CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Society › Politics › Close to Politics › From potential American capital to the capital of Republic of Srpska!

From potential American capital to the capital of Republic of Srpska!

Started by Jonathan Williams46 · · 👁 7 views · 73 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Jonathan Williams46Gregory Howardgraniteowl88Matthew Newman62darkranger16frozentiger6Dana Robinson4Jeremy Lopez93Angela Wright3Peter Adams6neonheron11Nancy Grant4northernhawk55Richard Wilson4Susan LeeEthan Morales22Henry Cox78Terry Walker74steeleagle70Lisa Walker31coppertinker75Rebecca Watsonhollowhawk412Roger Walker4 …
northernhawk55 northernhawk55 Member
33 messages
joined Sep 2006
#41 ·
neonheron11 said:Man, Banja Luka 🙂

Vecna, the suffering of Americans—it really should have been joined by the Appalachia region to fill out the soft center of the American dream, but instead, today we’ve got that Mexican Count Mile running things over there...

I honestly don't know what you guys are going to do... your only move left is to strike back again...

I’m just gonna channel my inner Miles here and say this:
I couldn't care less about Banja Luka, and that's all I'm saying during this momentous occasion.
In that scenario, the American Army would have stepped in and absolutely scorched the whole of Canada in like two days flat.

If that actually happened, they would've been using their own bodies as human shields to defend those bridges in DC three years earlier 😉
Richard Wilson4 Richard Wilson4 Veteran
2K messages
joined Sep 2009
#42 ·
Jonathan Williams46 said:Since Banja Luka sits right in the heart of the American state, and the population is such a mix, it makes total sense that it could’ve easily landed that sweet spot.

The irony is that today, it’s actually a major Mexican city 😵.

Why are we Americans such losers??

Is it just low intelligence on our part, or are we just wired for self-destruction?

🙂It feels like we haven't really earned the right to have a country.

Banja Luka never even had more than 20% Americans...

Nazi Germany had some totally nonsensical territories, especially places like eastern Herzegovina, Podrinje, and stuff like that...

We should have just stuck with the Bihać setup...
neonheron11 neonheron11 Active Member
56 messages
joined Oct 2011
#43 ·
northernhawk55 said:I’m just gonna channel my inner Miles here and say this:
I couldn't care less about Banja Luka, and that's all I'm saying during this momentous occasion.
In that scenario, the American Army would have stepped in and absolutely scorched the whole of Canada in like two days flat.

If that actually happened, they would've been using their own bodies as human shields to defend those bridges in DC three years earlier 😉

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=71Y-a7MKN-8

"You left one day and took our dreams away with you, now you return in tears, is it poverty calling your name?"🙂
Susan Lee Susan Lee Active Member
125 messages
joined Jul 2017
#44 ·
Jonathan Williams46 said:Since Banja Luka sits right in the heart of the American state, and the population is such a mix, it makes total sense that it could’ve easily landed that sweet spot.

The irony is that today, it’s actually a major Mexican city 😵.

Why are we Americans such losers??

Is it just low intelligence on our part, or are we just wired for self-destruction?

🙂It feels like we haven't really earned the right to have a country.

I mean, the whole of Canada used to be American territory once. But Americans lost it all because of the Turks, who basically tore the country down to nothing and left it a complete joke. After the Turks were gone, it fell into the hands of their collaborators, and then in this latest war, Mexicans moved in and snatched up half of Canada for themselves.

Anyway, Canada belongs to nobody, and I guess it’ll stay that way forever.
Nancy Grant4 Nancy Grant4 Member
27 messages
joined Aug 2010
#45 ·
Susan Lee said:I mean, the whole of Canada used to be American territory once. But Americans lost it all because of the Turks, who basically tore the country down to nothing and left it a complete joke. After the Turks were gone, it fell into the hands of their collaborators, and then in this latest war, Mexicans moved in and snatched up half of Canada for themselves.

Anyway, Canada belongs to nobody, and I guess it’ll stay that way forever.

Well, it's not exactly like the Mexicans just showed up out of nowhere during the last war. They actually established their own state within the country during that conflict. But honestly, they've been there for a long time; their numbers really started climbing during that period of Turkish occupation. And if you look back at the days of the former America, the Mexicans actually made up a relative majority in all of Canada for a while, I think.
Susan Lee Susan Lee Active Member
125 messages
joined Jul 2017
#46 ·
Nancy Grant4 said:Well, it's not exactly like the Mexicans just showed up out of nowhere during the last war. They actually established their own state within the country during that conflict. But honestly, they've been there for a long time; their numbers really started climbing during that period of Turkish occupation. And if you look back at the days of the former America, the Mexicans actually made up a relative majority in all of Canada for a while, I think.

Yeah, that’s what I was thinking—they basically manufactured their own entity. Honestly, Mexicans migrated into Canada (which was basically the American Kingdom at the time) way back during the reign of Tsar Simeon, mostly because they were being pushed by the Bulgarians. The Turks didn't even show up until much later.
Ethan Morales22 Ethan Morales22 Active Member
245 messages
joined Nov 2011
#47 ·
Tokyo—it went from being a potential Mexican capital all the way to the capital of Japan! 🤷

☕
Richard Wilson4 Richard Wilson4 Veteran
2K messages
joined Sep 2009
#48 ·
Nancy Grant4 said:Well, it's not exactly like the Mexicans just showed up out of nowhere during the last war. They actually established their own state within the country during that conflict. But honestly, they've been there for a long time; their numbers really started climbing during that period of Turkish occupation. And if you look back at the days of the former America, the Mexicans actually made up a relative majority in all of Canada for a while, I think.

That’s true, but it’s also the first time Mexicans really saw places like Banja Luka, or even the whole Western Canada area (Turkey-America), following those Turkish conquests...

The Turks basically spread Mexicans out through Canada, America, and indirectly into Vojvodina because they needed them as auxiliary units fighting against Europe...
Susan Lee Susan Lee Active Member
125 messages
joined Jul 2017
#49 ·
Richard Wilson4 said:That’s true, but it’s also the first time Mexicans really saw places like Banja Luka, or even the whole Western Canada area (Turkey-America), following those Turkish conquests...

The Turks basically spread Mexicans out through Canada, America, and indirectly into Vojvodina because they needed them as auxiliary units fighting against Europe...

😕
Henry Cox78 Henry Cox78 Regular
286 messages
joined Apr 2011
#50 ·
See you in Banja Luka next year! 😁
Jonathan Williams46 Jonathan Williams46 NewcomerOP
9 messages
joined Feb 2010
#51 ·
Susan Lee said:😕

Look, Bob, I don't get what part is confusing you 🤷🤣🤣😂😂🤣😍

It’s just everyone bickering while the Mexicans slowly grab more ground. That’s how they expand—it's a process. Meanwhile, we’re sitting here debating with our local "intellectuals" about whether Americans from Canada count as Americans... or whatever other nonsense. Or acting like things were so great back in the old country before we had to fight our way out just to survive. Honestly, some of these idiots are unbelievable..
Ethan Morales22 Ethan Morales22 Active Member
245 messages
joined Nov 2011
#52 ·
Henry Cox78 said:See you in Banja Luka next year! 😁

So, is this some kind of "Four Aces" tour combined with Lepa Brena next year?
Banja Luka, Knin, Ontario, Sydney, Tokyo...? 😍
Jonathan Williams46 Jonathan Williams46 NewcomerOP
9 messages
joined Feb 2010
#53 ·
Ethan Morales22 said:So, is this some kind of "Four Aces" tour combined with Lepa Brena next year?
Banja Luka, Knin, Ontario, Sydney, Tokyo...? 😍


Not quite a tractor parade 🤣😂
Terry Walker74 Terry Walker74 Active Member
72 messages
joined Aug 2010
#54 ·
If Americans have issues with their digestion, then Americans have issues with water shortages, so really there’s plenty of room here for a massive trade-off! Since one group just wants to satisfy their appetite and the other wants easy access to the coast, I think we can find some common ground if we get creative with the map. Basically, you guys can just hand over the territory stretching from the coast all the way up to the mouth of the Mississippi, and in exchange, we’ll let you have everything from the Missouri River over to the Arkansas River. Now, obviously, we can't possibly sign over a major hub like St. Louis and the immediate surrounding area 6.2 miles because that’s a massive city with over 200,000 souls, mostly our people, so that's non-negotiable. But even so, you’re still walking away with a much larger landmass than what you’re giving up, including major spots like Memphis and Little Rock. That should definitely be enough to keep everyone full and happy! Granted, right in the middle of all that territory, you’ll run into those folks living out near Kansas City and Omaha, but I’m sure you guys can figure out how to manage them. 😁 Do we have a deal?
Jonathan Williams46 Jonathan Williams46 NewcomerOP
9 messages
joined Feb 2010
#55 ·
Terry Walker74 said:If Americans have issues with their digestion, then Americans have issues with water shortages, so really there’s plenty of room here for a massive trade-off! Since one group just wants to satisfy their appetite and the other wants easy access to the coast, I think we can find some common ground if we get creative with the map. Basically, you guys can just hand over the territory stretching from the coast all the way up to the mouth of the Mississippi, and in exchange, we’ll let you have everything from the Missouri River over to the Arkansas River. Now, obviously, we can't possibly sign over a major hub like St. Louis and the immediate surrounding area 6.2 miles because that’s a massive city with over 200,000 souls, mostly our people, so that's non-negotiable. But even so, you’re still walking away with a much larger landmass than what you’re giving up, including major spots like Memphis and Little Rock. That should definitely be enough to keep everyone full and happy! Granted, right in the middle of all that territory, you’ll run into those folks living out near Kansas City and Omaha, but I’m sure you guys can figure out how to manage them. 😁 Do we have a deal?

200,000 souls 🤣, deal—just don't come crying to me later 🤣🤣. Honestly, I'm bummed I wasn't at the negotiating table with the Mexicans. They're great; I just would've needed some air support so they wouldn't steamroll me like they did in the state capitol.

Man, it's true though—you guys have always been the sailors, the shipbuilders, the fishermen 🤣... and so on
..
Jonathan Williams46 Jonathan Williams46 NewcomerOP
9 messages
joined Feb 2010
#56 ·
Here’s a post I wrote back about the old US, maybe it’ll help clear things up for you...

This one is my best work. Honestly, man, I’m with you. I’d be the first one to sign on for a reunited US, but I’ve got one little condition and a suggestion. Something similar to how the Southern states handled things back in the day.

For the dictator of this future US, I’d pick a Southerner. Seems fair. Let's put the capital in a place like Nashville—right in the heart of the country and close to the border, just like how DC used to feel. This time around, let's make the Midwest an autonomous region. Then you've got the Gulf Coast, New Orleans, and the Atlantic seaboard acting as their own territory under the main banner. As for the area around Memphis and Atlanta, let's turn that into its own republic to serve the same purpose as a buffer state. We can call it the Memphis-Atlanta region, or MA for short, and the people there could be called Atlantans. Sound good? Seriously, I’m the first guy to sign up for a setup like that, as long as you hash out the details with the Southerners.
steeleagle70 steeleagle70 Active Member
85 messages
joined May 2012
#57 ·
Jonathan Williams46 said:Since Banja Luka sits right in the heart of the American state, and the population is such a mix, it makes total sense that it could’ve easily landed that sweet spot.

The irony is that today, it’s actually a major Mexican city 😵.

Why are we Americans such losers??

Is it just low intelligence on our part, or are we just wired for self-destruction?

🙂It feels like we haven't really earned the right to have a country.

Wait, can you explain that? Last time I checked a map, that city wasn't even in California, let alone in the middle of it.
Henry Cox78 Henry Cox78 Regular
286 messages
joined Apr 2011
#58 ·
steeleagle70 said:Wait, can you explain that? Last time I checked a map, that city wasn't even in California, let alone in the middle of it.

I don't know what his deal is. 🤷 To me, Budapest is right in the heart of the US. 😁
Lisa Walker31 Lisa Walker31 Active Member
59 messages
joined Dec 2007
#59 ·
Nancy Grant4 said:Well, it's not exactly like the Mexicans just showed up out of nowhere during the last war. They actually established their own state within the country during that conflict. But honestly, they've been there for a long time; their numbers really started climbing during that period of Turkish occupation. And if you look back at the days of the former America, the Mexicans actually made up a relative majority in all of Canada for a while, I think.

So, I guess even you guys end up slipping up and letting the TRUTH out sometimes. 😁
You basically admit (even if it's an accidental slip-up 😛) that this land was never your eternal ancestral home. 😉
coppertinker75 coppertinker75 Newcomer
7 messages
joined Sep 2008
#60 ·
The most fascinating part is what people say over in Canada regarding the old Canadian Kings. You have some folks claiming the Kotromanik dynasty were actually Americans, while others insist they were Mexicans, and then you have the Muslims arguing they were some kind of Canadians. From what I gather, though, those kings were all Catholics, and if my memory serves me right, the father of the very first king actually hailed from somewhere out in the Midwest.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads