CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Society › Psychology › Did the brawl in paradise actually happen?

Did the brawl in paradise actually happen?

Started by silentpilot6 · · 👁 7 views · 257 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants silentpilot6Alex Patel96Carl Anderson76James Ramirez10quietseal2Rebecca Bennett41crimsonhound80John Parker5Casey WilliamsRoger RodriguezMorgan Cooper34wearyhawk83Michael Ortiz5Carol Young3Casey Wright4Hannah White2Ryan Morris15Kyle Lee7Matthew Morales17Matthew Moore13redharbor9Lawrence Wilson35silverpuma542Scott Miller7 …
Lawrence Wilson35 Lawrence Wilson35 Member
32 messages
joined Jul 2009
#241 ·
I don’t think parents even need to be on the same page regarding upbringing.
For instance, people constantly preach that parents shouldn't argue in front of their children.
Personally, I believe conflict doesn't inherently harm a child because it's an inescapable part of life. It's a simple fact: no two people are identical. It is perfectly fine to disagree, to hold different opinions, and to defend your own boundaries—while naturally respecting the boundaries of others. I also believe we should always tell children the truth; we shouldn't "pretend" just to avoid hurting them. In fact, I think we actually cause more harm by being performative.

A child can only be hurt by the MANNER in which a conflict unfolds.
If a conflict is resolved through mutual respect for oneself and others, no one gets hurt.
Let me be clear: when people talk about "respecting others," they often imply that we must simply do exactly what everyone else tells us to do. If we don't follow orders, it doesn't mean we lack respect!
To give you an example: I view my child as an equal to my partner, and I believe I should treat them with the same level of respect. My partner doesn't have to agree with me—I respect his opinion (meaning I listen to him, take him seriously, and try to understand him while stating my own views), but I won't demand that he changes who he is. I respect myself enough not to change for anyone, and I respect my partner enough not to demand he change for me.
Of course, if I realize I am in the wrong (my instincts usually kick in immediately), I won't stubbornly persist in being wrong.
Many people claim that consistency is the only thing that matters with children. For me, I will be consistent only when I am actually right. Being consistently wrong just for the sake of "consistency" is pure nonsense. Everyone makes mistakes, and that's fine. When we realize we've messed up, we should admit it to ourselves and to others.

This doesn't confuse children; rather, it teaches them how to respect themselves and others, and how to be accountable to both.

Actually, looking at it now, I see how much value children truly bring. They force us to dissipate our clouds of arrogance and condescension, they push us to stop acting foolishly, they compel us to be our authentic selves, and they teach us how to accept ourselves and find happiness.😍
Gerald Wilson23 Gerald Wilson23 Newcomer
7 messages
joined Jul 2009
#242 ·
Matthew Morales17 said:I couldn't agree with you more! The real issue is that so many people treat their kids like something that needs to be broken or forced into a tiny little box. They shove them into that corner and leave them there for years, but then, once that "weed" starts growing (to use a metaphor for all those inevitable behavioral issues), they act completely blindsided! They have no clue how or why things went wrong, and of course, they immediately point the finger at the child. It’s honestly heartbreaking!!☕

Yeah, the kid always ends up taking the fall... It’s pretty pathetic. I just heard this story about our former neighbors' daughter where she was getting physical with her mom, and you just know that at first glance, everyone is going to jump to conclusions and label the girl as some kind of monster or whatever.
Man, I’ve seen this exact same drama play out before. This mother used to go absolutely ballistic on her daughter—just constant physical outbursts and locking her inside the house whenever she wanted to actually head out into the city. She wouldn't even let her wear anything remotely more daring than a pair of jeans and a polo shirt, basically hovering over her like a shadow and nitpicking every single choice or decision she made. Fast forward to now, and that daughter has gone ahead and earned her Master’s degree, though she’s definitely got that sensitive artist soul about her. She ended up turning to drinking to cope, so naturally, everyone in the neighborhood looks down on her as some local alcoholic mess, while her "poor" mother gets played as this saintly, self-sacrificing woman who just did her best to raise a difficult child. 🙄😲

Hannah White2 said:Look, it’s actually pretty straightforward if you’ve got a clear set of guidelines and some basic goals in place—and more importantly, if both parents are actually on the same page when it comes to how they want to raise their kids. But if you’re just winging it without any fundamental knowledge? Man, that’s a recipe for disaster, especially when Mom and Dad are constantly clashing over different parenting styles.
Honestly, leading by example is the gold standard here. It doesn't require some magic formula; it just demands that you actually stop and think about how your own actions and lifestyle choices are playing out in real time.
If a person truly commits to this—if they treat parenting like the absolute top priority in their life rather than just some side project—the solutions will start showing up naturally.

That’s exactly why you need to vet who you’re actually starting a family with before you dive into the whole process. I definitely wouldn't sign up for a project like that with someone who thinks it's perfectly fine to lay hands on a kid, or believes they shouldn't have to provide an allowance, or stop them from going out, or just shut down every single question a child asks.👎
Look, I’m all for peace, and I definitely don't think parents should be bickering right in front of their kids—especially when they try to recruit their children to take sides in their marriage drama. When someone starts looking for an audience or an ally in the middle of a domestic dispute, that's a massive red flag. It's just wrong.
Minor disagreements are whatever, really—just people bumping heads or having different takes on things—but when stuff actually gets heavy, you handle that one-on-one.😉
Drew Morgan Drew Morgan Active Member
189 messages
joined Aug 2009
#243 ·
silentpilot6 said:Honestly, you’d basically be burning his favorite teddy bear right in front of him... I swear, that's easily five hundred times more cruel than just a little discipline with a belt. 😁
Professional counseling... it seems to be the big trend lately. I suppose all those high-priced psychologists and psychiatrists have to make a living somehow 😉... but professional help versus a few swats on the backside? I'm picking the latter. 😁

Honestly, the whole idea of destroying a toy seems straight-up sociopathic to me. Every child is different. What happens when you have a kid who's hurting animals? Do you call a therapist? For some people, moderate corporal punishment might be an acceptable disciplinary tool. For others, it isn't. It's all about the situation.
northernheron65 northernheron65 Newcomer
1 message
joined Jul 2009
#244 ·
Growing up, my old man used to lay hands on me. It happened all the time when I was around 12 or 13. Honestly? I remember being terrified of him. It wasn't respect—it was just straight-up fear.
Those beatings kept me from doing all sorts of stupid stuff, sure, but I never actually understood *why* certain things were off-limits. I just knew if I did this or that, I was going to get hit.
That’s how kids who deal with physical punishment feel. Deep down, it's just pure anxiety.

I'm firmly against corporal punishment. Period.
Matthew Morales17 Matthew Morales17 Member
38 messages
joined May 2009
#245 ·
Gerald Wilson23 said:Yeah, the kid always ends up taking the fall... It’s pretty pathetic. I just heard this story about our former neighbors' daughter where she was getting physical with her mom, and you just know that at first glance, everyone is going to jump to conclusions and label the girl as some kind of monster or whatever.
Man, I’ve seen this exact same drama play out before. This mother used to go absolutely ballistic on her daughter—just constant physical outbursts and locking her inside the house whenever she wanted to actually head out into the city. She wouldn't even let her wear anything remotely more daring than a pair of jeans and a polo shirt, basically hovering over her like a shadow and nitpicking every single choice or decision she made. Fast forward to now, and that daughter has gone ahead and earned her Master’s degree, though she’s definitely got that sensitive artist soul about her. She ended up turning to drinking to cope, so naturally, everyone in the neighborhood looks down on her as some local alcoholic mess, while her "poor" mother gets played as this saintly, self-sacrificing woman who just did her best to raise a difficult child. 🙄😲

That’s exactly why you need to vet who you’re actually starting a family with before you dive into the whole process. I definitely wouldn't sign up for a project like that with someone who thinks it's perfectly fine to lay hands on a kid, or believes they shouldn't have to provide an allowance, or stop them from going out, or just shut down every single question a child asks.👎
Look, I’m all for peace, and I definitely don't think parents should be bickering right in front of their kids—especially when they try to recruit their children to take sides in their marriage drama. When someone starts looking for an audience or an ally in the middle of a domestic dispute, that's a massive red flag. It's just wrong.
Minor disagreements are whatever, really—just people bumping heads or having different takes on things—but when stuff actually gets heavy, you handle that one-on-one.😉

You hit the nail right on the head! Everything you’re saying is spot on. I mean, really, can we even wrap our heads around the idea that it was just some random fluke? Is it even possible for a truly incredible, nurturing parent to end up with a child who grows up to be violent later in life? Honestly, I don't think so—not even by a single percent! It just doesn't add up, does it?☕
silentpilot6 silentpilot6 RegularOP
295 messages
joined Sep 2004
#246 ·
Drew Morgan said:Honestly, the whole idea of destroying a toy seems straight-up sociopathic to me. Every child is different. What happens when you have a kid who's hurting animals? Do you call a therapist? For some people, moderate corporal punishment might be an acceptable disciplinary tool. For others, it isn't. It's all about the situation.


That’s exactly it... I agree that physical punishment isn't necessary in 99% of cases, but there's always that 1%. Clearly, some people don't see it that way. 🤷
silentpilot6 silentpilot6 RegularOP
295 messages
joined Sep 2004
#247 ·
Gerald Wilson23 said:Yeah, the kid always ends up taking the fall... It’s pretty pathetic. I just heard this story about our former neighbors' daughter where she was getting physical with her mom, and you just know that at first glance, everyone is going to jump to conclusions and label the girl as some kind of monster or whatever.
Man, I’ve seen this exact same drama play out before. This mother used to go absolutely ballistic on her daughter—just constant physical outbursts and locking her inside the house whenever she wanted to actually head out into the city. She wouldn't even let her wear anything remotely more daring than a pair of jeans and a polo shirt, basically hovering over her like a shadow and nitpicking every single choice or decision she made. Fast forward to now, and that daughter has gone ahead and earned her Master’s degree, though she’s definitely got that sensitive artist soul about her. She ended up turning to drinking to cope, so naturally, everyone in the neighborhood looks down on her as some local alcoholic mess, while her "poor" mother gets played as this saintly, self-sacrificing woman who just did her best to raise a difficult child. 🙄😲

That’s exactly why you need to vet who you’re actually starting a family with before you dive into the whole process. I definitely wouldn't sign up for a project like that with someone who thinks it's perfectly fine to lay hands on a kid, or believes they shouldn't have to provide an allowance, or stop them from going out, or just shut down every single question a child asks.👎
Look, I’m all for peace, and I definitely don't think parents should be bickering right in front of their kids—especially when they try to recruit their children to take sides in their marriage drama. When someone starts looking for an audience or an ally in the middle of a domestic dispute, that's a massive red flag. It's just wrong.
Minor disagreements are whatever, really—just people bumping heads or having different takes on things—but when stuff actually gets heavy, you handle that one-on-one.😉

It’s the same logic: you need a license to carry a firearm, and you need one to drive a car, yet any idiot, God help us, 😁 can end up working with children...
Gerald Wilson23 Gerald Wilson23 Newcomer
7 messages
joined Jul 2009
#248 ·
Matthew Morales17 said:You hit the nail right on the head! Everything you’re saying is spot on. I mean, really, can we even wrap our heads around the idea that it was just some random fluke? Is it even possible for a truly incredible, nurturing parent to end up with a child who grows up to be violent later in life? Honestly, I don't think so—not even by a single percent! It just doesn't add up, does it?☕

Exactly, once a kid actually lays a hand on a parent, you know something went seriously wrong with how those people raised them...
I was just telling a friend of mine who's a doctor about this awful situation she dealt with, and even before I finished my story, she hit me with, "🙄you really think it's an accident that the daughter is being violent?" 😉

silentpilot6 said:It’s the same logic: you need a license to carry a firearm, and you need one to drive a car, yet any idiot, God help us, 😁 can end up working with children...

😂 🤣Seriously, though. I’d personally implement some kind of competency test before anyone is allowed to have children. You have people who can't conceive trying to adopt going through endless hoops and background checks to prove they're fit to be parents, while these certified morons who keep churning out kids don't have to prove a single damn thing.😛
William Baker9 William Baker9 Newcomer
3 messages
joined Jul 2009
#249 ·
Drew Morgan said:Honestly, the whole idea of destroying a toy seems straight-up sociopathic to me. Every child is different. What happens when you have a kid who's hurting animals? Do you call a therapist? For some people, moderate corporal punishment might be an acceptable disciplinary tool. For others, it isn't. It's all about the situation.


Wow, look at this... honestly, every single boy that crossed my path when I was growing up messed with animals—including my own brother... y'know, since I grew up hanging out with guys, I noticed it. Sadism, pyromania, blah blah blah... all that psychologist stuff is total BS. In my opinion, it’s just nature, and making a huge scene about it might actually make things worse. It comes, it goes... girls don't like it... whatever.
Also, just saying, for those of you advocating for doing nothing—I don't know how many of you even have kids to actually speak from experience on this topic..
Long story short.... you get a kid, a little creature that's totally unadapted, beautiful and magical... they have zero clue what's happening around them, while there's this whole circus going on that they need to adapt to—a circus created by people. It would be best if, instead of constantly violating that little being and bombarding them with stupid norms and rules, we just let them grow and live by instinct... then you'd end up with a kid without all those "popular" traumas.
But that's not how it works, and they need training, yeah, yeah... exactly... pure training until the kid is about 4 years old. That training includes occasional spankings because there's no other way to explain danger to a kid who hasn't fully developed verbal skills yet. After that age, I wouldn't consider spanking necessary anymore. And let's define spanking... it's just... you know... on the butt, basically... nobody's talking about beatings... let's not get carried away.
And it's easy to talk trash about how other people parent. You can't truly know how you'll react in certain situations once you become a parent. You can try to guess based on how your own parents acted, but in practice, it's TheJob—there's no manual for it.
So... yeah... like it says in my signature.....🙂
Matthew Morales17 Matthew Morales17 Member
38 messages
joined May 2009
#250 ·
William Baker9 said:Wow, look at this... honestly, every single boy that crossed my path when I was growing up messed with animals—including my own brother... y'know, since I grew up hanging out with guys, I noticed it. Sadism, pyromania, blah blah blah... all that psychologist stuff is total BS. In my opinion, it’s just nature, and making a huge scene about it might actually make things worse. It comes, it goes... girls don't like it... whatever.
Also, just saying, for those of you advocating for doing nothing—I don't know how many of you even have kids to actually speak from experience on this topic..
Long story short.... you get a kid, a little creature that's totally unadapted, beautiful and magical... they have zero clue what's happening around them, while there's this whole circus going on that they need to adapt to—a circus created by people. It would be best if, instead of constantly violating that little being and bombarding them with stupid norms and rules, we just let them grow and live by instinct... then you'd end up with a kid without all those "popular" traumas.
But that's not how it works, and they need training, yeah, yeah... exactly... pure training until the kid is about 4 years old. That training includes occasional spankings because there's no other way to explain danger to a kid who hasn't fully developed verbal skills yet. After that age, I wouldn't consider spanking necessary anymore. And let's define spanking... it's just... you know... on the butt, basically... nobody's talking about beatings... let's not get carried away.
And it's easy to talk trash about how other people parent. You can't truly know how you'll react in certain situations once you become a parent. You can try to guess based on how your own parents acted, but in practice, it's TheJob—there's no manual for it.
So... yeah... like it says in my signature.....🙂

I've said it before, and I'll say it again: there's just no need for hitting. It all comes down to the parents. We have never once raised a hand—not even our voices!—to our daughter, and we have a wonderful twenty-year-old today. Meanwhile, my neighbors have a three-year-old, and the stuff she pulls is just wild! Every single morning when they head out for work around 6:30 AM, it's a complete circus on the street. The poor woman is practically cowering like the kid is attacking her! The mom rides her bike maybe a hundred yards, and the little one is throwing a tantrum until she comes back to give her another kiss?! Everything has to happen exactly on the child's terms. Even getting into the car has to follow her specific order, or else it's a meltdown! If I've annoyed anyone with my comments about this kid, well, I get it. But who's really to blame here? It's the parents, plain and simple!! And mind you, they're highly educated people too!!👎
Matthew Morales17 Matthew Morales17 Member
38 messages
joined May 2009
#251 ·
And you know what’s actually the most ridiculous part? These parents don't even have an ounce of shame! They put on this entire circus right in front of the neighbors, day in and day out! Does it really not matter if they wake up the whole damn block? I mean, seriously, once their little angel finally falls asleep, isn't that exact same mother just out there chasing other kids off the street?!! It’s always just about them and their one child, isn't it? Honestly, these clueless parents are just raising clueless kids!👍
Lawrence Wilson35 Lawrence Wilson35 Member
32 messages
joined Jul 2009
#252 ·
I don't believe a child should ever be forced to conform.
In fact, I’d go further: I view "conformity" as nothing less than a violation of human integrity.
Why don't we try to "conform" you instead?😁
A child who is taught self-respect—which can only happen when their integrity remains intact—will naturally respect others, simply because their closest people haven't stripped them of their sense of self.

Those children who are subjected to "adjustment"—taught to sacrifice even their own essence for the sake of someone else—are essentially becoming externally controlled personalities. There is no genuine respect for others there. Children treated this way learn to respect power, rather than people.
And what is the result?
We are just running in circles.
We claim we are "adapting" them to a broken society—a fact we clearly acknowledge by attempting to mold them in the first place.
Consequently, we predictably create more of the same: a collection of externally controlled individuals living by rules dictated by force. We produce people who fail to realize they have inherent value just by existing, people who prioritize societal interests over individual needs. How can a society claim to be functional if its individual members are fundamentally broken?

Children possess the same level of dignity as adults. They may lack our experience, but they certainly don't lack our dignity.
Yet, we constantly trample over that dignity under the hollow excuse that they are "just" children.🙄
People will find justifications for any absurdity. It stems from the fact that many were raised without any sense of personal responsibility, being instead hyper-focused on social compliance—the kind of compliance that suggests it's perfectly fine to strike someone, provided you're the stronger one.

I find it fascinating how people love to criticize—complaining about how terrible society has become—while simultaneously doing absolutely nothing to change it. In fact, they are actively building that very same society.
Lawrence Wilson35 Lawrence Wilson35 Member
32 messages
joined Jul 2009
#253 ·
Matthew Morales17 said:And you know what’s actually the most ridiculous part? These parents don't even have an ounce of shame! They put on this entire circus right in front of the neighbors, day in and day out! Does it really not matter if they wake up the whole damn block? I mean, seriously, once their little angel finally falls asleep, isn't that exact same mother just out there chasing other kids off the street?!! It’s always just about them and their one child, isn't it? Honestly, these clueless parents are just raising clueless kids!👍

Agreed.
It is fundamentally wrong when parents turn into servants to their children.
Kids don't actually want that; they don't want power.
Here is what Jasper Juul says, and I find myself in total agreement:

Parents are still caught between two extremes: the authoritarian approach (do exactly as I say) and the permissive approach (you can do whatever you want). Both options are equally violent. One strips responsibility away from children, causing trauma, while the other dumps an overwhelming amount of responsibility on them. I am trying to discuss a style of parenting that isn't violent toward either the parents or the children. The core issue I have to deal with is what parents actually believe is most important to provide. This brings up cultural differences: in my home country, parents focus heavily on what they give their children in terms of emotional support and attention. In America, parents focus much more on how to set their children up financially—how to provide material things they themselves lacked growing up. That difference makes sense given the social standards here. But in both cases, whether in Denmark or America, we see parents increasingly becoming slaves to their children, completely surrendering to them. This is a typical reaction to fighting against the authoritarian upbringing those parents themselves received. It would be inaccurate to say "children rule," because children have no actual desire to rule; however, if parents withdraw and leave everything to the kids, I call them "invisible" parents. At that point, children begin to manage the entire family dynamic out of necessity. When children are the center of the universe and everything revolves around them, it’s just as bad for them as it is for any celebrity: they become lonely. When you are at the center, you are no longer part of the group. You are isolated. Relationships where one person is placed on a pedestal collapse for that very reason. Children understand all too well that this kind of asymmetrical relationship isn't love; it lacks the warmth of reciprocity. All they can do is ask for more, because the only language children of permissive parents understand is exploitation or accumulation, rather than building a relationship with their parents. Love expressed by giving a child everything they want creates egocentrics whose appetites can never be satisfied. Eventually, the parents start to crack and show increasing aggression, blaming the child for the very patterns of behavior they created themselves.
William Baker9 William Baker9 Newcomer
3 messages
joined Jul 2009
#254 ·
Lawrence Wilson35 said:I don't believe a child should ever be forced to conform.
In fact, I’d go further: I view "conformity" as nothing less than a violation of human integrity.
Why don't we try to "conform" you instead?😁
A child who is taught self-respect—which can only happen when their integrity remains intact—will naturally respect others, simply because their closest people haven't stripped them of their sense of self.

Those children who are subjected to "adjustment"—taught to sacrifice even their own essence for the sake of someone else—are essentially becoming externally controlled personalities. There is no genuine respect for others there. Children treated this way learn to respect power, rather than people.
And what is the result?
We are just running in circles.
We claim we are "adapting" them to a broken society—a fact we clearly acknowledge by attempting to mold them in the first place.
Consequently, we predictably create more of the same: a collection of externally controlled individuals living by rules dictated by force. We produce people who fail to realize they have inherent value just by existing, people who prioritize societal interests over individual needs. How can a society claim to be functional if its individual members are fundamentally broken?

Children possess the same level of dignity as adults. They may lack our experience, but they certainly don't lack our dignity.
Yet, we constantly trample over that dignity under the hollow excuse that they are "just" children.🙄
People will find justifications for any absurdity. It stems from the fact that many were raised without any sense of personal responsibility, being instead hyper-focused on social compliance—the kind of compliance that suggests it's perfectly fine to strike someone, provided you're the stronger one.

I find it fascinating how people love to criticize—complaining about how terrible society has become—while simultaneously doing absolutely nothing to change it. In fact, they are actively building that very same society.


If you're one of those people who actually thinks humans are somehow better than just another animal—then yeah, I totally see where your head's at with this post.
Human nature gets bullied from birth by a million useless little bullshit hurdles—honestly. So, it feels like that whole "puberty" phase is really just the final middle finger to everything they try to feed us before we finally just cave and assimilate into society.
And as for society—I don't even know what you think we can actually change... like, what's the plan? Tear down capitalism? Scrap this entire broken school system we're stuck with? Basically start from scratch with some new order that actually feels human—something more like hunting mammoths or just picking berries in the woods...
What I’m actually getting at here—we’ve built this whole societal machine that everyone’s forced to conform to, right? It’s totally unnatural, even if we trick ourselves into thinking it’s normal... and honestly, expecting a kid to grow up in this mess without a single trauma or setback? That’s just insane.
Look, just look at how many moms leave their kids sobbing every single morning when they head off to work... what do people think? That kid is crying just to be difficult? No—they’re crying because it’s fundamentally unnatural for a mother to leave a little one behind. They need her—her scent, her presence, just being *there*. This isn't some minor thing you can just brush off; it's a massive trauma. And honestly, you could list a million other situations just like this one.
Total waste of time... honestly.
Lawrence Wilson35 Lawrence Wilson35 Member
32 messages
joined Jul 2009
#255 ·
I never claimed that one person is inherently superior or inferior to an animal.
My respect extends equally to both humans and animals alike.

But what can we actually change?
Each of us has the power to reject the narrative that society forces down our throats.
And no, I’m not suggesting we go out and dismantle capitalism tomorrow.
I am talking strictly about the issue of human dignity.
The reality is that modern society constantly serves up ways to strip people of their dignity.
Within our own families, however, we don't have to follow that trend.
silentpilot6 silentpilot6 RegularOP
295 messages
joined Sep 2004
#256 ·
Matthew Morales17 said:And you know what’s actually the most ridiculous part? These parents don't even have an ounce of shame! They put on this entire circus right in front of the neighbors, day in and day out! Does it really not matter if they wake up the whole damn block? I mean, seriously, once their little angel finally falls asleep, isn't that exact same mother just out there chasing other kids off the street?!! It’s always just about them and their one child, isn't it? Honestly, these clueless parents are just raising clueless kids!👍


That is exactly the point... foolish parents will raise foolish children regardless of whether the law intervenes frequently, rarely, or never at all.
William Baker9 William Baker9 Newcomer
3 messages
joined Jul 2009
#257 ·
Lawrence Wilson35 said:I never claimed that one person is inherently superior or inferior to an animal.
My respect extends equally to both humans and animals alike.

But what can we actually change?
Each of us has the power to reject the narrative that society forces down our throats.
And no, I’m not suggesting we go out and dismantle capitalism tomorrow.
I am talking strictly about the issue of human dignity.
The reality is that modern society constantly serves up ways to strip people of their dignity.
Within our own families, however, we don't have to follow that trend.


Good luck trying to protect a kid from losing their dignity—it happens all the time. You shape them until they hit school age, then it's out of your hands once you deal with all those teachers and peer pressure... and once they start working some raw jobs? It could be anything from dead-end labor to prostitution, for crying out loud. But hey... I guess "times were tougher back then." So they say.🙂
Lawrence Wilson35 Lawrence Wilson35 Member
32 messages
joined Jul 2009
#258 ·
William Baker9 said:Good luck trying to protect a kid from losing their dignity—it happens all the time. You shape them until they hit school age, then it's out of your hands once you deal with all those teachers and peer pressure... and once they start working some raw jobs? It could be anything from dead-end labor to prostitution, for crying out loud. But hey... I guess "times were tougher back then." So they say.🙂

Of course, I can't control the environment or how society chooses to treat my child.
My point is this: if I respect my child and if I respect myself, that child will learn to respect themselves and others. They will understand their own worth, regardless of how some boss might treat them tomorrow or next week.
I agree, things have certainly been worse before.🙂

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads