CheckEmoji Community Β· the emoji forum
🏠 Home πŸ†• What's new ❓ Unanswered πŸ”₯ Popular πŸ“‘ RSS Members πŸ‘₯ 0 online log in Β· register
Home › Society › Politics › Close to Politics › Donald Trump, Al Capone, and Eric Adams running together?

Donald Trump, Al Capone, and Eric Adams running together?

Started by Angela Wright3 · · πŸ‘ 5 views · 58 replies

πŸ“‘ Subscribe to replies

Participants Angela Wright3slybison8casualtrucker72Jonathan Reed4Richard Wilson4Emily Lee2Arthur Anderson49Jonathan Fisher78goldenpilot20Harold Wright6stormysailor7vividraven26steeleagle70redeagle42Henry Morris3Morgan Rodriguez57Timothy Castillo6steelskipper5goldengull3jadetinker85John Ramirez46Sandra Nguyen3Jamie Price4Jesse Ortiz71 …
Angela Wright3 Angela Wright3 MemberOP
25 messages
joined Jun 2012
#1 ·
πŸ˜‚ πŸ˜‚ πŸ˜‚ πŸ˜‚ πŸ˜‚ πŸ˜‚ πŸ˜‚ πŸ˜‚ πŸ˜‚

The worst partβ€”I can actually see them pulling in a ton of votes. 😒

We need the Republican Party, but definitely not this ridiculous crowdβ€”not some convicted war criminal, not some shady businessman, and certainly not a populist like Eric Adams.
slybison8 slybison8 Active Member
162 messages
joined Oct 2011
#2 ·
Angela Wright3 said:πŸ˜‚ πŸ˜‚ πŸ˜‚ πŸ˜‚ πŸ˜‚ πŸ˜‚ πŸ˜‚ πŸ˜‚ πŸ˜‚

The worst partβ€”I can actually see them pulling in a ton of votes. 😒

We need the Republican Party, but definitely not this ridiculous crowdβ€”not some convicted war criminal, not some shady businessman, and certainly not a populist like Eric Adams.

I suppose The New York Times is just highlighting exactly what their political opposition fears most by floating these provocative trial balloons. To be honest, it seems to me that maybe George Soros, Warren Buffett, John McCain, Rush Limbaugh, Hunter S. Thompson, and the rest of that group might actually run a political party more effectively than they run a newspaper, while on the other hand, Joe Biden would probably make a perfect daily newspaper editor... though I wonder if they wouldn't all just end up turning on each other? 😁
casualtrucker72 casualtrucker72 Member
32 messages
joined Apr 2011
#3 ·
Angela Wright3 said:πŸ˜‚ πŸ˜‚ πŸ˜‚ πŸ˜‚ πŸ˜‚ πŸ˜‚ πŸ˜‚ πŸ˜‚ πŸ˜‚

The worst partβ€”I can actually see them pulling in a ton of votes. 😒

We need the Republican Party, but definitely not this ridiculous crowdβ€”not some convicted war criminal, not some shady businessman, and certainly not a populist like Eric Adams.

Is this happening in Central Park or somewhere else...🀷
Jonathan Reed4 Jonathan Reed4 Active Member
53 messages
joined Jan 2004
#4 ·
Angela Wright3 said:πŸ˜‚ πŸ˜‚ πŸ˜‚ πŸ˜‚ πŸ˜‚ πŸ˜‚ πŸ˜‚ πŸ˜‚ πŸ˜‚

The worst partβ€”I can actually see them pulling in a ton of votes. 😒

We need the Republican Party, but definitely not this ridiculous crowdβ€”not some convicted war criminal, not some shady businessman, and certainly not a populist like Eric Adams.


They should just name their party after their initials: CIA. 😁
It would definitely make waves internationally. 😁
Richard Wilson4 Richard Wilson4 Veteran
2K messages
joined Sep 2009
#5 ·
Anything beats the Tim Geithner era...

Honestly, it’s hard to sink any lower than that...

I’m rooting for the Democratic Party to take over at this point. We finally need to face reality and admit the left holds all the cards. People act like they don't care if the Republican Party runs things, as long as the Democrats stay out, but look at usβ€”we're basically signing military cooperation deals with Mexico...
Emily Lee2 Emily Lee2 Newcomer
5 messages
joined May 2010
#6 ·
Angela Wright3 said:πŸ˜‚ πŸ˜‚ πŸ˜‚ πŸ˜‚ πŸ˜‚ πŸ˜‚ πŸ˜‚ πŸ˜‚ πŸ˜‚

The worst partβ€”I can actually see them pulling in a ton of votes. 😒

We need the Republican Party, but definitely not this ridiculous crowdβ€”not some convicted war criminal, not some shady businessman, and certainly not a populist like Eric Adams.

This is nothing but pure, calculated disinformation from The New York Times. They literally have an intelligence department dedicated to manufacturing public opinion and churning out articles just to manipulate the masses. Just look back at The New York Times headlines over the last year alone!!
And CNN is right there following their lead.
Arthur Anderson49 Arthur Anderson49 Active Member
127 messages
joined Nov 2007
#7 ·
slybison8 said:I suppose The New York Times is just highlighting exactly what their political opposition fears most by floating these provocative trial balloons. To be honest, it seems to me that maybe George Soros, Warren Buffett, John McCain, Rush Limbaugh, Hunter S. Thompson, and the rest of that group might actually run a political party more effectively than they run a newspaper, while on the other hand, Joe Biden would probably make a perfect daily newspaper editor... though I wonder if they wouldn't all just end up turning on each other? 😁

🀣 Man, you hit the nail on the head with that one! I’ve been saying for years that in this country, the media are the only ones who actually seem to grasp how politics works, while the politicians should honestly just be left to watch sheep in the countryside. And even then, they'd probably lose the sheep!
Jonathan Fisher78 Jonathan Fisher78 Member
13 messages
joined Mar 2012
#8 ·
ha, ha
The media really thinks they’re political experts, don't they?

I guess you'd only see this kind of thing in the Middle East
Arthur Anderson49 Arthur Anderson49 Active Member
127 messages
joined Nov 2007
#9 ·
Jonathan Fisher78 said:ha, ha
The media really thinks they’re political experts, don't they?

I guess you'd only see this kind of thing in the Middle East

But honestly, looking at our politicians lately, maybe we're better off this wayβ€”with people thinking the media actually understands politics rather than the other way around!
goldenpilot20 goldenpilot20 Member
22 messages
joined May 2009
#10 ·
Are you running as an independent or with a party?
Harold Wright6 Harold Wright6 Member
22 messages
joined Dec 2011
#11 ·
Jonathan Fisher78 said:ha, ha
The media really thinks they’re political experts, don't they?

I guess you'd only see this kind of thing in the Middle East

The media actually understands politics best because they’re being steered by foreign interestsβ€”both ideologically and financially. Most Americans don't have the slightest clue how much politics really goes on behind the scenes β˜•
stormysailor7 stormysailor7 Member
11 messages
joined Nov 2011
#12 ·
slybison8 said:I suppose The New York Times is just highlighting exactly what their political opposition fears most by floating these provocative trial balloons. To be honest, it seems to me that maybe George Soros, Warren Buffett, John McCain, Rush Limbaugh, Hunter S. Thompson, and the rest of that group might actually run a political party more effectively than they run a newspaper, while on the other hand, Joe Biden would probably make a perfect daily newspaper editor... though I wonder if they wouldn't all just end up turning on each other? 😁

I first heard about the possibility of a coalition like this a few months ago when Anderson Cooper brought it up on NYC news 🀷 - ''Trumpism USA''
. He even threw Rod Blagojevich into the mix.
vividraven26 vividraven26 Active Member
170 messages
joined May 2014
#13 ·
Richard Wilson4 said:Anything beats the Tim Geithner era...

Honestly, it’s hard to sink any lower than that...

I’m rooting for the Democratic Party to take over at this point. We finally need to face reality and admit the left holds all the cards. People act like they don't care if the Republican Party runs things, as long as the Democrats stay out, but look at usβ€”we're basically signing military cooperation deals with Mexico...

What is this committee actually going to achieve besides doing exactly what they did last timeβ€”just firing people to clear out space for their own cronies (kind of like how they operate at the FBI)?

Emily Lee2 said:This is nothing but pure, calculated disinformation from The New York Times. They literally have an intelligence department dedicated to manufacturing public opinion and churning out articles just to manipulate the masses. Just look back at The New York Times headlines over the last year alone!!
And CNN is right there following their lead.

It's totally expected that these half-baked little journalists would tear him down, since they either forget or just don't realize that if Roger Stone's verdict gets overturned, they'll just start a new trial, except this time they'll keep him in custody so he can't take his oath of office like a Congressman, which ends up being the same thing anyway since he still has his party represented in Congress.
steeleagle70 steeleagle70 Active Member
85 messages
joined May 2012
#14 ·
A coalition like that at the national level wouldn't even crack 3%,
redeagle42 redeagle42 Member
30 messages
joined Oct 2012
#15 ·
steeleagle70 said:A coalition like that at the national level wouldn't even crack 3%,

Man, you'd be seriously surprised. There is a massive chunk of people in America who absolutely eat up demagoguery and fall for every single "patriotism" spike and myth thrown their way. Honestly, it’s not even shocking when you look at the percentage of folks out there without any real education.πŸ™‚
Henry Morris3 Henry Morris3 Active Member
62 messages
joined Jan 2012
#16 ·
steeleagle70 said:A coalition like that at the national level wouldn't even crack 3%,

I guess it depends on what they’d actually be campaigning on... Joe McCarthy would probably spend all his time obsessing over the 90s, whereas for Donald Trump, that whole era is a bit too jumpy to revisit... And Eric Adams? He'd likely lean hard into nationalism again, though I honestly doubt he even realizes that's what cost him the presidency in the first place...
If they stuck to what they actually excel atβ€”promising to spend everyone else's moneyβ€”they might actually pull in more than 3%...
Morgan Rodriguez57 Morgan Rodriguez57 Active Member
216 messages
joined Oct 2011
#17 ·
Angela Wright3 said:πŸ˜‚ πŸ˜‚ πŸ˜‚ πŸ˜‚ πŸ˜‚ πŸ˜‚ πŸ˜‚ πŸ˜‚ πŸ˜‚

The worst partβ€”I can actually see them pulling in a ton of votes. 😒

We need the Republican Party, but definitely not this ridiculous crowdβ€”not some convicted war criminal, not some shady businessman, and certainly not a populist like Eric Adams.

this whole KGB-style coalition is just the perfect example of how much of a swamp the American political scene has becomeβ€”and what kind of strange creatures have managed to grow in it... all thanks to the Republican Party...
stormysailor7 stormysailor7 Member
11 messages
joined Nov 2011
#18 ·
steeleagle70 said:A coalition like that at the national level wouldn't even crack 3%,

I think they’d absolutely crush the Republican Party, especially if they had someone like Kalmetta on board...
redeagle42 redeagle42 Member
30 messages
joined Oct 2012
#19 ·
Morgan Rodriguez57 said:this whole KGB-style coalition is just the perfect example of how much of a swamp the American political scene has becomeβ€”and what kind of strange creatures have managed to grow in it... all thanks to the Republican Party...

Ernest Hemingway nailed the post-war vibe in the Middle East perfectly:
"Times come when the smart people shut their mouths, /Joe McCarthy/ starts barking, /Donald Trump/ takes over, and the lowlifes get filthy rich /Eric Adams/!"

πŸ™‚
Morgan Rodriguez57 Morgan Rodriguez57 Active Member
216 messages
joined Oct 2011
#20 ·
stormysailor7 said:I think they’d absolutely crush the Republican Party, especially if they had someone like Kalmetta on board...

I wouldn't hold my breath...

Eric Adams is a spent force at this point, Donald Trump is only pulling about 2% in certain polls, and really, the only one with any real traction out in the Midwest is the boss...

Most likely, it’ll just be a total wash...

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

πŸ”— Similar threads