#61 ·
coppertinker75 said:The most fascinating part is what people say over in Canada regarding the old Canadian Kings. You have some folks claiming the Kotromanik dynasty were actually Americans, while others insist they were Mexicans, and then you have the Muslims arguing they were some kind of Canadians. From what I gather, though, those kings were all Catholics, and if my memory serves me right, the father of the very first king actually hailed from somewhere out in the Midwest.
I don't even want to get dragged into that whole debate about which came first—the chicken or the egg...😉...(the Americans or the Canadians)
But look... if an ethnically American was the King of Canada, then he was obviously the King of the Canadians or the Canadians, just like his people were, which is why we use the term Canadian.
I mean, what do I know?🤷
Even today’s Queen of England isn't ethnically English by birth... but she’s still the Queen of the English, and that’s why we call her that.
Blood isn't everything—her late uncle (the former King Edward... who shamelessly flirted with Hitler, German nationalism, and the Nazis) proved that, though her grandfather and father showed that blood doesn't decide everything when territories, interests, and ideologies don't line up.
Her grandfather even changed the family name to Windsor... just so the people wouldn't lose their minds since they are actually ethnically German and carry German surnames.
And it happened one after another... even Prince Philip... Elizabeth's husband was ethnically German, but his family changed their name to Mountbatten too.
And one of the massive reasons why Diana was chosen and seen as the perfect daughter-in-law for the heir, Charles... was precisely because Diana came straight from the "local" nobility, an Englishwoman (she even had an Armenian great-grandmother).