CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Society › Psychology › Justifying one wrong with another?

Justifying one wrong with another?

Started by Dennis Bailey2 · · 👁 6 views · 37 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Dennis Bailey2Lisa Lopez6wearybear75Kevin Bailey2John Stewart11Michelle Alvarez8Kimberly Murphy84Anthony Taylor393Angela Reyes3
Kimberly Murphy84 Kimberly Murphy84 Member
28 messages
joined Dec 2003
#21 ·
This brings to mind The Punisher—that sort of individual who steps in to deliver justice when the legal system fails to act.

While let’s be honest, a vigilante is constantly breaking the law in the process, I find myself rooting for them. If those who actually deserve punishment were being held accountable by the authorities, characters like him wouldn't even exist—much less earn my support...
Michelle Alvarez8 Michelle Alvarez8 Regular
299 messages
joined Nov 2015
#22 ·
Dennis Bailey2 said:So, what? Until we achieve perfect human relations, we can just ignore everything else and do whatever the hell we want? Including poisoning our water supply with dead dogs—which, let's be honest, circles right back to how we treat one another?

Not really. Honestly, as we work on fixing those human connections, everything else starts falling into place too.

What really gets under my skin, though, is how little some people care about actual suffering. You see a story on CNN about someone being cruel to a pet, and everyone loses their minds over it—everyone’s outraged. But when thousands of civilians are dying from war, famine, or disease? It's like nobody even blinks.
Michelle Alvarez8 Michelle Alvarez8 Regular
299 messages
joined Nov 2015
#23 ·
bannned said:I mean, the USA has basically become the worst place on earth—just killing off innocent people and stealing from whoever they want.

Don't you get that you can't just post stuff like that on this forum? 😁
Anthony Taylor393 Anthony Taylor393 Member
38 messages
joined May 2016
#24 ·
Michelle Alvarez8 said:Don't you get that you can't just post stuff like that on this forum? 😁

Look, everyone knows the USA was out there killing Native Americans and keeping Black people in slavery... but the second you mention how Russians did some shady business in the Caucasus, suddenly you're labeled a CIA plant or some pro-American hack.

It's all just relativism, I guess.
wearybear75 wearybear75 Member
10 messages
joined Sep 2010
#25 ·
Kevin Bailey2 said:Man, that really gets under my skin.

I was just over on the USA Today Facebook page commenting on that article about some sociopathic girl throwing puppies into the water. Absolutely twisted.

Some guy says:
Honestly, isn't it even worse when you look at what Ivo Sanders actually did to this country?

I mean, seriously, man... where the hell did you even fall from?

So, what now? Are we really going to claim one crime justifies the next?
I don't get it.

I mean, let's be real—wasn't running a concentration camp an absolutely disgusting crime?
Yep.
And that’s exactly how we end up tolerating "lesser evils," like people dumping puppies into the river.

Man, what a mess.
The sheer stupidity of some people's arguments is actually terrifying.

Every debate has its place. That’s just how it is.

If you want to argue about Ivo Sanders or WWII, go find the right thread and post it there.
Don't just jump into threads for the sake of trolling, only to end up looking like this:
Why are you guys getting so worked up? There are plenty of things out there that are way worse than this.

Of course there are worse things out there. Honestly, I’m disgusted by both. What’s the issue? Why shouldn't I be just as revolted by one as I am by the other?

Yeah, no kidding. Every single debate just ends up being about Nazis, Communists, or whatever extremist group people want to scream about.

Michelle Alvarez8 said:I don't know why, but I totally felt that personally. 😁

For me, it isn't about trying to justify one injustice a by pointing to another—it's more about trying to shine a light on much bigger issues and systemic injustices. My goal isn't to downplay injustice a at all; I just want to get people thinking about injustice b, which is honestly way worse.

Take this latest headline—puppies being dumped in a river. It's absolutely horrific on its own, sure, but it still doesn't compare to things like waterboarding and that kind of stuff. The logic behind what you said basically boils down to: "as long as we're treating humans like garbage, we don't need to feel bad about treating animals like garbage too." Personally? I think that as a civilization, we have some serious work to do regarding how we treat one another. Everything else flows from that—it's pretty obvious once you see it, right?

And who exactly are you to decide which problem is bigger or smaller? What else are you doing by shifting focus from one issue to another if you aren't justifying it?
So, what, if there's a "bigger" problem, we just ignore the smaller ones??
Like, say a woman gets raped and goes to the police to report it. Does the police department just decide, "well, she wasn't murdered, and we have much heavier cases than hers, so we won't bother"?😕
Michelle Alvarez8 Michelle Alvarez8 Regular
299 messages
joined Nov 2015
#26 ·
wearybear75 said:Yeah, no kidding. Every single debate just ends up being about Nazis, Communists, or whatever extremist group people want to scream about.

And who exactly are you to decide which problem is bigger or smaller? What else are you doing by shifting focus from one issue to another if you aren't justifying it?
So, what, if there's a "bigger" problem, we just ignore the smaller ones??
Like, say a woman gets raped and goes to the police to report it. Does the police department just decide, "well, she wasn't murdered, and we have much heavier cases than hers, so we won't bother"?😕

Come on, don't be ridiculous, please. 🤦

Just for kicks, I’ll actually answer your questions—even though I told myself I’d just ignore trolls like this. So, here we go:

a) I'm a human being. And as one, I'm perfectly capable of recognizing that murdering a person is a much greater evil than killing an animal. If that's not clicking for you, maybe look up the definition of Homo sapiens.
b) What do I mean by "shifting focus"? Well, I'm shifting the focus. Simple as that.
c) Honestly, I have no idea what kind of logic you're using here, but you're totally missing the point.
Michelle Alvarez8 Michelle Alvarez8 Regular
299 messages
joined Nov 2015
#27 ·
Anthony Taylor393 said:Look, everyone knows the USA was out there killing Native Americans and keeping Black people in slavery... but the second you mention how Russians did some shady business in the Caucasus, suddenly you're labeled a CIA plant or some pro-American hack.

It's all just relativism, I guess.

It’s a bit of relativism, sure. But from what I can tell—and this is just my take—people seem to swallow Russian screw-ups much easier simply because the Russians never pretended to be the world's moral compass. Americans, on the other hand? They've been at it since day one. They're constantly preaching democracy, human rights, and freedom—then they go and violate them everywhere they go. Honestly, the people I know find that hypocrisy so frustrating. Still, we're smart enough not to blame every single American for their government's foreign policy, right?

banned said:Ugh, I've been through that whole ordeal already. I wrote something in a place where I definitely shouldn't have—way more detailed than this—and I even had certain "organizations" reach out to me because of it.

So, it's not great for you either, since now you're linked to me. 😉

And hey, it won't exactly make your life easier on the forum if they link you to me, either! 😁
wearybear75 wearybear75 Member
10 messages
joined Sep 2010
#28 ·
Seriously, give me a break. Don't be ridiculous.

Look, I'm actually responding to you—even though I told myself I’d just ignore trolls like this. So, here we go:

a) I'm a human being. And because of that, I can clearly see that murdering a person is a much bigger deal than killing an animal. If that doesn't click for you, maybe go grab a dictionary and look up the definition of Homo sapiens.
b) What am I doing by "distracting from the issue"? Exactly what it sounds like—I'm distracting from it.
c) Honestly, I have no idea what kind of twisted logic led you to that conclusion, but you are completely off base. You missed the point entirely.

Oh, so *I'm* the funny one? Please. 🙄
So what, since a dog isn't Homo sapiens, we're just supposed to kill them without feeling any guilt because we aren't taking out a Homo sapiens?
And here I was thinking that murdering a Homo sapiens was actually treated differently under the law than just killing a few dogs 🤦.
Alright, Michelle Alvarez8, thanks for the distraction. Maybe now the actual authorities will finally step up and start handing out real sentences for murdering a Homo sapiens.🙄
Angela Reyes3 Angela Reyes3 Newcomer
5 messages
joined Sep 2010
#29 ·
I’ll be honest, I can't stand injustice—not when it's directed at me, and certainly not when it's happening to someone else. But if I’m the one who messed up? Well, the idea of trying to justify my own mistakes by pointing out how someone else got away with something even worse never even crosses my mind. Take a ban, for instance. No matter how you spin it, or how "unfair" it feels that you were the one caught while the guy speeding way past you wasn't, you still broke the rules and you have to face the consequences. You can't just start comparing yourself to everyone else to dodge accountability. Sure, there are countless crimes out there where people evade justice because they simply weren't caught or managed to slip through the cracks, but what does that mean? Does it give us all a green light to just dive headfirst into a life of crime?

Then there's the other thing... It’s always possible for things to be worse. No matter how bad any illness gets, there’s always something more severe out there, right? And just because someone else has it harder doesn't mean my own struggles aren't significant. Does someone else's hardship somehow strip me of my right to suffer through my own health issues? I mean, really, think about it.
The same logic applies to everything else—jobs, salaries, cars, houses, clothes, you name it. It doesn't matter. It is ALWAYS possible for things to be worse. Acknowledging that doesn't diminish my own struggles at all. In fact, if I follow that line of thinking and look toward those who are doing better off than I am... then my own situation starts looking even more dire!

And thirdly, just because a situation could be more dire or a crime could be more heinous, it doesn't negate the existence of the current wrongdoing, nor does it mean there shouldn't be accountability for it. That recent news story about the girl and the dogs really shook me to my core; I truly couldn't wrap my head around how a single child could harbor such malice and subject innocent little puppies to that kind of suffering. Yes, I feel just as much heartbreak for every innocent creature that is beaten, killed, or abused, and I won't try to compare those tragedies or deny them, but that doesn't change the fact that what that little girl did was absolutely brutal.

It honestly feels like such a logical fallacy to constantly go searching for a greater injustice; it's probably the easiest thing in the world to do. At that point, it isn't even about the old cliché of the grass being greener on the other side—it's more like claiming the neighbor's grass is even more dead than mine just to make my yard look better.

I'm really trying my best to view most problems and situations as individual experiences rather than constantly measuring them against what others are going through, because if you start down that path, there is simply no end to it...
Michelle Alvarez8 Michelle Alvarez8 Regular
299 messages
joined Nov 2015
#30 ·
wearybear75 said:
Seriously, give me a break. Don't be ridiculous.

Look, I'm actually responding to you—even though I told myself I’d just ignore trolls like this. So, here we go:

a) I'm a human being. And because of that, I can clearly see that murdering a person is a much bigger deal than killing an animal. If that doesn't click for you, maybe go grab a dictionary and look up the definition of Homo sapiens.
b) What am I doing by "distracting from the issue"? Exactly what it sounds like—I'm distracting from it.
c) Honestly, I have no idea what kind of twisted logic led you to that conclusion, but you are completely off base. You missed the point entirely.

Oh, so *I'm* the funny one? Please. 🙄
So what, since a dog isn't Homo sapiens, we're just supposed to kill them without feeling any guilt because we aren't taking out a Homo sapiens?
And here I was thinking that murdering a Homo sapiens was actually treated differently under the law than just killing a few dogs 🤦.
Alright, Michelle Alvarez8, thanks for the distraction. Maybe now the actual authorities will finally step up and start handing out real sentences for murdering a Homo sapiens.🙄

I’m not sure if you’re actually funny, but your attempts to convince me that I said things I never even mentioned? Definitely hilarious. It’s just like how you can’t seem to grasp my point—even though I explained my logic pretty clearly and simply.

Look, I get that you don't like my way of thinking, but—seriously—there's really no need to roll your eyes or try to twist my words into something they aren't.
wearybear75 wearybear75 Member
10 messages
joined Sep 2010
#31 ·
Oh, come on, what am I even implying?
You're getting seriously paranoid now.
Dennis Bailey2 Dennis Bailey2 Active MemberOP
76 messages
joined Oct 2013
#32 ·
Angela Reyes3 said:I’ll be honest, I can't stand injustice—not when it's directed at me, and certainly not when it's happening to someone else. But if I’m the one who messed up? Well, the idea of trying to justify my own mistakes by pointing out how someone else got away with something even worse never even crosses my mind. Take a ban, for instance. No matter how you spin it, or how "unfair" it feels that you were the one caught while the guy speeding way past you wasn't, you still broke the rules and you have to face the consequences. You can't just start comparing yourself to everyone else to dodge accountability. Sure, there are countless crimes out there where people evade justice because they simply weren't caught or managed to slip through the cracks, but what does that mean? Does it give us all a green light to just dive headfirst into a life of crime?

Then there's the other thing... It’s always possible for things to be worse. No matter how bad any illness gets, there’s always something more severe out there, right? And just because someone else has it harder doesn't mean my own struggles aren't significant. Does someone else's hardship somehow strip me of my right to suffer through my own health issues? I mean, really, think about it.
The same logic applies to everything else—jobs, salaries, cars, houses, clothes, you name it. It doesn't matter. It is ALWAYS possible for things to be worse. Acknowledging that doesn't diminish my own struggles at all. In fact, if I follow that line of thinking and look toward those who are doing better off than I am... then my own situation starts looking even more dire!

And thirdly, just because a situation could be more dire or a crime could be more heinous, it doesn't negate the existence of the current wrongdoing, nor does it mean there shouldn't be accountability for it. That recent news story about the girl and the dogs really shook me to my core; I truly couldn't wrap my head around how a single child could harbor such malice and subject innocent little puppies to that kind of suffering. Yes, I feel just as much heartbreak for every innocent creature that is beaten, killed, or abused, and I won't try to compare those tragedies or deny them, but that doesn't change the fact that what that little girl did was absolutely brutal.

It honestly feels like such a logical fallacy to constantly go searching for a greater injustice; it's probably the easiest thing in the world to do. At that point, it isn't even about the old cliché of the grass being greener on the other side—it's more like claiming the neighbor's grass is even more dead than mine just to make my yard look better.

I'm really trying my best to view most problems and situations as individual experiences rather than constantly measuring them against what others are going through, because if you start down that path, there is simply no end to it...

I completely agree; that's exactly how I see it.

Michelle Alvarez8, your method of "ranking the scale of injustice" is a bit shaky. We can easily agree that killing a person is worse than killing an animal, sure. But is executing a serial killer after they've been sentenced to death a greater sin than torturing and starving an innocent, loyal dog? 🤷

Furthermore, this tactic of "distracting with a larger injustice" can spiral out of control. For instance, if I were to wipe out your entire family, I could try to "shift the focus" to what the Russians did in the Caucasus or what Americans did in Vietnam. 🤷 I think we can both agree that murdering ten Homo sapiens is a smaller crime than murdering tens of thousands. Does that mean it’s perfectly fine for a killer of ten to go unpunished just because the guy who killed 10,000 actually faced justice?

That kind of logic just doesn't sit right with me.
Dennis Bailey2 Dennis Bailey2 Active MemberOP
76 messages
joined Oct 2013
#33 ·
bannned said:Of course not.

Let’s look at a hypothetical. You and your sister go out. You both mess up. You get home, and your mom punishes you, but she gives her a pass.

Are you just going to take that lying down? Does it not bother you that she isn't being held accountable? You messed up too, so you take your punishment... and you aren't even going to complain that she got off easy? You won't even bring it up, let alone act on it?

No, I’m going to lose my mind and demand she gets punished too. If I let my emotions take over and start acting like some vigilante, I might even end up slapping her myself. 🤷

What you all are suggesting is that neither of us should face any consequences just because some other kids out there committed even bigger screw-ups. 🤷
Dennis Bailey2 Dennis Bailey2 Active MemberOP
76 messages
joined Oct 2013
#34 ·
Banned. The user said:Now you're just contradicting yourself. Based on everything you've said up until this point, you don't have any right to throw a tantrum. You should be bowing your head and taking your punishment like a professional. But since that isn't happening? Well, that’s just life.

No, I didn't. Go back and read my posts again—I never said that. I told you plainly that you should have done two things: pay the fine and sue the boss for nepotism. The fact that you ran the second things got heated instead of appealing to a higher authority, taking it to a civil rights court, or even bringing it up in Strasbourg... well, that's on you. 🤷

Banned. The user said:I’m suggesting exactly what you would do. It comes down to this: why should you face consequences while she walks away scot-free for doing the exact same thing? Or even if it isn't identical, the principle remains. Either both parties are held accountable, or neither is. Anything else just creates an excuse for bias and unnecessary finger-pointing.

It’s the same story with me and the police. Why should I be the one footing the bill while he walks away scot-free? Why on earth would I just take that lying down? Of course I fought back. I’d do it again in a heartbeat. I have every right to stand my ground—especially since I’m acknowledging my own mistake and I'm fully prepared to pay my part of the fine. It's about fairness.

So, you're implying my grievance is rooted in self-interest—that I’m only making noise because I got hit with a penalty while she walked away clean. You're suggesting my issue isn't with the lack of consistency in the rules, but rather that I'm just bitter about being the one held accountable.

Are you seriously unable to see the distinction?
Lisa Lopez6 Lisa Lopez6 Member
37 messages
joined Mar 2011
#35 ·
So, I just joined this Facebook group to help call out that idiot who was throwing dogs into the water.🙂
Michelle Alvarez8 Michelle Alvarez8 Regular
299 messages
joined Nov 2015
#36 ·
Way to go. I’m sure your little "like" is totally going to change the world—really! 👍
Dennis Bailey2 Dennis Bailey2 Active MemberOP
76 messages
joined Oct 2013
#37 ·
bannned said:This is just pointless. I assume you’ve heard the saying... one drop at a time.

One person isn't going to move the needle, sure. But that single drop is still part of the ocean. If everyone shared your mindset, there wouldn't even be an ocean to begin with.😉

Anyway, if I ever decide to start a revolution, don't expect me to call you. 😉

👍
Michelle Alvarez8 Michelle Alvarez8 Regular
299 messages
joined Nov 2015
#38 ·
Revolution:

[IMAGE DELETED]

Pure sheep mentality:

image

☕

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads