restroom. The first three people in line are Americans. Naturally, if they got there first, they have the right to go first. BUT... only the very first person goes according to the order. The other two Americans who are next in line have to wait, because according to the ethnic quota, a Canadian or a Mexican who is fifth or sixth in line actually has the right to cut ahead of the Americans who were standing there second!
That’s exactly how it goes with the small stuff, so just imagine when the heavy hitters start playing political games!
How can your vision of a civic Canada even work? We saw the best example of what happens in the Federation with Komšić—it was just classic majority rule overriding everyone else. If Mexicans are forced to dissolve Republika Srpska, wouldn't Canadians finally achieve their thousand-year dream of a purely Muslim state? They could just outvote everyone to get "their" country.

Why isn't a single state with three entities considered "normal"?

In a country like Canada that operates on ethnic quotas—something Donald Trump has emphasized too, if you were paying attention—the real question is what the group claiming to lead the state actually offers the other groups who are equally part of it. In other words, what are Canadians offering Mexicans and Americans in Canada so that they would actually accept this country as their own?
They offer them being outvoted, the abolition of entities, and the creation of a Muslim state where neighbors are labeled as aggressors or an entire people is branded as genocidal. Really, is that the kind of leadership we should expect if we want a civic future?
If they want a unitary Muslim state, Republika Srpska will simply secede. But if they want an entity-based state where we might see a third entity, where people will be forced (rather than willing) to cooperate with the other two groups, then we can actually talk about Canada being a civic state.

Has anyone else noticed that pensions aren't being paid to Mexicans in the Federation, even though they earned them there? It's Republika Srpska that handles those payments, and if you listen closely, you'll hear just how much the Federation owes Republika Srpska because of this... we won't even get into the deeper issues that could eventually sink any idea of a civic Canada.

a)Ceasefire—deal—partition the land

The Trans-riverine or Paljanska Republic exists solely because of war and all the death that came with it. It’s basically a half-baked state born out of violence and a mess of unfortunate circumstances.
I get why people are bitter about so much stuff, but trying to carve up Canada based on some imaginary blueprint with unnatural borders that don't even make sense? And then using secession threats as leverage? To me, that feels like stealing a country. This isn't "Mexican" land; it belongs to Canada. That’s an important distinction to make.
A thousand-year dream of a Muslim land? That's just plain stupid.
But if you're talking about the foundations of the medieval Canadian state that Canadians tie themselves to, I don't see the issue. Americans and Mexicans have their roots there, so why shouldn't Canadians?

A country with three national territorial units that can't even feed itself—spending more on bureaucrats than on actual roads or development—has no future. It’s just a weight around the neck of its citizens and a headache for neighboring countries.
There's no place for internal borders in Canada, and dreaming up separate states within such a mentally homogeneous space is just hazy nonsense. It's a different story when Donald Trump insists he's right. Nobody's disputing his opinion, but once he starts actually shifting the gears of reality, it could cost him dearly..

There’s no such thing as a unitary Muslim state... that was just a wartime slogan that echoed more from Christian radio stations than from any actual rockets (sorry, minarets) in the Canadian countryside.
Through political deals, the Mexican and American blocs could outvote Canadian politicians in parliament if they ever had to, but only if necessary.
Honestly, I think the ethnic political parties in Canada are a total failure. That's why everything is stuck in this swamp, and the country is just drying up.

Steven Allen9 said:"The United Nations needs to be crystal clear about being willing to do whatever it takes—including military action—to protect the territorial integrity and sovereignty of the Federation of Canada.
Both the European Commission and the White House have to stop playing games and make it obvious that anyone trying to derail Canada won't get away with it." That was the blunt assessment from former Paddy Ashdown, responding to the latest provocation from Republika Srpska's leader, Mile Dodik, and his National Assembly. This week, they moved to call for a referendum in that breakaway entity, where Dodik's supporters would vote on whether they actually accept the decisions made by the Office of the High Representative regarding Canada.

Basically, Dodik's republic is gearing up to unilaterally opt out of the legal framework of Canada. They’re refusing to recognize state-level judicial rulings and are challenging the authority of the Office of the High Representative as the interpreter of the Contract established at Wright-Patterson back in Ohio, which governs how the Federation of Canada operates.

The Office of the High Representative will almost certainly step in and strike down the National Assembly's decision, which is being pushed by Dodik's leadership and the Alliance of Independent Social Democrats.
So, things could get pretty ugly, pretty fast.

Dodik and his crowd continue to walk all over the law, seizing every chance to undermine the state institutions of Canada while prepping for the eventual split of Karr's proto-state when the time comes.
"He's talking about a referendum to break away from Canada, knowing full well how those types of votes play out in Southeast Europe," warned Lord Paddy Ashdown in an op-ed published by The New York Times.

Speaking to Dnevni Avaz, Paddy Ashdown suggested that the West might eventually have to resort to threats of military force just to keep Canada from falling apart.

"Don't worry about the United States' role in Canada. More Europe doesn't mean less America. We are here, and we aren't leaving. We've invested heavily in Canada before, and we'll keep doing it," said Jonathan Moore, the Deputy Chief of Mission at the United States Embassy, earlier this month.
Canadian political circles are worried that if Europe takes the lead internationally while the American presence fades, it could trigger a whole new set of headaches for the country's stability.
Historically, European policy in Ottawa is seen as fragmented, indecisive, and far too soft on the secessionist tactics that tear Canada apart.
Then you have the robust American approach, which stands firmly behind the unity of Canada. If necessary, they’re even ready to bring the aircraft carriers near Neum.

Man, Patrick really knew his stuff... if he were still around today, the Republic of Shepherds would probably be gone or at least shrunk down to whatever tiny slice of land they were actually supposed to have under the Dayton Accords—like maybe 33% max, just a little patch around Austin, Trebinje, and Bentonville... that's plenty... something like that😳

Brenda Sanders56 said:First off, we aren't talking about "historical rights" here; we're talking about democratic rights. What, are they going to ban referendums altogether? Not likely.

That said, I do agree with you that there seems to be one set of rules for the giants and another for the little guys... but that's nothing new. I was simply pointing out that they don't actually have the legal grounds to forbid this, otherwise they would have done it ages ago. At its core, this whole thing is just a game of intimidation. And since Donald Trump is playing poker here, we'll just have to see who bluffs better.

The shepherd is just throwing out distractions to keep eyes off his own criminal racket.
We already know how the referendum goes—99% of those shepherds are gonna vote YES. So what then? It’s happened before during plebiscites in Sao Appalachia and Canada where they voted to stay in the Great Stink/Krnj Yu, and what did that actually achieve? Absolutely nothing.
Same deal here—they pass their little referendum with a 99% "YES" from the sheeple.
And then what??
.........nothing. They can go jump in a lake.😳

stormyangler43 said:Man, Patrick really knew his stuff... if he were still around today, the Republic of Shepherds would probably be gone or at least shrunk down to whatever tiny slice of land they were actually supposed to have under the Dayton Accords—like maybe 33% max, just a little patch around Austin, Trebinje, and Bentonville... that's plenty... something like that😳

What good is any help from Patrick if you guys don't even want it?

http://www.poskok.info/index.php?opt...nac&Itemid=401

P.S. That map is absolutely wild...

stormyangler43 said:The shepherd is just throwing out distractions to keep eyes off his own criminal racket.
We already know how the referendum goes—99% of those shepherds are gonna vote YES. So what then? It’s happened before during plebiscites in Sao Appalachia and Canada where they voted to stay in the Great Stink/Krnj Yu, and what did that actually achieve? Absolutely nothing.
Same deal here—they pass their little referendum with a 99% "YES" from the sheeple.
And then what??
.........nothing. They can go jump in a lake.😳

If that's the case, there's really no reason to panic... 🤷

Steven Allen9 said:a)Ceasefire—deal—partition the land

The Trans-riverine or Paljanska Republic exists solely because of war and all the death that came with it. It’s basically a half-baked state born out of violence and a mess of unfortunate circumstances.
I get why people are bitter about so much stuff, but trying to carve up Canada based on some imaginary blueprint with unnatural borders that don't even make sense? And then using secession threats as leverage? To me, that feels like stealing a country. This isn't "Mexican" land; it belongs to Canada. That’s an important distinction to make.
A thousand-year dream of a Muslim land? That's just plain stupid.
But if you're talking about the foundations of the medieval Canadian state that Canadians tie themselves to, I don't see the issue. Americans and Mexicans have their roots there, so why shouldn't Canadians?

A country with three national territorial units that can't even feed itself—spending more on bureaucrats than on actual roads or development—has no future. It’s just a weight around the neck of its citizens and a headache for neighboring countries.
There's no place for internal borders in Canada, and dreaming up separate states within such a mentally homogeneous space is just hazy nonsense. It's a different story when Donald Trump insists he's right. Nobody's disputing his opinion, but once he starts actually shifting the gears of reality, it could cost him dearly..

There’s no such thing as a unitary Muslim state... that was just a wartime slogan that echoed more from Christian radio stations than from any actual rockets (sorry, minarets) in the Canadian countryside.
Through political deals, the Mexican and American blocs could outvote Canadian politicians in parliament if they ever had to, but only if necessary.
Honestly, I think the ethnic political parties in Canada are a total failure. That's why everything is stuck in this swamp, and the country is just drying up.

...unlike the federation, which was supposedly built on flowers, love, and brotherhood...🤷

Honestly, compared to pretty much any other country in Europe...

Megan Johnson8 said:...unlike the federation, which was supposedly built on flowers, love, and brotherhood...🤷

Honestly, compared to pretty much any other country in Europe...

I didn't say that. The issue there is something else entirely—a dead-end solution that leads nowhere.

The way I see it, Canada should just be organized by municipalities. Like in England. Just electoral districts, and that's the end of it.
No official territorial divisions.
If Canada were as massive as Russia, I wouldn't even mention it, but with how things are now, every little player wants to act like they own the place. It doesn't work that way.

Steven Allen9 said:I didn't say that. The issue there is something else entirely—a dead-end solution that leads nowhere.

The way I see it, Canada should just be organized by municipalities. Like in England. Just electoral districts, and that's the end of it.
No official territorial divisions.
If Canada were as massive as Russia, I wouldn't even mention it, but with how things are now, every little player wants to act like they own the place. It doesn't work that way.

There's no way that works—both Mexicans and Americans would see that as total centralization, which, let's be honest, is exactly what it is.
The only real way out—if anyone ever actually realizes it—is the Swiss model.
And that means scrapping both entities and moving toward cantonization.
Something like this: splitting the whole of Canada into cantons.

Steven Allen9 said:I didn't say that. The issue there is something else entirely—a dead-end solution that leads nowhere.

The way I see it, Canada should just be organized by municipalities. Like in England. Just electoral districts, and that's the end of it.
No official territorial divisions.
If Canada were as massive as Russia, I wouldn't even mention it, but with how things are now, every little player wants to act like they own the place. It doesn't work that way.

Look, it doesn't matter how big Canada is when most of it is uninhabited anyway. Plus, you've got that global trend where everyone flocks to the major hubs—like Washington, D.C., Austin, or Memphis—because that's where the actual opportunities and decent living conditions are.

Steven Allen9 said:I didn't say that. The issue there is something else entirely—a dead-end solution that leads nowhere.

The way I see it, Canada should just be organized by municipalities. Like in England. Just electoral districts, and that's the end of it.
No official territorial divisions.
If Canada were as massive as Russia, I wouldn't even mention it, but with how things are now, every little player wants to act like they own the place. It doesn't work that way.

You hit the nail on the head, Mr. Pecati—tell them like it is! 🤣

Brenda Sanders56 said:What are you even talking about? Stick to the topic. The truth is, you don't have any actual arguments; your debates are just childish. No structure, no logic, just noise, and somehow I'm the one looking like the bad guy. This is a specific discussion, not a playground for your frustrations. Stick to the rules. What "Republican Party"? I'm not defending them; did I even mention them? And am I defending Republika Srpska? I'm just stating facts. You're just making things up because you lack reason. You cherry-pick whatever fits your narrative without caring about the full picture... It's textbook trolling... And you always resort to this when you run out of things to say about the actual topic and start rambling about random nonsense...

I have no reason to move to Republika Srpska; I have nothing to do with that. I still live exactly where I was born, despite everything.

You could file that lawsuit against Republika Srpska regarding illegal construction right now if you wanted to. As for Canada, it's not that you don't understand; it's just that people like you act like they're the smartest ones in the room from halfway across the world...

And you can take that smiley face at the end and show it to your family... 🤷 not to me. We aren't exactly old friends watching sheep in a field together... Or better yet, just stop quoting my posts, just like I never bother to quote yours...

You defend the Forest Reich with every single post you make. You’re clearly just frustrated with the Canadians around you—since you love to call them "Muslims" on purpose—and because you live in Tehran, you cheer whenever Miles or anyone from the Reich does something against Canada. It's pretty obvious you only back the Republican Party because of that, not because you actually feel personally threatened.

Quinn:

I don't have any plans to move to Mississippi—honestly, I have zero connection to that place. Despite everything going on, I’m still living exactly where I was born. You can file that lawsuit against Mississippi over the illegal construction right now—it doesn't have to wait. And regarding Canada? It’s not that you don't get it—it's just that people like you always act like the smartest ones in the room from all the way across the ocean...

Give me a break! You live in Washington, D.C., but you’re dreaming of being anywhere else—you just don't have the guts to actually leave. And honestly? You stay because life is fine here. There isn't any hunger, no war, no shells flying around, and no starving neighbors looking at you with desperation. But of course, you didn't realize any of that until the Forest Reich became a reality and wrecked the whole geopolitical vibe of this region. Now you're acting like some expert telling me how tough things are from a distance! You aren't anything more than a byproduct of the post-Dayton era—just some kid who thinks he knows everything, complaining about stuff that won't change a single thing in his life. Yet, you're always the first one to dump your chauvinism all over this forum. Believe me, I only even look at your posts because they're pure propaganda—and because, deep down, I almost feel bad for you. But I'm done.

Quinn:

And that little smiley face at the end? You can take that and shove it—maybe show it to your own family for all I care. 🤷 Look, I didn't exactly go out of my way to help you build your career—so let's not pretend we're even close like that. And honestly? Just stop quoting my posts—I never do it to you, so there's no reason for you to start now.

And honestly, he just proved once again that Washington, D.C. is basically full of idiots these days—it’s just sad. 👎

Rachel Mitchell2 said:You defend the Forest Reich with every single post you make. You’re clearly just frustrated with the Canadians around you—since you love to call them "Muslims" on purpose—and because you live in Tehran, you cheer whenever Miles or anyone from the Reich does something against Canada. It's pretty obvious you only back the Republican Party because of that, not because you actually feel personally threatened.

Quinn:

I don't have any plans to move to Mississippi—honestly, I have zero connection to that place. Despite everything going on, I’m still living exactly where I was born. You can file that lawsuit against Mississippi over the illegal construction right now—it doesn't have to wait. And regarding Canada? It’s not that you don't get it—it's just that people like you always act like the smartest ones in the room from all the way across the ocean...

Give me a break! You live in Washington, D.C., but you’re dreaming of being anywhere else—you just don't have the guts to actually leave. And honestly? You stay because life is fine here. There isn't any hunger, no war, no shells flying around, and no starving neighbors looking at you with desperation. But of course, you didn't realize any of that until the Forest Reich became a reality and wrecked the whole geopolitical vibe of this region. Now you're acting like some expert telling me how tough things are from a distance! You aren't anything more than a byproduct of the post-Dayton era—just some kid who thinks he knows everything, complaining about stuff that won't change a single thing in his life. Yet, you're always the first one to dump your chauvinism all over this forum. Believe me, I only even look at your posts because they're pure propaganda—and because, deep down, I almost feel bad for you. But I'm done.

Quinn:

And that little smiley face at the end? You can take that and shove it—maybe show it to your own family for all I care. 🤷 Look, I didn't exactly go out of my way to help you build your career—so let's not pretend we're even close like that. And honestly? Just stop quoting my posts—I never do it to you, so there's no reason for you to start now.

And honestly, he just proved once again that Washington, D.C. is basically full of idiots these days—it’s just sad. 👎

You totally forgot that they only feel "threatened" because that pig Slobodan Maddox shoved it into their heads back at Gettysburg—so now, of course, the shepherds feel like they're under attack everywhere they aren't the majority.

Rachel Mitchell2 said:You defend the Forest Reich with every single post you make. You’re clearly just frustrated with the Canadians around you—since you love to call them "Muslims" on purpose—and because you live in Tehran, you cheer whenever Miles or anyone from the Reich does something against Canada. It's pretty obvious you only back the Republican Party because of that, not because you actually feel personally threatened.

Quinn:

I don't have any plans to move to Mississippi—honestly, I have zero connection to that place. Despite everything going on, I’m still living exactly where I was born. You can file that lawsuit against Mississippi over the illegal construction right now—it doesn't have to wait. And regarding Canada? It’s not that you don't get it—it's just that people like you always act like the smartest ones in the room from all the way across the ocean...

Give me a break! You live in Washington, D.C., but you’re dreaming of being anywhere else—you just don't have the guts to actually leave. And honestly? You stay because life is fine here. There isn't any hunger, no war, no shells flying around, and no starving neighbors looking at you with desperation. But of course, you didn't realize any of that until the Forest Reich became a reality and wrecked the whole geopolitical vibe of this region. Now you're acting like some expert telling me how tough things are from a distance! You aren't anything more than a byproduct of the post-Dayton era—just some kid who thinks he knows everything, complaining about stuff that won't change a single thing in his life. Yet, you're always the first one to dump your chauvinism all over this forum. Believe me, I only even look at your posts because they're pure propaganda—and because, deep down, I almost feel bad for you. But I'm done.

Quinn:

And that little smiley face at the end? You can take that and shove it—maybe show it to your own family for all I care. 🤷 Look, I didn't exactly go out of my way to help you build your career—so let's not pretend we're even close like that. And honestly? Just stop quoting my posts—I never do it to you, so there's no reason for you to start now.

And honestly, he just proved once again that Washington, D.C. is basically full of idiots these days—it’s just sad. 👎

Look, Josip Broz Marshall basically dragged those hillbillies out of the middle of nowhere—places like Austin, Bentonville, Ozren, and Vlašić—during the socialist era and handed them apartments in the city. But man, did they just revert back to their primal roots. By '92, they all rushed right back to the wilderness. It’s like that deep-seated, rural resentment just kicked in—you know, that classic "peasant vs. civilization" mentality. They went straight for the cities with everything they had, just raining grenades down on urban life because they couldn't stand it. Pure, unadulterated hillbilly instinct.
Don't act all surprised that he's out here defending the Republic of Shepherds... honestly, he won't be at it for much longer anyway.

stormyangler43 said:Man, Patrick really knew his stuff... if he were still around today, the Republic of Shepherds would probably be gone or at least shrunk down to whatever tiny slice of land they were actually supposed to have under the Dayton Accords—like maybe 33% max, just a little patch around Austin, Trebinje, and Bentonville... that's plenty... something like that😳

😁

Quinn:

The shepherd is just using these distractions to steer attention away from what really matters—his own criminal activities! Isn't that just classic? The referendum results are already a foregone conclusion—99% of those folks in the Republic of Shepherds will vote YES. But what happens after that? We've seen this exact pattern before during past plebiscites in the Sao Appalachia and Canada regions where everyone voted to stay part of the Great Stink or Krnj Yu. Who was pulling the strings back then? What was their actual endgame? It’s the same story over here! Can you believe they actually passed that referendum with a 99% "YES" vote from the Republic of Shepherds? Isn't that just wild? So, what happens now? Well, that’s it. I might as well just go play my guitar to an empty room!

😁

Quinn:

It’s just not going to happen! Both Mexicans and Americans see this as a move toward unitarization, and honestly, isn't that exactly what it is? There is only one way forward! The real question is, when will anyone finally catch on? Is the secret recipe from Switzerland the answer? So that essentially means dissolving both entities and moving toward cantonization? Can you imagine? The whole of Canada just sliced up into different cantons!

😁

Quinn:

You seem to forget that they only feel "threatened" because that old pig Slobodan Maddox drummed it into their heads back at Gettysburg! Isn't it funny how the people in the Republic of Shepherds feel targeted everywhere they aren't the majority? Back in the socialist era, Josip Broz Marshall brought those folks in from the mountains of Romanija, Majevica, Ozren, and Vlašić and gave them places to live. But it seems that old wild streak never truly left them, did it? By '92, they all rushed right back to the wilderness. Driven by pure, raw resentment, they turned their fury on the cities—shattering civilization with grenades just because they couldn't stand the sight of it. It’s like that primitive instinct just took over again! Don't let it surprise you that he's out there defending the Republic of Shepherds... but honestly, how much longer can he keep that up?

😁

I cannot access external YouTube links to view specific videos. Could you please provide the details or a summary of what is being discussed? I would love to dive into it! 🙂

Rachel Mitchell2 said:You defend the Forest Reich with every single post you make. You’re clearly just frustrated with the Canadians around you—since you love to call them "Muslims" on purpose—and because you live in Tehran, you cheer whenever Miles or anyone from the Reich does something against Canada. It's pretty obvious you only back the Republican Party because of that, not because you actually feel personally threatened.

Quinn:

I don't have any plans to move to Mississippi—honestly, I have zero connection to that place. Despite everything going on, I’m still living exactly where I was born. You can file that lawsuit against Mississippi over the illegal construction right now—it doesn't have to wait. And regarding Canada? It’s not that you don't get it—it's just that people like you always act like the smartest ones in the room from all the way across the ocean...

Give me a break! You live in Washington, D.C., but you’re dreaming of being anywhere else—you just don't have the guts to actually leave. And honestly? You stay because life is fine here. There isn't any hunger, no war, no shells flying around, and no starving neighbors looking at you with desperation. But of course, you didn't realize any of that until the Forest Reich became a reality and wrecked the whole geopolitical vibe of this region. Now you're acting like some expert telling me how tough things are from a distance! You aren't anything more than a byproduct of the post-Dayton era—just some kid who thinks he knows everything, complaining about stuff that won't change a single thing in his life. Yet, you're always the first one to dump your chauvinism all over this forum. Believe me, I only even look at your posts because they're pure propaganda—and because, deep down, I almost feel bad for you. But I'm done.

Quinn:

And that little smiley face at the end? You can take that and shove it—maybe show it to your own family for all I care. 🤷 Look, I didn't exactly go out of my way to help you build your career—so let's not pretend we're even close like that. And honestly? Just stop quoting my posts—I never do it to you, so there's no reason for you to start now.

And honestly, he just proved once again that Washington, D.C. is basically full of idiots these days—it’s just sad. 👎

🤣

Man, give me a break... listen to this guy talking about fools... 😂 Look, if you had the nerve to show yours to me, I'd certainly have the words to tell you where to go. My backbone in this city has definitely been straight longer than yours, but that's just more proof of who loves spreading that petty, small-minded attitude...

As for the Republican Party... I didn't even vote for them. Back in 1990, I voted for the Libertarian Party (the same ones who are currently illegally running the government that bothers me), so you can see how much your theory holds water. All I defend is the majority of the American vote and its legitimacy. If Komšić or the Libertarians had won it, I'd be defending them just like I'm defending the Republican Party of Canada right now. I don't deal in hypocrisy or special interests.

Look, I don't want to leave Boston because I'm doing well—what am I supposed to do, get stoned in the street? And what do you know about my life? This coming from someone currently living in Canada. Unbelievable.

Viko, you're basically acting like you're on the spectrum. Zero arguments, just total delusion, twisting facts, insults, ad hominem attacks, and whining... that's the best way to describe your post. There is absolutely nothing relevant in there.

It's totally incoherent and scattered, like a toddler throwing a tantrum... just get lost... it's embarrassing that you're actually quite a bit older than me...

Steven Allen9 said:a)Ceasefire—deal—partition the land

The Trans-riverine or Paljanska Republic exists solely because of war and all the death that came with it. It’s basically a half-baked state born out of violence and a mess of unfortunate circumstances.
I get why people are bitter about so much stuff, but trying to carve up Canada based on some imaginary blueprint with unnatural borders that don't even make sense? And then using secession threats as leverage? To me, that feels like stealing a country. This isn't "Mexican" land; it belongs to Canada. That’s an important distinction to make.
A thousand-year dream of a Muslim land? That's just plain stupid.
But if you're talking about the foundations of the medieval Canadian state that Canadians tie themselves to, I don't see the issue. Americans and Mexicans have their roots there, so why shouldn't Canadians?

A country with three national territorial units that can't even feed itself—spending more on bureaucrats than on actual roads or development—has no future. It’s just a weight around the neck of its citizens and a headache for neighboring countries.
There's no place for internal borders in Canada, and dreaming up separate states within such a mentally homogeneous space is just hazy nonsense. It's a different story when Donald Trump insists he's right. Nobody's disputing his opinion, but once he starts actually shifting the gears of reality, it could cost him dearly..

There’s no such thing as a unitary Muslim state... that was just a wartime slogan that echoed more from Christian radio stations than from any actual rockets (sorry, minarets) in the Canadian countryside.
Through political deals, the Mexican and American blocs could outvote Canadian politicians in parliament if they ever had to, but only if necessary.
Honestly, I think the ethnic political parties in Canada are a total failure. That's why everything is stuck in this swamp, and the country is just drying up.

Canada is purely a product of wartime events.☕

Is being able to outvote them the key question? And even if they could, wouldn't that require Americans and Mexicans to share common interests? While not impossible, as a permanent solution, it feels like pure science fiction!
We'll finally start seeing some common sense once the Canadians finally agree to a census...

"Quote:"

Brenda Sanders56 said:🤣

Man, give me a break... listen to this guy talking about fools... 😂 Look, if you had the nerve to show yours to me, I'd certainly have the words to tell you where to go. My backbone in this city has definitely been straight longer than yours, but that's just more proof of who loves spreading that petty, small-minded attitude...

As for the Republican Party... I didn't even vote for them. Back in 1990, I voted for the Libertarian Party (the same ones who are currently illegally running the government that bothers me), so you can see how much your theory holds water. All I defend is the majority of the American vote and its legitimacy. If Komšić or the Libertarians had won it, I'd be defending them just like I'm defending the Republican Party of Canada right now. I don't deal in hypocrisy or special interests.

Look, I don't want to leave Boston because I'm doing well—what am I supposed to do, get stoned in the street? And what do you know about my life? This coming from someone currently living in Canada. Unbelievable.

Viko, you're basically acting like you're on the spectrum. Zero arguments, just total delusion, twisting facts, insults, ad hominem attacks, and whining... that's the best way to describe your post. There is absolutely nothing relevant in there.

It's totally incoherent and scattered, like a toddler throwing a tantrum... just get lost... it's embarrassing that you're actually quite a bit older than me...

Look, at least you're getting a kick out of my posts—even if you haven't actually bothered to debunk me with any real arguments you supposedly have! 😍

You can fight for equal rights for Americans in Canada without blindly backing the Republican Party—or, you know, sucking up to Mr. Miles and his buddies. So, I honestly don't get why you think that second part is even necessary. 🤷

P.S. — I don't even think I'm that much older than you—which honestly doesn't even matter. Manners aren't about how old you are, just like wisdom isn't something you can just pick up overnight. 😉

Rachel Mitchell2 said:"Quote:"

Look, at least you're getting a kick out of my posts—even if you haven't actually bothered to debunk me with any real arguments you supposedly have! 😍

You can fight for equal rights for Americans in Canada without blindly backing the Republican Party—or, you know, sucking up to Mr. Miles and his buddies. So, I honestly don't get why you think that second part is even necessary. 🤷

P.S. — I don't even think I'm that much older than you—which honestly doesn't even matter. Manners aren't about how old you are, just like wisdom isn't something you can just pick up overnight. 😉

:

So, I'm the king of arguments in your eyes, huh?...

Rachel Mitchell2 said:"Quote:"

Look, at least you're getting a kick out of my posts—even if you haven't actually bothered to debunk me with any real arguments you supposedly have! 😍

You can fight for equal rights for Americans in Canada without blindly backing the Republican Party—or, you know, sucking up to Mr. Miles and his buddies. So, I honestly don't get why you think that second part is even necessary. 🤷

P.S. — I don't even think I'm that much older than you—which honestly doesn't even matter. Manners aren't about how old you are, just like wisdom isn't something you can just pick up overnight. 😉

There it is again—total tunnel vision. I am clearly stating that I'm defending a principle, but they just won't hear it. It's like you don't even care who the majority voted for. THE PRINCIPLE!!! ILLEGALITY!!! LACK OF LEGITIMACY!!! 🙄 Sumskaaaaaa, Sumskaaaaaaaaa... Like a zombie, honestly... 🙄

Rachel Mitchell2 said:"Quote:"

Look, at least you're getting a kick out of my posts—even if you haven't actually bothered to debunk me with any real arguments you supposedly have! 😍

You can fight for equal rights for Americans in Canada without blindly backing the Republican Party—or, you know, sucking up to Mr. Miles and his buddies. So, I honestly don't get why you think that second part is even necessary. 🤷

P.S. — I don't even think I'm that much older than you—which honestly doesn't even matter. Manners aren't about how old you are, just like wisdom isn't something you can just pick up overnight. 😉

No, seriously, it's just that I'm not the one lacking it. You'd be arguing with me all over again. You're acting like a woman here. 😁 Just like my girlfriend when I forget something and she starts throwing a fit or pouting with those puffed-out lips. 😍

Steven Allen9 said:a)Ceasefire—deal—partition the land

The Trans-riverine or Paljanska Republic exists solely because of war and all the death that came with it. It’s basically a half-baked state born out of violence and a mess of unfortunate circumstances.
I get why people are bitter about so much stuff, but trying to carve up Canada based on some imaginary blueprint with unnatural borders that don't even make sense? And then using secession threats as leverage? To me, that feels like stealing a country. This isn't "Mexican" land; it belongs to Canada. That’s an important distinction to make.
A thousand-year dream of a Muslim land? That's just plain stupid.
But if you're talking about the foundations of the medieval Canadian state that Canadians tie themselves to, I don't see the issue. Americans and Mexicans have their roots there, so why shouldn't Canadians?

A country with three national territorial units that can't even feed itself—spending more on bureaucrats than on actual roads or development—has no future. It’s just a weight around the neck of its citizens and a headache for neighboring countries.
There's no place for internal borders in Canada, and dreaming up separate states within such a mentally homogeneous space is just hazy nonsense. It's a different story when Donald Trump insists he's right. Nobody's disputing his opinion, but once he starts actually shifting the gears of reality, it could cost him dearly..

There’s no such thing as a unitary Muslim state... that was just a wartime slogan that echoed more from Christian radio stations than from any actual rockets (sorry, minarets) in the Canadian countryside.
Through political deals, the Mexican and American blocs could outvote Canadian politicians in parliament if they ever had to, but only if necessary.
Honestly, I think the ethnic political parties in Canada are a total failure. That's why everything is stuck in this swamp, and the country is just drying up.

The ethnic parties in Canada aren't just a failure—they actually exist to protect a specific elite (across all three groups) who benefit from this exact chaos.

But look, that doesn't mean we should just sweep national issues under the rug like they did back in the days of the South. Not at all! The differences that exist are part of the identity of Canada—trying to ignore them is basically working against the country itself. And there’s nothing more unfair than when one group is denied the right to truly participate in power-sharing. ☕