#61 ·
Gregory Ramirez2 said:Ibra—hey, maybe it works for you because in German, the word for sect actually sounds like sparkling wine! So basically, you're just getting into everyone's heads in the best way possible and making us all feel happy/happier/more upbeat! 👍
So yeah, being a "cultist" might just mean you're part of a little batch of bubbly champagne! 🙂
That’s definitely a possibility; I hadn't even considered that... 🙂
Roger Cooper91 said:Poor Ibro, always playing the victim..
1. I’ve reported Exotericon myself more than once; if nobody else is reacting, that’s not on me. And yes, I called him out specifically because of what you call "charlatanism":
http://www.reddit.com/r/forum/1125447 ☕
2. I also said he isn't funny. I’m not part of your little cult where I have to speak on behalf of everyone who thinks he *is* entertaining. Let him explain himself. ☕
3. To be honest, I didn't think much of you before. I've been active on this sub-forum for a while, but back when I reported Rorion—when even the previous moderator tried to give him a "friendly warning" first because they were baffled by his behavior—there you were, defending him against "persecution." Even though his vocabulary was almost identical to Exotericon's (which actually made me think they were the same person for a few days). Back then, you didn't seem to mind his crude language about shoving things down throats, his antisemitism, and so on, or how he would just jump into a thread out of nowhere without any constructive input, just to say stuff like "you're stupid," or "look in the mirror, moron." Yeah, that's when I remembered you as someone who plays dumb just to aggressively defend your buddy. I already provided the link to that thread. ☕
4. Furthermore, I saw your hypocrisy firsthand when you defended another user who was provoking and insulting people by calling them clones. This was a user who had actually been punished for that exact violation. You didn't see an issue with it—not as an insult, not as trolling, nor as a breach of the standard practice on other subreddits where moderators would promptly shut down a "who is whose clone" debate and hand out penalties. No, to you, it wasn't a problem. And here you are, defending that kind of behavior. ☕
5. This habit of labeling people as clones is just a thing a few of you do, which is exactly why I consider you a cult. Among those who disagree with you, I’ve noticed maybe one or two users who went after Bonecrusher over proven cloning. I don't need to provide links; it's all right there in this thread too. You even go out of your way to call me a clone without provocation, even though I was just making a harmless point about an unverified statement being attributed to someone and questioning its relevance to the topic. And you actually consider that an attack, 🤦 so that tells you everything you need to know about your authority to judge who is being "attacked." Link:
http://www.reddit.com/r/forum/1125447
6. You admit yourself that other users have to notify you when they are debunking people you're ignoring (your cult's terminology is that they are "attacking" you). If you don't care about those users, why don't you just shut it down? Why do you let these messengers keep reporting those users' activities to you if you're so "cool"? It's a cult. ☕
7. On top of that, you messed up when you called Exotericon a clone of another dissenter. And you admitted—publicly, mind you—that you started a campaign against that other dissenter via private messages. Since then, one of your followers has been relentlessly pushing that same narrative. Cult. ☕
8. Looking at everything said, it's obvious that you initiated certain attacks, yet you try to distance yourself from them or simply stay silent about the mess you cooked up. Cult. ☕
9. And now you want to "settle this privately"? You could have just sent me a DM from the start. 😁
He's been flying under the radar for nearly a year now; there isn't really anyone to report him to, other than opening a thread about him here on PŽK. You know as well as I do that the alternative PDF hasn't had a moderator in ages, so clicking that little triangle icon feels pretty much like shouting into a void. 🤷
That’s exactly why this thread was started, and honestly, I'm quite surprised there hasn't been any reaction from the higher-ups regarding this endless stream of insults from the same individual we've been linking. 😕
Roger Cooper91 said:Poor Ibro, always playing the victim..
1. I’ve reported Exotericon myself more than once; if nobody else is reacting, that’s not on me. And yes, I called him out specifically because of what you call "charlatanism":
http://www.reddit.com/r/forum/1125447 ☕
2. I also said he isn't funny. I’m not part of your little cult where I have to speak on behalf of everyone who thinks he *is* entertaining. Let him explain himself. ☕
3. To be honest, I didn't think much of you before. I've been active on this sub-forum for a while, but back when I reported Rorion—when even the previous moderator tried to give him a "friendly warning" first because they were baffled by his behavior—there you were, defending him against "persecution." Even though his vocabulary was almost identical to Exotericon's (which actually made me think they were the same person for a few days). Back then, you didn't seem to mind his crude language about shoving things down throats, his antisemitism, and so on, or how he would just jump into a thread out of nowhere without any constructive input, just to say stuff like "you're stupid," or "look in the mirror, moron." Yeah, that's when I remembered you as someone who plays dumb just to aggressively defend your buddy. I already provided the link to that thread. ☕
4. Furthermore, I saw your hypocrisy firsthand when you defended another user who was provoking and insulting people by calling them clones. This was a user who had actually been punished for that exact violation. You didn't see an issue with it—not as an insult, not as trolling, nor as a breach of the standard practice on other subreddits where moderators would promptly shut down a "who is whose clone" debate and hand out penalties. No, to you, it wasn't a problem. And here you are, defending that kind of behavior. ☕
5. This habit of labeling people as clones is just a thing a few of you do, which is exactly why I consider you a cult. Among those who disagree with you, I’ve noticed maybe one or two users who went after Bonecrusher over proven cloning. I don't need to provide links; it's all right there in this thread too. You even go out of your way to call me a clone without provocation, even though I was just making a harmless point about an unverified statement being attributed to someone and questioning its relevance to the topic. And you actually consider that an attack, 🤦 so that tells you everything you need to know about your authority to judge who is being "attacked." Link:
http://www.reddit.com/r/forum/1125447
6. You admit yourself that other users have to notify you when they are debunking people you're ignoring (your cult's terminology is that they are "attacking" you). If you don't care about those users, why don't you just shut it down? Why do you let these messengers keep reporting those users' activities to you if you're so "cool"? It's a cult. ☕
7. On top of that, you messed up when you called Exotericon a clone of another dissenter. And you admitted—publicly, mind you—that you started a campaign against that other dissenter via private messages. Since then, one of your followers has been relentlessly pushing that same narrative. Cult. ☕
8. Looking at everything said, it's obvious that you initiated certain attacks, yet you try to distance yourself from them or simply stay silent about the mess you cooked up. Cult. ☕
9. And now you want to "settle this privately"? You could have just sent me a DM from the start. 😁
Who exactly are these "sect members"? 🤔
Could you perhaps list them and clarify what you mean?
I wasn't calling you that either; I simply said some people say they find him amusing. .
I don't think any sane person would find it entertaining when someone is constantly insulting everyone around them.
But apparently, those are the types who find it funny, whereas I certainly do not. 😁
Roger Cooper91 said:Poor Ibro, always playing the victim..
1. I’ve reported Exotericon myself more than once; if nobody else is reacting, that’s not on me. And yes, I called him out specifically because of what you call "charlatanism":
http://www.reddit.com/r/forum/1125447 ☕
2. I also said he isn't funny. I’m not part of your little cult where I have to speak on behalf of everyone who thinks he *is* entertaining. Let him explain himself. ☕
3. To be honest, I didn't think much of you before. I've been active on this sub-forum for a while, but back when I reported Rorion—when even the previous moderator tried to give him a "friendly warning" first because they were baffled by his behavior—there you were, defending him against "persecution." Even though his vocabulary was almost identical to Exotericon's (which actually made me think they were the same person for a few days). Back then, you didn't seem to mind his crude language about shoving things down throats, his antisemitism, and so on, or how he would just jump into a thread out of nowhere without any constructive input, just to say stuff like "you're stupid," or "look in the mirror, moron." Yeah, that's when I remembered you as someone who plays dumb just to aggressively defend your buddy. I already provided the link to that thread. ☕
4. Furthermore, I saw your hypocrisy firsthand when you defended another user who was provoking and insulting people by calling them clones. This was a user who had actually been punished for that exact violation. You didn't see an issue with it—not as an insult, not as trolling, nor as a breach of the standard practice on other subreddits where moderators would promptly shut down a "who is whose clone" debate and hand out penalties. No, to you, it wasn't a problem. And here you are, defending that kind of behavior. ☕
5. This habit of labeling people as clones is just a thing a few of you do, which is exactly why I consider you a cult. Among those who disagree with you, I’ve noticed maybe one or two users who went after Bonecrusher over proven cloning. I don't need to provide links; it's all right there in this thread too. You even go out of your way to call me a clone without provocation, even though I was just making a harmless point about an unverified statement being attributed to someone and questioning its relevance to the topic. And you actually consider that an attack, 🤦 so that tells you everything you need to know about your authority to judge who is being "attacked." Link:
http://www.reddit.com/r/forum/1125447
6. You admit yourself that other users have to notify you when they are debunking people you're ignoring (your cult's terminology is that they are "attacking" you). If you don't care about those users, why don't you just shut it down? Why do you let these messengers keep reporting those users' activities to you if you're so "cool"? It's a cult. ☕
7. On top of that, you messed up when you called Exotericon a clone of another dissenter. And you admitted—publicly, mind you—that you started a campaign against that other dissenter via private messages. Since then, one of your followers has been relentlessly pushing that same narrative. Cult. ☕
8. Looking at everything said, it's obvious that you initiated certain attacks, yet you try to distance yourself from them or simply stay silent about the mess you cooked up. Cult. ☕
9. And now you want to "settle this privately"? You could have just sent me a DM from the start. 😁
Given all that, do you personally believe that Quote : Exotericon deserves a permanent ban, similar to the one Rorion received for that kind of language?
This question applies to the supermods and admins as well.
Roger Cooper91 said:Poor Ibro, always playing the victim..
1. I’ve reported Exotericon myself more than once; if nobody else is reacting, that’s not on me. And yes, I called him out specifically because of what you call "charlatanism":
http://www.reddit.com/r/forum/1125447 ☕
2. I also said he isn't funny. I’m not part of your little cult where I have to speak on behalf of everyone who thinks he *is* entertaining. Let him explain himself. ☕
3. To be honest, I didn't think much of you before. I've been active on this sub-forum for a while, but back when I reported Rorion—when even the previous moderator tried to give him a "friendly warning" first because they were baffled by his behavior—there you were, defending him against "persecution." Even though his vocabulary was almost identical to Exotericon's (which actually made me think they were the same person for a few days). Back then, you didn't seem to mind his crude language about shoving things down throats, his antisemitism, and so on, or how he would just jump into a thread out of nowhere without any constructive input, just to say stuff like "you're stupid," or "look in the mirror, moron." Yeah, that's when I remembered you as someone who plays dumb just to aggressively defend your buddy. I already provided the link to that thread. ☕
4. Furthermore, I saw your hypocrisy firsthand when you defended another user who was provoking and insulting people by calling them clones. This was a user who had actually been punished for that exact violation. You didn't see an issue with it—not as an insult, not as trolling, nor as a breach of the standard practice on other subreddits where moderators would promptly shut down a "who is whose clone" debate and hand out penalties. No, to you, it wasn't a problem. And here you are, defending that kind of behavior. ☕
5. This habit of labeling people as clones is just a thing a few of you do, which is exactly why I consider you a cult. Among those who disagree with you, I’ve noticed maybe one or two users who went after Bonecrusher over proven cloning. I don't need to provide links; it's all right there in this thread too. You even go out of your way to call me a clone without provocation, even though I was just making a harmless point about an unverified statement being attributed to someone and questioning its relevance to the topic. And you actually consider that an attack, 🤦 so that tells you everything you need to know about your authority to judge who is being "attacked." Link:
http://www.reddit.com/r/forum/1125447
6. You admit yourself that other users have to notify you when they are debunking people you're ignoring (your cult's terminology is that they are "attacking" you). If you don't care about those users, why don't you just shut it down? Why do you let these messengers keep reporting those users' activities to you if you're so "cool"? It's a cult. ☕
7. On top of that, you messed up when you called Exotericon a clone of another dissenter. And you admitted—publicly, mind you—that you started a campaign against that other dissenter via private messages. Since then, one of your followers has been relentlessly pushing that same narrative. Cult. ☕
8. Looking at everything said, it's obvious that you initiated certain attacks, yet you try to distance yourself from them or simply stay silent about the mess you cooked up. Cult. ☕
9. And now you want to "settle this privately"? You could have just sent me a DM from the start. 😁
Could you send me the link? I don't want to go hunting for it right now since I'm in a bit of a rush. Actually, just send it via PP; I'd rather not keep discussing this here.
Roger Cooper91 said:Poor Ibro, always playing the victim..
1. I’ve reported Exotericon myself more than once; if nobody else is reacting, that’s not on me. And yes, I called him out specifically because of what you call "charlatanism":
http://www.reddit.com/r/forum/1125447 ☕
2. I also said he isn't funny. I’m not part of your little cult where I have to speak on behalf of everyone who thinks he *is* entertaining. Let him explain himself. ☕
3. To be honest, I didn't think much of you before. I've been active on this sub-forum for a while, but back when I reported Rorion—when even the previous moderator tried to give him a "friendly warning" first because they were baffled by his behavior—there you were, defending him against "persecution." Even though his vocabulary was almost identical to Exotericon's (which actually made me think they were the same person for a few days). Back then, you didn't seem to mind his crude language about shoving things down throats, his antisemitism, and so on, or how he would just jump into a thread out of nowhere without any constructive input, just to say stuff like "you're stupid," or "look in the mirror, moron." Yeah, that's when I remembered you as someone who plays dumb just to aggressively defend your buddy. I already provided the link to that thread. ☕
4. Furthermore, I saw your hypocrisy firsthand when you defended another user who was provoking and insulting people by calling them clones. This was a user who had actually been punished for that exact violation. You didn't see an issue with it—not as an insult, not as trolling, nor as a breach of the standard practice on other subreddits where moderators would promptly shut down a "who is whose clone" debate and hand out penalties. No, to you, it wasn't a problem. And here you are, defending that kind of behavior. ☕
5. This habit of labeling people as clones is just a thing a few of you do, which is exactly why I consider you a cult. Among those who disagree with you, I’ve noticed maybe one or two users who went after Bonecrusher over proven cloning. I don't need to provide links; it's all right there in this thread too. You even go out of your way to call me a clone without provocation, even though I was just making a harmless point about an unverified statement being attributed to someone and questioning its relevance to the topic. And you actually consider that an attack, 🤦 so that tells you everything you need to know about your authority to judge who is being "attacked." Link:
http://www.reddit.com/r/forum/1125447
6. You admit yourself that other users have to notify you when they are debunking people you're ignoring (your cult's terminology is that they are "attacking" you). If you don't care about those users, why don't you just shut it down? Why do you let these messengers keep reporting those users' activities to you if you're so "cool"? It's a cult. ☕
7. On top of that, you messed up when you called Exotericon a clone of another dissenter. And you admitted—publicly, mind you—that you started a campaign against that other dissenter via private messages. Since then, one of your followers has been relentlessly pushing that same narrative. Cult. ☕
8. Looking at everything said, it's obvious that you initiated certain attacks, yet you try to distance yourself from them or simply stay silent about the mess you cooked up. Cult. ☕
9. And now you want to "settle this privately"? You could have just sent me a DM from the start. 😁
And you're the one unprovokedly calling me a cultist and other names... I've already explained all that other stuff.
Roger Cooper91 said:Poor Ibro, always playing the victim..
1. I’ve reported Exotericon myself more than once; if nobody else is reacting, that’s not on me. And yes, I called him out specifically because of what you call "charlatanism":
http://www.reddit.com/r/forum/1125447 ☕
2. I also said he isn't funny. I’m not part of your little cult where I have to speak on behalf of everyone who thinks he *is* entertaining. Let him explain himself. ☕
3. To be honest, I didn't think much of you before. I've been active on this sub-forum for a while, but back when I reported Rorion—when even the previous moderator tried to give him a "friendly warning" first because they were baffled by his behavior—there you were, defending him against "persecution." Even though his vocabulary was almost identical to Exotericon's (which actually made me think they were the same person for a few days). Back then, you didn't seem to mind his crude language about shoving things down throats, his antisemitism, and so on, or how he would just jump into a thread out of nowhere without any constructive input, just to say stuff like "you're stupid," or "look in the mirror, moron." Yeah, that's when I remembered you as someone who plays dumb just to aggressively defend your buddy. I already provided the link to that thread. ☕
4. Furthermore, I saw your hypocrisy firsthand when you defended another user who was provoking and insulting people by calling them clones. This was a user who had actually been punished for that exact violation. You didn't see an issue with it—not as an insult, not as trolling, nor as a breach of the standard practice on other subreddits where moderators would promptly shut down a "who is whose clone" debate and hand out penalties. No, to you, it wasn't a problem. And here you are, defending that kind of behavior. ☕
5. This habit of labeling people as clones is just a thing a few of you do, which is exactly why I consider you a cult. Among those who disagree with you, I’ve noticed maybe one or two users who went after Bonecrusher over proven cloning. I don't need to provide links; it's all right there in this thread too. You even go out of your way to call me a clone without provocation, even though I was just making a harmless point about an unverified statement being attributed to someone and questioning its relevance to the topic. And you actually consider that an attack, 🤦 so that tells you everything you need to know about your authority to judge who is being "attacked." Link:
http://www.reddit.com/r/forum/1125447
6. You admit yourself that other users have to notify you when they are debunking people you're ignoring (your cult's terminology is that they are "attacking" you). If you don't care about those users, why don't you just shut it down? Why do you let these messengers keep reporting those users' activities to you if you're so "cool"? It's a cult. ☕
7. On top of that, you messed up when you called Exotericon a clone of another dissenter. And you admitted—publicly, mind you—that you started a campaign against that other dissenter via private messages. Since then, one of your followers has been relentlessly pushing that same narrative. Cult. ☕
8. Looking at everything said, it's obvious that you initiated certain attacks, yet you try to distance yourself from them or simply stay silent about the mess you cooked up. Cult. ☕
9. And now you want to "settle this privately"? You could have just sent me a DM from the start. 😁
I don't know if anyone is refuting me, nor does it really matter to me.
If I actually cared about what any of them had to say, I wouldn't have put them on ignore in the first place.
Roger Cooper91 said:Poor Ibro, always playing the victim..
1. I’ve reported Exotericon myself more than once; if nobody else is reacting, that’s not on me. And yes, I called him out specifically because of what you call "charlatanism":
http://www.reddit.com/r/forum/1125447 ☕
2. I also said he isn't funny. I’m not part of your little cult where I have to speak on behalf of everyone who thinks he *is* entertaining. Let him explain himself. ☕
3. To be honest, I didn't think much of you before. I've been active on this sub-forum for a while, but back when I reported Rorion—when even the previous moderator tried to give him a "friendly warning" first because they were baffled by his behavior—there you were, defending him against "persecution." Even though his vocabulary was almost identical to Exotericon's (which actually made me think they were the same person for a few days). Back then, you didn't seem to mind his crude language about shoving things down throats, his antisemitism, and so on, or how he would just jump into a thread out of nowhere without any constructive input, just to say stuff like "you're stupid," or "look in the mirror, moron." Yeah, that's when I remembered you as someone who plays dumb just to aggressively defend your buddy. I already provided the link to that thread. ☕
4. Furthermore, I saw your hypocrisy firsthand when you defended another user who was provoking and insulting people by calling them clones. This was a user who had actually been punished for that exact violation. You didn't see an issue with it—not as an insult, not as trolling, nor as a breach of the standard practice on other subreddits where moderators would promptly shut down a "who is whose clone" debate and hand out penalties. No, to you, it wasn't a problem. And here you are, defending that kind of behavior. ☕
5. This habit of labeling people as clones is just a thing a few of you do, which is exactly why I consider you a cult. Among those who disagree with you, I’ve noticed maybe one or two users who went after Bonecrusher over proven cloning. I don't need to provide links; it's all right there in this thread too. You even go out of your way to call me a clone without provocation, even though I was just making a harmless point about an unverified statement being attributed to someone and questioning its relevance to the topic. And you actually consider that an attack, 🤦 so that tells you everything you need to know about your authority to judge who is being "attacked." Link:
http://www.reddit.com/r/forum/1125447
6. You admit yourself that other users have to notify you when they are debunking people you're ignoring (your cult's terminology is that they are "attacking" you). If you don't care about those users, why don't you just shut it down? Why do you let these messengers keep reporting those users' activities to you if you're so "cool"? It's a cult. ☕
7. On top of that, you messed up when you called Exotericon a clone of another dissenter. And you admitted—publicly, mind you—that you started a campaign against that other dissenter via private messages. Since then, one of your followers has been relentlessly pushing that same narrative. Cult. ☕
8. Looking at everything said, it's obvious that you initiated certain attacks, yet you try to distance yourself from them or simply stay silent about the mess you cooked up. Cult. ☕
9. And now you want to "settle this privately"? You could have just sent me a DM from the start. 😁
It’s been handled. I have several people on my ignore list whom I don't bother reading at all.
As for the fact that someone I chat with privately occasionally mentions how the same group of people follows me around and attacks every single one of my posts—well, that's just spontaneous. No one can stop them from doing that, I suppose. But I have already told certain individuals that I simply don't care about anything involving those people, and I’ve even suggested to some that they should ignore them too, rather than wasting their precious time and energy.
Roger Cooper91 said:Poor Ibro, always playing the victim..
1. I’ve reported Exotericon myself more than once; if nobody else is reacting, that’s not on me. And yes, I called him out specifically because of what you call "charlatanism":
http://www.reddit.com/r/forum/1125447 ☕
2. I also said he isn't funny. I’m not part of your little cult where I have to speak on behalf of everyone who thinks he *is* entertaining. Let him explain himself. ☕
3. To be honest, I didn't think much of you before. I've been active on this sub-forum for a while, but back when I reported Rorion—when even the previous moderator tried to give him a "friendly warning" first because they were baffled by his behavior—there you were, defending him against "persecution." Even though his vocabulary was almost identical to Exotericon's (which actually made me think they were the same person for a few days). Back then, you didn't seem to mind his crude language about shoving things down throats, his antisemitism, and so on, or how he would just jump into a thread out of nowhere without any constructive input, just to say stuff like "you're stupid," or "look in the mirror, moron." Yeah, that's when I remembered you as someone who plays dumb just to aggressively defend your buddy. I already provided the link to that thread. ☕
4. Furthermore, I saw your hypocrisy firsthand when you defended another user who was provoking and insulting people by calling them clones. This was a user who had actually been punished for that exact violation. You didn't see an issue with it—not as an insult, not as trolling, nor as a breach of the standard practice on other subreddits where moderators would promptly shut down a "who is whose clone" debate and hand out penalties. No, to you, it wasn't a problem. And here you are, defending that kind of behavior. ☕
5. This habit of labeling people as clones is just a thing a few of you do, which is exactly why I consider you a cult. Among those who disagree with you, I’ve noticed maybe one or two users who went after Bonecrusher over proven cloning. I don't need to provide links; it's all right there in this thread too. You even go out of your way to call me a clone without provocation, even though I was just making a harmless point about an unverified statement being attributed to someone and questioning its relevance to the topic. And you actually consider that an attack, 🤦 so that tells you everything you need to know about your authority to judge who is being "attacked." Link:
http://www.reddit.com/r/forum/1125447
6. You admit yourself that other users have to notify you when they are debunking people you're ignoring (your cult's terminology is that they are "attacking" you). If you don't care about those users, why don't you just shut it down? Why do you let these messengers keep reporting those users' activities to you if you're so "cool"? It's a cult. ☕
7. On top of that, you messed up when you called Exotericon a clone of another dissenter. And you admitted—publicly, mind you—that you started a campaign against that other dissenter via private messages. Since then, one of your followers has been relentlessly pushing that same narrative. Cult. ☕
8. Looking at everything said, it's obvious that you initiated certain attacks, yet you try to distance yourself from them or simply stay silent about the mess you cooked up. Cult. ☕
9. And now you want to "settle this privately"? You could have just sent me a DM from the start. 😁
You don't actually know what I wrote in my private messages... or do you?
I don't have followers; I just have people who agree with me.
Roger Cooper91 said:Poor Ibro, always playing the victim..
1. I’ve reported Exotericon myself more than once; if nobody else is reacting, that’s not on me. And yes, I called him out specifically because of what you call "charlatanism":
http://www.reddit.com/r/forum/1125447 ☕
2. I also said he isn't funny. I’m not part of your little cult where I have to speak on behalf of everyone who thinks he *is* entertaining. Let him explain himself. ☕
3. To be honest, I didn't think much of you before. I've been active on this sub-forum for a while, but back when I reported Rorion—when even the previous moderator tried to give him a "friendly warning" first because they were baffled by his behavior—there you were, defending him against "persecution." Even though his vocabulary was almost identical to Exotericon's (which actually made me think they were the same person for a few days). Back then, you didn't seem to mind his crude language about shoving things down throats, his antisemitism, and so on, or how he would just jump into a thread out of nowhere without any constructive input, just to say stuff like "you're stupid," or "look in the mirror, moron." Yeah, that's when I remembered you as someone who plays dumb just to aggressively defend your buddy. I already provided the link to that thread. ☕
4. Furthermore, I saw your hypocrisy firsthand when you defended another user who was provoking and insulting people by calling them clones. This was a user who had actually been punished for that exact violation. You didn't see an issue with it—not as an insult, not as trolling, nor as a breach of the standard practice on other subreddits where moderators would promptly shut down a "who is whose clone" debate and hand out penalties. No, to you, it wasn't a problem. And here you are, defending that kind of behavior. ☕
5. This habit of labeling people as clones is just a thing a few of you do, which is exactly why I consider you a cult. Among those who disagree with you, I’ve noticed maybe one or two users who went after Bonecrusher over proven cloning. I don't need to provide links; it's all right there in this thread too. You even go out of your way to call me a clone without provocation, even though I was just making a harmless point about an unverified statement being attributed to someone and questioning its relevance to the topic. And you actually consider that an attack, 🤦 so that tells you everything you need to know about your authority to judge who is being "attacked." Link:
http://www.reddit.com/r/forum/1125447
6. You admit yourself that other users have to notify you when they are debunking people you're ignoring (your cult's terminology is that they are "attacking" you). If you don't care about those users, why don't you just shut it down? Why do you let these messengers keep reporting those users' activities to you if you're so "cool"? It's a cult. ☕
7. On top of that, you messed up when you called Exotericon a clone of another dissenter. And you admitted—publicly, mind you—that you started a campaign against that other dissenter via private messages. Since then, one of your followers has been relentlessly pushing that same narrative. Cult. ☕
8. Looking at everything said, it's obvious that you initiated certain attacks, yet you try to distance yourself from them or simply stay silent about the mess you cooked up. Cult. ☕
9. And now you want to "settle this privately"? You could have just sent me a DM from the start. 😁
Well, you could have done the same instead of snapping at me without provocation and resorting to tasteless insults.
To be perfectly clear regarding the timeline, I did mention my suspicions that you were a clone during the period when you were harassing me for no reason and using those names I mentioned earlier.
I suggest we wrap this up because it's getting off-topic, and we should probably get back to the actual subject.
If you want to continue this, you have my DMs; I won't be responding to this here anymore.
Have a pleasant day, to you and everyone else reading! 👋