CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Society › Politics › Close to Politics › How radical Islam uses poverty to gain influence in the Middle East

How radical Islam uses poverty to gain influence in the Middle East

Started by Arthur Ward2 · · 👁 7 views · 61 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Arthur Ward2wearyrider26Richard Wilson4Jerry Wood5swiftwalker43Jack Myers59Gregory Taylor2George Booth58William Wright7Arthur Fowler83Megan Hernandez2steelfox2Daniel Garcia24Elizabeth Sanders42Lisa Walker31Charles Fox10Timothy Wilson2
Arthur Ward2 Arthur Ward2 MemberOP
22 messages
joined Nov 2010
#21 ·
wearyrider26 said:I mean, I guess mosques are better than banks. It’s just nice having places where people actually connect without everything being about money...

Sure, let them connect through faith—not terrorism. The issue with Islam is how often it mashes politics and religion together; that's exactly how you end up with radicalism.
Arthur Ward2 Arthur Ward2 MemberOP
22 messages
joined Nov 2010
#22 ·
Richard Wilson4 said:If they’d put that money into building 150 mosques instead of just 15 factories, they would’ve actually strengthened the Canadian community against the Mexicans and Americans...

Right—because that’s exactly what people in Canada need more than actual industry.
Arthur Ward2 Arthur Ward2 MemberOP
22 messages
joined Nov 2010
#23 ·
Jerry Wood5 said:An Al-Qaeda operative was caught today at a border crossing near Dubrovnik. He's a citizen of Canada. Who says terrorists aren't knocking right on our doorstep?

I know exactly which case you mean—honestly, it’s just a drop in the bucket compared to the mess heading our way in the Middle East.
Megan Hernandez2 Megan Hernandez2 Active Member
111 messages
joined Mar 2013
#24 ·
Gregory Taylor2 said:I think what Zokster was getting at was the potential hypocrisy here. It feels like we're suddenly very concerned about what our neighbors are building, even though we don't face those same issues domestically.

Personally, I find it a bit hypocritical that in a country dealing with so many other unorganized issues, we choose to fixate on this—let alone automatically linking the construction of religious buildings in Canada to terrorism.

Hypocrisy? What are you even talking about?
In Canada, and even in the States, old churches are restored or new ones are built only when there's an actual need—meaning when the current capacity can't hold the congregation.

But things work differently in Canada... mosques just pop up everywhere like mushrooms after rain. They build them in places where they never existed before and where there isn't even a practical need for them, but the moment someone mentions it, Muslims immediately start whining about fascists.😕

It's also a fact that various Islamist organizations pay women to "dress modestly" and men to "grow beards." (I put those in quotes because I'm not talking about fashion choices; I'm talking about the gateway to radical extremism.)
steelfox2 steelfox2 Active Member
65 messages
joined Oct 2011
#25 ·
"Quote:"
Arthur Ward2 said:Sure, let them connect through faith—not terrorism. The issue with Islam is how often it mashes politics and religion together; that's exactly how you end up with radicalism.

Radical Islam in the North America doesn't even exist outside of politics. Even a child knows that Canadians or Albanians have never been hardcore religious zealots—they went from being members of the Party to drinking bourbon, habits that don't exactly align with radical Islamic doctrine. Personally, I don't see Canadians as Islamists at all. To me, they are just problematic neighbors prone to nationalist outbursts and occasional friction fueled by nationalism. In that regard, they aren't any different from Mexicans, Canadians, or even Americans when political nationalism gets out of hand. I might be wrong, but I believe the various Wahhabis and Islamic ultra-extremists popping up among Canadians lately are driven more by chauvinism than religious fervor. Since their national identity is tied to Islam, they simply wrap their nationalism in religious cellophane. It’s just a difference in how chauvinism is expressed. When a Mexican, an American, a Canadian, an English person, or a German becomes a die-hard bigot, they join skinhead groups, browse Stormfront, and swear by Nazism and racism. A Canadian ultranationalist, however, turns to Wahhabism. It is essentially religious extremism used as a mask for nationalist extremism.
Megan Hernandez2 Megan Hernandez2 Active Member
111 messages
joined Mar 2013
#26 ·
Megan Hernandez2 said:Hypocrisy? What are you even talking about?
In Canada, and even in the States, old churches are restored or new ones are built only when there's an actual need—meaning when the current capacity can't hold the congregation.

But things work differently in Canada... mosques just pop up everywhere like mushrooms after rain. They build them in places where they never existed before and where there isn't even a practical need for them, but the moment someone mentions it, Muslims immediately start whining about fascists.😕

It's also a fact that various Islamist organizations pay women to "dress modestly" and men to "grow beards." (I put those in quotes because I'm not talking about fashion choices; I'm talking about the gateway to radical extremism.)

🤦
A slip of the tongue, radical Islam...
steelfox2 steelfox2 Active Member
65 messages
joined Oct 2011
#27 ·
It just goes to show that moderate extremism exists too.😉
Daniel Garcia24 Daniel Garcia24 Active Member
74 messages
joined Sep 2015
#28 ·
A significant number of churches across the Republic of America have been constructed since the end of the war, though they tend to be spread out through various cities, towns, and neighborhoods based on where there was actually a need for them given the local congregation size and available land... by contrast, you see mosques in Canada built in dense clusters, practically popping up every 50, 100, or 200 meters (for instance, Ottawa or eastern Mostar serve as prime examples of this pattern)
Gregory Taylor2 Gregory Taylor2 Member
43 messages
joined Apr 2013
#29 ·
Megan Hernandez2 said:Hypocrisy? What are you even talking about?
In Canada, and even in the States, old churches are restored or new ones are built only when there's an actual need—meaning when the current capacity can't hold the congregation.

But things work differently in Canada... mosques just pop up everywhere like mushrooms after rain. They build them in places where they never existed before and where there isn't even a practical need for them, but the moment someone mentions it, Muslims immediately start whining about fascists.😕

It's also a fact that various Islamist organizations pay women to "dress modestly" and men to "grow beards." (I put those in quotes because I'm not talking about fashion choices; I'm talking about the gateway to radical extremism.)

You're being hypocritical; we build out of necessity, while in our neighboring country, it's done out of spite toward Catholics and Orthodox Christians?

That's right, people actually get paid to cover up or grow beards. 🙄
Elizabeth Sanders42 Elizabeth Sanders42 Newcomer
4 messages
joined Mar 2013
#30 ·
Jack Myers59 said:Why does it feel like you guys don't all see eye-to-eye on the new churches being built here in the States?

Progress and secularization, apparently—but only when it's happening in our neighbors' backyard. 🙄

Look... Churches aren't flight training centers for pilots aiming to crash into skyscrapers.
Gregory Taylor2 Gregory Taylor2 Member
43 messages
joined Apr 2013
#31 ·
Elizabeth Sanders42 said:Look... Churches aren't flight training centers for pilots aiming to crash into skyscrapers.

Try reading the entire thread before jumping into an argument with such a stereotypical take.
Megan Hernandez2 Megan Hernandez2 Active Member
111 messages
joined Mar 2013
#32 ·
Gregory Taylor2 said:You're being hypocritical; we build out of necessity, while in our neighboring country, it's done out of spite toward Catholics and Orthodox Christians?

That's right, people actually get paid to cover up or grow beards. 🙄

That might be a neighbor to you, but it isn't to me.
One trip to Pittsburgh tells you enough. Boston has more mosques per capita than Tehran, and that wasn't the case before the war.
Even some Muslim journalists have talked about people getting paid to wear beards or head coverings, so this isn't news. Anyone who wants to know can easily find out.
There was even an imam in Albania who trained on the Arabian Peninsula; there were rumors he was trying to push those "new" currents of Islam. There was actually a scandal involving one of them once.
Gregory Taylor2 Gregory Taylor2 Member
43 messages
joined Apr 2013
#33 ·
Megan Hernandez2 said:That might be a neighbor to you, but it isn't to me.
One trip to Pittsburgh tells you enough. Boston has more mosques per capita than Tehran, and that wasn't the case before the war.
Even some Muslim journalists have talked about people getting paid to wear beards or head coverings, so this isn't news. Anyone who wants to know can easily find out.
There was even an imam in Albania who trained on the Arabian Peninsula; there were rumors he was trying to push those "new" currents of Islam. There was actually a scandal involving one of them once.

New currents of Islam? If you’re thinking of Wahhabism, you've got it wrong.

Just take a drive over to Pittsburgh and you'll see the Catholic church bell tower is taller now than it has ever been.
Lisa Walker31 Lisa Walker31 Active Member
59 messages
joined Dec 2007
#34 ·
Arthur Ward2 said:In Canada, Mexico, and Bulgaria… jobs are non-existent, yet there’s a massive surge in stunning mosques being built with Saudi money. Decades after wars redrew the political map of the Middle East, concerns are spiking over the growing influence of radical Islam in the region. Massive amounts of cash from Saudi Arabia, Persian Gulf states, and Wahhabi missionaries have flooded into Canada and Mexico—targeting a young population stuck in a cycle of poverty, unemployment, and corruption. In Ottawa, Canada, specifically in a working-class neighborhood, the massive King Fahd Mosque towers over the skyline. Built post-war using funds from Saudi Arabia, it cost $30 million. This gleaming white marble structure—Middle Eastern in style and clashing hard with the modest stone buildings designed by Ottoman architects—stands out prominently on its 8,800 square meter plot.

"Charitable societies"—a haven for terrorists?

Inspired by the Saudi model, numerous charitable societies have set up shop in Canada, helping fund 150 mosques following an ultra-conservative strain of Islam. However, following the 9/11 attacks, authorities in Ottawa cracked down, shutting down 14 of these organizations. Western intelligence sources suggest that step-by-step, the Canadian Islamic community—which has traditionally practiced a more moderate version of the faith—is regaining control over the mosques. Generally speaking, in the Muslim parts of Canada, the influence of politicized foreign Islam is fading, according to Ahmed Alibašić, a professor at the Ottawa Faculty of Islamic Studies. "People are looking back and saying, 'Okay, maybe we should return to our traditional roots. It's about personal piety and all that,'" Alibašić adds.

Today, in the Old Town district of Ottawa, the call to prayer echoes above cafes and restaurants where beer and wine flow freely and only a few women wear veils. Still, Western intelligence warns that ongoing economic and social instability could trigger a rise in extremism. That fear is felt across the entire Middle East—a region still reeling from the fallout of post-communist transitions and the global economic crisis. Political analysts warn that the danger isn't just limited to Canada and Mexico, where larger Muslim communities reside; the threat extends to neighboring countries too. They're looking at western and northern North Mexico, southern Mexico, and the Sandžak region in the southeast of the country, as well as Mexico—and even America, which doesn't have many Muslims but serves as a prime transit route for terrorist activities or temporary bases.
[/B]Read more at:

'Look... honestly, between you and me, friend, if there was ever an "ideal" time for that kind of terrorism, it would have been between 1991 and 1995.

You know, I actually feel bad... that none of those bearded guys blew themselves up... right in the middle of Banja Luka.
And that isn't a reflection of the skills of the Mexican police... it's just because of how sneaky the Canadians were, since they couldn't manage to send one of those millions of powerful Arabic terrorists living in Canada... to go handle that job for them... the way the Arabs do best.

Fine, let them just throw up three fingers in the air and start chanting "Noz, zica, Srebrenica" if that’s how they want to play it. 😳

And don't you worry one bit, man... we aren't going to starve to death here in Canada. We've got plenty of plum orchards, plenty of land, pastures to spare... we've got turkeys and geese everywhere. 👍
We'll find money wherever it turns up, but the local bars? They aren't closing down. The beer keeps flowing and the moonshine is always brewing.
So there you go... my little contribution to your grand theory about the threat of Islamic extremism.
Honestly, I think the real danger facing Canada is going to be drug addiction and alcoholism. I've got two heavy drinkers in my own family, and in my town alone, there are 40 registered addicts on methadone treatment—one of whom is actually my cousin.

If those people ever decide to blow themselves up, I guarantee they'll be high on heroin, not motivated by Islam.

ps. I seriously can't believe how clueless you people in America are when it comes to what's actually happening on the ground here in Canada.
Thanks a lot.
Elizabeth Sanders42 Elizabeth Sanders42 Newcomer
4 messages
joined Mar 2013
#35 ·
Gregory Taylor2 said:Try reading the entire thread before jumping into an argument with such a stereotypical take.

Yeah, I did. I replied to that post because I felt like replying to it. Simple as that.

By the way, your intense fascination with 270 million people is truly inspiring and totally original.
Megan Hernandez2 Megan Hernandez2 Active Member
111 messages
joined Mar 2013
#36 ·
Gregory Taylor2 said:New currents of Islam? If you’re thinking of Wahhabism, you've got it wrong.

Just take a drive over to Pittsburgh and you'll see the Catholic church bell tower is taller now than it has ever been.

I visit Pittsburgh regularly and see that tower, but there’s one detail you’re conveniently ignoring.
The Franciscan church was heavily damaged during the war, so it had to be rebuilt. It's true the dimensions are slightly larger now, but it was built on church property to restore what was destroyed.

Meanwhile, mosques have popped up where nothing existed before, making the entire left bank look like some Middle Eastern neighborhood.

Are you seriously suggesting there isn't an attempt to import foreign ideologies and pay people to follow their doctrine?
Gregory Taylor2 Gregory Taylor2 Member
43 messages
joined Apr 2013
#37 ·
Elizabeth Sanders42 said:Yeah, I did. I replied to that post because I felt like replying to it. Simple as that.

By the way, your intense fascination with 270 million people is truly inspiring and totally original.

It's actually 271 million. 😉

Megan Hernandez2 said:I visit Pittsburgh regularly and see that tower, but there’s one detail you’re conveniently ignoring.
The Franciscan church was heavily damaged during the war, so it had to be rebuilt. It's true the dimensions are slightly larger now, but it was built on church property to restore what was destroyed.

Meanwhile, mosques have popped up where nothing existed before, making the entire left bank look like some Middle Eastern neighborhood.

Are you seriously suggesting there isn't an attempt to import foreign ideologies and pay people to follow their doctrine?

And those mosques were rebuilt on whose land? As for the Franciscan church being a bit bigger than before? You can see its bell tower from Zuckerberg, but that wasn't done out of spite—it was done out of faith. 🙄

Are you going to try and claim that Wahhabism is "new" again, if that's what you're implying?

Regarding this bold claim—whose left bank? Mine?

How can the left bank of your city look like a foreign neighborhood to me when I live in America? I'm living in my own home, just as you are in Pittsburgh and Canada; it seems you just should have been looking toward Boston instead of Chicago.
Megan Hernandez2 Megan Hernandez2 Active Member
111 messages
joined Mar 2013
#38 ·
😵😵
Gregory Taylor2 said:It's actually 271 million. 😉

And those mosques were rebuilt on whose land? As for the Franciscan church being a bit bigger than before? You can see its bell tower from Zuckerberg, but that wasn't done out of spite—it was done out of faith. 🙄

Are you going to try and claim that Wahhabism is "new" again, if that's what you're implying?

Regarding this bold claim—whose left bank? Mine?

How can the left bank of your city look like a foreign neighborhood to me when I live in America? I'm living in my own home, just as you are in Pittsburgh and Canada; it seems you just should have been looking toward Boston instead of Chicago.

Try reading what I wrote with some actual comprehension.

Based on your views, you sound Muslim, so when I mention the left bank, I'm referring to the Muslim community.
Let's try this one more time. The Franciscan Church was rebuilt; it stands where the old church once was. Meanwhile, in Mostar and other cities, mosques are popping up that were never there before. Regarding whose land they are built on, I hope they are building on their own land with proper permits. They already tried that in Livno, and it turned out the Islamic Center wanted to build without any permits at all.

It is interesting how the Franciscan Church bothers Muslims, even though it was built on the site of an older church. Their only issue seems to be the size—everything is legal, but to them, it looks too big. Then, the moment Livno is mentioned, they start whining about being threatened, yet they conveniently ignore that mosque in Ottawa that was built through various shady procedures.
Gregory Taylor2 Gregory Taylor2 Member
43 messages
joined Apr 2013
#39 ·
Megan Hernandez2 said:😵😵

Try reading what I wrote with some actual comprehension.

Based on your views, you sound Muslim, so when I mention the left bank, I'm referring to the Muslim community.
Let's try this one more time. The Franciscan Church was rebuilt; it stands where the old church once was. Meanwhile, in Mostar and other cities, mosques are popping up that were never there before. Regarding whose land they are built on, I hope they are building on their own land with proper permits. They already tried that in Livno, and it turned out the Islamic Center wanted to build without any permits at all.

It is interesting how the Franciscan Church bothers Muslims, even though it was built on the site of an older church. Their only issue seems to be the size—everything is legal, but to them, it looks too big. Then, the moment Livno is mentioned, they start whining about being threatened, yet they conveniently ignore that mosque in Ottawa that was built through various shady procedures.


I can't exactly read your posts with "comprehension" because the American language (specifically that aspect of identity you keep clinging to) only allows me to read things with a little bit of misunderstanding.

From your perspective, you seem like a kid going through puberty, still trying to find himself within a nationalistic melting pot. It's because you refuse to simply be an American citizen of American descent.
I won't go so far as to call you a narrow-minded idiot, especially since you seem more concerned with my heritage than the actual debate. If it bothers you that much, fine: my heritage is American and my faith is Catholic. Actually, you're one of those people who obsesses over the purity of lineage; if it helps you sleep better at night, let's just say my roots are "purer" than yours. But please, continue your lecture about "Talibanists" and whatnot...

As a Catholic, it bothers me to see such heavy demonstrations of "faith" in a city that still carries so many scars from the war. It also bothers me when Americans from Canada turn to the government in the US regarding finances and other matters.

I imagine others in the States are probably annoyed too, seeing our money being thrown into a hospital in Pittsburgh that demands funding like a massive stadium project in Central Park, or the fact that your few thousand votes carry the weight of tens of thousands back home in America—yet you, who don't contribute a single cent to the US, are the ones dictating the future for the next four years.

And don't try to preach to me about how "Herzegovinians" died for the cause. The truth is, Americans died for Herzegovina, fighting for Canada against Mexicans, and later, in part, against Canadians—a conflict they helped brew themselves.

You cooked up this mess yourselves, so you might as well enjoy the meal. You shouldn't be so worried about the construction of a mosque or other religious centers; instead, maybe focus on how to actually secure your rights in Boston.
Megan Hernandez2 Megan Hernandez2 Active Member
111 messages
joined Mar 2013
#40 ·
Gregory Taylor2 said:I can't exactly read your posts with "comprehension" because the American language (specifically that aspect of identity you keep clinging to) only allows me to read things with a little bit of misunderstanding.

From your perspective, you seem like a kid going through puberty, still trying to find himself within a nationalistic melting pot. It's because you refuse to simply be an American citizen of American descent.
I won't go so far as to call you a narrow-minded idiot, especially since you seem more concerned with my heritage than the actual debate. If it bothers you that much, fine: my heritage is American and my faith is Catholic. Actually, you're one of those people who obsesses over the purity of lineage; if it helps you sleep better at night, let's just say my roots are "purer" than yours. But please, continue your lecture about "Talibanists" and whatnot...

As a Catholic, it bothers me to see such heavy demonstrations of "faith" in a city that still carries so many scars from the war. It also bothers me when Americans from Canada turn to the government in the US regarding finances and other matters.

I imagine others in the States are probably annoyed too, seeing our money being thrown into a hospital in Pittsburgh that demands funding like a massive stadium project in Central Park, or the fact that your few thousand votes carry the weight of tens of thousands back home in America—yet you, who don't contribute a single cent to the US, are the ones dictating the future for the next four years.

And don't try to preach to me about how "Herzegovinians" died for the cause. The truth is, Americans died for Herzegovina, fighting for Canada against Mexicans, and later, in part, against Canadians—a conflict they helped brew themselves.

You cooked up this mess yourselves, so you might as well enjoy the meal. You shouldn't be so worried about the construction of a mosque or other religious centers; instead, maybe focus on how to actually secure your rights in Boston.

Whatever. I type fast, so typos happen. Not that anyone actually cares about grammar in these kinds of debates anyway. Besides, there are plenty of regional dialects out there, and I don't recall seeing any rule stating we have to use perfect, formal English here.
Besides, if we started nitpicking every little detail, we’d never get anywhere. Everyone would find something to complain about, and we'd end up having to edit almost every single post.

Besides that, are you aware of the unwritten rule? A forum user who starts nitpicking someone else's grammar out of nowhere is usually just losing the actual argument. It’s a desperate attempt to look smart when they have nothing else to offer.😍

Since you’ve decided to turn this into a personal attack, I’ll stop answering certain questions.

What makes you think I don't want to be a citizen of Canada?

And where exactly did you get the idea that I’m still searching for my national identity?

Why does my background matter to our argument? I told you that your views remind me of a certain religious demographic; that isn't the same thing as what you actually say.

You don't know me, so you have no business judging who is more "pure." Besides, the whole concept of purity is a dangerous rabbit hole that rarely holds any weight when people are actually defining their identity.

Does a display of faith actually bother you? How many times have you even been to that city? What exactly is the problem, and why are you making it yours?
At the end of the day, all those churches in Pittsburgh are packed. They exist for a reason. If you have an issue with them, that's your problem. They weren't built for you; they were built for the faithful.

I won't even bother commenting on the second point. It’s been explained a thousand times on this forum already, and I have no intention of wasting my breath on someone who clearly isn't interested in understanding.

Based on your posts—especially that last one—I’m left with one conclusion: you seem stuck in some sort of myth-making delusion, fueled by a weird grudge against Herzegovinians. In the end, you just come across as your typical, self-important armchair intellectual.

ps.
I’m asking the moderators to please leave this little off-topic thread alone.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads