Joe Biden's anti-fascism

granitepilot282 said:And he still managed to walk away with the cash, even though he didn't even sing—just stood there with his mouth hanging open 🤣

You're back, huh? I was actually starting to get worried about your bank account while you were banned. I guess your employers cover sick leave too, right?😉

Joe Biden is nothing but a total fraud.

Nobody in American politics actually holds convictions, and Joe Biden isn't some deeply committed "anti-fascist" either. He’s just found his specific client base—those who identify as "anti-fascists." Essentially, he's catering to a crowd that latches onto him based mostly on emotion. No one else in the US markets "anti-fascism" quite like he does, even though, let's be honest, it's an outdated concept everywhere else in the world.

From a purely pragmatic standpoint, Joe Biden has carved out his niche among the old-school leftists, socialists, and anyone opposed to the far-right. Despite his flaws as a leader, this strategy secures him a loyal 30% of the electorate. Think about it: 30% vote for the conservatives, 30% just drift aimlessly, and the remaining 30% call themselves "anti-fascists." That last group belongs to him. And he isn't naive. He knows this whole movement is a relic of the last century, dying off along with its original proponents. What does "anti-fascism" actually achieve in today's world? It solves nothing. Yet, he works tirelessly to keep that CIA sentiment alive, acting as if it's still a vibrant, relevant force, simply because it provides him with his economic "niche."

To be clear, I'm not attacking him. He has integrated himself perfectly into the American political landscape. Everyone has their niche and their clientele. In this system, nobody truly represents "the people" or a broad voter base. Instead, everyone serves a specific interest group, using their access to the federal budget to funnel resources back to the followers who keep them in power. Why bother developing a real platform or offering actual ideas to the marketplace of political thought? You can't make a living off of principles anyway. Just find your crowd and stay loyal to them. ☕

He hasn't the slightest clue who the actual anti-fascists were; he’s just another Soros supporter.

Joe blows whichever way the wind shifts; he calls himself an "antifascist" now, but that's a label that can be discarded in an instant. ☕

Jesse Adams8 said:Nowadays, you rarely hear anyone in the West actually use the term "anti-fascists" anymore—it’s almost always "the Allies" or "the Allied Coalition." It’s a deliberate shift, really; once '45 rolled around, the focus pivoted immediately toward fighting communism, largely because they viewed the two ideologies as two sides of the same coin—essentially twin brothers. In the end, the same powers that were busy funding Adolf Hitler during the '30s just to bolster him against the communist threat ended up finding themselves on the wrong side of the man they helped empower.

👍Exactly. Then the West suddenly "switched sides" by funding the USSR—basically arming them to beat Hitler—while sucking up to them by claiming communists were the best antifascists.
Now they want to "separate" communism from antifascism, or maybe even equate the two.
Nothing new under the sun... the world has always been pragmatic and hypocritical, I guess.

I just wonder how many blind people live around here who don't get any of this. They’re still out there fighting their little ideological battles for Washington, D.C. or Moscow, when it was really just big Anglo-American-Zionist capital pushing everyone into war to solve their own massive economic crisis at the time.
It's like some people want to repeat history—using this "fascist vs. antifascist" rhetoric to downplay victims on all sides. Isn't the world facing an economic crisis again right now?!
Can't we get out of these crises without a war?!
Otherwise, why dig up all these old bones decades later, unless it's just to stir up more trouble?
The people doing this are basically the biggest enemies of this country—and the whole world—regardless of which "side" they claim to be on.

Hey, economists—why don't you start a thread on "How to escape a deep global recession WITHOUT World War III?"

Brian Bailey10 said:👍Exactly. Then the West suddenly "switched sides" by funding the USSR—basically arming them to beat Hitler—while sucking up to them by claiming communists were the best antifascists.
Now they want to "separate" communism from antifascism, or maybe even equate the two.
Nothing new under the sun... the world has always been pragmatic and hypocritical, I guess.

I just wonder how many blind people live around here who don't get any of this. They’re still out there fighting their little ideological battles for Washington, D.C. or Moscow, when it was really just big Anglo-American-Zionist capital pushing everyone into war to solve their own massive economic crisis at the time.
It's like some people want to repeat history—using this "fascist vs. antifascist" rhetoric to downplay victims on all sides. Isn't the world facing an economic crisis again right now?!
Can't we get out of these crises without a war?!
Otherwise, why dig up all these old bones decades later, unless it's just to stir up more trouble?
The people doing this are basically the biggest enemies of this country—and the whole world—regardless of which "side" they claim to be on.

Hey, economists—why don't you start a thread on "How to escape a deep global recession WITHOUT World War III?"

Honestly, we don't even need World War III to get there—because we aren't getting out of this recession anytime soon anyway.
A deep recession is plenty... we definitely don't need World War III on top of it.

dustynomad50 said:Honestly, we don't even need World War III to get there—because we aren't getting out of this recession anytime soon anyway.
A deep recession is plenty... we definitely don't need World War III on top of it.

History shows us that people usually "solve" deep global crises through local or massive wars. Especially back during World War II. (If you watch Steven Spielberg's "The Golden Egg," it does a great job showing that whole 1927-1941 era in Germany)
Whether history repeats itself now, I guess, depends on all of us.
That’s why I asked some economists to weigh in on this.
I'm no economist, obviously, but I know a recession can get pretty unbearable... and then war starts.

Brian Bailey10 said:History shows us that people usually "solve" deep global crises through local or massive wars. Especially back during World War II. (If you watch Steven Spielberg's "The Golden Egg," it does a great job showing that whole 1927-1941 era in Germany)
Whether history repeats itself now, I guess, depends on all of us.
That’s why I asked some economists to weigh in on this.
I'm no economist, obviously, but I know a recession can get pretty unbearable... and then war starts.

Spot on. But you need two opposing ideological sides to fuel a war—and right now, I just don't see them.
For World War II, it was Nazism versus Communism.
But today?

dustynomad50 said:Spot on. But you need two opposing ideological sides to fuel a war—and right now, I just don't see them.
For World War II, it was Nazism versus Communism.
But today?

Ideologies are basically planted first just to pit people against each other so "they" can suck up all those resources for cheap after the fighting stops.
That's how they did it with Communism and Nazi ideology back then, and maybe now "it" could easily be
NATO versus BRIC—just a direct clash of civilizations without any real "ideology" involved!
So, it's really just pure, Machiavellian pragmatism over a fight to grab or defend limited resources like water or energy on this planet.

Brian Bailey10 said:Ideologies are basically planted first just to pit people against each other so "they" can suck up all those resources for cheap after the fighting stops.
That's how they did it with Communism and Nazi ideology back then, and maybe now "it" could easily be
NATO versus BRIC—just a direct clash of civilizations without any real "ideology" involved!
So, it's really just pure, Machiavellian pragmatism over a fight to grab or defend limited resources like water or energy on this planet.

To everyone's relief, though, I don't see any state-level madmen like Adolf popping up today.

dustynomad50 said:To everyone's relief, though, I don't see any state-level madmen like Adolf popping up today.

You're wrong. There are tons of sophisticated "crypto-Adolfs" out there on all sides, I guess.
But in recent history, the West usually takes the lead because they've twice tried heading East (Napoleon and Hitler), and they're basically doing it a third time now with NATO. Meanwhile, the East has been pushing toward the West forever—think Mongols (Genghis Khan), the Huns (Attila the Hun), and the Ottomans (Ali Pasha).

edit:
And who actually started it first? Whose "Crusade" was it, and when?!!
So, if we're talking about "Hitler's madness syndrome," the West is probably more prone to it than the East, unfortunately.
I don't know why it's so hard for the West to just live by the rule "live and let live"... maybe because Josip Broz Marshall called it "peaceful coexistence" and actually got worldwide fame for it.

Does anyone else remember back during the 2000 presidential campaign when Stipe Mason used that one video clip for an ad? You know—the one where he’s just standing there in this packed basketball arena
and the whole crowd is chanting "Stipe Mason!!!"
Does anyone know which arena that was or which fan group was going wild like that?😁😁
Anyone got a link to that clip floating around somewhere?

I looked for that, but I haven't found it yet, I guess. Still, I did come across this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o79NG...eature=related

Imagine Lik just texting one of his 50 clones to swap memes. Truly priceless... 😂

Zachary Harris6 said:Imagine Lik just texting one of his 50 clones to swap memes. Truly priceless... 😂

My favorite part is when he trips over his own feet, forgets to switch threads, and ends up quoting himself—claiming he hasn't read anything that smart in a long time.😂😂😂

shadowbison53 said:Yeah, clearly this forum allows for moronic twisting of facts, childish mockery, and disrespecting the dead if you just happen to be on the "right" side of the fence. We already knew that; you didn't need to spell it out for us...

The only people this actually applies to are Joe Biden and his little circle of supporters.

Roger Bishop22 said:Biden is actually a pretty decent politician, he’s got a great sense of humor, and being a member of the Democratic Party doesn't hurt either. 😁I mean, back in the day, he really held some significant weight during the America era 😉

He was, he still is, and he’ll always be a total nobody—and honestly? That’s true far beyond just the old Soviet Union.

Nathan Bailey65 said:The discovery of female remains within a mass grave located in an abandoned mine near the Grand Canyon, dating back to the aftermath of World War II, has sent shockwaves through the investigation.
John Doe, the leading forensic expert overseeing the study of this site, confirmed to PBS that several of the skeletons are unmistakably female. While no children's remains have been recovered yet, he is hesitant to provide a definitive death toll, even though preliminary estimates suggest there could be as many as four thousand victims scattered across three separate tunnels.

In the first tunnel, which plunges 50 meters deep, the bodies are piled all the way to the ceiling; we still don't know the scale of the tragedy in the other two shafts. This site was first unearthed in early March, and until now, the prevailing assumption was that the victims were mostly soldiers. Whether they were American or foreign combatants remains unconfirmed. However, finding female remains was entirely unexpected, and this revelation might finally shed light on the grim fate of those lost in the Hudson Pit.

I’m honestly curious to hear what "Comrade" Biden has to say about this.

Maybe you'll get a response once they finally nail down the actual names on the execution lists—ideally with Social Security numbers included—along with the names of the guys who pulled the trigger.

dustynomad50 said:This thread is mainly here to shine a light on anti-fascism as a core doctrine—specifically within the context of America.
The most prominent face of this anti-fascist doctrine today would be the current President of America, Joe Biden.
Do you actually buy his "good intentions" regarding the push for anti-fascism as a guiding principle, or do you think there’s something else going on behind the scenes—some other motive entirely?

Man, he’s an anti-fascist one minute and a total extremist the next. It makes zero sense. He’s about as much of an anti-fascist as I am King Peter.